<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Bush&#8217;s speech on Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:32:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bhishma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129784</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhishma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129784</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 13th, 2007 at 9:22 pm, Leatherneck said:

What really shapes Bush? Poor judgement would top the list, followed by cronyism that ensures he’ll never get any good counsel either, religious zealotry that puts Israel over the U.S., and probably his relationship with his father.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

-Timidity.
- Corruption.
- Persuit of wealth.
- Persuit of power.
.. shape Bush.
His record speaks for himself.

For more read &#039;Letters to Leaders&#039; at: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/?id=20004&amp;lvl=F</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 13th, 2007 at 9:22 pm, Leatherneck said:</p>
<p>What really shapes Bush? Poor judgement would top the list, followed by cronyism that ensures he’ll never get any good counsel either, religious zealotry that puts Israel over the U.S., and probably his relationship with his father.</p></blockquote>
<p>-Timidity.<br />
- Corruption.<br />
- Persuit of wealth.<br />
- Persuit of power.<br />
.. shape Bush.<br />
His record speaks for himself.</p>
<p>For more read &#8216;Letters to Leaders&#8217; at: <a href="http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/?id=20004&amp;lvl=F" rel="nofollow">http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/?id=20004&amp;lvl=F</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhishma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129783</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhishma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129783</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2007 at 1:12 pm, Surak said: 
Hi, Bhishma. I just finished reading the Mahabharata - I loved it!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Congratulations, Surak! How did you lik the turn of events? What were the salient features? How much do you believe / do not believe? If you feel like discussing the great epic, I&#039;d be happy to. Congrats again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2007 at 1:12 pm, Surak said:<br />
Hi, Bhishma. I just finished reading the Mahabharata &#8211; I loved it!</p></blockquote>
<p>Congratulations, Surak! How did you lik the turn of events? What were the salient features? How much do you believe / do not believe? If you feel like discussing the great epic, I&#8217;d be happy to. Congrats again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhishma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129782</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhishma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129782</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On September 14th, 2007 at 9:19 am, James Felix said: 

Actually, protecting Saudi Arabia from an expansionist and aggressive Iraq was one of the stated goals of that war.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, it is official, the 1991 was was to save rich wahhabis from Saddam. What did Saudi Arabia give USA (not the Bush family) in return? What were the other stated goals that were not related ot he first one? If the war was in no US interest, how is the war, not an abuse of using national resources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On September 14th, 2007 at 9:19 am, James Felix said: </p>
<p>Actually, protecting Saudi Arabia from an expansionist and aggressive Iraq was one of the stated goals of that war.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, it is official, the 1991 was was to save rich wahhabis from Saddam. What did Saudi Arabia give USA (not the Bush family) in return? What were the other stated goals that were not related ot he first one? If the war was in no US interest, how is the war, not an abuse of using national resources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129308</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129308</guid>
		<description>I had always thought the purpose of the surge was to give the &lt;em&gt;Iraqi&#039;s room to make political progress.&lt;/em&gt;

Has there been political progress in Iraq?  OK, some local municipal political progress (and, that should not be frowned upon) but the intent was for &#039;National&#039; political progress.

The accepted cliche definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome.  Hence, we changed &#039;strategery&#039; and what we were doing in Iraq.  We moved from &#039;clear&#039; to &#039;clear and hold.&#039;  That was good and wise.

Now for the definition of unmitigated stupidity.  Doing what works and is successful and then stopping it.  

The surge is working, why stop?  Surge into other provinces, surge into more neighborhoods, surge until victory, because surge actually works.

I am just so cynical about Pres Bush and how he is prosecuting the Iraqi front on the GWOT.

