See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Boobs on Display
2. Take Our Country Back
3. Pirate’s Cove » >>Americans Never Quit » Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup
4. Breasts Not Bombs… Big Time Breasts… Bomb… Part Two: Nipples For Nirvana | Stuck On Stupid
5. Is that all your sensitive stomach can handle? « Cowardly political musings…
6. Moonbattery
7. 9ac8e9f58d7698b61916

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On September 29th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, zorro said:

   Yikes!

2. #2
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:00 pm, zorro said:

   …oh, I forgot to say thanks for showing the entire photograph, it’s almost supper time!

3. #3
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, zorro said:

   #2 should say thanks for not showing the entire photograph.

4. #4
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:22 pm, jeanie said:

   Yikes!!! She needs to use a better quality bra when she decides to get dressed again!!! Perhaps exercise??

5. #5
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, Laree said:

   OMG, okay I give up, please put your shirts back on. Now would you please do this samething in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and I don’t know Pakistan. I think this very well could be our NOT so secret weapon. Do not look directly at your monitor…this isn’t a test. If this was a test, you would have been given blind folds first.

   They don’t look like beer drinkers to me. Latte drinkers more then likely, I can’t imagine what their coffee clutch is like, when this is the results.

6. #6
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:30 pm, ThackerAgency said:

   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, Laree said:

   OMG, okay I give up, please put your shirts back on. Now would you please do this samething in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and I don’t know Pakistan.

   hahaha funny.

7. #7
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:43 pm, serfer62 said:

   Wrong name, it should be

   Tits for terrorists…

8. #8
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:49 pm, Defector01 said:

   Who’s the one guy with the “Breasts not Bombs” group?

   Five women and one man from the group Breasts not Bombs

   What’s up with that?

9. #9
   On September 29th, 2007 at 5:50 pm, locomotivebreath1901 said:

   boob (n.) Slang - A stupid or foolish person; a dolt.

   ~nuff said.

10. #10
    On September 29th, 2007 at 5:50 pm, katieanne said:

    Spokeswoman Janine Boneparth says going topless is just another way to oppose the Iraq carnage.

    I really don’t get the connection of boobs and protesting the Iraq war. The dim bulb in the attic of these women must be totally out.

11. #11
    On September 29th, 2007 at 5:51 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Well, if they’re nekked, the Secret Service will know they aren’t hiding a weapon…

12. #12
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, swj719AWG said:

    Nearby Secret Service agents made no move to intervene.

    Most likely because they were too busy laughing their asses off, or trying to not vomit…

    I really don’t get the connection of boobs and protesting the Iraq war. The dim bulb in the attic of these women must be totally out.

    I have a list of women who’s breasts would cause me to stop fighting a war…

    None of these ladies are on it…

13. #13
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:25 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Now… if it was Playboy Playmates?

    Or… Hooter Girls?

    Or… Victoria Secrets models???

    OK… that would get my attention…

    Of course, they do realize they are protesting agianst the people who are making it so they don’t have to wear BURKAS!!!! How about protesting THEM for a change…

14. #14
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:26 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    I see Howard Stern’s TG treatments are working.

15. #15
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:35 pm, ajmontana said:

    ew.

16. #16
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:37 pm, ajmontana said:

    No, Major ew.

17. #17
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:39 pm, blogagog said:

    What does ‘a Hotair affiliate’ mean?

18. #18
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:41 pm, blogagog said:

    Also, we need to counter the ‘breasts not bombs’ crowd. Let’s start a ‘Breasts AND Bombs’ group!

    Who’s with me? Anyone? Hello?

19. #19
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:44 pm, Rick Moran said:

    Five women and one man from the group Breasts not Bombs staged the event

    I echo #7 defector’s question above.

    What’s a guy doing there? Contributing his “man-boobs” to the spectacle?

    Wonder what his bra size is?

20. #20
    On September 29th, 2007 at 6:55 pm, JWS said:

    There goes dinner…

21. #21
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:14 pm, Sanddog said:

    going topless is just another way to oppose the Iraq carnage.

    Huh?

    WTF does that even mean?

22. #22
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:18 pm, OldGuy53 said:

    From what I’ve seen the only thing that group symbolizes is that the antiwar movement is sagging.

