About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

The Larry Craig mess

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 28, 2007 12:29 AM

Update 5:15pm Eastern. Here’s the full statement on Craig’s site. He’s not just a lying crapweasel.

He’s a supremely arrogant, lying crapweasel. Blaming the press. Non-apology apologizing. How do you spell creep? C-r-a-i-g.

Update 4:30pm Eastern press conference scheduled. Here’s the vid.

Update 1:30pm Eastern 8/28. The poll results so far…

pollcraig.jpg

***

Update: The Idaho Statesman has two detailed articles. The first recaps the Minnesota incident. The second is a five-month investigative piece into Craig’s past alleged acts of indecency and solicitation dating back to 1982, when an underage page made allegations that he had had sex with three House members.

ABC News has the docs from the Minnesota incident.

Any takers on a Larry Craig Resignation Date/Time Betting Pool?

***

What a weasel.

He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card. He pleads guilty. Then he blames the police for misunderstanding him and “misconstruing” all his bathroom antics.

Bleccch.

Let me amend my reaction. He’s not just a weasel.

He’s a lying crapweasel.

Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?

Here’s a poll. Have at it:

Should Larry Craig resign?
Yes
Hell yes
No
Who cares? They’re all crapweasels

  

***

Here’s the Romney endorsement video Craig made that has been disappeared from the Romney YouTube channel.

Posted in: GOP, Larry Craig

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. JunkYardBlog
  2. Bill's Bites
  3. Liberty Pundit
  4. Outside The Beltway | OTB
  5. Free In Idaho! » Blog Archive » Say Goodbye Larry
  6. The Purple Nation
  7. SENATOR ARRESTED, IN DISGRACE « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  8. Self-hating right wing gays at Antony Loewenstein
  9. politicalpartypoop.com » Blog Archive » The Larry Craig mess: May I touch your feet?
  10. Neocon News » Just when you thought it was safe to fly...
  11. Think Progress » Conservatives Begin Calling For Craig To Resign Over ‘Lewd Conduct’ And Guilty Plea
  12. Minefeed.com
  13. Sen. Craig: Fiddle Faddle in a non-Fiddling Party
  14. PAXALLES
  15. Radio Left
  16. Jeremayakovka
  17. Wonkette
  18. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Open thread: Larry Craig presser at 4:30 p.m. ET; Update: GOP Senate leaders call for ethics probe of Craig; Update: “I am not gay” video added; Update: Press(?) heckles Craig
  19. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Craig Plays the Victim
  20. the unequivocal notion
  21. i-DUH-hoo in ‘da news ~ « On a Quest…
  22. Spokompton » Blog Archive » Craig Followup
  23. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Officer acquitted of Abu Ghraib charges
  24. A Blog For All
  25. BIRD
  26. Dust my Broom
  27. Sen. Larry Craig: Not Gay, Not Even a Little. « Subject to Complete Defeasance
  28. Beware the Boy’s Room « Right Ringtail
  29. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Homosexual “Marriage”
  30. Conservative Musings
  31. The Craig Debacle… » Freedom Folks
  32. Senator pleaded guilty, reportedly after bathroom stall incident - Page 8 - Hardcore Politics
  33. The Fact About Larry Craig: Larry.. Larry Craig Swears By Mitt.. » My Wired News . net
  34. First Round | August 29, 2007 : The Shot! @ shotpolitics.com
  35. It would be hypocritcal for Larry Craig not to resign. Goodbye! « Volunteer Opinion Journal
  36. Buck Naked Politics
  37. Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » Demonizing fags = eletoral winner
  38. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Leaping to denounce Craig
  39. Senator Larry Craig’s “Intent to Resign:” When An Apology Isn’t An Apology » The Moderate Voice
  40. Villainous Company
  41. Craig’s Behavior - Glenn Greenwald « Allpaths
  42. Rhymes With Right
  43. Michelle Malkin - Should Senator Larry Craig resign?

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:40 am, see-dubya said:

    Yeah, I don’t think “dignity” is one of Sen. Craig’s primary concerns.

  2. #2
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:45 am, almeehan said:

    It does clearly demonstrate that we are all made of clay and are fallen creatures. It doesn’t excuse the intent of the act or the act itself. With the high position in government entrusted to a senator or the like, comes great responsibility including giving up the right to selfish or self serving inclinations to serve the country. Apart from the act and attempted coverup, I wonder how the information got leaked and the timing of it all.

  3. #3
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:51 am, Regulus said:

    What a fool. He needs to get out of the way so that by 2008 the Idaho GOP will have enough temporal distance from him so as to still have a shot at retaining his Senate seat.

    And of all the useless things to “learn” about today: tapping your right foot in the stall followed up by some weird attempt to play footsie-wootsie = … oh, never mind.

  4. #4
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:09 am, Jim M. said:

    He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card.

    Wasn’t there a scene like that in “Blazing Saddles”?

  5. #5
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:10 am, OldGuy53 said:

    Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?

    And really how many do?
    That’s the problem with modern politics, the office holds no dignity anymore.

  6. #6
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:11 am, nbarry said:

    Did he also flash his American Express card?

  7. #7
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 am, Michael Bates said:

    Next “trial balloon” explanation: The senator was experiencing a moment of TV nostalgia and thought it would be fun to re-enact the “My Three Sons” opening animation with the person in the next stall.

  8. #8
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:43 am, Snooper said:

    Be gone with the slog!!

  9. #9
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:56 am, tony the tiger said:

    #4 Jim
    I don’t think so…
    Give the Governor a harumph!

  10. #10
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:01 am, i b squidly said:

    He’s Republican and he’s got to go. The quicker the better.

    Were he Democrat the police would be homophobes and we’d give him a committee.

    Funny how that works.

  11. #11
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:02 am, tony the tiger said:

    Aww hell - you can only vote once!?
    Where’s my sock-puppet…

  12. #12
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:35 am, W.B. Wittmeyer said:

    We strongly protest your associating us with a lying politician.

    The Crapweasles.

