The Larry Craig mess

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 28, 2007 12:29 AM

Update 5:15pm Eastern. Here’s the full statement on Craig’s site. He’s not just a lying crapweasel.

He’s a supremely arrogant, lying crapweasel. Blaming the press. Non-apology apologizing. How do you spell creep? C-r-a-i-g.

Update 4:30pm Eastern press conference scheduled. Here’s the vid.

Update 1:30pm Eastern 8/28. The poll results so far…

pollcraig.jpg

***

Update: The Idaho Statesman has two detailed articles. The first recaps the Minnesota incident. The second is a five-month investigative piece into Craig’s past alleged acts of indecency and solicitation dating back to 1982, when an underage page made allegations that he had had sex with three House members.

ABC News has the docs from the Minnesota incident.

Any takers on a Larry Craig Resignation Date/Time Betting Pool?

***

What a weasel.

He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card. He pleads guilty. Then he blames the police for misunderstanding him and “misconstruing” all his bathroom antics.

Bleccch.

Let me amend my reaction. He’s not just a weasel.

He’s a lying crapweasel.

Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?

Here’s a poll. Have at it:

Should Larry Craig resign?
Yes
Hell yes
No
Who cares? They’re all crapweasels

  

***

Here’s the Romney endorsement video Craig made that has been disappeared from the Romney YouTube channel.

Posted in: GOP, Larry Craig

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. JunkYardBlog
  2. Bill's Bites
  3. Liberty Pundit
  4. Outside The Beltway | OTB
  5. Free In Idaho! » Blog Archive » Say Goodbye Larry
  6. The Purple Nation
  7. SENATOR ARRESTED, IN DISGRACE « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  8. Self-hating right wing gays at Antony Loewenstein
  9. politicalpartypoop.com » Blog Archive » The Larry Craig mess: May I touch your feet?
  10. Neocon News » Just when you thought it was safe to fly...
  11. Think Progress » Conservatives Begin Calling For Craig To Resign Over ‘Lewd Conduct’ And Guilty Plea
  12. Minefeed.com
  13. Sen. Craig: Fiddle Faddle in a non-Fiddling Party
  14. PAXALLES
  15. Radio Left
  16. Jeremayakovka
  17. Wonkette
  18. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Open thread: Larry Craig presser at 4:30 p.m. ET; Update: GOP Senate leaders call for ethics probe of Craig; Update: “I am not gay” video added; Update: Press(?) heckles Craig
  19. Webloggin - Blog Archive » Craig Plays the Victim
  20. the unequivocal notion
  21. i-DUH-hoo in ‘da news ~ « On a Quest…
  22. Spokompton » Blog Archive » Craig Followup
  23. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Officer acquitted of Abu Ghraib charges
  24. A Blog For All
  25. BIRD
  26. Dust my Broom
  27. Sen. Larry Craig: Not Gay, Not Even a Little. « Subject to Complete Defeasance
  28. Beware the Boy’s Room « Right Ringtail
  29. Keith Burgess-Jackson » Homosexual “Marriage”
  30. Conservative Musings
  31. The Craig Debacle… » Freedom Folks
  32. Senator pleaded guilty, reportedly after bathroom stall incident - Page 8 - Hardcore Politics
  33. The Fact About Larry Craig: Larry.. Larry Craig Swears By Mitt.. » My Wired News . net
  34. First Round | August 29, 2007 : The Shot! @ shotpolitics.com
  35. It would be hypocritcal for Larry Craig not to resign. Goodbye! « Volunteer Opinion Journal
  36. Buck Naked Politics
  37. Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » Demonizing fags = eletoral winner
  38. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Leaping to denounce Craig
  39. Senator Larry Craig’s “Intent to Resign:” When An Apology Isn’t An Apology » The Moderate Voice
  40. Villainous Company
  41. Craig’s Behavior - Glenn Greenwald « Allpaths
  42. Rhymes With Right
  43. Michelle Malkin - Should Senator Larry Craig resign?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #120941
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:40 am, see-dubya said:

    Yeah, I don’t think “dignity” is one of Sen. Craig’s primary concerns.

