The Larry Craig mess

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 28, 2007 12:29 AM

Update 5:15pm Eastern. Here’s the full statement on Craig’s site. He’s not just a lying crapweasel.

He’s a supremely arrogant, lying crapweasel. Blaming the press. Non-apology apologizing. How do you spell creep? C-r-a-i-g.

Update 4:30pm Eastern press conference scheduled. Here’s the vid.

Update 1:30pm Eastern 8/28. The poll results so far…

pollcraig.jpg

***

Update: The Idaho Statesman has two detailed articles. The first recaps the Minnesota incident. The second is a five-month investigative piece into Craig’s past alleged acts of indecency and solicitation dating back to 1982, when an underage page made allegations that he had had sex with three House members.

ABC News has the docs from the Minnesota incident.

Any takers on a Larry Craig Resignation Date/Time Betting Pool?

***

What a weasel.

He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card. He pleads guilty. Then he blames the police for misunderstanding him and “misconstruing” all his bathroom antics.

Bleccch.

Let me amend my reaction. He’s not just a weasel.

He’s a lying crapweasel.

Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?

Here’s a poll. Have at it:

Should Larry Craig resign?
Yes
Hell yes
No
Who cares? They’re all crapweasels

  

***

Here’s the Romney endorsement video Craig made that has been disappeared from the Romney YouTube channel.

Posted in: GOP, Larry Craig

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. JunkYardBlog
  2. Bill's Bites
  3. Liberty Pundit
  4. Outside The Beltway | OTB
  5. Free In Idaho! » Blog Archive » Say Goodbye Larry
  6. The Purple Nation
  7. SENATOR ARRESTED, IN DISGRACE « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  8. Self-hating right wing gays at Antony Loewenstein
  9. politicalpartypoop.com » Blog Archive » The Larry Craig mess: May I touch your feet?
  10. Neocon News » Just when you thought it was safe to fly...
  11. Think Progress » Conservatives Begin Calling For Craig To Resign Over ‘Lewd Conduct’ And Guilty Plea
  12. Minefeed.com
  13. Sen. Craig: Fiddle Faddle in a non-Fiddling Party
  14. PAXALLES
  15. Radio Left
  16. Jeremayakovka
  17. Wonkette
  18. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Open thread: Larry Craig presser at 4:30 p.m. ET; Update: GOP Senate leaders call for ethics probe of Craig; Update: “I am not gay” video added; Update: Press(?) heckles Craig
  19. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Craig Plays the Victim
  20. the unequivocal notion
  21. i-DUH-hoo in ‘da news ~ « On a Quest…
  22. Spokompton » Blog Archive » Craig Followup
  23. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Officer acquitted of Abu Ghraib charges
  24. A Blog For All
  25. BIRD
  26. Dust my Broom
  27. Sen. Larry Craig: Not Gay, Not Even a Little. « Subject to Complete Defeasance
  28. Beware the Boy’s Room « Right Ringtail
  29. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Homosexual “Marriage”
  30. Conservative Musings
  31. The Craig Debacle… » Freedom Folks
  32. Senator pleaded guilty, reportedly after bathroom stall incident - Page 8 - Hardcore Politics
  33. The Fact About Larry Craig: Larry.. Larry Craig Swears By Mitt.. » My Wired News . net
  34. First Round | August 29, 2007 : The Shot! @ shotpolitics.com
  35. It would be hypocritcal for Larry Craig not to resign. Goodbye! « Volunteer Opinion Journal
  36. Buck Naked Politics
  37. Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » Demonizing fags = eletoral winner
  38. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Leaping to denounce Craig
  39. Senator Larry Craig’s “Intent to Resign:” When An Apology Isn’t An Apology » The Moderate Voice
  40. Villainous Company
  41. Craig’s Behavior - Glenn Greenwald « Allpaths
  42. Rhymes With Right
  43. Michelle Malkin - Should Senator Larry Craig resign?

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

  1. #101
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Which is why I find it so strange that he didn’t fight the charges.

    Well, fighting the charges, true or not, would only draw attention to the whole thing. Pleading to a lesser charge increaed the odds of the whole darn thing staying out of the public eye.

  2. #102
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pm, taylork said:

    Pleading to a lesser charge increaed the odds of the whole darn thing staying out of the public eye.

    Senator Craig may want to stay away from Vegas.

  3. #103
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, Peejz said:

    swj719AWG said

    Read that. The third typed line doesn’t read “disorderly conduct”. It’s “Title: Lewd conduct”.

    Now, I know you might not have been on the recieving end of our criminal justice system, but, here’s a couple pointers:

    - Cops lable/title their reports under what the arresting/primary charge was. He didn’t say “lewd conduct” because he felt like it.

