Comments on: Federal judge blocks tougher penalties for illegal-alien hiring

By: Michelle Malkin » Judge Bars Bush Crackdown on Illegal Workers

Michelle Malkin » Judge Bars Bush Crackdown on Illegal Workers — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:43:01 +0000

[...] Federal judge blocks tougher penalties for illegal-alien hiring Posted in: Employer Sanctions, Open Borders Lobby Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

By: Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Why is big labour more worried about the rights of non american workers?

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:13:47 +0000

[...] the rights of non american workers? Posted by dinosaur under diversity , Immigration As I noted a few days ago, Big Labor is busying itself these days suing the government to protect illegal alien [...]

By: puhiawa

puhiawa — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:27:58 +0000

Bush must be in heaven. He and the judge agree on every point. If there is one thing Bush and the Democrats believe in, it is that the American worker must be reduced to serfdom.

By: Chief RZ

Chief RZ — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:32:33 +0000

At least our Miss Teen South Carolina had the courage to call them, “U.S. American workers” which brings the question of Illegal Alien criminals to light.

By: Alphonse

Alphonse — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:44:48 +0000

What a surprise.

Next thing you know we’ll have welcoming centers for illegal aliens and call them “new Americans.”

Oops, we already have than in Mexinois under our corrupt Gov. Blago. Nothing helps a Democrat stay in power like a steady stream of “new Americans” and jackpot babies who vote Democratic.

http://www.dhs.state.il.us/ts/cfsmm/page.aspx?item=31050
DHS has opened an Illinois Welcoming Center (IWC) to welcome new immigrants to Illinois. Creation of the IWC is one of the recommendations of the Governor’s New Americans Initiative.

By: Common Sense Journal » Blog Archive » Open Borders Federal Judge Maxine Chesney

Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:30:38 +0000

[...] is apparently against letting companies know they can’t knowingly hire illegal aliens. She was appointed by Clinton, no surprise [...]

By: jbirish

jbirish — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:11:14 +0000

Well, there goes any safeguard for those who are prospective victims of identity theft! The unions get their monthly stipend for dues to promote their liberal agenda, and the judges rule the world!

By: tyrion

tyrion — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:11:39 +0000

Help me out. Who’s the bastard here, Marbury or Madison.

By: pressto

pressto — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:05:37 +0000

Abuse of power in the Government? Sure is when a single judge has the power to do this.

By: reine.de.tout

reine.de.tout — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:34:44 +0000

The AFL-CIO lawsuit, filed this week, claims that new Department of Homeland Security rules outlined in accompanying letters threaten to violate workers’ rights and unfairly burden employers. Chesney said the court needs “breathing room” before making any decision on the legality of new penalties aimed at cracking down on the hiring of illegal immigrants.

How would this violate worker’s rights? If the employee has proper and appropriate identification, then NOTHING HAPPENS to the employee. It is not burdensome for individuals to make sure they have proper and appropriate identification.
As far as being unfairly burdensome on employers – why? Employers are already supposed to check the employment eligibility (proof of citizenship or work visa) of people they hire. Why would it be unfairly burdensome for employers to simply do what they are supposed to do in the first place? If they do, then they will get very few “no-match” letters.

By: Y Prime

Y Prime — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:42:38 +0000

“breathing room” = we need more time to come up with a technicality to justify not enforcing the law.

By: crashemt

crashemt — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:53:12 +0000

On September 1st, 2007 at 9:40 am, ajmontana said:
I know exactly where my ssn # is being used

Ditto. Sanctuary city of Chicago. Even Patrick Fitzgerald refused to enforce this one. Dirty illegal probably registered Democrat.

1) Had the SSA been able to do this in the past, I would nto have the identity theft issues I have today
2) Desert…I feel your pain. You will prevail. here’s what I did:
-Get a good attorney
-Have them serve an injunction against the business who supposedly paid you, and force their operations to shut down until they provide the employment paperwork
-Include IRS in the notification of the injunction

My Spidey-sense tells me we are very, very close to a national tragedy. I don’t want this to happen, but I feel the only way we (the victims of illegal alien identity theft) can unite and destroy this foe is to serve injunctions against Every business and agency that offers jobs, aid, and support to these crimes.

Something has to get our ship sailing straight again.

By: PokerGuy

PokerGuy — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:20:19 +0000

The big labor unions are, and have been for some time, shrinking and in danger of becoming totally irrelevant. They, like their politician buddies in the Dem Party, see the millions of illegals as a new victim class to exploit and thus provide their salvation.

labor bosses:illegals:Dem pols/jurists

Just one big happy family, marching arm-in-arm into a future workers’ paradise.

By: rightisright

rightisright — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:54:49 +0000

Amen to that Boomer…can’t have too many 2nd amendment rights in the house.

By: Boomer

Boomer — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:54:35 +0000

Now this is more like the rulings I have always seen and expected from Federal Judges from the People’s Republic of San Francisco. An incompetent judge that needs more breathing room to twist the current laws to suit her agenda instead of adhering to the immigration laws of this nation.

Thomas Jefferson was right when he stated we had to fear the judiciary in losing our individual freedoms. Thank God they gave us the 2nd Amendment escape clause in the US Constitution. We are quickly reaching a tipping point where we may have to refresh the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants.