Did You Know...


National security, 1; whales, 0

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 31, 2007 03:37 PM

The far Left 9th Circuit Court of Appeals finally makes some sense:

A federal appeals court allowed the Navy today to resume using underwater sonar blasts in anti-submarine warfare tests off the Channel Islands in Southern California, saying the nation’s military needs outweigh the safety of endangered whales.

In a 2-1 decision, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco suspended an April 6 injunction by a federal judge in Los Angeles that ordered the Navy to halt the sonar experiments during training exercises scheduled through 2009.

In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper said the underwater sound waves could harm nearly 30 species of marine mammals, including five species of endangered whales.

The Navy had earlier been allowed to conduct sonar tests in the area while taking steps to protect the whales, such as posting lookouts and reducing sound levels when whales were present. Navy officials have not proposed those measures this time.

In today’s ruling to lift the injunction while the case continues, Judge Andrew Kleinfeld said Cooper had failed to consider the national interest in military preparedness.

“We are currently engaged in war, in two countries,” said Kleinfeld, joined by Judge Consuelo Callahan. “There are no guarantees extending from 2007 to 2009 or at any other time against other countries deciding to engage us, or our determining that it is necessary to engage other countries.

“The safety of the whales must be weighed, and so must the safety of our warriors. And of our country.”

The court majority said the tests should be allowed to resume because the government will probably be able to show that sonar can be used safely, with protective measures similar to what the Navy used earlier.

My previous blogging/columnizing on this case:
2006 – Eco-zealots vs. the Navy
2002 – Protecting squid before sailors

The conclusion of my column five years ago:

Despite numerous precautions and mitigation measures being taken by the Navy, Mark Palmer of the San Francisco-based Earth Island Institute fretted on CNN…that the system is a “sonar bomb” developed by the Navy “to attack whales and other sorts of things in the name of finding submarines, and we don’t think it’s appropriate. We know very little about the effects on fish, on squid, on other types of marine organisms.”

Foreign enemies invaded our borders and murdered over 3,000 men, women and children on Sept. 11. Hundreds of thousands of young men and women have volunteered to make sure it doesn’t happen again. And all this guy can worry about is the comfort level of squid and plankton?

Of course, Navy planners should be conscientious environmental stewards. They are. The branch will spend upwards of $700 million next year on environmental protection alone. But the balance between environmental protection and military effectiveness is out of whack. Isn’t it time to put American lives over spineless invertebrates-human and otherwise?

We’ll see how long this ruling lasts…

PETA get an early jump on April Fools with this?

March 31, 2017 08:56 PM by Doug Powers

They try so hard

Sponsors of Anarchy

January 18, 2017 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

PETA names its ‘Person of the Year’ but one animal didn’t get a vote

December 18, 2014 03:16 PM by Doug Powers

Who speaks for Chuck?

PETA Heartache: Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Seeking Slavery Protection for SeaWorld Whales

February 8, 2012 09:36 PM by Doug Powers

Animal rights group’s legal counsel, above, may appeal

Categories: Animal rights wackos