  2. #120942
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:45 am, almeehan said:

    It does clearly demonstrate that we are all made of clay and are fallen creatures. It doesn’t excuse the intent of the act or the act itself. With the high position in government entrusted to a senator or the like, comes great responsibility including giving up the right to selfish or self serving inclinations to serve the country. Apart from the act and attempted coverup, I wonder how the information got leaked and the timing of it all.

  3. #120947
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:51 am, Regulus said:

    What a fool. He needs to get out of the way so that by 2008 the Idaho GOP will have enough temporal distance from him so as to still have a shot at retaining his Senate seat.

    And of all the useless things to “learn” about today: tapping your right foot in the stall followed up by some weird attempt to play footsie-wootsie = … oh, never mind.

  4. #120949
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:09 am, Jim M. said:

    He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card.

    Wasn’t there a scene like that in “Blazing Saddles”?

  5. #120950
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:10 am, OldGuy53 said:

    Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?

    And really how many do?
    That’s the problem with modern politics, the office holds no dignity anymore.

  6. #120951
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:11 am, nbarry said:

    Did he also flash his American Express card?

  7. #120953
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 am, Michael Bates said:

    Next “trial balloon” explanation: The senator was experiencing a moment of TV nostalgia and thought it would be fun to re-enact the “My Three Sons” opening animation with the person in the next stall.

  8. #120954
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:43 am, Snooper said:

    Be gone with the slog!!

  9. #120955
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:56 am, tony the tiger said:

    #4 Jim
    I don’t think so…
    Give the Governor a harumph!

  10. #120956
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:01 am, i b squidly said:

    He’s Republican and he’s got to go. The quicker the better.

    Were he Democrat the police would be homophobes and we’d give him a committee.

    Funny how that works.

  11. #120957
    On August 28th, 2007 at 2:02 am, tony the tiger said:

    Aww hell – you can only vote once!?
    Where’s my sock-puppet…

  12. #120971
    On August 28th, 2007 at 3:35 am, W.B. Wittmeyer said:

    We strongly protest your associating us with a lying politician.

    The Crapweasles.

  13. #120983
    On August 28th, 2007 at 6:17 am, iamsaved said:

    Where are the Democrats rushing to his defense? They condone this type of behavior and feel it should be legalized, sanctioned and protected don’t they?

  14. #120996
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:14 am, PBoilermaker said:

    He’s a lying crapweasel.

    Although I agree he is a crapweasel, I can’t stop laughing at the fact you called him a crapweasel.

    I am going to incorporate “crapweasel” into my daily vocabulary.

  15. #121006
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:41 am, derel3433 said:

    it was a misunderstanding i’m sure.

    maybe there were intimidating black men in the men’s room and and he was nervous.

    http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?s=rss&storyid=60650

  16. #121010
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:55 am, DanME said:

    First, what the hell is happening to the Republican Party. Total lack of leadership, wimpo Elizabeth Dole running the 2006 senate campaign, and now all this misconduct. Second, I smell Chucky Shumer all over this and the Vitter incident. Chucky is a real scum bag and just loves to dig up all kinds of dirt.

  17. #121011
    On August 28th, 2007 at 7:56 am, derel3433 said:

    duke taught us not to rush to judgement, so we need to hear him out.

    but, on another note, not unlike the soul searching taking place in the catholic church, i wonder if it is time to ask ourselves why it is so many of our conservative men in politics keep getting involved these compromising and often hypocritical situations.

    in the last 3 weeks we’ve had–gay rape accusations against the head of the young republicans usa, a prominent baptist minister and state legislator in NC arrested for prostitution, a prominent legislator chasing his secretary around the office naked, and a top gop political consultant murdered in gay love triangle. all of these men were championed by family values organizations. i have no way of understanding this all, but it threatens the future of our movement and i feel that’s what karl rove has been getting at when he has deflected criticism from the 2006 election losses from the war and white house incompetence and to the candidate scandals.

  18. #121015
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:27 am, Jaded said:

    It is the hypocrisy that is killing the Republican party not the being gay. I told people that if he is gay just say it hell there are Log Cabin Republicans however they are not pushing gay marriage or special protections for themselves. Lindsay come out of the closet before you to are outed first.

