About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Showdown in the House: Petraeus/Crocker testimony Update: Dems pounded for MoveOn ad; Update: Fiasco…microphones broken…hecklers run amok; 1:45pm Eastern update: Petraeus interrupted by hecklers whom Dems refused to remove before his testimony began; Mid-July 2008….drawdown of 15 BCTs expected; Update: Crocker interrupted…the fiasco continues

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 10, 2007 12:02 PM

Update: 4:26pm Eastern. USAToday’s Mark Memmott is trying to get Dems on record regarding the MoveOn.org smear. So far: Two non-response responses from Obama and Clinton’s offices.

More reax “The Peace Racket,” you should. This is what we are up against, people.

And milblogger Austin Bay weighs in on the testimony today, using the microphone failure as a metaphor.

Update 2:33pm Eastern. Here it is…the face of the Democrat Party. They’ve done virtually nothing to disassociate themselves from it. They made their bed. Lie in it:

pinkosposter.jpg

***
pethearing.jpg

Ambassador Crocker was also interrupted by the Pinkos. Cindy Sheehan was arrested. Amateur hour in the House continues.

2:25pm Eastern. Video of the Code Pinkos’ removal from the hearing room.

Full transcript of Petraeus testimony. Slides here.

1:45pm Eastern. Petraeus is interrupted by hecklers while reviewing the success in Anbar. Rep. Skelton was warned about these thugs before the testimony began. Instead of listening to GOP panel members’ warnings, he snapped at them. What a disgrace.

To summarize, the security situation is improving…The strategy: “Security while transitioning.” No “rush to failure.” Notes the need to fight on the ground and on the Internet. Gen. Petraeus projects draw-down of some 15 Battalion Combat Teams that were part of the surge.

1:29pm Eastern. Recess is over. Skelton warns protesters they’ll be removed. Gen. Petraeus has the floor. “This is my testimony…I wrote this testimony myself.” The military objectives of the serve are mostly being met…the tribal rejection of al Qaeda that started in Anbar has spread to other regions as well…by next summer, a reduction of surge levels achieavable without compromising security…”

1:23pm Eastern. A five-minute recess is called…before the testimony even begins…to fix the damned microphones. Talk about a “fiasco.” Un. Freaking. Believable.

1:17pm Eastern. Well, terrific. Gen. Petraues is supposed to be speaking, but the microphones aren’t working. Meanwhile, there’s a heckler loose in the hearing room. The world is watching the clown Democrats.

GOP Rep. Dan Burton tells Rep. Skelton to remove the hecklers. Apparently, according to mumbling, there are at least 10 protesters with signs.

1:10pm Eastern. GOP Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen also pounds the Dems for the MoveOn smear. The silence of the Dems is deafening.

Speaking in defense of Gen. Petraeus: Retired Colonel Joe Repya.

12:57pm Eastern. A grown-up speaks…GOP Rep Duncan Hunter references the attacks on Petraeus’s character. Duty, honor, country. Those are the principles by which are officers derive their careers and based their careers on…Frankly, Mr. Chairman, the idea that we have spent the week prepping the battlefield attacking the messenger, goes against the honor of this House.

Hunter excoriates the MoveOn disgrace and counterattacks Tom “Fiasco” Lantos. DH: “I think it’s an outrage…bashing the credibility of a general officer whose trademark is integrity, who was unanimously supported in the Senate, and also, Mr. Crocker, who brings an outstanding, unblemished record in the State Dept. to this position.” Hunter counterattacks Lantos on the signficiance of the Anbar awakening.

12:45pm Eastern. You know, there are no shortage of problems with the Maliki government, but I’m getting a little sick of the meme, repeated several times just now by Democrat Rep. Ike Skelton, that the Iraqis aren’t doing anything to help themselves. It’s bull. Read Bill Ardolino’s latest dispatches from Fallujah. See also our Baghdad video report, “Iraqis speak to America.”

***

The hearing begins at 12:30pm. Live audiocast here.

Forget MoveOn. Michael Yon says listen to battalion commanders.

Michael Totten reports on Ramadi.

Worth a re-read: Bryan Preston’s post, “Assessing Iraq,” published after we returned from our embed in January.

The far Left is spitting mad at the Dems:

Rabbi Michael Lerner, the editor of Tikkun magazine, posted the transcript Friday on the website of the Network of Spiritual Progressives, of which he is a co-chair.

The transcript shows that opponents of the war in Iraq plan to try to convince freshman Democrats from conservative districts that they might not get reelected unless the party produces something serious in the way of resistance to the war.

But the call shows the war opponents are having little success because of fears about the impact on next year’s elections if the party is seen as defeatist.

I’ll have more thoughts/liveblogging as the hearing commences. Let’s hear yours.