One last question - 

It is not about our military doing what is asked of them, but &lt;em&gt;do you trust the Iraqis?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had always thought the purpose of the surge was to give the <em>Iraqi&#8217;s room to make political progress.</em></p>
<p>Has there been political progress in Iraq?  OK, some local municipal political progress (and, that should not be frowned upon) but the intent was for &#8216;National&#8217; political progress.</p>
<p>The accepted cliche definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome.  Hence, we changed &#8217;strategery&#8217; and what we were doing in Iraq.  We moved from &#8216;clear&#8217; to &#8216;clear and hold.&#8217;  That was good and wise.</p>
<p>Now for the definition of unmitigated stupidity.  Doing what works and is successful and then stopping it.  </p>
<p>The surge is working, why stop?  Surge into other provinces, surge into more neighborhoods, surge until victory, because surge actually works.</p>
<p>I am just so cynical about Pres Bush and how he is prosecuting the Iraqi front on the GWOT.</p>
<p>One last question &#8211; </p>
<p>It is not about our military doing what is asked of them, but <em>do you trust the Iraqis?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Ladybug</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129246</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Ladybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129246</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say the president doesn&#039;t have leadership skills.  When you say he doesn&#039;t &quot;speak the way Reagan did&quot;, not many people do - they didn&#039;t call Reagan the &quot;Great Communicator&quot; for nothing.  I&#039;m sure his public speaking skills came from being an actor and learning how to put emotion and passion into practiced speech.  Bush never has done well when presenting prepared speeches.  As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, Bush speaks so much better when he speaks &quot;off the cuff&quot; than when he&#039;s reading a speech.  And, as for the particular words used?  Every politician these days has speech writers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say the president doesn&#8217;t have leadership skills.  When you say he doesn&#8217;t &#8220;speak the way Reagan did&#8221;, not many people do &#8211; they didn&#8217;t call Reagan the &#8220;Great Communicator&#8221; for nothing.  I&#8217;m sure his public speaking skills came from being an actor and learning how to put emotion and passion into practiced speech.  Bush never has done well when presenting prepared speeches.  As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, Bush speaks so much better when he speaks &#8220;off the cuff&#8221; than when he&#8217;s reading a speech.  And, as for the particular words used?  Every politician these days has speech writers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamsaved</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129119</link>
		<dc:creator>iamsaved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129119</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;““We need a new direction that redeploys our troops from Iraq, rebuilds our military and refocuses on fighting terrorism across the world,” Ms. Pelosi said.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah like Bosnia or maybe Grenada!. Better yet, she&#039;d redeploy them to the rear so we can save them for a rainy day when they might really be needed.

&lt;strong&gt;Vote Democrat! We Invest in Failure (so we can make the highest political returns)! &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>““We need a new direction that redeploys our troops from Iraq, rebuilds our military and refocuses on fighting terrorism across the world,” Ms. Pelosi said.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah like Bosnia or maybe Grenada!. Better yet, she&#8217;d redeploy them to the rear so we can save them for a rainy day when they might really be needed.</p>
<p><strong>Vote Democrat! We Invest in Failure (so we can make the highest political returns)! </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al in St. Lou</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129088</link>
		<dc:creator>Al in St. Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129088</guid>
		<description>On September 13th, 2007 at 9:50 pm, bear1909 said:&lt;blockquote&gt;Nancy Pelosi is certifiably insane. Her latest pearl:

““We need a new direction that redeploys our troops from Iraq, rebuilds our military and refocuses on fighting terrorism across the world,” Ms. Pelosi said.”

Say what?&lt;/blockquote&gt;My moonbat SO says the same stuff. I think I first heard something like it from Joe Biden or Barack Obama. They say that the war in Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror and that we need to &quot;redeploy&quot; so we can return to fighting the existing terrorists instead of creating more terrorists in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 13th, 2007 at 9:50 pm, bear1909 said:<br />
<blockquote>Nancy Pelosi is certifiably insane. Her latest pearl:</p>
<p>““We need a new direction that redeploys our troops from Iraq, rebuilds our military and refocuses on fighting terrorism across the world,” Ms. Pelosi said.”</p>
<p>Say what?</p></blockquote>
<p>My moonbat SO says the same stuff. I think I first heard something like it from Joe Biden or Barack Obama. They say that the war in Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror and that we need to &#8220;redeploy&#8221; so we can return to fighting the existing terrorists instead of creating more terrorists in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iowavette</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129085</link>
		<dc:creator>iowavette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129085</guid>
		<description>Bush&#039;s leadership style is a corporate type; flying under the radar.  I&#039;m familiar with it since I practice it as well.  He wants to get the absolute right people into the right roles, get out of their way and let them do their jobs.  He sets the course and makes adjustments.  Not too easy to maintain at a large corporation and impossible to accomplish just running the country in the face of a treasonous far left and press much less attempting to save the rest of the free world from it&#039;s own headlong rush to cultural suicide.  But I understand and sympathize with the approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush&#8217;s leadership style is a corporate type; flying under the radar.  I&#8217;m familiar with it since I practice it as well.  He wants to get the absolute right people into the right roles, get out of their way and let them do their jobs.  He sets the course and makes adjustments.  Not too easy to maintain at a large corporation and impossible to accomplish just running the country in the face of a treasonous far left and press much less attempting to save the rest of the free world from it&#8217;s own headlong rush to cultural suicide.  But I understand and sympathize with the approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129071</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129071</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Miss Ladybug Said: The country was much different when Reagan was president - he won both his elections by a landslide, so he had the “political capital” to be confrontational with the Democrat-controlled Congress. Bush won two extremely close elections (both electorally and in raw numbers). &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe if GW could speak the way Reagan did, the elections wouldn&#039;t have been so close.  And if he had called out the Demoncrats during the first term, the second election wouldn&#039;t have been so close.