23. #23
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:19 pm, JWS said:

    I think she meant “going topless is just another way to expose THIS carnage…”

24. #24
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:22 pm, Defector01 said:

    which carnage; the war or them topless? (shudder)

25. #25
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:24 pm, blues said:

    I think it means a bunch of fugly women are tired of the pretty ones getting all the attention.That said,I don’t think its working since they can’t even get arrested.

26. #26
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:32 pm, Speakup said:

    A little off topic but still…

    “Where else but in America could the women’s liberation movement take off their bras, then go on TV to complain about their lack of support?” —Bob Hope

27. #27
    On September 29th, 2007 at 7:35 pm, Sir Loin said:

    Save that image for a later nightmare.

28. #28
    On September 29th, 2007 at 8:32 pm, SteveG said:

    “carnage” as in: meat scattered across the horizon?
    Got it.

    On a medical note, that one lady (who has probably been going braless since her first Jefferson Airplane concert) had some fleshy growths covering her knees.

29. #29
    On September 29th, 2007 at 8:51 pm, SirKnob said:

    There should be laws against this sort of thing.. oh.. wait a min, there is.. oh well.. where is the lady from the Simpson’s that always screams out ‘what about the children’

    I guess I can best sum this up with this

    As far as protests go, these people are just plain ‘Sad and Sick’

30. #30
    On September 29th, 2007 at 8:52 pm, crochetmama said:

    I don’t get what all the fuss is about….these are just your average blue-state Democrats out for a typical Saturday stroll in Washington DC. Now if they tried to do this in Iran or Saudi Arabia, well….THEN maybe it might be a bigger deal, but here, they’re just typical feminist comrades of Hillary and members of Daily Kos and MoveOn, etc, etc….Right??!!

31. #31
    On September 29th, 2007 at 8:55 pm, nbarry said:

    Why didn’t the Secret Service intervene? As Lenny Bruce once observed, if the boobs are ugly, the display is clean. If they are beautiful, then it’s dirty and the women would be arrested.

32. #32
    On September 29th, 2007 at 9:12 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    It looks like these ladies are borrowing a page from the peta handbook of shock protest by going topless with sign.

    As a gentleman I will keep my comments to myself about their appearance except to say that there are straight guys that have bigger mammary glands than those ladies have.

    GSP

33. #33
    On September 29th, 2007 at 9:14 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    P.s. The medical conditon for a man that has excessively large development of the male breast to the point of lactation is called gynecomastia.

    GSP

34. #34
    On September 29th, 2007 at 9:16 pm, terrig said:

    Ick, ick, ick. These broads probably haven’t worn bras since they were parading around 40 years ago burning them.
    I do have to wonder why the Secret Service didn’t intervene either. Could you imagine taking a small child to see the White House and seeing that?

35. #35
    On September 29th, 2007 at 9:20 pm, geminicontender said:

    and they want to run our country?

36. #36
    On September 29th, 2007 at 10:07 pm, Lindsay said:

    Why weren’t they protesting for Ahmadenijad’s recent visit? This would have surely made him see the 12th imam.

    Did not click on photos yet as I think I saw the same old hippie photos when they were released in San Fran at a Hillary headquarters at their last Boobapalooza.

37. #37
    On September 29th, 2007 at 10:21 pm, Boomer said:

    Man! That was enough to make me question my sexuality. The Horror! The Horror! The Horror! (while rocking back and forth in the corner in the fetal position)

38. #38
    On September 29th, 2007 at 10:26 pm, bear1909 said:

    This is the same crap they believe brought the war in Viet Nam to a close.

    Yawn. The rooster crows at sunrise, but it doesn’t mean it makes the Sun come up. Duh.

39. #39
    On September 29th, 2007 at 10:33 pm, ajmontana said:

    “Faux News Alert”

    Nevermind, it really happened.

40. #40
    On September 29th, 2007 at 10:35 pm, LoneRanger said:

    I’m glad I get off work at 8 a.m. I’m out of town before any of this blood-chilling goofiness begins.

41. #41
    On September 29th, 2007 at 11:02 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Oh. My. Goodness.

    These people really are nuts. Just completely round the bend, four-rubber-walls OUT OF THEIR MINDS. Do they REALLY think standing around half-naked like a bunch of cattle sorely in need of milking is going to bring peace to the world? No! In fact, the very terrorists who want to blow us up hate the fact I walk around in jeans and t-shirts because - to them - I’m naked. I can’t imagine what they think of these crazy, crazy people.

    And they’re inflicting this on the rest of us.