    The cop writes a report and the DA is the one that brings the charges. Just because a cop says one thing, doesn’t mean the DA will charge for it, mainly because of lack of evidence, as is the case here.

    It should also be nothed that according to the arresting officer, Craig was charged with:
    1. Interference with privacy
    2. Disorderly conduct

  4. #104
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, taylork said:

    hmmm press conference. Will Senator Craig come and say that he’s gay american? Will Peejz be eating crow? only time will tell!

  5. #105
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, ajmontana said:

    Do you’re business, wash you’re hands, finished, the whole bathroom ordeal should be over at most 5 minutes. Unless you are a Durky Lurky. ew.

  6. #106
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:47 pm, taylork said:

    I wonder if Bill O will have a body language segment on the press conference?

  7. #107
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, mom2jack said:

    I find it quite disturbing that their appears to be an entire subculture of anonymous public bathroom sex. The fact that the police officer recognized the behavior consistent with this type of activity seems to suggest that this happens much more frequently than people probably think. The fact that it happens in such a public place makes me shudder.

    I must be incredibly naive (that, or I’m a female who never goes in a men’s room, but whatever). All I know is that my family and I are making a connection in MSP in a few weeks. When my son tells me he has to use the potty, what am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to know that the restrooms are safe? He’s too old to take him in a women’s restroom with me. But I guess if I have to choose between making women uncomfortable or having my son exposed to lewdness, I’ll take the former, thanks.

  8. #108
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, taylork said:

    Just heard Mitts statement on Hannity where he blasts Craig. I can only imagine what the news conference is going to be now.

  9. #109
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Another point…

    This Police man was there in a sting Op… he was NOT there to stop the behaviour. To do that he would have just stood in the bathroom in uniform… would have stopped it cold.

    This “Officer” was trolling, and took what are pretty innocent behaviours of proof of Lewd behaviour. He was out to make busts…

  10. #110
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:40 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    Craig, Vitter, Gonzales, Gingrich, Delay, Nixon, Foley, etc…all resigned or asked to resign.

    Kennedy, Dodd, Clinton, Condit, Reynolds, Jefferson (William, not Thomas) all hang on to the bitter end.

    Why is it always republicans that have to resign?

    I am not defending Craig, but would liberals and democrats just once show the same decency and respect for what is right in this world?

    The double standard is sickening.

    Respectfully,

    eric http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

  11. #111
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:45 pm, taylork said:

    Craig stands by his previous statement. And says he’s been relentlessly be pursued by the Idaho statesmen about whether or not he’s gay, which is why he was in a bad frame of mind and made a stupid decision to plea guilty to lessor charges. Fine. I guess we have to take him at his word. and I’ll apologize for thinking and writing otherwise.

    However, his immigration stance and his showing of the business card still makes him a crapweasel in my book.

    Let’s just hope he stays on his best behavior from here on out.

  12. #112
    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, theloneranger said:

    I haven’t yet figured out why anyone would choose to have sex in a public bathroom. That in itself is pretty disgusting.

  13. #113
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, Peejz said:

    taylork said:

    hmmm press conference. Will Senator Craig come and say that he’s gay american? Will Peejz be eating crow? only time will tell!

    Nope, I won’t eat crow. I’m not trying to justify any lewd acts..don’t get me wrong. In this case, there was no lewd act, no money exchanged, basically, no case. He was just an idiot in the way he handled it.

    Craig should have come forward within 24 hours of the incident, instead, he allowed another Foleygate to unfold….interesting twist to it is that Rogers and Avorsosis(sp?) are now coming back to the forefront in this…2 of the major players in last fall’s pre-election gay mafia tactics.

    Time will tell how this plays out

  14. #114
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, Peejz said:

    However, his immigration stance and his showing of the business card still makes him a crapweasel in my book.

    Agree on the immigration stance, must disagree on the business card though…didn’t he have to leave the bag in the hall, which had the id?

    He’s a bit more than just a crapweasel…

  15. #115
    On August 28th, 2007 at 5:36 pm, ajmontana said:

    Now all the Gay’s are going to be ticked off because he didn’t add “not that that’s a bad thing” after he cried out.”Im not gay!”

  16. #116
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:49 pm, jferg49 said:

    and people say the republican party doesn’t have any gays!..but jeeze, does he have to be a such a disgusting gay guy?…at any rate…he needs to go…we should expect better from our elected officials…the sad thing, this sorry sob has been doing this type of stuff forever, without accountability. Unfortunately, he’s just like most the rest of those representatives, they think they are above the law or don’t need to adhere to the moral code of society….