  19. #121016
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:28 am, swj719AWG said:

    While I do indeed love “crapweasel”, I had to go with “Hell Yes”.

    Thought they ARE all crapweasels… I think there’s a dozen congressmen/women that aren’t worthless.

  20. #121019
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:32 am, BigAnge said:

    This isn’t an issue about Democrats or Republicans, it is about the sociopathic nature of homosexual behavior. Perhaps Congress should take some vetting lessons from the Boy Scouts.

  21. #121020
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:32 am, DesertLover said:

    swj719AWG

    Only a dozen? …

  22. #121023
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:35 am, Peejz said:

    Resign for what? Disorderly conduct and not lewd and lacivious behavior? Don’t you think that pales in comparison to driving off a bridge and leaving a girl to die? Or driving drunk, getting caught and then trying to use a voting procedure to get out of it?

  23. #121024
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:41 am, Cricket said:

    Soliciting for ‘lewd’ conduct is not the same as actually groping. It depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is. After, according to the Dems sexuality is no one else’s business.

    Well, news flash: What they do on my dime is my business. I am not paying for them to have ‘relationships’ that violate their marriage vows. I am paying them to represent ME.

    Fire them all.

  24. #121026
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 am, ajmontana said:

    He’s lucky he didn’t get the crap beat out of him. But, then it would be a gay bashing hate crime. These folks on the hill are really disgusting.

  25. #121028
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:49 am, swj719AWG said:

    So because many/most democrats in congress are worthless piles of shite, we shouldn’t hold out people to any kind of standard?

    He was flappin’ Mr Happy around for all to see, and when confronted by police tried to get out of the arrest by showing off his Senator-ness.

    What he did was on par (I suppose… I really don’t want to have to rank this stuff) with McKinney. You thought SHE should resign, right?

    Look, I’m sick and tired of hearing – from EITHER sdie – “Well, they have done bad things, so what does it matter that we do bad things?”

    It isn’t a God Damn deffense. Act right, or get the hell out of office. Let us find someone who isn’t a moral retard to serve.

  26. #121031
    On August 28th, 2007 at 8:51 am, zyzzyg said:

    I just think it is funny.

    I loved his explanation about why his foot extended beyond his stall. He said, “I have a wide stance.”

    Senator ‘Wide Stance’ from Idaho. LOL.

    Isn’t ‘Broke Back Mountain’ in Idaho? LOL.

    As for hyprocrisy – this is as hypocritical as any politician saying the government spends too much money, and then slips an earmark into a farm bill for public restrooms along a nature hiking trail.

    OK, I’ll stop. It’s a misdemeanor, not a felony. Nothing to see here folks. Just move along. Thank you.

    Whatever happens, the people of Idaho should decide. I for one just enjoy the humor in it, and think August is no longer a dull news month.

  27. #121037
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:13 am, ajmontana said:

    As the Pool goes, I’m going with Today.

  28. #121038
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:14 am, derel3433 said:

    I take comfort in knowing he will not be on the DC madam’s phone list.

  29. #121039
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:15 am, ajmontana said:

    Noon Today… :)

  30. #121040
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:18 am, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    #9 tony

    You cut that dialogue short; the lines you were looking for were:

    “harumph!”

    “you watch your ass…”

  31. #121042
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:20 am, Laree said:

    zyzzyg

    No broke back mountain was supposedly Montana.

    I think I will have to vote yes, he has the taint, it isn’t about orientation it is about behavior.

  32. #121046
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:26 am, Craig said:

    Any takers on a Larry Craig Resignation Date/Time Betting Pool?

    YES. I declare the Over/Under to be 2 weeks.

  33. #121047
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:27 am, taylork said:

    Since he was already on the toilet, I think it’s time we hit flush. buh-bye.

  34. #121049
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:32 am, Rick Moran said:

    SWJ:

    He was flappin’ Mr Happy around for all to see,

    That’s a gross exaggeration of what occurred. Please keep your facts straight. Read the Roll Call piece which contains a description of what happened.

    As for the rest, I agree with you – especially your last sentence which should be engraved on placques and stuck on the desk of every elected official in America.

  35. #121051
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:34 am, Rusty said:

    Where are the Democrats rushing to his defense? They condone this type of behavior and feel it should be legalized, sanctioned and protected don’t they?

    Um, no.

    This isn’t an issue about Democrats or Republicans, it is about the sociopathic nature of homosexual behavior. Perhaps Congress should take some vetting lessons from the Boy Scouts.

    Wow. People wonder how liberal blogs can cherry pick comments to make this site look hateful? A call to ban all gays from Congress? That’s nuts.

    As plenty of people have already pointed out, the problem isn’t just lewd behavior, it’s hypocrisy. Voting for the FMA twice and voting against hate-crime protection for gays…running as a social conservative…he misrepresented himself.

    The sad part is if he were comfortable being an outed homosexual, he could have a real relationship instead of resorting to anonymous sex in an airport bathroom. Of course, if he were an outed homosexual, he would never get the opportunity to be a legislator in a “family values” state like Idaho.

    Talk about your can’t wins.

  36. #121053
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:36 am, ajmontana said:

    What’s Steve Duecy have to do with this? :)

  37. #121055
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:38 am, RedRepub said:

    Sen. Craig is gay? He’s not even cute!
    What he did is disgusting. There are rational logical gay Republicans who aren’t perverts committing lewd acts.

    This will only hurt the GOP and Gov. Romney in 2008.

  38. #121056
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:38 am, nbarry said:

    It’s the hypocrisy. Democrats don’t try to cover up catering to the greed of their campaign financiers by moral posturing to the rank-and-file over sexual sins. That’s why they are better able to get away with their own peccadillos.

  39. #121059
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:41 am, Rick Moran said:

    Rusty:

    You’re right in taking Big Ange to task for his “sociopathic” comment. That’s just not called for and there is no evidence that homosexual behavior is anything except what it is – different. Ange’s characterization of homosexual behavior is not accepted by mainstream psychiatry. Whatever your personal opinion is, please try to keep clinical terms like “sociopathic” out of the conversation unless there is a basis in fact.

  40. #121060
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:42 am, swj719AWG said:

    #34 On August 28th, 2007 at 9:32 am, Rick Moran said:
    That’s a gross exaggeration of what occurred. Please keep your facts straight. Read the Roll Call piece which contains a description of what happened.

    True enough. It was, however, an exageration in order to illustrate a point. I fully accept that he wasn’t jumpin’ around with it “all hangin’ out”.

    It is, however, merely a matter of degrees. Soliciting lewd conduct (look, lets call it what it was. He was looking for some kinda hook-up in a public bathroom) and lewd conduct differ only in regard to where in the process you are caught.

    If people are quite willing to overlook this, they should – if they are being internally consistant – be ok with him doing what I said.

  41. #121061
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:44 am, swj719AWG said:

    Whatever your personal opinion is, please try to keep clinical terms like “sociopathic” out of the conversation unless there is a basis in fact.

    Well, he IS a member of congress… ;)

  42. #121065
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:52 am, RobM1981 said:

    Hard to argue with swj719AWG’s logic there…

  43. #121068
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:55 am, RobM1981 said:

    Let’s clarify a few things here:

    The man is not being prosecuted for being a homosexual. No law enforcement agency is accusing him of homosexuality. Moreover, no sane person would call for his resignation if the headline read “Craig comes out of the closet and announces ‘I, too, am a Gay American…’” Nobody cares.

    The issue is that he was being lewd in a public bathroom. In 2007 it’s *highly* unlikely that all he did was proposition someone – rude and inappropriate as that would be, even for a non-US-Senator. Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

  44. #121067
    On August 28th, 2007 at 9:55 am, RobM1981 said:

    Let’s clarify a few things here:

    The man is not being prosecuted for being a homosexual. No law enforcement agency is accusing him of homosexuality. Moreover, no sane person would call for his resignation if the headline read “Craig comes out of the closet and announces ‘I, too, am a Gay American…’” Nobody cares.

    The issue is that he was being lewd in a public bathroom. In 2007 it’s *highly* unlikely that all he did was proposition someone – rude and inappropriate as that would be, even for a non-US-Senator. Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

  45. #121074
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:06 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Regarding the poll:

    “Crapweasel”? MM – that made me laugh so hard I snorted.