  13. #13
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:17 am, iamsaved said:

    Where are the Democrats rushing to his defense? They condone this type of behavior and feel it should be legalized, sanctioned and protected don’t they?

  14. #14
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:14 am, PBoilermaker said:

    He’s a lying crapweasel.

    Although I agree he is a crapweasel, I can’t stop laughing at the fact you called him a crapweasel.

    I am going to incorporate “crapweasel” into my daily vocabulary.

  15. #15
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:41 am, derel3433 said:

    it was a misunderstanding i’m sure.

    maybe there were intimidating black men in the men’s room and and he was nervous.

    http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?s=rss&storyid=60650

  16. #16
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:55 am, DanME said:

    First, what the hell is happening to the Republican Party. Total lack of leadership, wimpo Elizabeth Dole running the 2006 senate campaign, and now all this misconduct. Second, I smell Chucky Shumer all over this and the Vitter incident. Chucky is a real scum bag and just loves to dig up all kinds of dirt.

  17. #17
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:56 am, derel3433 said:

    duke taught us not to rush to judgement, so we need to hear him out.

    but, on another note, not unlike the soul searching taking place in the catholic church, i wonder if it is time to ask ourselves why it is so many of our conservative men in politics keep getting involved these compromising and often hypocritical situations.

    in the last 3 weeks we’ve had–gay rape accusations against the head of the young republicans usa, a prominent baptist minister and state legislator in NC arrested for prostitution, a prominent legislator chasing his secretary around the office naked, and a top gop political consultant murdered in gay love triangle. all of these men were championed by family values organizations. i have no way of understanding this all, but it threatens the future of our movement and i feel that’s what karl rove has been getting at when he has deflected criticism from the 2006 election losses from the war and white house incompetence and to the candidate scandals.

  18. #18
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:27 am, Jaded said:

    It is the hypocrisy that is killing the Republican party not the being gay. I told people that if he is gay just say it hell there are Log Cabin Republicans however they are not pushing gay marriage or special protections for themselves. Lindsay come out of the closet before you to are outed first.

  19. #19
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:28 am, swj719AWG said:

    While I do indeed love “crapweasel”, I had to go with “Hell Yes”.

    Thought they ARE all crapweasels… I think there’s a dozen congressmen/women that aren’t worthless.

  20. #20
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:32 am, BigAnge said:

    This isn’t an issue about Democrats or Republicans, it is about the sociopathic nature of homosexual behavior. Perhaps Congress should take some vetting lessons from the Boy Scouts.

  21. #21
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:32 am, DesertLover said:

    swj719AWG

    Only a dozen? …

  22. #22
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:35 am, Peejz said:

    Resign for what? Disorderly conduct and not lewd and lacivious behavior? Don’t you think that pales in comparison to driving off a bridge and leaving a girl to die? Or driving drunk, getting caught and then trying to use a voting procedure to get out of it?

  23. #23
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:41 am, Cricket said:

    Soliciting for ‘lewd’ conduct is not the same as actually groping. It depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is. After, according to the Dems sexuality is no one else’s business.

    Well, news flash: What they do on my dime is my business. I am not paying for them to have ‘relationships’ that violate their marriage vows. I am paying them to represent ME.

    Fire them all.

  24. #24
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 am, ajmontana said:

    He’s lucky he didn’t get the crap beat out of him. But, then it would be a gay bashing hate crime. These folks on the hill are really disgusting.

  25. #25
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:49 am, swj719AWG said:

    So because many/most democrats in congress are worthless piles of shite, we shouldn’t hold out people to any kind of standard?

    He was flappin’ Mr Happy around for all to see, and when confronted by police tried to get out of the arrest by showing off his Senator-ness.

    What he did was on par (I suppose… I really don’t want to have to rank this stuff) with McKinney. You thought SHE should resign, right?

    Look, I’m sick and tired of hearing - from EITHER sdie - “Well, they have done bad things, so what does it matter that we do bad things?”

    It isn’t a God Damn deffense. Act right, or get the hell out of office. Let us find someone who isn’t a moral retard to serve.

  26. #26
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:51 am, zyzzyg said:

    I just think it is funny.

    I loved his explanation about why his foot extended beyond his stall. He said, “I have a wide stance.”

    Senator ‘Wide Stance’ from Idaho. LOL.

    Isn’t ‘Broke Back Mountain’ in Idaho? LOL.

    As for hyprocrisy - this is as hypocritical as any politician saying the government spends too much money, and then slips an earmark into a farm bill for public restrooms along a nature hiking trail.

    OK, I’ll stop. It’s a misdemeanor, not a felony. Nothing to see here folks. Just move along. Thank you.

    Whatever happens, the people of Idaho should decide. I for one just enjoy the humor in it, and think August is no longer a dull news month.

  27. #27
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:13 am, ajmontana said:

    As the Pool goes, I’m going with Today.

  28. #28
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:14 am, derel3433 said:

    I take comfort in knowing he will not be on the DC madam’s phone list.

  29. #29
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:15 am, ajmontana said:

    Noon Today… :)

  30. #30
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:18 am, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    #9 tony

    You cut that dialogue short; the lines you were looking for were:

    “harumph!”

    “you watch your ass…”

  31. #31
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:20 am, Laree said:

    zyzzyg

    No broke back mountain was supposedly Montana.

    I think I will have to vote yes, he has the taint, it isn’t about orientation it is about behavior.

  32. #32
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:26 am, Craig said:

    Any takers on a Larry Craig Resignation Date/Time Betting Pool?

    YES. I declare the Over/Under to be 2 weeks.

  33. #33
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:27 am, taylork said:

    Since he was already on the toilet, I think it’s time we hit flush. buh-bye.

  34. #34
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:32 am, Rick Moran said:

    SWJ:

    He was flappin’ Mr Happy around for all to see,

    That’s a gross exaggeration of what occurred. Please keep your facts straight. Read the Roll Call piece which contains a description of what happened.

    As for the rest, I agree with you - especially your last sentence which should be engraved on placques and stuck on the desk of every elected official in America.