  17. #117
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:58 pm, tony the tiger said:

    U.S. Senator, the Honorable Mr. Larry Craig said:

    “As I mentioned earlier, I have now retained counsel to examine this matter and I will make no further comment.”

    Hiding behind a lawyer… good character reference, that!

  18. #118
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:06 pm, rightisright said:

    #115 My exact thoughts when I heard him said that…then i thought, now where’s going to get a date?

  19. #119
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:13 pm, RightOnPeachtree said:

    Craig is a pimp for amnesty. Maybe he thinks the gay/straight ratio is higher amongst illegals than it is amongst Americans. More illegals = more bathroom visits = more “fun” for Larryboy.

  20. #120
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:15 pm, blacktygrrrr said:

    A liberal made an excellent point to me (shocking, but giving credit where due) today on my blog.

    If Senator Craig is not gay, as he insisted four times, why would he begin his press conference by “thanking everybody for coming out today?”

    Wait for it, wait for it…(hitting cybercymbals)…ba dum bum!

    eric :) http://www.blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com

    P.S. All of this reminds me of the 80s tv show “WKRP in Cincinnati.” At the beginning of the credits before the music was a radio announcer saying, “The Senator, although insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.”

  21. #121
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:17 pm, bear1909 said:

    Toilet trolling and the appearance of impropriety by a Republican power broker……disaster for Romney. Will it end him? Dunno. But it is creating one helluvan echo.

    “How come you didn’t know this about a trusted advisor?”

    This is gonna just get nastier.

  22. #122
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Craig needs an intervention. If he’s planning on running next year, he probably won’t even be able to get elected dog catcher. Someone needs to sit him down and talk some sense into him.

    He’s about to drag his family and the party through a very messy, public defense of the indefensible. Best he resign and keep his mouth shut.

  23. #123
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:31 pm, 24Klady said:

    The only thing I would question is what kind of record the arresting undercover cop has? How many of his arrests have been denied by high profile people and how were those cases were settled? If the senator is truly confused about the arrest, and innocent of whatever charges or plea deal was reached, he should resign and go after the truth. He’d regain his seat next election. If he resigns and does nothing, he’s eternally tainted.

  24. #124
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:34 pm, bear1909 said:

    This is another case of fallin dominos because someone has been leading a secret life, while milking dollars from people “who believe” in the cardboard merchandiser that these creeps hide behind. Vick, Craig….what is the difference?

    All the donors who have supported this reprobate, his family, all of his friends, his constiuency….all of them are stuck with a first class liar who used them.

    Clean out the bathrooms and clean out the campaigns and the NFL. We must demand it.

    The moral void is being filled by veil wearing head chopping fanatics who believe in a violent “god”. Every piece of filth like Craig simply proves our enemies “right”.

    One helluva predicament for the Right. It will never be for the Left because they stand for nothing other than their right *TO* stand for nothing.

    This kinda stuff makes me sick to my stomach.

    *WE* are better than this. Anyone want to start a news network that focuses on something else besides the proclivities of American society?

  25. #125
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:48 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Keep him in office to counterbalance the Dem scumbags.

    If we allow only perfect Republicans in Congress, the Congress will be all-Democrat.

  26. #126
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:59 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well my “pool” time went down in flames for noon today, I was thinking Rick had it by noon tomorrow until Crapweasels little speech sent everyones time down the poop shoot.

  27. #127
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:33 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Just saw Michelle’s bit on the Factor covering this, and the end of the segment sounded a LOT like the argument I made…

    And as an aside…

    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:48 pm, greenLibertarian said:
    Keep him in office to counterbalance the Dem scumbags.

    If we allow only perfect Republicans in Congress, the Congress will be all-Democrat.

    That’s the WORST idea I have ever heard.

    We shouldn’t keep ANYONE in officer if they are office-abusing, anonymous sex-seeking (ok, I suppose if their single, but there are limits people), unhinged (his cries that his rights have somehow been violated) politicians.

    They should be booted from office.

    ALL of them.

    EVERY SINGLE DAMN ONE OF THEM!!!

    I don’t care what party they are. If engage in acts of moral turpitude, and/or attempt to abuse their office, they should GO!

    To suggest we should let republicans slide because democrats let their people slide is 100% wrong.

    We’re better than the “But they do it tooooooooooooooo” game.

  28. #128
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:38 pm, corona said:

    Who says that he is “gay”? Notice how that is the only word he uses to describe what he is supposedly not.

    Ever heard of “bi curious”?