Posted in: Iraq

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Old War Dogs
  2. I’m A Pundit Too » Blog Archive » Why Don't We Shoot Traitors?!
  3. Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » “MoveOn.org Calls Petraeus a Traitor”
  4. LOTUS blog » Blog Archive » “This is my testimony…I wrote this testimony myself.”
  5. Wake up America-Live Blogging Petraeus
  6. The Nose On Your Face » Blog Archive » Democrats Mixed In Assessment Of Petraeus Talk
  7. Wizbang
  8. Petraeus speech/statement to Congress: Updated at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.
  9. Wonkette
  10. Pirate’s Cove » >>Americans Never Quit » More On Patraeus
  11. The Secret of Happiness « A Right Ringtail
  12. Before the 11th « Diplomatic Proposal
  13. Moveon.org: no surprise there | Musing
  14. Neocon News » Petraeus Testimony: House Edition
  15. Back Home Again
  16. Michelle Malkin » Vandalism. Desecration. Cowardice. Coddling. Enough is enough.
  17. Pro General Petraeus, Anti Betray Us Editorial Cartoons « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  18. The Fighting GOP
  19. 4fc2141305375f3275be
  20. Michelle Malkin » Petraeus on the Hill; Dems can’t control Code Pinkos

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:05 pm, ajmontana said:

    Is it going to be on c-span?

  2. #2
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:11 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    But the call shows the war opponents are having little success because of fears about the impact on next year’s elections if the party is seen as defeatist.

    Translation: The advocates of isolationist/defeatism are in a pickle because they can’t figure out a way to represent the situation unfairly and get away with it.

  3. #3
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:14 pm, katieanne said:

    But the call shows the war opponents are having little success because of fears about the impact on next year’s elections if the party is seen as defeatist.

    I like that…”seen as defeatist”. What a hoot that is. Democrats are defeatist and have been since the beginning. You’re right Mr. Conservative Cat, they are having trouble spinning fact into fantasy.

  4. #4
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:34 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    What was that idiot shouting?

  5. #5
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:35 pm, ajmontana said:

    I didnt catch it pb. :(

  6. #6
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:35 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj … it’s on CSPAM3

  7. #7
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:40 pm, ajmontana said:

    Thanks, It’s on all over the place. :)

  8. #8
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:41 pm, Brian72 said:

    Maha Rushie just tore the Democrats a new one!

    He asks:

    ” Who the hell made Diane Feinstein a military expert to be held above Generals who have served our country for decades?!?”

    That is a good question. He asked the same about “Slow Joe” Biden also.

    Why should anyone listen to what these hacks have to say about this war? They have been wrong at every turn, and they want defeat in “Bush’s War”, so they can win in ‘08. Well, I’ve got news for you libs, it’s AMERICA that is fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, not the Republican Party!!

    Are you on board with AMERICA or not?

    I hearby challenge their patriotism.

  9. #9
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:42 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I really hope this isn’t just going to be a day of liberal grandstanding at the expense of actual testimony.

  10. #10
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:43 pm, ajmontana said:

    Geez, let the General speak for crying out loud!

  11. #11
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:44 pm, ajmontana said:

    Grab the hook!

  12. #12
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:45 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    This is already a circus.

    I agree, get the hook.

  13. #13
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:46 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Lantos sounds like “The Count”.

    Vun, vun peanut butter and jelly sandwiches!

  14. #14
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:47 pm, ajmontana said:

    ARGHHHHHHH!!!

  15. #15
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:48 pm, DesertLover said:

    well … now we have no doubt what the Dems talking points are that were distributed by Soros for the day … did this Missouri Dip S… miss a single thing over the past 6 years and all the years of the ignored UN sanctions …

    20 minutes of pure BS …

  16. #16
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:48 pm, ajmontana said:

    OMG.

  17. #17
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:48 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Enough of the boilerplate Lib doom and gloom, defeatist talking points!

  18. #18
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:50 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Did he just flat out said they refuse to listen to the facts if they don’t support the Dem position?

    YGBSM!

  19. #19
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:50 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    er, flat out -say-

  20. #20
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:53 pm, ajmontana said:

    Is it to early to say this guy is full of “bullcrap”???

  21. #21
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:53 pm, Brian72 said:

    This is from Hugh Hewitt:

    I KNOW, I KNOW. The modern liberal establishment just can’t understand anything that isn’t done purely for political gain. They can’t even imagine a man in David Petraeus’ position being anything other than a lackey for the Bush White House, eagerly aiding the quest to bolster Halliburton’s stock price by any means necessary. A person who cares about something other than partisan politics, anything other than partisan politics, is a creature beyond their comprehension.

    This is the price of Markos Moulitsas’ politics of winnerism. Markos understands the limits of publicly practicing this kind of politics, having learned a hard lesson in this regard when he made his infamous “Screw Them” comment three years ago. But his duller fellow travelers have no idea how their countrymen will perceive them. The people at Moveon.Org don’t understand how noxious the suggestion is that Petraeus would willingly and eagerly sell out the 160,000 men and women who he leads. After all, if you’re a Daily Kos diarist or a MoveOn.org director, it’s all about politics. Everything is about politics, all the time.

    The Democratic Party, through its conspiracy with Moveon.Org to slander the man leading 160,000 American troops in harm’s way, has shown its true colors. Characteristically idiotic, they’ve chosen to do so at a time when the country is watching.

    Yes, we are watching and we will not forget this travesty.

    As for the Democrats, screw them. I feel nothing for them, they are a bunch of political mercenaries, and they deserve what they get.

  22. #22
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:54 pm, DesertLover said:

    let’s see … I don’t remember casting a vote in the Iraq elections … so where does this A..H… get off saying that WE put the wrong people in charge of the government …

    Did I miss something? …

    More damned polls that we are supposed to yield to as fact … GRRRRRR …

  23. #23
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:54 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Wow, this is really sickening.

  24. #24
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:55 pm, ajmontana said:

    why are they spewing this now? again let the Gen. speak. holy crikey.

  25. #25
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:56 pm, Brian72 said:

    Duncan Hunter is up! time for some reality.

  26. #26
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:56 pm, DesertLover said:

    My admiration for Petraeus is rising with each of the camera shots of him sitting there … What a poker face … and I have no doubt that inside he is seething … but you would never know it from looking …

    Someone shove a rifle in these numbnuts senators hands and drop them off in the desert …

  27. #27
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Longest 5 minutes of my life. sheesh.

  28. #28
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:57 pm, Brian72 said:

    Honor, duty, country.
    Damn straight.

  29. #29
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:58 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Hunter just opened up a can of whoop-a**

  30. #30
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:59 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Mr. Lantos is right out of Bramstroker!!!!!!!!!

    Question: If the Clinton administration didn’t cut the military so much, would we still be in a hurt locker?

  31. #31
    On September 10th, 2007 at 12:59 pm, DesertLover said:

    Go get ‘em Duncan Hunter … but anyone want to take bets on which of these “speeches” will be broadcast all over the MSM tonight …

  32. #32
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    wont be Hunters thats for sure. good call dl.

  33. #33
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:04 pm, trinitytim said:

    Somebody demand that the dems condemn the NYT Moveon ad.

  34. #34
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:07 pm, DesertLover said:

    I am offended by the comment about Petraeus being 3 years too late … BS … that line of thinking would mean the south would have won the Civil War and we would have lost WWII … Lincoln and Roosevelt went through a lot of generals in charge before they settled on MacArthur, Eisenhower, and Grant …

    Such assininity is hard to take …

  35. #35
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:09 pm, Brian72 said:

    I wish Gen. Petraeus were accompanied by R.Lee Ermey, so he could order the libs to “drop and give me 25, maggots!! I have not dismissed you yet, turds!”

  36. #36
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:10 pm, trinitytim said:

    Yea!!!!!!!!!!

  37. #37
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:11 pm, Dersu said:

    I think this lady Ros-Lehtinen from FL
    Just made my day.

    Hats off to FL for sending her to Congress.

  38. #38
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:14 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    I wonder if osama is going to wear his move-on.org hat in his next video? Mr. Lantos is way out of line for telling one of our best generals “I don’t buy it”

  39. #39
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:15 pm, ajmontana said:

    Rock $ Ros!

  40. #40
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, ajmontana said:

    unreal, audio probs. give me a break.

  41. #41
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, Brian72 said:

    typical big government. nobody checked the microphones!

  42. #42
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    You’d think that for something this important, an A/V check would have been done.

  43. #43
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:18 pm, Dersu said:

    Now we know who was in charge of the mics
    at the el’debates on Sunday.
    Same people in charge od Congress

  44. #44
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:19 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Martha McCallum is giving credibility to the MoveOn ad.

    Brilliant.

  45. #45
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:19 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol pb, no brainer. some moron now having donuts is scrambling.

  46. #46
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:19 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    They broke the General mike on purpose!!! another freaken disturbance!!!!

  47. #47
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:22 pm, trinitytim said:

    Is that “Ike” Skelton or “Red” Skelton?

    Kinda looks like the later to me.

  48. #48
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:23 pm, DesertLover said:

    ok … if they “knew” these people were going to be disruptive … why did they let them and their “signs” in to begin with … DUH????

  49. #49
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:24 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Letme guess, the audio guy’s name is Hugo Chavez!!!!!!!!!!

  50. #50
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:25 pm, Jammer said:

    Broken microphone = Democrat dirty tricks, pure and diabolically simple.

  51. #51
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:25 pm, Brian72 said:

    Did you see that loser they threw out? How did he get in there in the first place? Oh, nevermind. He’s a lib, he must be heard.

  52. #52
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:28 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:23 pm, DesertLover said:
    ok … if they “knew” these people were going to be disruptive … why did they let them and their “signs” in to begin with … DUH????

    Because much like some congressional Dems stated earlier, they want the little people to do the nutjob, disrespectful antics that they want to do themselves (but are too spineless to do).

    Any bets on what political affiliation the removed nutjobs have?

  53. #53
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:29 pm, Brian72 said:

    Finally, here we go with the real deal Holyfield.

  54. #54
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:29 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    It is outrageous for Senator Lantos to call Gen. Petraues a liar!!!!! Out freaken outrageous!!!!!

  55. #55
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:34 pm, katieanne said:

    I wonder just how much of the American public is going to be aware of what is going on here. What would the majority of Americans think of a General being treated in this manner? IMO, they would be appalled and totally disgusted with the Democrats. This makes me ill.

  56. #56
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:36 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    #55, I bet the majority of liberal, military-hating Dems (and residents of San Francisco) are cheering the fact that Gen Petraeus is being disrespected.

  57. #57
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:40 pm, Laree said:

    Boy when you think about what he is reporting, there are some American and Iraqi troops, really busting their humps.

  58. #58
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:41 pm, ajmontana said:

    PB they arent even listening their minds are rotted out and already been made up.

  59. #59
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:44 pm, trinitytim said:

    Iran needs to feel some significant pain NOW

  60. #60
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:45 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    aj, you’re right…they will not listen.

  61. #61
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:46 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    They need to ban everyone except the press and official parties from these proceedings. These interruptions are unacceptable.

  62. #62
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:47 pm, DesertLover said:

    PB … they won’t have to listen because the MSM will never present it to them in the first place …

  63. #63
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:48 pm, ajmontana said:

    A syringe full of happy juice would work on the idiots.

  64. #64
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:48 pm, purplepeep said:

    To watch the Fox News online video feed of the testimony, try the link below. Whn clicked on Windows Media Player should pop up and play the the 282Kbps video stream. Or copy and paste URL text beneath the link into the Meida Player “open URL” option.

    Video Stream

    http://foxnews-foxstream.wm.llnwd.net/foxnews_foxstream

  65. #65
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol, or one of the Bears magic milkshakes.:)

  66. #66
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:52 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:47 pm, DesertLover said:
    PB … they won’t have to listen because the MSM will never present it to them in the first place …

    That is what saddens, angers and frustrates me. If American citizens, by large, can’t be bothered to pay attention to and make informed decisions regarding the events which dictate the future success or failure of our country, we are in deep trouble.

  67. #67
    On September 10th, 2007 at 1:56 pm, purplepeep said:

    Link to slides used by the General in pdf format, from politico.com -

    PDF slides

  68. #68
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:00 pm, purplepeep said:

    Another PDF of testimony -
    Testimony

  69. #69
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:02 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Why can’t the public be banned from these proceedings?!

  70. #70
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:02 pm, bear1909 said:

    aj- some “hair of the bear” would leave their innnards in severe disrepair.

    8)

    gotta be in shape inside to survive a ride on the Magic Bear lol

    not for anybody who is, let’s say, full of it :)

    God Bless America! Censure these Congressional Idiots…especially Diane “Pork” Feinstein.

  71. #71
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:05 pm, purplepeep said:

    PBoilermaker said:
    Why can’t the public be banned from these proceedings?!

    Yup, especially since it’s not an “interactive” thing.

  72. #72
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, DesertLover said:

    pb … I suspect that many are not more informed because they grew up with only the alphabet networks and newspapers as their “news” source … they have not ever felt they had reason to doubt and re-examine that “trust” in what they hear from those sources … as a result they do not explore and seek the “rest of the story” to get full answers as many of us here do …

  73. #73
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, Brian72 said:

    Those idiots were not the public. they were Code Pink morons. How the hell do you let into an official proceeding these moronic idiots wearing pink Burger King looking crowns on their heads? At least Ike said from now on disruptors would be prosecuted. Why he didn’t say that at the top of the hearing is beyond me, other than Democrats wanted those pathetic pukes to disrupt the hearing, and then have plausible deniability when they are removed. These are the people the Democrats are conference calling with almost everyday. Disgraceful.

  74. #74
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, ajmontana said:

    In the old days the good humor boys would have picked up those code stinkers and fast tracked em to bellvue in straight jackets..

  75. #75
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:09 pm, Brian72 said:

    Tony Snow is on Rush right now, and he was laughing at the Code Pink idiots. they are a pathetic joke, and the only people who take them seriously are themselves.

  76. #76
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:11 pm, DesertLover said:

    Brian72

    Didn’t you get the memo? … Code Pink elected the Dems and now “own them” and can kick them out if they don’t tow the line they want …

  77. #77
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:13 pm, ajmontana said:

    Tow this. :)

  78. #78
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:16 pm, calamityville said:

    I nominate Tom Lantos for crapweasel membership.

  79. #79
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:17 pm, DesertLover said:

    what’s that you’re towing aj? … peeps bag of pesos? … lol

  80. #80
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:18 pm, DesertLover said:

    The Dems look bored … surprise … and Lantos looks like he’s going to fall off his chair asleep …

  81. #81
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:19 pm, Brian72 said:

    Looks like the only people “kicked out” are the morons with stupid cardboard pink hats. What a bunch of a$$hat ninnies.

    I can’t get over how stupid they are. People around the world are seeing these whining nags, and thinking “that’s America”. Makes me very angry. GRRRRRRRRR!!

  82. #82
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:20 pm, John Ansell said:

    Code Fink is a joke.

  83. #83
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:20 pm, DesertLover said:

    calamityville

    Lantos crapweasel application was rejected … too much crap and not enough weasel …

  84. #84
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:22 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well thank God the didn’t show their saggy wears this time. ew.

  85. #85
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:22 pm, purplepeep said:

    The usual psycho suspects emerge:

    “Cindy Sheehan arrested at Petraeus hearing
    By Klaus Marre
    September 10, 2007
    Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan was arrested Monday in or near the hearing room where General David Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker are testifying on the situation in Iraq, according to the U.S. Capitol Police.

    Four anti-war protesters were arrested for disorderly conduct. One of them, who was not named, is being taken to George Washington Hospital “due to complaint of injury” is also charged with assault on a police officer.

    According to the information from the Capitol Police, Sheehan and the other three were shouting in a hallway.”
    (thehill.com)

  86. #86
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:23 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    People around the world are seeing these whining nags, and thinking “that’s America”. Makes me very angry. GRRRRRRRRR!!

    The Dems know this…they are chuckling inside. No low is too low if it means making Bush look bad, even if it means allowing Pinkos into these proceedings.

    This isn’t an Anne Coulter speech or a college commencement…this is a congressional hearing about the way ahead for our nation!

    IMI, ban these idiots from further proceedings. They are not difficult to identify, we just need to engage in some textile profiling.

  87. #87
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:24 pm, USMCgramma said:

    Good for Rush! He just said “If you aren’t a military family, you have no business being war-weary.” Today I swear 75% of U.S. citizens (and 100% of the Democrats) don’t know and don’t care what is at stake. Most of their lives are not interrupted or inconvenienced on a daily basis. I want a Republican presidential hopeful who will promise to get us out of the U.N. One nation - one vote - wake up!

  88. #88
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:25 pm, michael griggs said:

    Code Pink was a clown show,3 stooges,and fools.They just dont get it when they holler no one can understand what they say.Ive got almost 30 years in and 3 wars,the general is one of our finest soldiers ever.

  89. #89
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, ajmontana said:

    It sounded like they were shouting “Where’s my Meds” to me.

  90. #90
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, trinitytim said:

    michael #88…

    I had 3 years in and 25 in law enforecement and I agree the General is a great man and a great leader.

    Code Pink should be banned from all congressional hearings.

  91. #91
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:32 pm, Brian72 said:

    Rush is now replaying the soundbites from the Code Pink spectacle of stupidity. I did not realise that Cindy, the peacemom herself was present. I hope she goes to jail, and that stupid fool Medea Benjamin goes with her. They have no respect for our country acting like this. Cindy has taken a giant poop on the memory of her son, who died a U.S. Marine trying to save lives, and kill the enemy. What would Casey have to say about the disgraceful cartoonish joke his mother has created of herself, all the while cynically trashing what Casey chose to risk his life to protect?

    Not to mention that these unhappy hags descended on Walter Reed Army Hospital to use our wounded warriors as props for the same anti-American crap they pulled in that hearing just now. That should be a crime. They disgust me, each and every one.

    I should kick back and read some of your comments, my blood pressure is rising by the second, and I don’t want to get banned:)

  92. #92
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:34 pm, DesertLover said:

    with these idiots being continually allowed into the halls of congress to fill the gallery at these hearings and such the question is never whether they will cause a disruption the question is when

  93. #93
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:34 pm, jah said:

    Code Pink was a clown show,3 stooges,and fools

    Michael,

    No at least the 3 Stooges had some socially redeeming value in that they were actually funny and harmless, these people are just pathetic. Please don’t insult the 3 Stooges by comparing them to these people.

  94. #94
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:35 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    I should kick back and read some of your comments, my blood pressure is rising by the second, and I don’t want to get banned:)

    You and me both.

  95. #95
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:37 pm, Brian72 said:

    Come to think of it, a boilermaker doesn’t sound too bad right about now:)

  96. #96
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:37 pm, Jaded said:

    These people are for whom the drug companies make their products:-)

    Thank you General for being smart, intelligent and well spoken because you make the idiots look even more stupid, if that is possible.

  97. #97
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:38 pm, DesertLover said:

    Skelton has his facts wrong .. saying the surge was passed and started in Fevruary … that is total BS … we only got the troops fully in place in June or July … and I do recall the damned DEMS holding up the funding for everything military for several months to pay for things … hope someone calls him on that false timeline …

  98. #98
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:39 pm, DesertLover said:

    Ike Skelton … obviously named after the nickname of a great general … also obviously not related to comedian Red Skelton … who was an unabashed and patriotic American …

  99. #99
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:39 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    That’s P(urdue)Boilermaker.

    Whatever floats your boat, though :)

  100. #100
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:40 pm, Brian72 said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:38 pm, DesertLover said:

    and I do recall the damned DEMS holding up the funding for everything military for several months to pay for things

    That’s right. What was it, 185 days to pass the Defense appropriation bill?

    Support the troops, my a$$.