  35. #35
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:34 am, Rusty said:

    Where are the Democrats rushing to his defense? They condone this type of behavior and feel it should be legalized, sanctioned and protected don’t they?

    Um, no.

    This isn’t an issue about Democrats or Republicans, it is about the sociopathic nature of homosexual behavior. Perhaps Congress should take some vetting lessons from the Boy Scouts.

    Wow. People wonder how liberal blogs can cherry pick comments to make this site look hateful? A call to ban all gays from Congress? That’s nuts.

    As plenty of people have already pointed out, the problem isn’t just lewd behavior, it’s hypocrisy. Voting for the FMA twice and voting against hate-crime protection for gays…running as a social conservative…he misrepresented himself.

    The sad part is if he were comfortable being an outed homosexual, he could have a real relationship instead of resorting to anonymous sex in an airport bathroom. Of course, if he were an outed homosexual, he would never get the opportunity to be a legislator in a “family values” state like Idaho.

    Talk about your can’t wins.

  36. #36
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:36 am, ajmontana said:

    What’s Steve Duecy have to do with this? :)

  37. #37
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:38 am, RedRepub said:

    Sen. Craig is gay? He’s not even cute!
    What he did is disgusting. There are rational logical gay Republicans who aren’t perverts committing lewd acts.

    This will only hurt the GOP and Gov. Romney in 2008.

  38. #38
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:38 am, nbarry said:

    It’s the hypocrisy. Democrats don’t try to cover up catering to the greed of their campaign financiers by moral posturing to the rank-and-file over sexual sins. That’s why they are better able to get away with their own peccadillos.

  39. #39
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:41 am, Rick Moran said:

    Rusty:

    You’re right in taking Big Ange to task for his “sociopathic” comment. That’s just not called for and there is no evidence that homosexual behavior is anything except what it is - different. Ange’s characterization of homosexual behavior is not accepted by mainstream psychiatry. Whatever your personal opinion is, please try to keep clinical terms like “sociopathic” out of the conversation unless there is a basis in fact.

  40. #40
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:42 am, swj719AWG said:

    #34 On August 28th, 2007 at 9:32 am, Rick Moran said:
    That’s a gross exaggeration of what occurred. Please keep your facts straight. Read the Roll Call piece which contains a description of what happened.

    True enough. It was, however, an exageration in order to illustrate a point. I fully accept that he wasn’t jumpin’ around with it “all hangin’ out”.

    It is, however, merely a matter of degrees. Soliciting lewd conduct (look, lets call it what it was. He was looking for some kinda hook-up in a public bathroom) and lewd conduct differ only in regard to where in the process you are caught.

    If people are quite willing to overlook this, they should - if they are being internally consistant - be ok with him doing what I said.

  41. #41
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:44 am, swj719AWG said:

    Whatever your personal opinion is, please try to keep clinical terms like “sociopathic” out of the conversation unless there is a basis in fact.

    Well, he IS a member of congress… ;)

  42. #42
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:52 am, RobM1981 said:

    Hard to argue with swj719AWG’s logic there…

  43. #43
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:55 am, RobM1981 said:

    Let’s clarify a few things here:

    The man is not being prosecuted for being a homosexual. No law enforcement agency is accusing him of homosexuality. Moreover, no sane person would call for his resignation if the headline read “Craig comes out of the closet and announces ‘I, too, am a Gay American…’” Nobody cares.

    The issue is that he was being lewd in a public bathroom. In 2007 it’s *highly* unlikely that all he did was proposition someone - rude and inappropriate as that would be, even for a non-US-Senator. Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

  44. #44
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:55 am, RobM1981 said:

    Let’s clarify a few things here:

    The man is not being prosecuted for being a homosexual. No law enforcement agency is accusing him of homosexuality. Moreover, no sane person would call for his resignation if the headline read “Craig comes out of the closet and announces ‘I, too, am a Gay American…’” Nobody cares.

    The issue is that he was being lewd in a public bathroom. In 2007 it’s *highly* unlikely that all he did was proposition someone - rude and inappropriate as that would be, even for a non-US-Senator. Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

  45. #45
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:06 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Regarding the poll:

    “Crapweasel”? MM - that made me laugh so hard I snorted.

  46. #46
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 am, gayle said:

    swj719AWG;

    If you insist on taking GOD’S name in vain, please do it somewhere OTHER than this site!

    We Christians are offended.

  47. #47
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:27 am, JWS said:

    When this happens to a Dhimmicrat, it’s their private life and none of anyone’s business and how dare you and it has nothing to do with how they do their jobs, etc, etc, blahblahblah. A Repub? OMG! See! See! Hypocrites all!! Get the pitch forks! And onandonandon…

    That said, this freak needs to go bye bye…

  48. #48
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:38 am, taylork said:

    I find it quite disturbing that their appears to be an entire subculture of anonymous public bathroom sex. The fact that the police officer recognized the behavior consistent with this type of activity seems to suggest that this happens much more frequently than people probably think. The fact that it happens in such a public place makes me shudder.

  49. #49
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:46 am, James Felix said:

    He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card.
    Wasn’t there a scene like that in “Blazing Saddles”?

    No, that was “High Anxiety”, during the opening credits.

  50. #50
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:50 am, Peejz said:

    swj719AWG- obviously you haven’t even read what was alledged to have happened. There is no video tape, there is no allegation of an actual proposition for sex. It was a cop, on a mission to catch lewd behavior, that interpruted what he thought to be a come on. There were no charges brought for that, obviously for a very good reason. Based on the roll call report, it appears that the disorderly came from Craig refusing to leave the bathroom. That’s an easy one to make stick.

  51. #51
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:52 am, thirteen28 said:

    Once again, crapweasels get their names smeared by comparison to a sitting U.S. senator.

  52. #52
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, gunslingerpatriot said:

    I thought it was Cynthia McGinny from Georgia when she “slapped” a police officer for not recognising her highness when she came in?