  29. #129
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    If we can eliminate both Rep and Dem scumbags, I agree, swj719AWG, but how do we eliminate the Dems?

    The greater good may be served by keeping the Rep scumbags in place, think about all of the ramifications of further reducing the Rep/Dem ratio.

    A scumbag in his/her personal life can still cast good votes.

  30. #130
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:30 pm, joeyb1955 said:

    Just one more in a line of arrogant bastards…

  31. #131
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:43 pm, taylork said:

    At the very least, he’s gotten himself a new nickname. Ladies and gentlemen, may I introduce to you Senator widestance

  32. #132
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:05 pm, derel3433 said:

    Brokeback Larry?

  33. #133
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:45 pm, Dersu said:

    If boyCraig is innocent, why is he not charging the cop with false arrest?

    Or why is the cop still on duty after arresting a USA Senator without just cause.

    Who would you believe, boyCraig or the cop?

    I vote for the cop!

  34. #134
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:17 pm, DarkKnight said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 4:40 pm, blacktygrrrr said:
    Craig, Vitter, Gonzales, Gingrich, Delay, Nixon, Foley, etc…all resigned or asked to resign.

    Kennedy, Dodd, Clinton, Condit, Reynolds, Jefferson (William, not Thomas) all hang on to the bitter end.

    Why is it always republicans that have to resign?

    Three things:

    1)
    Vitter asked to resign… doesn’t.

    Durbin asked to resign too… doesn’t.

    2)
    Gonzales was the AG, and it seems conservatives and democrats both asked for him to be gone.

    3)
    If you are going to include bureaucrats, you convienently fogot to leave Secretary Rumsfeld off your list of people who were asked to resign (which may have been because he offered his resignation twice and the President refused to accept it).

    One things you, Sean Hannity, and I agree on. The double standard is sickening.

    Respectfully to you as well.

  35. #135
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:57 pm, swj719AWG said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 pm, greenLibertarian said:
    The greater good may be served by keeping the Rep scumbags in place, think about all of the ramifications of further reducing the Rep/Dem ratio.

    A scumbag in his/her personal life can still cast good votes.

    No.

    No no no.

    The greater good is NEVER served by keeping a crook of ANY kind in office. If it means a 100% Democrat congress, NO republican/independant crooks. NONE!

    I will NEVER accept that you can cancel out someone’s feckless moral turpitude because they might be useful for the party. Never.

    Republicans are supposed to be the one with ethics and morals. If you think we should keep someone without any sense of propriety in office, you become the exact thing we dislike so much about the worse of the democrats: a moral relativist.

  36. #136
    On August 29th, 2007 at 1:18 am, nbarry said:

    What can anyone say about the culture of our nation’s capital when a Google search of escort services there turns up thousands of entries?

  37. #137
    On August 29th, 2007 at 1:32 am, Rob Taylor said:

    Capitalism works?

  38. #138
    On August 29th, 2007 at 2:57 am, Romeo13 said:

    I truly thought more of Conservatives than I’ve seen on this thread.

    He really broke no law.

    He was not lewd, just stupid.

    He has not been prooven to be gay, yet most on here think he is.

    Why do I feel like I’m watching the McCarthy era all over again?

    You have judged him… and are now executing the sentence, without knowing what really happend past that a Vice Cop, on a trolling expedition, saw him tap his feet and look in a bathroom stall. You know, the Vice cop whose JOB it is to BUST people… who was there to entrap people… who may very well have seen exactly what he wanted to see….

    Sorry, I’ve been busted by a cop, then exonerated… and was asked to plead to a lesser charge on that occasion… but luckily was smart enough to fight it… instead of trying to just get it over with (especialy in another state… with all the court appearances you’d have to make to fight a silly allegation…).

  39. #139
    On August 29th, 2007 at 3:31 am, blues said:

    swj.-excellent.Whatever either party is “supposed to represent”,THEY AREN’T DOING IT.Two election cycles,no incumbents,no returnees.It is time for our elected officials to do the damn job we are paying them to do,and since they aren’t doing it,the time has come to FIRE them.To H*** with the party,the country comes first.

  40. #140
    On August 29th, 2007 at 4:26 am, doingwhatican said:

    Tapping his foot on the floor of his stall? I thought only Mr. Ed did that.

    So, might we say Senator Craig is now out of the water closet?

  41. #141
    On August 29th, 2007 at 4:26 am, greenLibertarian said:

    Get over yourself, swj719AWG, life is not black and white. This man has cast good votes, yes. If he represents the people well by his votes, he has done his job. Real life is shades of gray, someone who ’sins’ can still do good. Sex in the restroom is not a a mortal sin.