    I need to go take a long, hot shower now and try to scrub out my mind’s eye with a Brillo pad.

42. #42
    On September 29th, 2007 at 11:14 pm, Jim M. said:

    Good Lord!

    Forget the bras, how about a spatula???

    A sight like that would make a man convert to Islam - that is the best reason for a burqua I have seen yet.

    I have to go and wash my eyes out now.

43. #43
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:00 am, whm3113 said:

    My eyes! What has happened to my eyes?!

44. #44
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:11 am, greenLibertarian said:

    Perhaps the Jihadists will leave us alone now, do they really want to rule a country with citizens like them?

45. #45
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:17 am, almeehan said:

    Oh, the humanity! Folsom East

46. #46
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:18 am, see-dubya said:

    More sad proof of See-Dub’s Iron Law of Public Nudity: people most interested in exposing themselves are almost always the people with the least justification for doing so.

47. #47
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:35 am, Canadian Infidel said:

    Photographic proof that perhaps liberal women are easy by necessity and not choice.

48. #48
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:50 am, see-dubya said:

    Alicia Silverstone’s looking quite reasonable in comparison.

49. #49
    On September 30th, 2007 at 1:16 am, hadsil said:

    Well, if they’re nekked, the Secret Service will know they aren’t hiding a weapon…

    Oh, there’s a way. Captain Jack does it in a Christopher Eccelston Doctor Who episode.

    Anyway, Rush Limbuagh is vindicated again with one of his maxim’s: “Feminism was established to allowed unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.”

50. #50
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:08 am, Ombre Rose said:

    John Lennon with boobs and signs - and they want to influence people to do WHAT?

    And they are not carted off to lunatic asylums WHY??????????????

    So barfing!!!

    Oh, THAT was the “WHAT” they wanted to influence us to do, you say?????

    Happy to comply, barfing my toenails up!

    Why doesn’t someone lay a trail of bait AWAY from civilization for these critters?

    These skanky lookin’ thaings look plumb scurvy. Wonder if they’ve ever had a healthy diet!

51. #51
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:09 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Where are the Pilgrims and their gazing stocks when you really need them?

    heheheheh

52. #52
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:13 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On September 29th, 2007 at 5:49 pm, Defector01 said:
    Who’s the one guy with the “Breasts not Bombs” group?

    Before I ever saw your post, I was wondering about the critter in the pink hat, if that was a male.

53. #53
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:21 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Why didn’t the Secret Service arrest them??????? $#@#$#$ Good Grief - they’d be afraid of catching something, like a flesh eating disease or something!

    These whackos need to take THIS show on the ROAD - to Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Syrian and Iran, where it will be really appreciated. For the fullness of what it is really worth!

    Of, if only they had been able to become HUMAN SHIELDS for SADDAM HUSSEIN! They could have saved his life! And been his Paradise - all in ONE!

54. #54
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:23 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Oh! IT ISN’T TOO LATE FOR THEM TO BECOME HUMAN SHIELDS FOR OSAMA bin LADIN! I’m SURE that Bill Clinton would be glad to give them PERSONAL ESCORT to Osama’s warm side!

    ROTFLTHH!!!

55. #55
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:26 am, Ombre Rose said:

    Well, they certainly are a CARNAGE, aren’t they!

    The CARNAGE SISTERS FREAK AND SIDE ROAD SHOW!

    ROTFLTHH!!! Oh to see them with Bill Clinton and Osama bin Ladin!!!!

    Well, not with yer actual EYEBALLS, just to know those two men are working together to give these gals their covering protection!

    You know, just to KNOW THEY ARE HOME WHERE THEY BELONG.

56. #56
    On September 30th, 2007 at 7:04 am, yohannbiimu said:

    Meanwhile, our Islamo-Fascist enemy is looking at this and commenting “See that–this is why we’ll win.”
    Also–”Make sure when we stone those wh*res that we bury them up to their necks–blekkk!”

57. #57
    On September 30th, 2007 at 7:05 am, gayle said:

    Were they arrested for indecent exposure????

58. #58
    On September 30th, 2007 at 7:11 am, ajmontana said:

    I dont know Gayle, I think they just handed them back their butterfly nets and were pointed in the direction of the closest grassy field.

59. #59
    On September 30th, 2007 at 9:46 am, ajmontana said:

    see-dubya said:
    Alicia Silverstone’s looking quite reasonable in comparison.

    lol c,dub,
    ya think!