  53. #53
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, RobM1981 said:

    taylor, that’s the issue and I’m glad you’re focused on it. When Gov. James McGreavey of NJ resigned a couple of years ago, what made us puke is that he alluded to it being because he was “a gay American.” What a load of garbage. The reason he had to resign is that it quickly became known that amongst about 50 other illegal things he was being monitored for, he was absolutely engaging in public bathroom sex.

    This is illegal for a reason… SEVERAL reasons, actually, not the least of which is that CHILDREN use these bathrooms.

    And, to underscore JWS’s feelings: very, very few people from the MSM even mentioned that McGreavey’s actions were ILLEGAL and potentially involved children walking in on him.

    It certainly seems as if the MSM has no problem with kids learning “the facts of life” by watching homosexual sex in pubic restrooms… It’s appalling.

    Never mind Craig resigning: he should do TIME. Just like Kennedy should do TIME for driving under the influence last winter. Just like Webb for his involvement in the “handguns in the Capital” incident (he doesn’t like the gun laws? HE’S A SENATOR, let him work to change it…).

    These should be NO-BRAINERS. You do the crime, you do the time.

  54. #54
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, pressto said:

    Resign for what? Disorderly conduct and not lewd and lacivious behavior? Don’t you think that pales in comparison to driving off a bridge and leaving a girl to die? Or driving drunk, getting caught and then trying to use a voting procedure to get out of it?

    Yes, he is guilty of the same thing Rep. McKinney, yet I heard no one call on her to resign. I read the complain and charges and the lewd one was dropped, but what the heck lets ignore that just like ABC did. He pleaded guilty to being an arrogant stupid congressperson who thought they were above the law, but unlike her he admitted it.

    Strange that this case happened on 8/8, yet is just now getting reported about. I wonder who notified Rollcall and ABC on this case?

  55. #55
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:56 am, radio relay said:

    Craig, is not a “statesman”. He’s low life scumbag. He should be run out of town!

    Then the democRats, like Kennedy, Murtha, “Cold Cash” Davis, Barney “The Gay Pimp” Franks, and all the other democRat weasels that get a pass by the MSM for their disgusting behavior, need to be booted, too!

    Watch for more “republican’t” indiscretions and “crimes” to be splashed all over the MSM, while the other side’s same behavior will be ignored, or possibly even glorified!!

  56. #56
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:06 am, brentano said:

    The upside is that democrats will be distracted for a few days from supporting terrorists and weakening America.

  57. #57
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:06 am, Airforce_5_O said:

    This is the difference between us and the Libs. When our people are stuck in scandle we demand the resign until they are cleared. He plead guilt. Got to go now.
    Libs just hang on and on and on.
    I don’t have give many examples, Clinton, Kennedy, Jefferson. Anymore???

  58. #58
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:14 am, Vatar said:

    Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

    I once took out my privates in a bathroom too.

  59. #59
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:20 am, swj719AWG said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 am, gayle said:
    swj719AWG;

    If you insist on taking GOD’S name in vain, please do it somewhere OTHER than this site!

    We Christians are offended.

    Again you say “we christians” as though I’m not. I’m fascinated by this, and would ask you when exactly I converted to something, anything besides “Luthern”…

    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:50 am, Peejz said:
    swj719AWG- obviously you haven’t even read what was alledged to have happened. There is no video tape, there is no allegation of an actual proposition for sex. It was a cop, on a mission to catch lewd behavior, that interpruted what he thought to be a come on. There were no charges brought for that, obviously for a very good reason. Based on the roll call report, it appears that the disorderly came from Craig refusing to leave the bathroom.

    Please. It was obviously a plea deal (”plead guilty” is a tip off) for a lesser charge. A 100% common occurance in every jurisdiction in the country. Read the cop’s statements in the rollcall piece again. He is telling you that the Senator was attempting to initiate an encounter in a public bathroom. If you think the cop’s lying, that’s one thing, but if you think he’s telling the truth (ar that it’s likely he’s telling the truth), then your assertation is bunk.

    The Senator, criminal record not withstanding, attempted to initiate an “encounter” in a public bathroom. That’s a lewd act, I don’t care who you are.

    I would be VERY interested to see the original arrest report, in addition to the original charges filed. They won’t say “disorderly conduct”.

  60. #60
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:24 am, tony the tiger said:

    #57 Airforce_5_O
    Gregoire, maybe?
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=gregoire+scandal

  61. #61
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:26 am, Dr. Lead Based Paint said:

    Just one more Republican acting like a freakin’ Democrat. He should either resign, or change parties.

  62. #62
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:26 am, tony the tiger said:
  63. #63
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:31 am, Peejz said:

    This is the difference between us and the Libs. When our people are stuck in scandle we demand the resign until they are cleared

    What, and then they get their job back?

    We elected a POTUS that was an admitted alcoholic. We took his word that he is sober.

    Where are you going to draw the line on those involved in scandal? How will you differentiate between manufactured on real charges against a person?

  64. #64
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:37 am, swj719AWG said:

    Thanks Tony…

  65. #65
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:47 am, bgarland said:

    As an Idahoan, I had already informed his office that I would not be backing him in the next primary due to his support of the recent Shamnesty Bill. But this disgrace calls for an immediate resignation NOW.

  66. #66
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:49 am, taylork said:

    We elected a POTUS that was an admitted alcoholic. We took his word that he is sober.

    Since when is being a recovered alcoholic a scandal?

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office, espcially since it was a sex crime in a public place.

    And Craig plead guilty here, to a charge which was clearly a plea deal, just read the report and you’ll see that he didn’t appear to do what he plead guilty of doing.

  67. #67
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:50 am, Peejz said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:20 am, swj719AWG said

    Did you read the link provided to the report?

    Where did you get that it was a plea deal? There wasn’t a case against Craig, based on the Police Officer’s account.

    Based on most of the comments by the men at HA and other places, most of them could be charged with the exact same thing. Who knew standing and waiting for a stall was considered lewd? Or the way one places their bag in the stall? Or the stance you assume when doing your business.

    There wasn’t a charge there.

  68. #68
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:56 am, Peejz said:

    taylork, when was Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions.

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office

    How so? Certainly not based on the responses I see here. We don’t allow anyone with scandal, ever, that’s the difference between us and them..seems to be the message…

  69. #69
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:56 am, ed said:

    Dang it!The shame should be enough punishment.

  70. #70
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:58 am, RobM1981 said:

    I agree that the MSM, and the scum that support the politicians that get away with this type of behavior, are contemptible.

    I also feel, however, that this is the single largest reason that the public supports conservative candidates. About 2/3 of Americans are, in fact, decent - and care enough to vote that way.

    The fact that about 1/3 of our citizens will support scum like the people mentioned here is terrifying, but I digress…

    What has driven a wedge between conservatives and republicans is precisely this kind of thing. Ronald Reagan would have chewed this kind on nonsense up. He’d be instructing Congress, publically, “clean up the people’s house!”

    Instead we get liberals running amock, republicans afraid of their own shadows, etc.

    What a mess.

  71. #71
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:01 pm, RobM1981 said:

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office
    How so? Certainly not based on the responses I see here. We don’t allow anyone with scandal, ever, that’s the difference between us and them..seems to be the message…

    How about: before you’re elected, the electorate gets to factor your infraction into their voting pattern? If you do something like this after, the only thing we can do is call for your prosecution and removal.

    That seems to be a pretty big difference.

  72. #72
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:02 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Vatar:

    Craig did NOT “expose himself” in the restroom. He supposedly propositioned this undercover cop.

    Get your facts straight.

  73. #73
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, taylork said:

    Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions

    .

    Michael Vick took a plea deal too, but we know what really went on. I typically all for giving people the benefit of the doubt, but when you take an obivious plea deal, such as this one where the report doesn’t say anything about resisting the cops actions, other than being slightly hesitant.

  74. #74
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, 3Steps said:

    Peejz and BigAnge… got one of you denying the whole thing and the other making incredibly stupid biggoted comments.

    Is it any wonder the libs think we are morons?

    Airforce_5_0 has the way of it.

    It’s not about what *points finger* they got away with. “He did worse and he gets to stay.. nah nah…”

    It isn’t even about ‘family values’.

    It IS about personal responsibility. (At least to me it is) ;-)

    He needs to step down now. Not because he may or may not be gay. I could care less.

    Because he was indulging in illegal and unsafe behavior in a public restroom.

    The moral high road? Weren’t we just discussing that? He needs to stop playing the McKinny ‘don’t you know who I am card’ and start taking responsiblity for his actions. To do otherwise just makes him a crapweasel.

  75. #75
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:08 pm, Rick Moran said:

    AJ:

    Close on the pool. I make it noon tomorrow.

  76. #76
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:12 pm, corona said:

    Some of you need to learn to read.

    “Interference with privacy” - look it up.

  77. #77
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:17 pm, Bad Candy said:

    Question, does Craig outright resign, or does he just not seek reelection?

    And if he does leave, on a scale of 1-10, how hard does the Media beat the homophobia drum?

  78. #78
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:20 pm, bear1909 said:

    I thought name calling was a venial sin.
    8)

  79. #79
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:30 pm, Peejz said:

    3 steps said:

    Because he was indulging in illegal and unsafe behavior in a public restroom.

    Where did you come up with that? I am not denying that Craig was in the bathroom. I am denying that he was charged with a lewd act. I am denying that he copped a lessor plea. I come to that conclusion based on the written statement of the cop.

  80. #80
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:32 pm, 3Steps said:

    I assume you are a lawyer Peejz?

  81. #81
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:40 pm, taylork said:

    and the fact that he apparently has a history of these types of incidents doesn’t seem to matter, eh Peejz?

  82. #82
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:42 pm, JEM said:

    The man made his own noose the minute he got all loquatious and self-important in the restroom, and he put his neck in it when he pleaded guilty to anything that could be tied back to the original event.

    He’s now hanging at the end of the rope and it seems like he’s the only one who doesn’t yet realize he’s dead. Maybe he’s right and we’re wrong, but it seems the Idaho GOP’s in there tugging on his feet listening for that satisfying ’snap’ that’d free them from this mess with enough time before the election to fix things.

  83. #83
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:48 pm, flenser said:

    nbarry

    It’s the hypocrisy. Democrats don’t try to cover up catering to the greed of their campaign financiers by moral posturing to the rank-and-file over sexual sins.

    That is absurd. Democrats are every bit as hypocritical as Republicans on sex issues, and are even moreso on non-sex issues.

    The hypocrisy of Bill Clinton and his sex with his female subordinates gets lost on people for some reason. The Democrats claim to be the womens party and that it is Republicans who treat women in a demeaning fashion.

    And the hypocrisy of Al Gore with his huge mansion and jet setting lifestyle never seems to bother liberals in the slightest.

  84. #84
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pm, Peejz said:

    and the fact that he apparently has a history of these types of incidents doesn’t seem to matter, eh Peejz?

    What history? His record was clean according to the cops.

    His record is not so clean if I am to take the word of a blogger that is hell bent on outing gays in the Republican party.

    I too can make up stories and tell how I did extensive research, but never share my work.

  85. #85
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    Rick,
    I still have two hours out here in California…. lol.

  86. #86
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:11 pm, Boomer said:

    As an Idaho resident I want Senator Reid to resign or at least do us the favor of not running for re-election. The wife and I have had it with his stance on illegal immigration and so have many of my neighbors. This incident is another nail in the coffin of his attempt to run for re-election. We will continue to work against his re-election only because of his views on amnesty for law breakers. We could care less about his personal lifestyle choice.

  87. #87
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Peejz said the following at various times:
    Did you read the link provided to the report?
    Where did you get that it was a plea deal? There wasn’t a case against Craig, based on the Police Officer’s account.
    Based on most of the comments by the men at HA and other places, most of them could be charged with the exact same thing. Who knew standing and waiting for a stall was considered lewd? Or the way one places their bag in the stall? Or the stance you assume when doing your business.

    taylork, when was Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions.