    There I go again:)

  101. #101
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:42 pm, coaster said:

    Did you see the code pink guy with the little pink headpiece that looked like small bunny ears. I was looking for his tutu. Lantos looks like he sleeps in a coffin.

  102. #102
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:42 pm, DesertLover said:

    hey Lantos … now that you are awake again … Juxtapose This …

  103. #103
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:44 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Lantos’ argument is based off anecdotal MSM assessments of the war which he can’t even verify?

    Strong.effing.position.Dracula.

  104. #104
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:44 pm, Brian72 said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:39 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    That’s P(urdue)Boilermaker.

    Whatever floats your boat, though :)

    Heh. I do need a drink, but I’m on anti-biotics, and it’s lunch time, so it’s a no-no. Like Drew Brees and Rod Woodson, so that’s something we have in common:)

  105. #105
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:45 pm, trinitytim said:

    Lantos is a loon. Dems had nothing to do with N. Korea or Lybia

  106. #106
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:46 pm, DesertLover said:

    Brian72 abd PB … gee … no mention of Bob Griese? … lol

  107. #107
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:48 pm, DesertLover said:

    trinitytim … you are spot on there … I believe Lybia decided the choices of coming to their senses or getting and up close and personal view of what we gave Afghanistan and Iraq he chose caving in … and has not been heard from much since …

    As for NK … give me a break … refusing to cave in to NK and the Dems is what has made progress there … not more Clintonia coddling

  108. #108
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:48 pm, ajmontana said:

    Their going to have to put a stick down the back of lantos suit to keep him propped up soon.

  109. #109
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:49 pm, gayle said:

    Sorry, but my nerves cannot take this today. No Live Coverage for me.

    Trying to keep calm ’cause it’s only Monday and tomorrow is 9/11….another day of stress.

  110. #110
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:49 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:46 pm, DesertLover said:
    Brian72 abd PB … gee … no mention of Bob Griese? … lol

    or Dawson, Phipps, Keyes, Armstrong, Alstott, etc. :)

  111. #111
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Trying to keep calm ’cause it’s only Monday and tomorrow is 9/11….another day of stress.

    Relaaaaaaxxxxxx…everything will be fine.

  112. #112
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, Brian72 said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:42 pm, coaster said:

    Did you see the code pink guy with the little pink headpiece that looked like small bunny ears. I was looking for his tutu. Lantos looks like he sleeps in a coffin.

    That is what I was saying, how do you let an idiot with a stupid 2nd grade cardboard hat into the gallery to begin with? Rush said probably Democrat staffers greased their way in, so they could get thrown out “speaking truth to power” on C-SPAN. Sounds about right.

    I remember a wife of a Republican House member being asked to leave a State of the Union address before it started because of a red, white and blue support the troops t-shirt she had on under her jacket.

    The Dem staffers probably got them in, to embarrass the General and the Ambassador. How else do you get in with elementary school pink “peace” crap all over you?

  113. #113
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, michael griggs said:

    Sorry,must apoligize to the 3 Stooges,meant to say they acted like stooges,Larry,Curley and Moe were an early influence on part of my childhood.

  114. #114
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:53 pm, DesertLover said:

    michael griggs

    at least Larry, Curly and Moe didn’t take themselves seriously … unlike the Pinkos …

  115. #115
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, trinitytim said:

    I love the 3 stooges. Can’t stand Code Pink or stinking dems.

  116. #116
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, purplepeep said:

    michael griggs said:
    Sorry,must apoligize to the 3 Stooges,meant to say they acted like stooges,Larry,Curley and Moe were an early influence on part of my childhood.

    Oh - a wise guy, eh? Nyuk, nyuk, nyuck…

  117. #117
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Why dont these dopes just ask one simple question “General, What would you recommend?” and let him speak his mind.

  118. #118
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:57 pm, Boomer said:

    One good thing about being home sick I have been able to watch this farce run by the Democrats. I believe Chairman Lantos is an idiot. Especially after his remarks to General Petraeus about responsible media and retired Military Officer’s spouting we should speed up the withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. So far the only responsible media I have seen has come from the blogesphere (i.e. this site, Michael Yon, Mudville Gazette. Black Five and others that are fairly well plugged in to personnel in the AOR). The retired Military Officer’s are all Clinton era picks and couldn’t lead a group of men to a whore house with $50,000 in their pockets. The Democrats are really showing how low and vile they are along with the Romper Room antics of Code Pinko. Too bad more American’s aren’t paying attention today or get their news from the Liberal MSM. The truth really needs to get out to the electorate so we can clean house in 2008.

  119. #119
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:58 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:56 pm, ajmontana said:
    Why dont these dopes just ask one simple question “General, What would you recommend?” and let him speak his mind.

    Their goal is to obfuscate and disrupt, that’s why.

  120. #120
    On September 10th, 2007 at 2:58 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    This is but the Gathering Storm by Winston Churchill. These left wing anarchists, isolationists, and peaceniks have been around a long time. The big problem is they are now in control of the Democrat Party, the organization that loves socialism/communism and hates religion and anything that smacks of right and wrong. Look at what virtually every Democrat represents and then ask yourself if any country can survive their nihilistic philosophy.

