Comments on: The MoveOn.org Democrats http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:56:29 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jonah Goldberg Should School Himself, Not CNN, on Blogosphere | Christopher Howell http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-690564 Jonah Goldberg Should School Himself, Not CNN, on Blogosphere | Christopher Howell Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:58:02 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-690564 [...] too. The blogs weren’t under the party’s thumb, but rather the other way around. Just ask Michelle Malkin. Tommy on: Daily Dose I I TwitterOrder The Audacity of Democracy Starring Tommy [...] [...] too. The blogs weren’t under the party’s thumb, but rather the other way around. Just ask Michelle Malkin. Tommy on: Daily Dose I I TwitterOrder The Audacity of Democracy Starring Tommy [...]

]]> By: Jonah Goldberg Should School Himself, Not CNN, on Blogosphere | Christopher Howell http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-690563 Jonah Goldberg Should School Himself, Not CNN, on Blogosphere | Christopher Howell Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:58:01 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-690563 [...] too. The blogs weren’t under the party’s thumb, but rather the other way around. Just ask Michelle Malkin. Tommy on: Daily Dose I I TwitterOrder The Audacity of Democracy Starring Tommy [...] [...] too. The blogs weren’t under the party’s thumb, but rather the other way around. Just ask Michelle Malkin. Tommy on: Daily Dose I I TwitterOrder The Audacity of Democracy Starring Tommy [...]

]]> By: 0a89d66477eb96fa7adf http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-143738 0a89d66477eb96fa7adf Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:53:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-143738 <strong>0a89d66477eb96fa7adf...</strong> 0a89d66477eb... 0a89d66477eb96fa7adf…

0a89d66477eb…

]]> By: nj car show http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-142811 nj car show Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:02:28 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-142811 <strong>nj car show...</strong> As people get older, you see, there ears tend to attenuate higher frequencies.... nj car show…

As people get older, you see, there ears tend to attenuate higher frequencies….

]]> By: dannavy85 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-138958 dannavy85 Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:12:52 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-138958 Kennedy is a damned traitor. Kennedy is a damned traitor.

]]> By: UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Marco Martinzez: A Marine Talks About the War http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-138002 UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Marco Martinzez: A Marine Talks About the War Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:02:46 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-138002 [...] Voice of the Democratic Party™ (MoveOn.org) and believe that General David Petraeus has “betrayed” his country (after a lifetime of distinguished and dedicated service to his [...] [...] Voice of the Democratic Party™ (MoveOn.org) and believe that General David Petraeus has “betrayed” his country (after a lifetime of distinguished and dedicated service to his [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Rush Limbaugh, phony soldiers, and the Left’s desperate need for its own “Betray Us” moment http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-136714 Michelle Malkin » Rush Limbaugh, phony soldiers, and the Left’s desperate need for its own “Betray Us” moment Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:24:41 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-136714 [...] is what this phony fiasco is really all about: It’s about the MoveOn.org Democrats trying to save face in the aftermath of the disastrous “General Betray Us” smear. They [...] [...] is what this phony fiasco is really all about: It’s about the MoveOn.org Democrats trying to save face in the aftermath of the disastrous “General Betray Us” smear. They [...]

]]> By: Marshall Russ http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-133034 Marshall Russ Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:22:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-133034 We will have Open borders,socialized medicine, social experiment and devastated military"meals on wheels",a very liberal Supreme Court, legalized gay marriage and every other kind of marriage, no gun rights, we will pay reparations to everybody we might have "injured" for past 200 years, open elections to everybody even non citizens, no free speech especially on the radio, how's that for starters. We will have Open borders,socialized medicine, social experiment and devastated military”meals on wheels”,a very liberal Supreme Court, legalized gay marriage and every other kind of marriage, no gun rights, we will pay reparations to everybody we might have “injured” for past 200 years, open elections to everybody even non citizens, no free speech especially on the radio, how’s that for starters.

]]> By: 29Victor http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132885 29Victor Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:46:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132885 If Democrats wind up controlling the White House, the House and the Senate and they are more beholden to MoveOn.org than to their constituents (‘cause what they really want is votes and money gets votes) then what will happen to Democracy in the U.S.? If Democrats wind up controlling the White House, the House and the Senate and they are more beholden to MoveOn.org than to their constituents (‘cause what they really want is votes and money gets votes) then what will happen to Democracy in the U.S.?