    We are not perfect, our government reps are not perfect, deal with it.

  42. #142
    On August 29th, 2007 at 6:19 am, ajmontana said:

    #142, You’re statments are beyond lame. Step away from the pipe.

  43. #143
    On August 29th, 2007 at 6:27 am, ajmontana said:

    correction # 141

  44. #144
    On August 29th, 2007 at 7:11 am, Ranten.N.Raven said:

    Saying “I am not a homosexual” with his wife at his side? Reminds me of Bill Clinton. It’s TECHNICALLY the truth because homosexuals desire only their own gender, but bisexuals like both boys and girls. So of course a bisexual can truthfully say he’s not a homosexual! Slick, just like Slick Willy (pun intended).

  45. #145
    On August 29th, 2007 at 7:14 am, ajmontana said:

    Michelle / Rick
    This was on my RR home page, Partial Good News if true.

    QALA-E-QAZI, Afghanistan(AP) Taliban militants released three South Korean hostages on Wednesday, the first of 19 captives scheduled to be freed under a deal struck between the insurgents and the South Korean government.

  46. #146
    On August 29th, 2007 at 7:44 am, Craig said:

    How do you spell creep? C-r-a-i-g.

    Hey….wait just a doggone minute. lol

  47. #147
    On August 29th, 2007 at 8:23 am, pressto said:

    I truly thought more of Conservatives than I’ve seen on this thread

    I agree.

  48. #148
    On August 29th, 2007 at 8:25 am, purplepeep said:

    greenLibertarian said:
    Get over yourself, swj719AWG, life is not black and white. This man has cast good votes, yes. If he represents the people well by his votes, he has done his job. Real life is shades of gray, someone who ’sins’ can still do good. Sex in the restroom is not a a mortal sin.
    We are not perfect, our government reps are not perfect, deal with it.

    Craig clearly realizes the homosexual lifestyle is wrong. If these allegations are true, he should seek treatment.

    You are correct, GL, that a person can do wrong things but still have the correct views. e.g. his position against same sex “marriage” is right. It’s like a bank robber who knows robbing banks is wrong.

    I hope we’re not going to get weeks of ’round the clock 24/7 media obsession with homosexual bathroom hookups. I’d even take “all-Paris, all the time” over that. Ewwww.

  49. #149
    On August 29th, 2007 at 8:56 am, taylork said:

    I truly thought more of Conservatives than I’ve seen on this thread
    I agree.

    Give me a break. This story stinks to high heaven. We have no choice other than to believe him right now, given the lack of real evidence. However, if this doesn’t set off tons of alarms in your head, then I sincerely doubt you have any common sense.

  50. #150
    On August 29th, 2007 at 10:36 am, nbarry said:

    Someone has now come forward claiming to have had sex with Sen. Craig in a bathroom stall. By all means, give this gentleman a lie detector test ASAP.

    http://www.nypost.com

    Stay tuned, folks, for the next heartwarming episode of “The Crapweasels.” [Schmaltzy sitcom music]

  51. #151
    On August 29th, 2007 at 7:03 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Stay tuned, folks, for the next heartwarming episode of “The Crapweasels.” [Schmaltzy sitcom music]

    Don’t you mean “As the Crapweasels Squirm”?

  52. #152
    On August 30th, 2007 at 2:08 am, greenLibertarian said:

    Hey, purplepeep, thanks for a considered response to my views. I don’t believe the gay lifestyle is wrong, and I pity those who are forced to deny their lifestyle.

    It is especially hard for a Republican politician, given the intolerance of much of the party. Someone who is mostly in line with Republican views, as the Senator seems to be, can do much good but be forced to conceal part of his private life.

    That is a shame.

  53. #153
    On August 30th, 2007 at 12:25 pm, taylork said:

    Someone who is mostly in line with Republican views, as the Senator seems to be, can do much good but be forced to conceal part of his private life.

    This isn’t about his private life. It’s about his decision to bring his private life into a public bathroom.

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bad taste award

June 25, 2009 12:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

The dignity of Jenny vs. the jerkitude of Mark

June 24, 2009 06:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

95 Comments | 22 Trackbacks

Bastard

June 24, 2009 02:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

341 Comments | 55 Trackbacks

Ensign resigns GOP leadership post

June 17, 2009 01:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

110 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Hero worship

May 12, 2009 09:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

100 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Tom Ridge won’t run against Toomey

May 7, 2009 12:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

60 Comments | 9 Trackbacks


Categories: GOP, Larry Craig



Pundit & Pundette

» Sarah Palin to resign??

Conservatives4Palin

» Sarah Palin Crosses the Rubicon