  46. #121079
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 am, gayle said:

    swj719AWG;

    If you insist on taking GOD’S name in vain, please do it somewhere OTHER than this site!

    We Christians are offended.

  47. #121080
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:27 am, JWS said:

    When this happens to a Dhimmicrat, it’s their private life and none of anyone’s business and how dare you and it has nothing to do with how they do their jobs, etc, etc, blahblahblah. A Repub? OMG! See! See! Hypocrites all!! Get the pitch forks! And onandonandon…

    That said, this freak needs to go bye bye…

  48. #121084
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:38 am, taylork said:

    I find it quite disturbing that their appears to be an entire subculture of anonymous public bathroom sex. The fact that the police officer recognized the behavior consistent with this type of activity seems to suggest that this happens much more frequently than people probably think. The fact that it happens in such a public place makes me shudder.

  49. #121090
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:46 am, James Felix said:

    He plays the “Don’t you know who I am?” game by whipping out his Senate business card.
    Wasn’t there a scene like that in “Blazing Saddles”?

    No, that was “High Anxiety”, during the opening credits.

  50. #121094
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:50 am, Peejz said:

    swj719AWG- obviously you haven’t even read what was alledged to have happened. There is no video tape, there is no allegation of an actual proposition for sex. It was a cop, on a mission to catch lewd behavior, that interpruted what he thought to be a come on. There were no charges brought for that, obviously for a very good reason. Based on the roll call report, it appears that the disorderly came from Craig refusing to leave the bathroom. That’s an easy one to make stick.

  51. #121095
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:52 am, thirteen28 said:

    Once again, crapweasels get their names smeared by comparison to a sitting U.S. senator.

  52. #121096
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, gunslingerpatriot said:

    I thought it was Cynthia McGinny from Georgia when she “slapped” a police officer for not recognising her highness when she came in?

  53. #121097
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, RobM1981 said:

    taylor, that’s the issue and I’m glad you’re focused on it. When Gov. James McGreavey of NJ resigned a couple of years ago, what made us puke is that he alluded to it being because he was “a gay American.” What a load of garbage. The reason he had to resign is that it quickly became known that amongst about 50 other illegal things he was being monitored for, he was absolutely engaging in public bathroom sex.

    This is illegal for a reason… SEVERAL reasons, actually, not the least of which is that CHILDREN use these bathrooms.

    And, to underscore JWS’s feelings: very, very few people from the MSM even mentioned that McGreavey’s actions were ILLEGAL and potentially involved children walking in on him.

    It certainly seems as if the MSM has no problem with kids learning “the facts of life” by watching homosexual sex in pubic restrooms… It’s appalling.

    Never mind Craig resigning: he should do TIME. Just like Kennedy should do TIME for driving under the influence last winter. Just like Webb for his involvement in the “handguns in the Capital” incident (he doesn’t like the gun laws? HE’S A SENATOR, let him work to change it…).

    These should be NO-BRAINERS. You do the crime, you do the time.

  54. #121099
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 am, pressto said:

    Resign for what? Disorderly conduct and not lewd and lacivious behavior? Don’t you think that pales in comparison to driving off a bridge and leaving a girl to die? Or driving drunk, getting caught and then trying to use a voting procedure to get out of it?

    Yes, he is guilty of the same thing Rep. McKinney, yet I heard no one call on her to resign. I read the complain and charges and the lewd one was dropped, but what the heck lets ignore that just like ABC did. He pleaded guilty to being an arrogant stupid congressperson who thought they were above the law, but unlike her he admitted it.

    Strange that this case happened on 8/8, yet is just now getting reported about. I wonder who notified Rollcall and ABC on this case?

  55. #121100
    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:56 am, radio relay said:

    Craig, is not a “statesman”. He’s low life scumbag. He should be run out of town!

    Then the democRats, like Kennedy, Murtha, “Cold Cash” Davis, Barney “The Gay Pimp” Franks, and all the other democRat weasels that get a pass by the MSM for their disgusting behavior, need to be booted, too!