]]> By: Lan Astaslem http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132498 Lan Astaslem Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:01:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132498 Cross-posted at HA... <blockquote>From HotAir Obama quote: The way to honor that service is to give them a mission that is responsible, not to vote on amendments like the Cornyn amendment while we continue to pursue the wrong policy in Iraq.</blockquote> Hmmm.... I was looking at the congressional record, and it appears that Obama was <strong>not </strong>too principled to vote on the "Boxer Amendment" (also yesterday) which was: <blockquote>To reaffirm strong support for all the men and women of the U.s. Armed Forces and to strongly condemn attacks on the honor, integrity, and patriotism of any individual who is serving or has served honorably in the U.s. Armed Forces.</blockquote> Was it because the Cornyn amendment specifically mentions Petraeus? BTW, Shrillary also voted for the "Boxer" amendment, but against the Cornyn amendment. Does it matter that much whether it's a (D) or and (R) who sponsors the bill? Of course, you could look at this the other-way-'round too. Why wasn't the Boxer amendment good enough for the (R)s? It was voted on first, and was defeated 51-46 (3 NVs -- one of them Biden, of course). Only 3 (R)s voted Yea. Could it be, maybe, that within the amendment were the following "findings?" <blockquote>(4) In 2004, a Senator from Massachusetts who is a Vietnam veteran and the recipient of a Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V, and three Purple Hearts, was personally attacked and accused of dishonoring his country; (5) This attack was aptly described by a Senator and Vietnam veteran as ``dishonest and dishonorable.'' </blockquote> Well I wonder who they could mean? Cross-posted at HA…

From HotAir Obama quote:
The way to honor that service is to give them a mission that is responsible, not to vote on amendments like the Cornyn amendment while we continue to pursue the wrong policy in Iraq.

Hmmm…. I was looking at the congressional record, and it appears that Obama was not too principled to vote on the “Boxer Amendment” (also yesterday) which was:

To reaffirm strong support for all the men and women of the U.s. Armed Forces and to strongly condemn attacks on the honor, integrity, and patriotism of any individual who is serving or has served honorably in the U.s. Armed Forces.

Was it because the Cornyn amendment specifically mentions Petraeus? BTW, Shrillary also voted for the “Boxer” amendment, but against the Cornyn amendment. Does it matter that much whether it’s a (D) or and (R) who sponsors the bill?

Of course, you could look at this the other-way-’round too. Why wasn’t the Boxer amendment good enough for the (R)s? It was voted on first, and was defeated 51-46 (3 NVs — one of them Biden, of course). Only 3 (R)s voted Yea. Could it be, maybe, that within the amendment were the following “findings?”

(4) In 2004, a Senator from Massachusetts who is a Vietnam veteran and the recipient of a Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V, and three Purple Hearts, was personally attacked and accused of dishonoring his country;
(5) This attack was aptly described by a Senator and Vietnam veteran as “dishonest and dishonorable.”

Well I wonder who they could mean?

]]> By: franksalterego http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132483 franksalterego Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:49:44 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132483 As a resident of Washington State, please accept my sincerest apologies, for our Dunderheaded Senator Murray, who was elected by the people in two - count 'em, TWO counties, (Pierce and King) in this state, and rejected by the other Thirty-six. She doesn't speak for us. As a resident of Washington State, please accept my sincerest apologies, for our Dunderheaded Senator Murray, who was elected by the people in two – count ‘em, TWO counties, (Pierce and King) in this state, and rejected by the other Thirty-six.

She doesn’t speak for us.

]]> By: This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Senate Democrats; we love losing http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132372 This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Senate Democrats; we love losing Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:19:12 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132372 [...] the names of the 25 spineless weinies at Gateway Pundit and Michele Malkin. Hang Right Politics asks you to name the [...] [...] the names of the 25 spineless weinies at Gateway Pundit and Michele Malkin. Hang Right Politics asks you to name the [...]

]]> By: pgtips http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132359 pgtips Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:30:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132359 @CommentGuy I applaud you for being able to read left leaning blogs. My stomach just can't take it. @CommentGuy

I applaud you for being able to read left leaning blogs. My stomach just can’t take it.

]]> By: More proof on the split in the Democrat party | BitsBlog http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132349 More proof on the split in the Democrat party | BitsBlog Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:47:34 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132349 [...] Michelle has a list of those Democrats who voted against the resolution. [...] [...] Michelle has a list of those Democrats who voted against the resolution. [...]

]]> By: CommentGuy http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-132329 CommentGuy Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:51:14 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/20/the-moveonorg-democrats/#comment-132329 This was Senator Feingold's statement after the bill was defeated: “I am pleased that the Senate leadership cosponsored and strongly supported this amendment and that, once again, the majority of Democrats supported ending the President’s flawed Iraq policy. The time to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq is now, and I will not relent until it happens. A vote against Feingold-Reid was a vote to continue the President’s disastrous Iraq policy. Every day that the Congress fails to act, our brave troops remain in harm’s way, and our national security continues to be undermined.” This was Senator Feingold’s statement after the bill was defeated:

“I am pleased that the Senate leadership cosponsored and strongly supported this amendment and that, once again, the majority of Democrats supported ending the President’s flawed Iraq policy. The time to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq is now, and I will not relent until it happens. A vote against Feingold-Reid was a vote to continue the President’s disastrous Iraq policy. Every day that the Congress fails to act, our brave troops remain in harm’s way, and our national security continues to be undermined.”

]]>