Comments on: Petraeus/Crocker, Part II Update: Marred by protesters again http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:55:00 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Have you no decency, sir? « Right Minded Online http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-552931 Have you no decency, sir? « Right Minded Online Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:10:19 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-552931 [...] Comments Democrats in the U.S. Congress treated General David Petraeus with utter contempt during his testimony yesterday, reducing the four-star general to a receptacle for their political frustrations. In [...] [...] Comments Democrats in the U.S. Congress treated General David Petraeus with utter contempt during his testimony yesterday, reducing the four-star general to a receptacle for their political frustrations. In [...]

]]> By: September, 2007 Archive « Right Minded Online http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-399702 September, 2007 Archive « Right Minded Online Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:45:33 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-399702 [...] sir? Democrats in the U.S. Congress treated General David Petraeus with utter contempt during his testimony yesterday, reducing the four-star general to a receptacle for their political frustrations. In [...] [...] sir? Democrats in the U.S. Congress treated General David Petraeus with utter contempt during his testimony yesterday, reducing the four-star general to a receptacle for their political frustrations. In [...]

]]> By: a829bcfcaa51bf9f3d45 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-142530 a829bcfcaa51bf9f3d45 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:06:14 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-142530 <strong>a829bcfcaa51bf9f3d45...</strong> a829bcfcaa51... a829bcfcaa51bf9f3d45…

a829bcfcaa51…

]]> By: 2007 car car new review http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-137793 2007 car car new review Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:02:45 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-137793 <strong>2007 car car new review...</strong> These may be the best speakers car for having a party, but they are terrible for listening to any but the most simplistic music.... 2007 car car new review…

These may be the best speakers car for having a party, but they are terrible for listening to any but the most simplistic music….

]]> By: Jessie http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-136865 Jessie Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:48:09 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-136865 <strong>Jessie...</strong> Its interesting that we think alike :)... Jessie…

Its interesting that we think alike :) …

]]> By: The Wide Awake Cafe » The Potted Plant Democrats http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-128363 The Wide Awake Cafe » The Potted Plant Democrats Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:15:37 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-128363 [...] by the likes of Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, and Barack Obama on General Petraeus (and the rage of the Code Pinkers) I couldn’t help but think of his wife and family. Dave married an Army [...] [...] by the likes of Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, and Barack Obama on General Petraeus (and the rage of the Code Pinkers) I couldn’t help but think of his wife and family. Dave married an Army [...]

]]> By: gunslingerpatriot http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127844 gunslingerpatriot Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:13:31 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127844 Osama-osis---Nope, I think its the "Stockholm Sydrome" and it was best displayed by madame pelosi when she did her dhimi pose overseas. Osama-osis—Nope, I think its the “Stockholm Sydrome” and it was best displayed by madame pelosi when she did her dhimi pose overseas.

]]> By: almeehan http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127720 almeehan Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:15:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127720 157 you are wrong. They couldn't answer in the affirmative until the threat was neutralized which only came after the fall of Berlin, death of Hitler and the last Abomb on Nagasaki with a quick surrender. There was a whole lot of troop commitment, deaths and sorrow long before that occurred. I also remember blackouts on the coast in the 40's--safer? Only a fool would ask such a question while the enemy was still there and determined to cut my throat and those of you and your family. 157 you are wrong. They couldn’t answer in the affirmative until the threat was neutralized which only came after the fall of Berlin, death of Hitler and the last Abomb on Nagasaki with a quick surrender. There was a whole lot of troop commitment, deaths and sorrow long before that occurred. I also remember blackouts on the coast in the 40’s–safer? Only a fool would ask such a question while the enemy was still there and determined to cut my throat and those of you and your family.

]]> By: SilverCat http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127701 SilverCat Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:59:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127701 If General Patraeus can not say the efforts and sacrifices of our troops are making America safer, then most of the war mongers are absolutely advocating something that is making America less safe. That's hard to accept when they've beating the war drums so long. I doubt Roosevelt or Eisenhower would have hesitated for a second to answer John Warner's important question in the affirmative. If General Patraeus can not say the efforts and sacrifices of our troops are making America safer, then most of the war mongers are absolutely advocating something that is making America less safe. That’s hard to accept when they’ve beating the war drums so long. I doubt Roosevelt or Eisenhower would have hesitated for a second to answer John Warner’s important question in the affirmative.

]]> By: feebiebabe http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127696 feebiebabe Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:32:51 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127696 #155 - That'll work. #155 – That’ll work.

]]> By: almeehan http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127694 almeehan Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:16:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127694 Can you imagine these Senators & Representatives, Dems or Republicans asking such questions as, "will your strategy make America safer?" or "when will you bring all the troops home?" to President Roosevelt or Gen Eisenhower, etc. during the Pacific or European theaters? Such pompus, audacious, ignorant, treasonous ---and I can't write what comes to mind as I don't want to get kicked off here. It boggles the mind that these nerds (spelled with a T) are in positions of leadership. They don't care a whit about making us safer from the worldwide jihad threat. These sorry butts need to be removed...they are the threat our forefathers saw when they wrote our constitution. And if they tamper with the ballot box--which they have and are still doing with a passion--we were given other amendments to the constitution to really make America safe! Can you imagine these Senators & Representatives, Dems or Republicans asking such questions as, “will your strategy make America safer?” or “when will you bring all the troops home?” to President Roosevelt or Gen Eisenhower, etc. during the Pacific or European theaters? Such pompus, audacious, ignorant, treasonous —and I can’t write what comes to mind as I don’t want to get kicked off here. It boggles the mind that these nerds (spelled with a T) are in positions of leadership. They don’t care a whit about making us safer from the worldwide jihad threat. These sorry butts need to be removed…they are the threat our forefathers saw when they wrote our constitution. And if they tamper with the ballot box–which they have and are still doing with a passion–we were given other amendments to the constitution to really make America safe!

]]> By: ajmontana http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127688 ajmontana Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:48:59 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127688 I can already hear the responses in my head from the left/loons/Dems. I can already hear the responses in my head from the left/loons/Dems.

]]> By: feebiebabe http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127680 feebiebabe Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:28:23 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127680 Everytime I watch Kennedy I cannot focus on anything else but how much the man loves to here himself talk. Was there even a question in there for anyone?....and then he ran out of time and kept going. Everyone is too poilite to step on him.... #107 - Chortle! You funny. Everytime I watch Kennedy I cannot focus on anything else but how much the man loves to here himself talk.

Was there even a question in there for anyone?….and then he ran out of time and kept going. Everyone is too poilite to step on him….

#107 – Chortle! You funny.

]]> By: PBoilermaker http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127676 PBoilermaker Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:12:48 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127676 Glacier is making light of the fact that UBL has not been captured or taken care of. Aside from the inherent hypocrisy in that, she has no clue how easily one can be hidden in the tribal areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Yes, even in this day and age, there are plenty of places where Osama can safely hide and plenty of people who will ensure his secret is safe. Glacier is making light of the fact that UBL has not been captured or taken care of. Aside from the inherent hypocrisy in that, she has no clue how easily one can be hidden in the tribal areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Yes, even in this day and age, there are plenty of places where Osama can safely hide and plenty of people who will ensure his secret is safe.

]]> By: AlohaGuy http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/comment-page-2/#comment-127670 AlohaGuy Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:36:37 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/11/petraeuscrocker-part-ii/#comment-127670 He ran out on Mary Jo. He wants to run out on Iraq. Ted, your legacy awaits. He ran out on Mary Jo.
He wants to run out on Iraq.
Ted, your legacy awaits.

]]>