    Watch for more “republican’t” indiscretions and “crimes” to be splashed all over the MSM, while the other side’s same behavior will be ignored, or possibly even glorified!!

  56. #121108
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:06 am, brentano said:

    The upside is that democrats will be distracted for a few days from supporting terrorists and weakening America.

  57. #121109
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:06 am, Airforce_5_O said:

    This is the difference between us and the Libs. When our people are stuck in scandle we demand the resign until they are cleared. He plead guilt. Got to go now.
    Libs just hang on and on and on.
    I don’t have give many examples, Clinton, Kennedy, Jefferson. Anymore???

  58. #121113
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:14 am, Vatar said:

    Instead, we have strong reason to believe that he exposed himself. In a PUBLIC restroom, in an AIRPORT

    I once took out my privates in a bathroom too.

  59. #121115
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:20 am, swj719AWG said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 am, gayle said:
    swj719AWG;

    If you insist on taking GOD’S name in vain, please do it somewhere OTHER than this site!

    We Christians are offended.

    Again you say “we christians” as though I’m not. I’m fascinated by this, and would ask you when exactly I converted to something, anything besides “Luthern”…

    On August 28th, 2007 at 10:50 am, Peejz said:
    swj719AWG- obviously you haven’t even read what was alledged to have happened. There is no video tape, there is no allegation of an actual proposition for sex. It was a cop, on a mission to catch lewd behavior, that interpruted what he thought to be a come on. There were no charges brought for that, obviously for a very good reason. Based on the roll call report, it appears that the disorderly came from Craig refusing to leave the bathroom.

    Please. It was obviously a plea deal (”plead guilty” is a tip off) for a lesser charge. A 100% common occurance in every jurisdiction in the country. Read the cop’s statements in the rollcall piece again. He is telling you that the Senator was attempting to initiate an encounter in a public bathroom. If you think the cop’s lying, that’s one thing, but if you think he’s telling the truth (ar that it’s likely he’s telling the truth), then your assertation is bunk.

    The Senator, criminal record not withstanding, attempted to initiate an “encounter” in a public bathroom. That’s a lewd act, I don’t care who you are.

    I would be VERY interested to see the original arrest report, in addition to the original charges filed. They won’t say “disorderly conduct”.

  60. #121116
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:24 am, tony the tiger said:

    #57 Airforce_5_O
    Gregoire, maybe?
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=gregoire+scandal

  61. #121119
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:26 am, Dr. Lead Based Paint said:

    Just one more Republican acting like a freakin’ Democrat. He should either resign, or change parties.

  62. #121120
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:26 am, tony the tiger said:
  63. #121123
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:31 am, Peejz said:

    This is the difference between us and the Libs. When our people are stuck in scandle we demand the resign until they are cleared

    What, and then they get their job back?

    We elected a POTUS that was an admitted alcoholic. We took his word that he is sober.

    Where are you going to draw the line on those involved in scandal? How will you differentiate between manufactured on real charges against a person?

  64. #121126
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:37 am, swj719AWG said:

    Thanks Tony…

  65. #121131
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:47 am, bgarland said:

    As an Idahoan, I had already informed his office that I would not be backing him in the next primary due to his support of the recent Shamnesty Bill. But this disgrace calls for an immediate resignation NOW.

  66. #121132
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:49 am, taylork said:

    We elected a POTUS that was an admitted alcoholic. We took his word that he is sober.

    Since when is being a recovered alcoholic a scandal?

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office, espcially since it was a sex crime in a public place.

    And Craig plead guilty here, to a charge which was clearly a plea deal, just read the report and you’ll see that he didn’t appear to do what he plead guilty of doing.

  67. #121133
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:50 am, Peejz said:

    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:20 am, swj719AWG said

    Did you read the link provided to the report?

    Where did you get that it was a plea deal? There wasn’t a case against Craig, based on the Police Officer’s account.

    Based on most of the comments by the men at HA and other places, most of them could be charged with the exact same thing. Who knew standing and waiting for a stall was considered lewd? Or the way one places their bag in the stall? Or the stance you assume when doing your business.

    There wasn’t a charge there.