    Where did you come up with that? I am not denying that Craig was in the bathroom. I am denying that he was charged with a lewd act. I am denying that he copped a lessor plea. I come to that conclusion based on the written statement of the cop.

    First, I did read the link. I don;t know about you, but I don’t peer into a stall while waiting for it for over two minutes. That’s not waiting. Do you suppose he kept looking in (as alledged by the officer) because he thought the guy in the stall (the cop) disappeared? If you know someone’s in there, you’ll see them leave. They have to come out at some point. The cop detailed the entire event in his writen report.

    Here is the cop’s actual report.

    Read that. The third typed line doesn’t read “disorderly conduct”. It’s “Title: Lewd conduct”.

    Now, I know you might not have been on the recieving end of our criminal justice system, but, here’s a couple pointers:

    - Cops lable/title their reports under what the arresting/primary charge was. He didn’t say “lewd conduct” because he felt like it.

    - When you plead guilty, about 95% of the time you do so to recieve a conviction on a charge that is lesser to the original charge. ‘Murder to manslaughter’, ‘aggrivated assault’ to ’simple assault’, so on and so on. To plead guilty to disorderly conduct almost certainly tells us that it’s a lesser charge. ‘Disorderly conduct’ is a lesser charge to ‘lewd conduct’.

    To deny that he was attempting to entice the guy in the stall next to him is to deny every single thing the officer wrote in his report. It wasn’t just the placement of the bag, it wasn’t the foot all the way over tapping, it wasn’t the peering into the stall (so closely the cop could make out his blue eyes) over a period of two minutes, it is the sum total of all those behaviors.

    Sure, any one of them could be 100% innocent. All together they suggest something less than wholesome.

  88. #88
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:22 pm, ajmontana said:

    I’d like to make a suggestion, have one of you’re artist friends do a caricature of a Crapweasel. This way when another of probably several other Crapweasel stories comes around we can have a “Crapweasel Alert” with a pic to help identify the upcoming story of behavior unbecoming a person in power.

  89. #89
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:23 pm, pclevenger said:

    You would think that after the gay outing fiasco last election AND especially running presidential campaigns that Republicans would grab a clue and keep their behavior above reproach. Apparently not.

  90. #90
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:24 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Hmmm… I’m 48 and have been single for all but 4 years of my life… I’ve never heard that tapping your foot in a bathroom is a signal for gay sex…

    Good thing… I do it sometimes too… like when I’m in a hurry…

    This cop was on a sting op… he was looking for behaviours, and TROLLING himself… he said he saw the guy looking through the door cracks a few time… which means HE had to be watching out as well…

    Crap, if someone was watching me through the cracks, I’d be looking back wondering what the heck is going on…

    Then he put his luggage agianst the door??? Uh… unless you leave it outside, just where else to you put it?

    Crap, I’ve done a lot of these behaviors when traveling… and I’m about as Hetero as you can get.

    Me thinks that you are all judging very quickly…

    As to his pleading guilty? He did pull his Senate Card, ie tried to intimidate the officer into letting him go…

    He shoulda got a lawyer…

  91. #91
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pm, blues said:

    Is what Craig did actuallly a crime?It seems to me that making suggestive overtures of this type(while certainly repulsive)don’t qualify as criminal acts.Can anyone out there clarify this for me?That said,I have to wonder about all of these Republicans who are engaging in lewd behavior when the GOP is the party of Christian values.It appears that these people only call themselves Republicans to get elected in areas where a Dhimmicrat can’ win.Time for a clean sweep-2 election cycles with no incumbents on either side of the aisle.Many people will argue that it takes time for freshman to learn the ropes etc.,so nothig will get done in Washington.So how much is getting done now with all the career (criminals)politians we keep re-electing?

  92. #92
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “Lying Crapweasel”? - go get the soap young lady… ;)

    I’m just trying to get over a “sitting Senator” with a “wide stance”. Though I think that’s the norm, but usually they’re dumping on the taxpayers.

  93. #93
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:37 pm, blues said:

    Oops,didn’t catch the typos.

  94. #94
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pm, swj719AWG said:

    I will admit: I too occationally adopt a “wide stance”, but almost always it’s after I eat something with a lot of fiber…

    Too much?

  95. #95
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:51 pm, taylork said:

    “I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct. I should have had the advice of counsel in resolving this matter. In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously.” Since when do you have to enter a plea at the airport? Since he didn’t plead guilty at the airport, I have to imagine he had some time to think this through.

    You would think a Senator of all people would know when to have and use counsel.

    His record is not so clean if I am to take the word of a blogger that is hell bent on outing gays in the Republican party.

    I too can make up stories and tell how I did extensive research, but never share my work.

    Normally, I’d given him the benefit of the doubt on this one. However, he was “outed” last year. Seems to me that this is abit too coincidental.

    Furthermore, if you were a Senator who was accused of being gay and having sex with underaged pages, my guess would be that you would fight charges of lewd conduct, rather than giving your opponents more fodder. Espcially when it seems like it would be easy enough to have this dismissed, (I’m not too sure that a person can be convicted over foot touching or having your hand in the wrong place).

  96. #96
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:54 pm, almeehan said:

    A good lawyer would have argued, he mistakenly thought he was in the ladies room & that all senators need a wide stance because they are so full of it.

  97. #97
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, Bill DeFelice said:

    Hey,where is our diversity understanding?The politico party,of the left,would not even mention his behavier.It’s don’t do as I do.Do what I say.Maybe his aim was off,and some guy’s shoes got wet.
    We have other problems to deal with.
    Real troubles! This story is just a distraction.Wake up!

  98. #98
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:11 pm, pressto said:

    Hmmm… I’m 48 and have been single for all but 4 years of my life… I’ve never heard that tapping your foot in a bathroom is a signal for gay sex…

    Good thing… I do it sometimes too… like when I’m in a hurry…

    Yes I am 46 and never heard of these things. I put my bag in front of me in airport restrooms so I can always keep an eye on it. I also tap my foot when I am in a hurry to get my business done between flights. I think the charge was dropped because they didn’t have the proof based on reading that report.