  121. #121
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:03 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Save the videotape. Re-run it as ads during election season to remind the public what a Democratic Congress looks like. I guess a 13% approval rating is too high for Reid and Pelosi…

  122. #122
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:03 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj … reposting part of my comment from another thread …

    D enial
    E vasion
    M isinformation
    O bfuscation
    C onfusion
    R ejection
    A rrogance
    T ruculence
    S tupidity

    Need I say more?

  123. #123
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:04 pm, ajmontana said:

    That about covers it ty.

  124. #124
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Can we card candidates please? I’d prefer an “adults only” policy for politicians.

    BTW, the audio problems were from all the radio waves bouncing off their hats…

  125. #125
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:06 pm, ajmontana said:

    obects because boo hoo we wernt part of it. thats not the point! somebody slap that guy.

  126. #126
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:09 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj … noticed the objection to the lady’s request again to her colleagues to speak out against the Moveon.org ad was not credited to a formally acknowledged objector by the committee chairman …

  127. #127
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:09 pm, davidleerothmann said:

    The more juvenile antics on the Hill, the brighter the future of our Nation. Who will vote for the Party aligned with children to protect them from a nuclear-armed Iran and Al Qaeda? The more they debase themselves, the more obvious it becomes that all the grownups have an (R) after their name.

  128. #128
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:14 pm, ajmontana said:

    geez, when skeleton extended his neck he looked just like a turtle.

  129. #129
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:26 pm, DesertLover said:

    would be interesting to know who all those folks are that are gathering around the General to talk to him personally …

  130. #130
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:27 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Well, the Dems appear to have their marching orders and they are saying that GEN Petraeus is lying about his facts.

    Did we expect anything less?

  131. #131
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:28 pm, tarpon said:

    I wonder how the protesters get seats in the hearing room? You don’t think the Democrats may have invited them, do you. Naw, that would be to obvious, wouldn’t it.

  132. #132
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:33 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    a**holes describes the House Dems too.

  133. #133
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, DesertLover said:

    why aren’t they putting up anything to tell us the party affiliation of these reps now asking questions?

  134. #134
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, ajmontana said:

    Ouch my shoulder, lol!!! tell me thats not staged as soon as their touched. ROFL. :)

  135. #135
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, DesertLover said:

    looks like code pink got to reload during the “break”

  136. #136
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj … right out of the Jihadist Guide … immediately yell abusive treatment …

  137. #137
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, crashemt said:

    Why does Skelton look like a whipped puppy whenever he has to stop proceedings for his party’s spokespeople?

    They gave the nutjobs their voice by taking their money and letting them make ads for them.

    They should take their medicine, like good little traitors!

  138. #138
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:45 pm, ajmontana said:

    And she started crying whiplash! after the first slightest touch. hahahahah still laughing.

  139. #139
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:47 pm, Rational Thought said:

    Just saw another protester disrupt the proceedings. A nut job just like the others, incoherent, unaudible, hysterical. Let ‘em scream. Let ‘em be seen. This is the face of the Democrat party. I want EVERYONE to see these people and tie them very closely to the Dems. Believe me, the Dem congressmen that let them in are not going to be happy with the fallout. I mean, seriously, are you seeing anything here in these “protests” that is likely to whip up a ground swell of anything but contempt and disgust? I say bring ‘em all on. Let the American people look at the Code Pinkos and these windbag Dem congressmen and then look at Gen. Petraeus. They’ll figure out very quickly who the grown ups are.

  140. #140
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    the last ones ejected during the Generals interuption one of the pinkos was camera phone taping, so theres still a few left in the room. what a bunch of losers!

  141. #141
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I don’t know if someone posted this above, but Cindy Sheehan was arrested at the hearing.

    It sounds like an absolute circus.

    This reminds me of growing up with my brother. When we were young, we shared a bedroom. Each summer, my mom would re-paint the room and we were supposed to take turns picking the color.

    Every time it was my turn we’d go to the hardware store and my brother would throw a temper tantrum on the floor of the paint aisle until he got to pick the color.

    This reminds me a lot of the Democratic party and their constituents - angry children incapable of controlling their emotions or acting in a rational manner.

    And they want to lead the country. It’d be anarchy.

  142. #142
    On September 10th, 2007 at 3:55 pm, DesertLover said:

    Rational Thought

    too bad the broadcast can’t superimpose a banner that says “Anti-American and Democratic Supporter” across the screen when these imbeciles get ejected …

  143. #143
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, taylork said:

    Ackerman sure is making some silly comparisons

  144. #144
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    “Anti-American and Democratic Supporter”

    Same thing, dl

  145. #145
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:03 pm, DesertLover said:

    ackerman is an ass … won’t even let the general speak … another reason I wiah they were letting us know the affiliations of each of these people …someone actually elected this fool? … geez … we need to make sure that every citizen in this country sees the stupidity of their elected officials in these types of things …

  146. #146
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, nbarry said:

    The MSM will celebrate the disruptors as sensitive flower children merely exercising their First Amendment rights. As usual, most spoonfeeders of the news are still living in the 1960’s.