  68. #121136
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:56 am, Peejz said:

    taylork, when was Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions.

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office

    How so? Certainly not based on the responses I see here. We don’t allow anyone with scandal, ever, that’s the difference between us and them..seems to be the message…

  69. #121137
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:56 am, ed said:

    Dang it!The shame should be enough punishment.

  70. #121138
    On August 28th, 2007 at 11:58 am, RobM1981 said:

    I agree that the MSM, and the scum that support the politicians that get away with this type of behavior, are contemptible.

    I also feel, however, that this is the single largest reason that the public supports conservative candidates. About 2/3 of Americans are, in fact, decent – and care enough to vote that way.

    The fact that about 1/3 of our citizens will support scum like the people mentioned here is terrifying, but I digress…

    What has driven a wedge between conservatives and republicans is precisely this kind of thing. Ronald Reagan would have chewed this kind on nonsense up. He’d be instructing Congress, publically, “clean up the people’s house!”

    Instead we get liberals running amock, republicans afraid of their own shadows, etc.

    What a mess.

  71. #121140
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:01 pm, RobM1981 said:

    And there’s a huge difference between getting a DUI before you were ever elected, and committing a crime while serving in office
    How so? Certainly not based on the responses I see here. We don’t allow anyone with scandal, ever, that’s the difference between us and them..seems to be the message…

    How about: before you’re elected, the electorate gets to factor your infraction into their voting pattern? If you do something like this after, the only thing we can do is call for your prosecution and removal.

    That seems to be a pretty big difference.

  72. #121142
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:02 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Vatar:

    Craig did NOT “expose himself” in the restroom. He supposedly propositioned this undercover cop.

    Get your facts straight.

  73. #121148
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, taylork said:

    Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions

    .

    Michael Vick took a plea deal too, but we know what really went on. I typically all for giving people the benefit of the doubt, but when you take an obivious plea deal, such as this one where the report doesn’t say anything about resisting the cops actions, other than being slightly hesitant.

  74. #121149
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, 3Steps said:

    Peejz and BigAnge… got one of you denying the whole thing and the other making incredibly stupid biggoted comments.

    Is it any wonder the libs think we are morons?

    Airforce_5_0 has the way of it.

    It’s not about what *points finger* they got away with. “He did worse and he gets to stay.. nah nah…”

    It isn’t even about ‘family values’.

    It IS about personal responsibility. (At least to me it is) ;-)

    He needs to step down now. Not because he may or may not be gay. I could care less.

    Because he was indulging in illegal and unsafe behavior in a public restroom.

    The moral high road? Weren’t we just discussing that? He needs to stop playing the McKinny ‘don’t you know who I am card’ and start taking responsiblity for his actions. To do otherwise just makes him a crapweasel.

  75. #121150
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:08 pm, Rick Moran said:

    AJ:

    Close on the pool. I make it noon tomorrow.

  76. #121154
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:12 pm, corona said:

    Some of you need to learn to read.

    “Interference with privacy” – look it up.

  77. #121155
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:17 pm, Bad Candy said:

    Question, does Craig outright resign, or does he just not seek reelection?

    And if he does leave, on a scale of 1-10, how hard does the Media beat the homophobia drum?

  78. #121157
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:20 pm, bear1909 said:

    I thought name calling was a venial sin.
    8)

  79. #121164
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:30 pm, Peejz said:

    3 steps said:

    Because he was indulging in illegal and unsafe behavior in a public restroom.

    Where did you come up with that? I am not denying that Craig was in the bathroom. I am denying that he was charged with a lewd act. I am denying that he copped a lessor plea. I come to that conclusion based on the written statement of the cop.

  80. #121166
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:32 pm, 3Steps said:

    I assume you are a lawyer Peejz?

  81. #121168
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:40 pm, taylork said:

    and the fact that he apparently has a history of these types of incidents doesn’t seem to matter, eh Peejz?

  82. #121170
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:42 pm, JEM said:

    The man made his own noose the minute he got all loquatious and self-important in the restroom, and he put his neck in it when he pleaded guilty to anything that could be tied back to the original event.