60. #60
    On September 30th, 2007 at 11:26 am, William Teach said:

    There should be a law against this type of display.

    There is? It should be much, much stricter.

    Will Hillary’s healthcare plan pay for the damage it has done to my eyes?

61. #61
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:24 pm, George said:

    scary!

62. #62
    On September 30th, 2007 at 12:55 pm, huhwhat said:

    The title of the photo should be “Amazing Disgrace”. I once could see, but now I am blind. Arrrgh.

63. #63
    On September 30th, 2007 at 1:03 pm, BOB said:

    Looks like Howard Stern will do anything for ratings…..UGH!!

64. #64
    On September 30th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    Keyriiist!

65. #65
    On September 30th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, 29Victor said:

    These pictures may help to explain the large number of gay men in the Looney Left. I mean, if this is what Lib chicks look like topless…

66. #66
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:07 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Delete the video, there’s not enough mental bleach to clean this stuff out of my computers memory banks (or my mind either!)

67. #67
    On September 30th, 2007 at 5:53 pm, davidcaskey said:

    This is the answer to solving the problem in Iraq. Those women certainly scared me and I am still sick days later. Send them over.

68. #68
    On September 30th, 2007 at 6:47 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    The title of the photo should be “Amazing Disgrace”. I once could see, but now I am blind. Arrrgh.

    

    That’s great.

69. #69
    On September 30th, 2007 at 6:47 pm, tim zank said:

    The sad thing is, these morons, along with almost all other peace protesters, actually think they are doing something beneficial. They are not smart enough to realize (or maybe admit) that their shenanagins never change anyones mind, they are preaching to choir.

70. #70
    On September 30th, 2007 at 7:37 pm, Frantic Freddie said:

    I got $10 says they kick a kick outta exposin’ themselves.

    What happens later is just too horrible to contemplate….

71. #71
    On September 30th, 2007 at 7:38 pm, Frantic Freddie said:

    That should be “get a kick”…..hangover posting…

72. #72
    On September 30th, 2007 at 9:33 pm, PDColeman said:

    Udderly ridiculous…

73. #73
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:57 am, bour3 said:

    The more extreme people get for attention the more extreme I get to avoid it.

    But, I admit to being properly disgusted with those dreadful pendently hanging pendulately swinging unsupported breasts, and not with the conflict in Iraq.

74. #74
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:28 am, CMD said:

    Hell, I’ll make them a deal. They can stay topless, just shave the freaking beards! There’s ugly, and then there’s scary…

75. #75
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:46 am, guitarguy said:

    Looks more like ‘Flapjacks, not bombs.’

76. #76
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:47 am, Chuck said:

    I think we’ve found a way to keep teens from having sex! Force them to stare at these hags and their pet (supposed) male escort! A couple weeks of that and we won’t have to worry about population growth.

77. #77
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:52 am, faraway said:

    I thought this was a PlusSizes.com convention.:)

78. #78
    On October 1st, 2007 at 12:17 pm, Roman Con said:

    Gouging out my eyes in 3…2…1…

79. #79
    On October 1st, 2007 at 12:34 pm, right_on said:

    Didn’t Al Bundy coin the phrase, “MY EYES, MY EYES…!”

80. #80
    On October 1st, 2007 at 1:30 pm, Glibertarian said:

    Breasts not Bombs

    If these are the Breasts than can I have the Bombs instead?

81. #81
    On October 1st, 2007 at 1:35 pm, Harbynger said:

    I have a disturbing image of this protest put on video with a track of Arlo Guthrie tunes and marketed on late night TV as “Liberal Girls Gone Wild ! ! !”

82. #82
    On October 1st, 2007 at 1:49 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Perhaps their intent was to start turning men into stone…AVERT YOUR EYES IMMEDIATELY….

83. #83
    On October 1st, 2007 at 2:13 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Five women and one man from the group Breasts not Bombs

    Uh, please don’t run photos of the man…

84. #84
    On October 1st, 2007 at 2:30 pm, pubscout said:

    That reminds me…on the way home I have to pick up milk for the family and feed for the cattle.

85. #85
    On October 1st, 2007 at 2:41 pm, Eric_CharlotteNC said:

    Bombshells
    [Michelle]
    NOT Boobs
    [these wacko's,MoveOn,Code Pink]

86. #86
    On October 1st, 2007 at 2:49 pm, jsr said:

    This must be some ploy to demoralize the troops.