See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Old War Dogs
2. Infidels Are Cool » Blog Archive » Michelle Malkin interviews Laura Ingraham
3. c1a5e01cf54768a8f7cf

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On September 11th, 2007 at 4:06 pm, zorro said:

   Most refreshing, interviews that make sense. Thanks Michelle.

2. #2
   On September 11th, 2007 at 5:06 pm, kougar said:

   How about a Malkin/Ingraham run at ‘08!!??

3. #3
   On September 11th, 2007 at 5:13 pm, Schweggie said:

   I haven’t found the medical name on WebMd for what I have yet and I’m sure it afflicts many readers here. When there is more awesomeness on MM.com and Hot Air than can be viewed at work, it results in acute frazzlement and discombobulation.

   Does anyone know the name of this condition and if there is a known cure? Thanks.

4. #4
   On September 11th, 2007 at 6:31 pm, walterc said:

   Does anyone know the name of this condition and if there is a known cure?

   It’s called too far down the ladder syndrome and the cure is to quit, have yourself declared mentally disabled and become one of John Edwards “other Americans” i.e. poor and live off the government. Then you’ll have all day to read Michelle (and other blogs). Maybe even write your own.

   Of coures if too many of us start doing this, they’ll legislate that only “New Americans” are eligible. Then we’ll have to move to mexico and sneak back in to get the benefit of our tax dollars.

5. #5
   On September 11th, 2007 at 8:23 pm, Laree said:

   All,

   This is an update on the New Jersey Corruption Arrest two have now resigned.

   New Jersey is going to run out of Legislatures at this rate according to this article. Could the Republicans win New Jersey, the next Election?

   http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/09/11/ap4104885.html

6. #6
   On September 11th, 2007 at 10:41 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

   Michelle,

   It’s fascinating how few reponses there have been to this thread. My analysis, for what it’s worth? The people here have chosen their voice, and it’s you.

   Laree,

   NJ is my home state. As active as it can be on the east, relaxing in the west, funny in the North and sunny-seaside in the south, this all surprises me not one bit. I can only hope for all my friends there that this marks a watershed event back to a majority of right-leaning Republican Legislatures.

7. #7
   On September 12th, 2007 at 12:22 am, palani said:

   In line with great conservative thinkers, did anyone read yesterday’s Los Angeles Times piece by Denise Gellene? Check it out at: Study finds left-wing brain, right-wing brain.

   From the article:
   

   Exploring the neurobiology of politics, scientists have found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because of how their brains work.

   Amazingly biased and silly conclusions based on a simple experiment conducted by a (drunken?) professor upon (drunken?) UCLA students.

8. #8
   On September 12th, 2007 at 1:10 am, DesertLover said:

   Looking forward to more from Inhofe later on … he sure nailed the money facts regarding the Dems … Laura is great as always with straight forward and well reasoned points … keep up the great work Michelle …

9. #9
   On September 12th, 2007 at 1:12 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

   This story deserves its own thread here.

   The problem isn’t that the test was biased, but that the reporting appears to be biased, favoring one side of analysis over the other, and there is a hint of the other.

   However, remarks like this

   Based on the results, he said, liberals could be expected to more readily accept new social, scientific or religious ideas.

   Could and perhaps should just as easily read like this:

   “Liberals could be expected to more readily embrace illogical inconsistancies and hypocracies than the more strictly intellectually disciplined conservative mind”.

   Instead we get descriptions like “ridgid” and “inflexible” to describe conservatives instead of “logical” and “disciplined” and “open-minded” to describe liberals nstead of “sloppy” and “illogical”, which is the other and perhaps more accurate way to describe what the tests themselves strongly suggest.

   The meanstream media really is America’s biggest enemy.

10. #10
    On September 12th, 2007 at 7:25 am, BobUSMC said:

    I saw the interview with Laura Ingraham and she makes great points about the need for some effective “marketing”, and the lack thereof by Bush. But, I want to go much further after some of latest dispicable acts on the part of the leftist’s such as the “General BetrayUs” ad, and the defacing of the Vietnam Memorial over the weekend that are NOT getting denounced by nearly enough Democrats, and not aggressively enough on the part of Bush, in fact, not at all as far as I know.

    After reading the “General BetrayUs” ad in the NYTimes, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, and I want to know why Bush isn’t more forceful in dealing with blatantly subversive, seditious, and yes, treasonous acts by the left. They are blatantly complicit in helping embolden our enemies to kill more of our troops that the left claims to support, but of course they’ll never see it that way. The gumption of the leftist’s is remarkable I must say. How dare they, of all people, talk of betrayal? Someone reminded me of the old psychological offensive communist trick of accusing your enemy of what you yourself are doing. I also love the discount rate the NYTimes gave MoveOn. How special.

    Bush, and all Republicans and conservative leaders, should be calling out all of the dems, and especially their presidential candidates, very, very aggressively on the fact that they are in bed with treasonous, underhanded, vile, anti-American saboteurs like the MoveOn’s and Kos nuthouses. They way I see it, they aren’t denouncing them so they must agree with the MoveOn.org position.

    The Republicans must take advantage of the fact that there are many, many, many Americans who do not like that kind of disrespect and outright lie being told about a man of honor, and one who knows the sitrep much, much better than MoveOn will ever know, as he’s actually there in Iraq to see for himself. The leftist’s, on the other other hand, like Brian DiPalma, never will be. The vast majority of Americans will also be against the vandalizing of the Wall, if the story ever gets out. The light must be put brightly and squarely on the leftist’s for these sickening actions, PERIOD.

    It now falls upon conservative leadership to go on a major offensive in what has now become IMHO a non-shooting civil war against liberalism’s insanity. Up to now, only one side has been fighting, and that’s the left, and in a rabid manner. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. FIGHT BACK NOW!

    See ya at the Wall on Saturday for the Gathering Of Eagles.