    This case would be completely different if this Officer had heard statements of a proposition from him or offered one he accepted like when Rep. Bob Allen did.

    He did not. Instead the officer said he just did saw some “signs”, and they could not convict him on that alone.

    Wait, Republican and hint at Gay Sex with no act? Full speed ahead and hang them high.

  99. #99
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pm, gayle said:

    I didn’t know that Michelle would allow anyone to take GOD’S name in vain on this site without deleting the post.

    I am appalled.

  100. #100
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:13 pm, taylork said:

    I think the charge was dropped because they didn’t have the proof based on reading that report.

    They weren’t dropped, they were dropped down.

    Instead the officer said he just did saw some “signs”, and they could not convict him on that alone

    Which is why I find it so strange that he didn’t fight the charges. As I said before, he’s already been under pretty heavy scrutiny by “outers” so why give them more ammo? He has to know it would come out eventually.

  101. #101
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Which is why I find it so strange that he didn’t fight the charges.

    Well, fighting the charges, true or not, would only draw attention to the whole thing. Pleading to a lesser charge increaed the odds of the whole darn thing staying out of the public eye.

  102. #102
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pm, taylork said:

    Pleading to a lesser charge increaed the odds of the whole darn thing staying out of the public eye.

    Senator Craig may want to stay away from Vegas.

  103. #103
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, Peejz said:

    swj719AWG said

    Read that. The third typed line doesn’t read “disorderly conduct”. It’s “Title: Lewd conduct”.

    Now, I know you might not have been on the recieving end of our criminal justice system, but, here’s a couple pointers:

    - Cops lable/title their reports under what the arresting/primary charge was. He didn’t say “lewd conduct” because he felt like it.

    The cop writes a report and the DA is the one that brings the charges. Just because a cop says one thing, doesn’t mean the DA will charge for it, mainly because of lack of evidence, as is the case here.

    It should also be nothed that according to the arresting officer, Craig was charged with:
    1. Interference with privacy
    2. Disorderly conduct

  104. #104
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, taylork said:

    hmmm press conference. Will Senator Craig come and say that he’s gay american? Will Peejz be eating crow? only time will tell!

  105. #105
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, ajmontana said:

    Do you’re business, wash you’re hands, finished, the whole bathroom ordeal should be over at most 5 minutes. Unless you are a Durky Lurky. ew.

  106. #106
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:47 pm, taylork said:

    I wonder if Bill O will have a body language segment on the press conference?

  107. #107
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, mom2jack said:

    I find it quite disturbing that their appears to be an entire subculture of anonymous public bathroom sex. The fact that the police officer recognized the behavior consistent with this type of activity seems to suggest that this happens much more frequently than people probably think. The fact that it happens in such a public place makes me shudder.

    I must be incredibly naive (that, or I’m a female who never goes in a men’s room, but whatever). All I know is that my family and I are making a connection in MSP in a few weeks. When my son tells me he has to use the potty, what am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to know that the restrooms are safe? He’s too old to take him in a women’s restroom with me. But I guess if I have to choose between making women uncomfortable or having my son exposed to lewdness, I’ll take the former, thanks.

  108. #108
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, taylork said:

    Just heard Mitts statement on Hannity where he blasts Craig. I can only imagine what the news conference is going to be now.

  109. #109
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Another point…

    This Police man was there in a sting Op… he was NOT there to stop the behaviour. To do that he would have just stood in the bathroom in uniform… would have stopped it cold.

    This “Officer” was trolling, and took what are pretty innocent behaviours of proof of Lewd behaviour. He was out to make busts…

  110. #110
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:40 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Craig, Vitter, Gonzales, Gingrich, Delay, Nixon, Foley, etc…all resigned or asked to resign.

    Kennedy, Dodd, Clinton, Condit, Reynolds, Jefferson (William, not Thomas) all hang on to the bitter end.

    Why is it always republicans that have to resign?

    I am not defending Craig, but would liberals and democrats just once show the same decency and respect for what is right in this world?

    The double standard is sickening.

    Respectfully,

    eric http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

  111. #111
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:45 pm, taylork said:

    Craig stands by his previous statement. And says he’s been relentlessly be pursued by the Idaho statesmen about whether or not he’s gay, which is why he was in a bad frame of mind and made a stupid decision to plea guilty to lessor charges. Fine. I guess we have to take him at his word. and I’ll apologize for thinking and writing otherwise.

    However, his immigration stance and his showing of the business card still makes him a crapweasel in my book.

    Let’s just hope he stays on his best behavior from here on out.

  112. #112
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, theloneranger said:

    I haven’t yet figured out why anyone would choose to have sex in a public bathroom. That in itself is pretty disgusting.

  113. #113
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Peejz said:

    taylork said:

    hmmm press conference. Will Senator Craig come and say that he’s gay american? Will Peejz be eating crow? only time will tell!

    Nope, I won’t eat crow. I’m not trying to justify any lewd acts..don’t get me wrong. In this case, there was no lewd act, no money exchanged, basically, no case. He was just an idiot in the way he handled it.

    Craig should have come forward within 24 hours of the incident, instead, he allowed another Foleygate to unfold….interesting twist to it is that Rogers and Avorsosis(sp?) are now coming back to the forefront in this…2 of the major players in last fall’s pre-election gay mafia tactics.

    Time will tell how this plays out

  114. #114
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, Peejz said:

    However, his immigration stance and his showing of the business card still makes him a crapweasel in my book.

    Agree on the immigration stance, must disagree on the business card though…didn’t he have to leave the bag in the hall, which had the id?

    He’s a bit more than just a crapweasel…

  115. #115
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:36 pm, ajmontana said:

    Now all the Gay’s are going to be ticked off because he didn’t add “not that that’s a bad thing” after he cried out.”Im not gay!”