Leadership skills have always been his weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Miss Ladybug Said: The country was much different when Reagan was president &#8211; he won both his elections by a landslide, so he had the “political capital” to be confrontational with the Democrat-controlled Congress. Bush won two extremely close elections (both electorally and in raw numbers). </p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe if GW could speak the way Reagan did, the elections wouldn&#8217;t have been so close.  And if he had called out the Demoncrats during the first term, the second election wouldn&#8217;t have been so close.</p>
<p>Leadership skills have always been his weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129065</link>
		<dc:creator>Surak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129065</guid>
		<description>Hi, Bhishma.  I just finished reading the Mahabharata - I loved it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Bhishma.  I just finished reading the Mahabharata &#8211; I loved it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphonse</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129054</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphonse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129054</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On September 13th, 2007 at 9:22 pm, Leatherneck said:

As I performed another OB ultrasound exam on an illegal alien, (tax payer funded), I wonder how America can fight a war with the southern border wide open. I mean, If a preg. illegal alien female can make it to the Red River, who can not?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actions speak louder than words. If Bush were really committed to protecting the American people from terrorism, cheap labor for his business cronies wouldn&#039;t be his top priority.

We are left with the inescapable conclusion that Bush is a manipulative BS artist. This is so obvious I can&#039;t stand to watch his predictable speeches.

What really shapes Bush? Poor judgement would top the list, followed by cronyism that ensures he&#039;ll never get any good counsel either, religious zealotry that puts Israel over the U.S., and probably his relationship with his father.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On September 13th, 2007 at 9:22 pm, Leatherneck said:</p>
<p>As I performed another OB ultrasound exam on an illegal alien, (tax payer funded), I wonder how America can fight a war with the southern border wide open. I mean, If a preg. illegal alien female can make it to the Red River, who can not?</p></blockquote>
<p>Actions speak louder than words. If Bush were really committed to protecting the American people from terrorism, cheap labor for his business cronies wouldn&#8217;t be his top priority.</p>
<p>We are left with the inescapable conclusion that Bush is a manipulative BS artist. This is so obvious I can&#8217;t stand to watch his predictable speeches.</p>
<p>What really shapes Bush? Poor judgement would top the list, followed by cronyism that ensures he&#8217;ll never get any good counsel either, religious zealotry that puts Israel over the U.S., and probably his relationship with his father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-129050</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-129050</guid>
		<description>Potestas Democraticorum delenda est!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potestas Democraticorum delenda est!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeMediacratic Nation</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-128983</link>
		<dc:creator>DeMediacratic Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-128983</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats:  An End to the War; Short, Bittersweet...&lt;/strong&gt;

President Bush spoke for the eighth time on the subject of Iraq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats:  An End to the War; Short, Bittersweet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>President Bush spoke for the eighth time on the subject of Iraq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Felix</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-128914</link>
		<dc:creator>James Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-128914</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Few realize that the first invasion in 1991 in Iraq was to save wahhabbis in Riyadh.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, protecting Saudi Arabia from an expansionist and aggressive Iraq was one of the &lt;em&gt;stated goals&lt;/em&gt; of that war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Few realize that the first invasion in 1991 in Iraq was to save wahhabbis in Riyadh.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, protecting Saudi Arabia from an expansionist and aggressive Iraq was one of the <em>stated goals</em> of that war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Felix</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-128909</link>
		<dc:creator>James Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/13/president-bushs-speech-on-iraq/#comment-128909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Few realize that the first invasion in 1991 in Iraq was to save wahhabbis in Riyadh. The policy of Bush Jr, has remained the same today. Hence the immense prize payed in American taz-dollars and blood. Will continue to do so, no matter what Bush communicates i,e lies, to people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahhh, no blood for oil. As predictable as sunrise. Nice to know that in an everchanging world some things remain constant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Few realize that the first invasion in 1991 in Iraq was to save wahhabbis in Riyadh. The policy of Bush Jr, has remained the same today. Hence the immense prize payed in American taz-dollars and blood. Will continue to do so, no matter what Bush communicates i,e lies, to people.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahhh, no blood for oil. As predictable as sunrise. Nice to know that in an everchanging world some things remain constant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