  147. #147
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, Wade said:

    The fartsacks in DC in full display. How can we trust them with immigration, for Christs sake, they can not even control who is in a small room? They can not prepare for a meeting as important as war. Absolutely disgraceful exhibition.

  148. #148
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, ajmontana said:

    fox news dl is putting up the info.

  149. #149
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, taylork said:

    Q Burton: “Is Iraq part of the global war on terror?”

    It’s sad that we still have to answer this question. Here’s a question to the dems? Does Al Qaeda in Iraq exist? If so, do you think they’ll roll up and go home if we withdrawal?

  150. #150
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, taylork said:

    Why is it I’m only hearing about us capturing hezbollah in Iraq now?

  151. #151
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:18 pm, MichaelO said:

    If these people (Dems, Code Pink, Move On, etc.) retain control of Congress and gain the CinC, then it is time to consider partition.

    Not of Iraq; of the U.S. The partitioning between our incredibly brave and effective warfighters- along with those that support them- and those that never will support them and seem to detest their very existence. While not true in every case, these anti-military types have congregated on both coasts and in the Democrat Party.

    I propose, should these anti-military types take full control of the government in 2008, that the warfighters resign en masse and emigrate to a location that has a higher level of support for them. My recommendation would be to Texas, where there is not only a significantly higher proportion of supporters, but the state has both historical and legal frameworks for a full ‘partitioning’ if it is needed. If a full partitioning were in order, by what mechanism would the anti-militaries protest? The U.N.? Yah, riiight. Severing trade? Texas has oil, refineries, agriculture, manufacturing- including defense materials; good luck. A military solution? With what; the Kos Kids? What fun that would be.

    Oh, there would be a minor amount of need to encourage others to partition out of Texas; Austin, for example. But that could be easily accomplished by giving full scholarships to UT Austin to any and all warfighters, with the single condition that they wear full ‘battle rattle’ to class. Having a hundred or so new students in class with M16s who might disagree with extreme leftwing ideology would likely encourage all the partitioning needed there. You certainly would preclude any Virginia Tech type incidents.

    After we get the fence built- on ALL borders of Texas- the rest of the country could go on its merry way, not perturbed that wars can’t be run with a TV remote and treating the jihadists as a law enforcement issue. And after NewYork and D.C. have large glowing craters and they finally realize that your can’t negotiate with barbarians, possibly they’ll realize they might be mistaken. Then Texas can roll out it new and largest commercial enterprise; ass-kicking peacemaking- by warfighters’ rules- to contract.

    Sorry to get lengthy; it helps me to reign in my desire to go strangle anything wearing pink at the moment.

  152. #152
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:18 pm, DesertLover said:

    isn’t Rep Taylor the same individual they showed earlier (while the general was speaking) without a jacket on standing back in behind everyone? … must have had a rough night last night and is having trouble staying awake …

  153. #153
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, ajmontana said:

    well dl, code pink was in town .lol

  154. #154
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, michael griggs said:

    Just checked in to the Continueos Negative News,they ran a piece on the Moveon ad and said the Republicans were “pouting”.That ad was a setup to make the Dems that condemn it look good
    Think I’ll go and learn how to pout.

  155. #155
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj … think they were partying together last night?

  156. #156
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, taylork said:

    MichaelO…don’t leave me to be with these kooks all by myself!!! All I’d ever see is stupid bumper stickers and Ron Paul graffiti.

  157. #157
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    ew. but yes.

  158. #158
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, DesertLover said:

    I am tired of hearing from “retired” military generals and officers … they are “retired” … they do not have a clue what the current status is of any situation anywhere in the world … so shut the hell up and go back to your golf and leave the fighting to those still in the active services …

  159. #159
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, greysheepdog said:

    Petraeus/ Crocker vs. SenDems

    What a stark contrast between professionalism and idiocy. How this man can answer these questions with a straight face (multiple times) I don’t know. I think they should skip the questions and just start shining his shoes.

    BTW CodePink is doing a marvelous job for the Dems.

  160. #160
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, DesertLover said:

    Petraeus for President …

  161. #161
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, ajmontana said:

    wow a truthism!

  162. #162
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, ajmontana said:

    did I hear that right?

  163. #163
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:29 pm, taylork said:

    didn’t hear about the NYT smear. Thank Congressman Bartlett.

  164. #164
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:31 pm, taylork said:

    i wondered how long it would take before someone in Congress told us to look at our own effectiveness first. HA!

  165. #165
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:31 pm, DesertLover said:

    Jr member with more brains than Sr members … what a concept … just like a rookie in the pros … just need a chance to show what they can do …

  166. #166
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, DesertLover said:

    taylork

    look at “General Petraeus or General Betray Us” on main page if this site … full page in NYT …

  167. #167
    On September 10th, 2007 at 4:33 pm, ajmontana said:

    wish that guy in front would move his toupe.

  168. #168
    On