  116. #116
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:49 pm, jferg49 said:

    and people say the republican party doesn’t have any gays!..but jeeze, does he have to be a such a disgusting gay guy?…at any rate…he needs to go…we should expect better from our elected officials…the sad thing, this sorry sob has been doing this type of stuff forever, without accountability. Unfortunately, he’s just like most the rest of those representatives, they think they are above the law or don’t need to adhere to the moral code of society….

  117. #117
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:58 pm, tony the tiger said:

    U.S. Senator, the Honorable Mr. Larry Craig said:

    “As I mentioned earlier, I have now retained counsel to examine this matter and I will make no further comment.”

    Hiding behind a lawyer… good character reference, that!

  118. #118
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:06 pm, rightisright said:

    #115 My exact thoughts when I heard him said that…then i thought, now where’s going to get a date?

  119. #119
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:13 pm, RightOnPeachtree said:

    Craig is a pimp for amnesty. Maybe he thinks the gay/straight ratio is higher amongst illegals than it is amongst Americans. More illegals = more bathroom visits = more “fun” for Larryboy.

  120. #120
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:15 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    A liberal made an excellent point to me (shocking, but giving credit where due) today on my blog.

    If Senator Craig is not gay, as he insisted four times, why would he begin his press conference by “thanking everybody for coming out today?”

    Wait for it, wait for it…(hitting cybercymbals)…ba dum bum!

    eric :) http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

    P.S. All of this reminds me of the 80s tv show “WKRP in Cincinnati.” At the beginning of the credits before the music was a radio announcer saying, “The Senator, although insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.”

  121. #121
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:17 pm, bear1909 said:

    Toilet trolling and the appearance of impropriety by a Republican power broker……disaster for Romney. Will it end him? Dunno. But it is creating one helluvan echo.

    “How come you didn’t know this about a trusted advisor?”

    This is gonna just get nastier.

  122. #122
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Craig needs an intervention. If he’s planning on running next year, he probably won’t even be able to get elected dog catcher. Someone needs to sit him down and talk some sense into him.

    He’s about to drag his family and the party through a very messy, public defense of the indefensible. Best he resign and keep his mouth shut.

  123. #123
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:31 pm, 24Klady said:

    The only thing I would question is what kind of record the arresting undercover cop has? How many of his arrests have been denied by high profile people and how were those cases were settled? If the senator is truly confused about the arrest, and innocent of whatever charges or plea deal was reached, he should resign and go after the truth. He’d regain his seat next election. If he resigns and does nothing, he’s eternally tainted.

  124. #124
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:34 pm, bear1909 said:

    This is another case of fallin dominos because someone has been leading a secret life, while milking dollars from people “who believe” in the cardboard merchandiser that these creeps hide behind. Vick, Craig….what is the difference?

    All the donors who have supported this reprobate, his family, all of his friends, his constiuency….all of them are stuck with a first class liar who used them.

    Clean out the bathrooms and clean out the campaigns and the NFL. We must demand it.

    The moral void is being filled by veil wearing head chopping fanatics who believe in a violent “god”. Every piece of filth like Craig simply proves our enemies “right”.

    One helluva predicament for the Right. It will never be for the Left because they stand for nothing other than their right *TO* stand for nothing.

    This kinda stuff makes me sick to my stomach.

    *WE* are better than this. Anyone want to start a news network that focuses on something else besides the proclivities of American society?

  125. #125
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:48 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Keep him in office to counterbalance the Dem scumbags.

    If we allow only perfect Republicans in Congress, the Congress will be all-Democrat.

  126. #126
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:59 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well my “pool” time went down in flames for noon today, I was thinking Rick had it by noon tomorrow until Crapweasels little speech sent everyones time down the poop shoot.

  127. #127
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:33 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Just saw Michelle’s bit on the Factor covering this, and the end of the segment sounded a LOT like the argument I made…

    And as an aside…

    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:48 pm, greenLibertarian said:
    Keep him in office to counterbalance the Dem scumbags.

    If we allow only perfect Republicans in Congress, the Congress will be all-Democrat.

    That’s the WORST idea I have ever heard.

    We shouldn’t keep ANYONE in officer if they are office-abusing, anonymous sex-seeking (ok, I suppose if their single, but there are limits people), unhinged (his cries that his rights have somehow been violated) politicians.

    They should be booted from office.

    ALL of them.

    EVERY SINGLE DAMN ONE OF THEM!!!

    I don’t care what party they are. If engage in acts of moral turpitude, and/or attempt to abuse their office, they should GO!

    To suggest we should let republicans slide because democrats let their people slide is 100% wrong.

    We’re better than the “But they do it tooooooooooooooo” game.

  128. #128
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:38 pm, corona said:

    Who says that he is “gay”? Notice how that is the only word he uses to describe what he is supposedly not.

    Ever heard of “bi curious”?

  129. #129
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    If we can eliminate both Rep and Dem scumbags, I agree, swj719AWG, but how do we eliminate the Dems?

    The greater good may be served by keeping the Rep scumbags in place, think about all of the ramifications of further reducing the Rep/Dem ratio.

    A scumbag in his/her personal life can still cast good votes.

  130. #130
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:30 pm, joeyb1955 said:

    Just one more in a line of arrogant bastards…

  131. #131
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:43 pm, taylork said:

    At the very least, he’s gotten himself a new nickname. Ladies and gentlemen, may I introduce to you Senator widestance

  132. #132
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:05 pm, derel3433 said:

    Brokeback Larry?

  133. #133
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:45 pm, Dersu said:

    If boyCraig is innocent, why is he not charging the cop with false arrest?

    Or why is the cop still on duty after arresting a USA Senator without just cause.

    Who would you believe, boyCraig or the cop?

    I vote for the cop!

  134. #134
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:17 pm, DarkKnight said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:40 pm, blacktygrrrr said:
    Craig, Vitter, Gonzales, Gingrich, Delay, Nixon, Foley, etc…all resigned or asked to resign.

    Kennedy, Dodd, Clinton, Condit, Reynolds, Jefferson (William, not Thomas