    He’s now hanging at the end of the rope and it seems like he’s the only one who doesn’t yet realize he’s dead. Maybe he’s right and we’re wrong, but it seems the Idaho GOP’s in there tugging on his feet listening for that satisfying ’snap’ that’d free them from this mess with enough time before the election to fix things.

  83. #121173
    On August 28th, 2007 at 12:48 pm, flenser said:

    nbarry

    It’s the hypocrisy. Democrats don’t try to cover up catering to the greed of their campaign financiers by moral posturing to the rank-and-file over sexual sins.

    That is absurd. Democrats are every bit as hypocritical as Republicans on sex issues, and are even moreso on non-sex issues.

    The hypocrisy of Bill Clinton and his sex with his female subordinates gets lost on people for some reason. The Democrats claim to be the womens party and that it is Republicans who treat women in a demeaning fashion.

    And the hypocrisy of Al Gore with his huge mansion and jet setting lifestyle never seems to bother liberals in the slightest.

  84. #121178
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pm, Peejz said:

    and the fact that he apparently has a history of these types of incidents doesn’t seem to matter, eh Peejz?

    What history? His record was clean according to the cops.

    His record is not so clean if I am to take the word of a blogger that is hell bent on outing gays in the Republican party.

    I too can make up stories and tell how I did extensive research, but never share my work.

  85. #121180
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    Rick,
    I still have two hours out here in California…. lol.

  86. #121182
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:11 pm, Boomer said:

    As an Idaho resident I want Senator Reid to resign or at least do us the favor of not running for re-election. The wife and I have had it with his stance on illegal immigration and so have many of my neighbors. This incident is another nail in the coffin of his attempt to run for re-election. We will continue to work against his re-election only because of his views on amnesty for law breakers. We could care less about his personal lifestyle choice.

  87. #121185
    On August 28th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Peejz said the following at various times:
    Did you read the link provided to the report?
    Where did you get that it was a plea deal? There wasn’t a case against Craig, based on the Police Officer’s account.
    Based on most of the comments by the men at HA and other places, most of them could be charged with the exact same thing. Who knew standing and waiting for a stall was considered lewd? Or the way one places their bag in the stall? Or the stance you assume when doing your business.

    taylork, when was Craig charged with a sex crime? He wasn’t. He plead guilty to and was charged with disorderly conduct, as in resisting the cops actions.

    Where did you come up with that? I am not denying that Craig was in the bathroom. I am denying that he was charged with a lewd act. I am denying that he copped a lessor plea. I come to that conclusion based on the written statement of the cop.

    First, I did read the link. I don;t know about you, but I don’t peer into a stall while waiting for it for over two minutes. That’s not waiting. Do you suppose he kept looking in (as alledged by the officer) because he thought the guy in the stall (the cop) disappeared? If you know someone’s in there, you’ll see them leave. They have to come out at some point. The cop detailed the entire event in his writen report.

    Here is the cop’s actual report.

    Read that. The third typed line doesn’t read “disorderly conduct”. It’s “Title: Lewd conduct”.

    Now, I know you might not have been on the recieving end of our criminal justice system, but, here’s a couple pointers:

    - Cops lable/title their reports under what the arresting/primary charge was. He didn’t say “lewd conduct” because he felt like it.

    - When you plead guilty, about 95% of the time you do so to recieve a conviction on a charge that is lesser to the original charge. ‘Murder to manslaughter’, ‘aggrivated assault’ to ’simple assault’, so on and so on. To plead guilty to disorderly conduct almost certainly tells us that it’s a lesser charge. ‘Disorderly conduct’ is a lesser charge to ‘lewd conduct’.

    To deny that he was attempting to entice the guy in the stall next to him is to deny every single thing the officer wrote in his report. It wasn’t just the placement of the bag, it wasn’t the foot all the way over tapping, it wasn’t the peering into the stall (so closely the cop could make out his blue eyes) over a period of two minutes, it is the sum total of all those behaviors.

    Sure, any one of them could be 100% innocent. All together they suggest something less than wholesome.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» When the wind won't blow

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails or Else!

Pundit & Pundette

» About last night's vote

JustOneMinute

» "Unequivocal"?
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook