Miller Lite-approved: Toddlers at the Folsom Street Fair

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 1, 2007 03:37 PM

Update: A call from B. Daniel Blatt for gay leaders to demand that Folsom Street Fair prevent children from attending.

***

It’s not just 17-year-olds who were welcome at the Folsom Street Fair leather/bondage orgy.

Check out the photos of two-year-old twin toddlers in attendance at the 2005 fair. (Hat tip – LGF commenters)

Look. At. The. Children’s. Clothes.

One is wearing a leather-studded harness. Via the Xpress Online:

folsomtwins002.jpg

The caption on the photo reads:

“Veronica Kruschel, 2, drinks water while her twin sister Zola enjoys the Folsom Street Fair environment. Their parents Gary Beuschel and John Kruse (not photographed) watch nearby while having a lunch break.”

More from the accompanying article:

Two-year-olds Zola and Veronica Kruschel waddled through Folsom Street Fair amidst strangers in fishnets and leather crotch pouches, semi and fully nude men.

The twin girls who were also dressed for the event wore identical lace blouses, floral bonnets and black leather collars purchased from a pet store.

Fathers Gary Beuschel and John Kruse watched over them closely. They were proud to show the twins off.

“They will see more than the kids with moms and dads in Iowa,” said Beuschel, who wanted to expose his children to San Francisco�s diverse community. “Every parent has to decide for themselves what is right for them. And I respect that. And we decided that this is right for our children.”

Beuschel and his girls were at the 22nd Folsom Street Fair, an annual leather event in San Francisco�s South of Market district, which showcased outrageous costumes, fetish attire, and a community obsessed with bondage, whipping, and spanking.

For crying out loud:

“Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god’s sake,” said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.

Oakland resident Veronica Charles, 36, was with a baby stroller and said her son was too young to understand. “I don’t think I’ll bring him here when he is 6,” Charles said.

Brought to you by the proud sponsors at Miller Lite…

***

Zombie was there at this year’s fair.

Just in case you needed not-safe-for-work reminders of what these toddlers were exposed to, watch here.

Or here.

Posted in: Folsom Street Fair

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. All American Blogger » Folsom Street Fair - Toddlers Welcome
  2. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Family values, Democrat style
  3. San Francisco Values - Page 15 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum
  4. UPDATE ON FOLSOM STREET PERVERTS « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  5. Sierra Faith
  6. Leaning Straight Up
  7. politicalpartypoop.com » Blog Archive » Miller Lite-approved: Toddlers at the Folsom Street Fair
  8. Michelle Malkin » Miller: The beer of open-borders and S&M
  9. The American Princess
  10. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Miller proudly sponsors S & M kids at Folsom gay pride where 2 year olds can watch adults masturbate.
  11. They should have arrested them « Bookworm Room
  12. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Photos: Folsom Street Fair celebrates empowerment and erections, but mostly erections
  13. Michelle Malkin » Miller-sponsored, Miller-approved: The Folsom Street Fair, uncovered
  14. Miller Should Be Proud | The Daily Conservative
  15. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Miller doesn’t want you to put any of the Deviance on their site that they sponsor.
  16. AbuGarab High School - Page 3 - TDR Roundtable
  17. Fleet Week and the idiot left | BitsBlog
  18. The Red America - Today Top Blog Posts from the Conservative Movement - Powered by SocialRank
  19. Millers sponsors the Folsom Street Fair & Children Participate? « Fusion of Media, Culture with an Entertainment Twist
  20. Its Things Like This |
  21. If you care about civil rights you should be a Republican - Page 4 - Debate Politics Forums
  22. Miller Should Be Proud | TDC

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #137294
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:42 pm, katieanne said:

    Those poor children. Family values, Democrat style.

    Miller Lite needs to be boycotted.

  2. #137297
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:45 pm, W_over_w said:

    If God ever gives America an enema it will be through San Francisco.

  3. #137298
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:45 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Oh. My. Goodness.

    How horrible to subject these children to this depravity. They should be playing with dolls or stuffed animals, not leather-studded clothing.

    Some people just SHOULD NOT be parents. Period.

  4. #137306
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:52 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    I’m almost glad I’m at work and can’t look at the nastiness…that pic above is bad enough.

    Studded leather chokers and baby bottles just don’t mix in my book, no matter HOW old you are…….

  5. #137307
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:53 pm, azconservative said:

    Disgusting. Despicable.

    I’m sickened by this whole thing.

  6. #137308
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:53 pm, cwdancer said:

    Amen, Englishqueen. I have my doubts about them having the maturity/responsibility to own pets. Just too sad.

  7. #137309
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:54 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Gavin’s letter to attendents (in the program) was addressed to “Families”…

    Grrreeeeaaatttt.

    (PS. those parents should have child protective services over their house immediately).

  8. #137311
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:56 pm, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    It’s a freak show. Oh, boy, let’s bring the kids!

  9. #137313
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:57 pm, rageagainsttheleft said:

    So help me . . . Not like I would ever go to that sleaze fest. But if I were there and saw those “parents” exposing those precious children to that waste of humanity, I would have dragged them out into the street and given them a sinister beating. The problem is, those sorry excuses for humans would have probably enjoyed it.

  10. #137317
    On October 1st, 2007 at 3:58 pm, terrig said:

    Yes, where is CPS while some little girl is dressed as a dominatrix? So these parents, Gary & John want to expose their little girls to this depravity and mock people who live in the Heartland. This is disgusting and I just cannot fathom what St. Francis would think of the city named in his honor.

  11. #137318
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:00 pm, sunandsteel said:

    This is acceptable for children, yet reading the Bible in school is not??!?

  12. #137319
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:01 pm, purplepeep said:

    terrig said:
    where is CPS while some little girl is dressed as a dominatrix?

    They’re all at the fair – this is San Francisco we’re talking about here, afterall.

  13. #137327
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:06 pm, GenericUser said:

    “’Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god’s sake,’ said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.”

    If this guy didn’t want kids seeing this then why was he joining in on it IN PUBLIC?

  14. #137331
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:09 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I wrote to Miller again, and here’s the text of my e-mail:

    Dear Julian:

    In a follow up to my e-mail of last week, it has come to my attention that the organizers of the Folsom Street Fair allow children as young as age 2 into the Fair.

    Please see Michelle Malkin’s blog for the details regarding this deplorable behavior, including a picture of a 2-year-old girl and her twin sister, clad in studded leather, drinking from their bottles at the Fair.

    While I understand that Miller is not directly responsible for who attends the Fair, Miller’s sponsorship of this event does indicate that Miller condones this behavior. Personally, I classify exposing children to half-naked (or almost totally naked), leather-clad, sadomasochistic individuals and sex toys as abuse.

    As a corporate sponsor, Miller needs to hold the organizers of the Fair responsible for making sure that only adults (age 18 and up) attend this event. I could not (nor would I ever) take my son into a shop that sells sex toys, pornographic videos, or the like. In fact, most places require anyone entering the store show proof of age via IDs.

    Simply because the Folsom Street Fair is an “open air” event does not absolve the organizers from the responsibility of protecting children from what can easily be classified as sexual abuse.

    I will NEVER buy another Miller product. Miller’s support of this indecent, inappropriate behavior is irresponible and disgusting.

    I am outraged.

    And I agree – CPS needs to be called and these girls need to be protected. How messed up must their home life be if they’re exposed to this in public? San Francisco or not, NO ONE deserves to abuse children in this manner.

  15. #137332
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:09 pm, Defector01 said:

    No wonder kids in these heavy liberals areas are the highest drug users in the country; they actually NEED those drugs to try and forget everything they saw from their parents!!!

  16. #137335
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:11 pm, purplepeep said:

    from article -
    “Their parents Gary Beuschel and John Kruse”

    I could’ve made a million bucks selling tickets to that delivery room. But I wasn’t even invited to the twin’s baby shower.

  17. #137339
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:12 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Sexual deviance knows no bounds.

  18. #137340
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:12 pm, sunandsteel said:

    Father of two, John Kruse said it is an educational experience for children. He said there were conservative parents against having kids at the event.

    ?Those are the same close-minded people who think we shouldn?t have children to begin with,? he said.

    Umm, maybe this is why people (including myself) think you should not have children.

  19. #137342
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:15 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:

    If a hetrosexual couple took their kids to strip club they would be arrested…and rightfully so.

  20. #137344
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:17 pm, MarkAB said:

    I’ve always been a little conflicted on the concept of gay/lesbian adoption. This certainly makes it a little clearer to me now.

  21. #137347
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:19 pm, sunandsteel said:

    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:15 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:
    If a hetrosexual couple took their kids to strip club they would be arrested…and rightfully so.

    Ask the guy who left his kid in the car while he partied in the brothel about that.

    I’m sure someone will come to these homosexuals defense and say it is “culture” or some crap like that.

  22. #137352
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:21 pm, infidel4life said:

    Disgusting. Sodom-by-the-Bay is a lost cause.

  23. #137353
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:21 pm, CO of Fort Housewife said:

    Disgusting. Absolutely horrifying. Where can I find the number to the SF Child Protective Services? “They will see more than the kids with moms and dads in Iowa.” Is he talking in terms of naked flesh? Then if so, yes, those poor girls will see more. As a Midwesterner, I am offended by both the slur on Iowa AND the thinly veiled jibe on 2 (opposite sex) parent households. However, those 2 digs don’t even register in terms of offense as to what those 2 innocent girls had to witness. I’m taking my 1 year old daughter to the Lincoln, NE Haymarket this weekend, where she can get some REAL culture. God willing, she will never see anything like San Fransisco until she is a more appropriate age. Like 42…

  24. #137356
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:21 pm, Gothguy said:

    This is beyond deplorable!

    If adults (21+) want to participate/attend in a disgusting event such as this, that is their discretion as adults.

    However, subjecting children to this is akin to showing them pornography at home, which would have CPS knocking on your door ASAP.

    But, since this is San Francisco, it’s all done in the interest of ‘enlightenment’ and ‘diversity’, because you know, we must not judge them!

    Pathetic!

  25. #137365
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:27 pm, Wearyman said:

    First the gay couple gets to raise kids.

    Then they dress them in leather.

    Then they take them to the Fulsom Street fair.

    Sounds like the next stop is at the house of Uncle “Pedo” Johnny for a special visit.

    Welcome to “Defining Deviancy Down” in America. Disgusting.

  26. #137366
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:28 pm, texasdee said:

    Place a call to Miller Brewing Co. They will write down your opinions and I was told they are reviewing them all.
    Heres the phone number
    1-800-MILLER6 (645-5376). I just got off the phone with them and the woman I spoke with assured me they want to know how people feel about this!

  27. #137367
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:28 pm, cblesz said:

    Why oh why do we find this shocking? Really. Why? Those poor kids are at a disadvantage from the get go…

  28. #137370
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:28 pm, Fasternu 426 said:

    Thank you Lord for letting me be born in Texas where we would put people like this in jail for child abuse.

    Amen.

  29. #137371
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:29 pm, unamused said:

    There’s no shortage of outrage in our liberal cities.

    But we need to do better by our nation’s children.

  30. #137374
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:31 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Where were Nancy, Barbara and Dianne? I know they MUST have been there to greet their constituents….

  31. #137377
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:32 pm, Luthien said:

    Really is quite disgusting. Don’t drink Miller myself so not drinking it isn’t a big deal for me.

    Anyone else notice how the kids have a different last name than their parents and that the parents both have different last names? It looks like they split each others last name and then combined them to get their children’s last name. Hope that made sense.

  32. #137383
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:38 pm, Bob68 said:

    Slap your child on the butt for misbehaving and DFACS takes away your kid…Where was DFACS while this went on.

    Bye Bye Miller lite. Never again in my home.

  33. #137385
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:40 pm, Rusty said:

    No disagreement from me that there are certain places where children shouldn’t be welcome.

    But I think people are overreacting a bit. I don’t think children should be in such a sexualized environment, but wearing leather in and of itself isn’t a problem. I mean, it’s a studded collar. No harm, no foul.

    If you look at the pictures, most of them aren’t even that offensive to me. So, people are in wacky costumes. Big deal. The public sexual acts are the problem. Until those are stopped, children should be kept away.

    I mean, no one complains when tykes are walking down Commercial Street in P-Town surrounded by drag queens and people in leather. Because in P-Town, people are more behaved. That’s what the Folsom Street Fair should strive for.

  34. #137389
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:43 pm, blue-eyed-devil said:

    Simply nauseating.

    I just called Miller and expressed my disgust.

    Thanks for the number, texasdee.

  35. #137391
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:43 pm, MarkAB said:

    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:32 pm, Luthien said:
    Really is quite disgusting. Don’t drink Miller myself so not drinking it isn’t a big deal for me.

    Anyone else notice how the kids have a different last name than their parents and that the parents both have different last names? It looks like they split each others last name and then combined them to get their children’s last name. Hope that made sense.

    Ayy, very observant. And how equitable with exactly four letters from each leather Daddy. Sounds like an arrangement made in he…. Ah, nevermind.

  36. #137392
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:43 pm, michiganmom said:

    Those poor little girls.
    Can you imagine what they see at home if this considered ok in public?
    G-d help us!

  37. #137393
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:43 pm, CO of Fort Housewife said:

    Just got off the phone with San Fransisco’s CPS department, and they are unable to do anything without and address. The lady on the other end was nice about it, though. You can bet your sweet bippy that I’ll be calling them again for next year’s fair.

  38. #137396
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:44 pm, Eric_CharlotteNC said:

    This is the number problem I have with this event. But I need to get over it…they will be teaching our kids these things in school before long.
    As a single parent of an 8 yo girl…i’m disgusted!

  39. #137399
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:47 pm, MarkAB said:

    Rusty, are you trying to make a point? If so, I don’t see one. You can’t always play both sides of the ball(gag).

  40. #137401
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:48 pm, CharlieT said:

    What do this dispicable acts of child abuse and Miller Lite have in common? They both make me gag!

  41. #137402
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:50 pm, Fasternu 426 said:

    Miller Brewing Co also sponsored May Day uh… I mean Pro Illegal Immigration marches.

  42. #137403
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:50 pm, ajmontana said:

    There all going to hell.

  43. #137404
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:51 pm, thebronze said:

    The Zombie link is no good, it goes to LGF.

  44. #137405
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:52 pm, ajmontana said:

    Their all going to hell.

  45. #137406
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:52 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:

    And to think that Miller used to be considered a redneck beer.

  46. #137409
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I mean, it’s a studded collar. No harm, no foul.

    Rusty, it’s a studded DOG collar. The article MM quotes clearly says it was purchased at a pet store.

    If you’re a rebellious teen and decide to wear a dog collar, it’s strange but at least you have a choice.

    There is NO reason to put a dog collar on a child. Whatsoever.

  47. #137412
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:56 pm, Fasternu 426 said:

    “Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god’s sake,” said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.

    The weenie whacker was appalled that someone brought the kids?

    What is the argument FOR gay marriage again?

  48. #137413
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:56 pm, dm60462 said:

    Never mind ‘how do they bring children there’..

    HOW DO THSE PEOPLE GET CHILDREN IN THE FIRST PLACE????

  49. #137414
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:57 pm, yt1300inHtown said:

    By the way, Friday I saw a Miller Lite truck painted Red White and Green like a certain country’s flag and all the writing on it was really hard for me to understand.

    I think it said, “Hey, don’t buy this beer…gringo”

  50. #137416
    On October 1st, 2007 at 4:58 pm, Caitriona3 said:

    I’ve had movie theaters check my ID for a rated “R” film (after I’ve turned 25 – which was kind of flattering), but these two munchkins get exposed to worse while people around them shrug. Absolutely insane. I don’t care what people want to wear, and I leave judgements on personal relationships to someone a lot higher placed than me, but I do believe that this is taking the “expose the children to diversity” thing too far.

  51. #137421
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:02 pm, ajmontana said:

    dm60462 said,
    HOW DO THSE PEOPLE GET CHILDREN IN THE FIRST PLACE????

    Exactly, and they should just stick to the chihuahua’s that can fit in their purses.

  52. #137424
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:05 pm, Go_Fish said:

    So a certain segment of the population thinks is perfectly appropriate for toddlers, eh? Nice. Of course, these are the very same people who crap kittens about religious conservatives “shoving their morals down our throats”.

  53. #137429
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:08 pm, rooinctown said:

    I am sick to stomach and that was just about the two “dads”. I think Miller and San Francisco should be boycotted. Or better let’s just build a wall around these idiots so we don’t have to look at them.

  54. #137434
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:10 pm, Uplander said:

    Rusty says -
    If you look at the pictures, most of them aren’t even that offensive to me.

    That pretty much says it all Rusty.

  55. #137444
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:16 pm, Ragspierre said:

    “Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god’s sake,” said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.

    To quote Frank Zappa…

    “It’s been an long time this time, pow, pow , pow…”

    Annually, huh….

  56. #137445
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:17 pm, Walldog said:

    I’m surprised Zombie hasn’t gone insane photographing these sick fools.

    .

  57. #137447
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:18 pm, Ragspierre said:

    “Why do (these people) bring kids here? This is a leather fair for god’s sake,” said Bahran Aliassa, who was masturbating in public. He has been doing it annually for the past six years.

    To quote Frank Zappa–

    “It’s been a long time this time…pow, pow, pow…

    Annually, huh…?

  58. #137450
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:21 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Just freaking sick. After that – I am speachless.

  59. #137460
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:27 pm, RedRepub said:

    There is absolutely no excuse for parents to expose their children to this fair!!!!!!!! Their kids should be taken away.

    That being said, not all gays are going to Hell. But they are so boring, they’ll never be featured in the news.

    There are gay couples who are great parents, but they won’t make it in the news.

    The Folsom Street Fair is a spectacle not only for the raunch, but also because these are the people and pics that get put on the news, and the blogs. People point to this and say,” That’s why gays aren’t equal to everyone else. This proves they are deviants.” (See above posts for examples.)

    It is disgusting and Miller should be boycotted. BUT blaming all gay parents or the entire community at large isn’t the answer.

    Other raunch festivals have explicit age limits with an ID required. Some even require visitors to sign a waiver.

    Miller has a long history supporting the gay community, HOWEVER this is going WAAAY too far.

    Back in the 1970’s and 1980’s, the only companies who would advertise in gay news publications were adult entertainment businesses. Now we know why.

    As bfor the whole “diversity” crap. Exposing your children to raunch and expalining it away as “culture” is crap. Most parents wouldn’t take their kids to a porn store. This is no different.

  60. #137463
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:28 pm, daveglo said:

    All the more reason to drink Bud!

    What do you expect out of the land of fruits and nuts?

    I hear the city wants to change it’s name to San Fruitcisco.

  61. #137473
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:32 pm, RedRepub said:

    What do you expect out of the land of fruits and nuts?

    I hear the city wants to change it’s name to San Fruitcisco.

    Real mature. Never heard that one before.

  62. #137480
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:36 pm, ARCountry said:

    Rest assured that there are legions of gay folk who (1) find the public displays that go on at functions like these completely repugnant, and (2) think that any person, gay or straight, who takes their child/children to something like this is in no way fit to be a parent.

    People such as this are unfit to guide the development of another human being. They veil something like this in exposing their kids to “culture” and then demand “equal rights”?

    It amazes me that anyone could become so totally skewed in their perception of right/wrong that they would think this appropriate.

    I’m gay. And I’ll go on the record and say that, as a community, until we collectively begin to conduct ourselves in such a manner to justify being granted civil unions or marriage, we should be denied such. These people sully the very idea of marriage and family by their actions alone.

  63. #137501
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:55 pm, feebiebabe said:

    ARCountry,

    best of luck and I certainly respect the post. Unfortuately, SF seems to really be hindering your efforts but it is good to be reminded that we are not talking about ALL gays.

    For me, its gonna take a little time for me to be really gung-ho about gay adoption. I live here, and from what i’ve seen, i am really unimpressed on account I think here it is more about politics than what is in the best interest of the children. I suppose when and if that pendilum ever swings back around, I would be willing to rethink my current stance.

    That said.

    Miller has committed corporate suicide with this one….

    I can’t even imagine what those little ones were witnessing. Good grief if this is not child abuse.

  64. #137504
    On October 1st, 2007 at 5:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    ARCountry:

    What a great post. Thank you for the perspective.

    Miller has committed corporate suicide with this one….

    We’ll see.

  65. #137511
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:03 pm, Bruce Hendrix said:

    Wow, now I know what to get my best friend for his pending baby shower..anyone know where to get baby whips, ass less diapers and a gag pacifier?

  66. #137518
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:14 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Reprobate \ n: a thoroughly bad person: SCOUNDREL -

  67. #137521
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:17 pm, terrig said:

    thanks Texasdee, just called them myself. The annoucement said that they were very busy-I guess they are. I’ve been a fan of Miller Beer since I started going to concerts when I was 14 and was drinking underage, which I know is another issue in itself but I digress. However, the Champagne of Beers will never darken my door again. I don’t care if I have a party and someone brings it along. I will never buy it at a sports event, concert, what have you. I’m done, I told them that. They were nice but I could tell they were stressed out.

  68. #137531
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:22 pm, fred5676 said:

    Last year at this time I called a half dozen “leaders” of Miller to complain of their stupidity of being blackmailed by pro-illegal alien groups for $30,000, after they discovered that Miller had given $2,000 to their OWN Congressman, Sensenbrenner. I used http://www.millerbrewing.com/aboutMiller/aboutleaders.asp

    Tom Long, President and CEO, or at least someone who represented himself as Mr. Long, called me on Labor Day Sunday afternoon to respond to my complaints. We had a 15 minute educational chat. I explained that DEMOCRATS, not Sensenbrenner, made sure that ‘felony’ was part of HR 4437. Therefore, Miller cluelessly gave in to blackmail. http://www.jmi.com/immigrationmarches/#housevote

    They are still clueless, and worse.

    More calls to make today.

  69. #137532
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:22 pm, TeutonicNomad said:

    This is a large reason why the homosexual community gets hammered about gay marriage and the ability to raise families in a wholesome environment; it doesn’t happen. Using children as accessories to your life-style is utterly disgusting.

  70. #137534
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:23 pm, jeanie said:

    It’s not clear to me whether these kids were adopted or biological children. Can anyone clear that up? And if biological, where were/are the mothers? This whole item is frightening and confusing. The screenings for adopted children, in my experience, are very, very strict. I’m wondering how these two ever made it. Not because they are gay, but because they are decadent enough to dress toddlers in what could be construed as as sexual gear. Perhaps child welfare should be looking at these two?

  71. #137563
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:41 pm, feebiebabe said:

    “The screenings for adopted children, in my experience, are very, very strict.”

    Well, welcome to SF. The city of the mentally challanged and nonsensical communist elites.

    There has been a campaign underway here to SEEK out Gay, Lesbian and Transgender parents for adopting/fostering children here in the bay area. I couldn’t prove it either way, but I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if perspective gay and transgender parents are given preference over straight parents based solely on account of political agenda.

    Out here we really do have reverse discrimination.

    Why would a city be “seeking out” a certain demographic instead of relying on those who willingly come forward voluntarily to adopt.

    It matters not that these parents are FIT to the SF community et, al (Mr. Gavin) but more that they are GAY. With these types of priorities…no wonder we have “Babes in Joyland”

    It is an absolute joke.

  72. #137565
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:43 pm, Regulus said:

    Reasons I don’t drink Miller beer, in order:

    1. It tastes like p*ss.

    2. It puts its name behind stunts like pro-illegal immigration rallies.

    3. It puts its name behind activities that would’ve made the denizens of Soddom and Gomorrah blush.

    They’re free to spend their ad money however they want. And I’m free to spend my money on other brands of beer.

  73. #137577
    On October 1st, 2007 at 6:52 pm, joeyb1955 said:

    Ahhh…every liberal’s collective desire for a completely secular society takes one more tiny step towards reality.

  74. #137595
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:07 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:

    Would it surprise any of you to know that John Kruse, one of the girls two fathers, is a well San Francisco psychiatrist?

    Link…(scroll down to 1982).

    Link.

  75. #137597
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:09 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:

    oops….Should have read :
    “…a well respected San Francisco psychiatrist?”

  76. #137605
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:20 pm, Russ N said:

    Reason #934 for never visiting San Fran….I pray for these twins.

  77. #137617
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:32 pm, feebiebabe said:

    According to the Bay Insider Online, they had an article about this couple and twin Daughters called “Folsom: a place for children?” back in September of 2005.

    So, looks like this has been going on for at least 3 years now and no one has brought it to the CPS’s attention? Where is the outrage?

  78. #137623
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:36 pm, Ringo the Gringo said:

    feebiebabe,

    Michelle points out that the article linked to above is from 2005.

  79. #137631
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:46 pm, suek said:

    CO of Fort Housewife:

    You said San Fransisco’s CPS department needed an address???

    >>Would it surprise any of you to know that John Kruse, one of the girls two fathers, is a well San Francisco psychiatrist?>>

    #74 might give a lead for that info…(links follow in original)

    Heh.

  80. #137633
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:47 pm, Thomas R. said:

    Since this is Bizarro World we’re talking about here, I’ll ask the questions which are obvious anywhere else in America:

    Is masturbating in public not a crime in San Francisco?

    Is walking around fully naked not a crime in San Francisco?

    If this went on in my city, the police could have shut this down as an unlawful assembly and public nusiance, once 5 people were caught commiting the same public indecency crime, whether the organizers of the fair had a permit or not!

  81. #137634
    On October 1st, 2007 at 7:49 pm, feebiebabe said:

    ooohh. my bad. thanks, RTG.

  82. #137645
    On October 1st, 2007 at 8:02 pm, Augustine said:

    Great…let’s bathe innocent children in hedonism and debauchery, and poison their little minds with this perversion and filth…they won’t be innocent long.

  83. #137658
    On October 1st, 2007 at 8:17 pm, RedWinged Blackbird said:

    Prevent Taste Loss with Miller.

  84. #137673
    On October 1st, 2007 at 8:40 pm, ajmontana said:

    Ah c’mon you guys whats wrong with parading around in front of children in buttless chaps swilling an ice cold miller beer with the fella’s?

  85. #137674
    On October 1st, 2007 at 8:40 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    “They will see more than the kids with moms and dads in Iowa,” said Beuschel, who wanted to expose his children to San Francisco�s diverse community.

    What a moron. Kids see that stuff in downtown Iowa City all the time.

  86. #137682
    On October 1st, 2007 at 9:15 pm, greenfairie said:

    Absolutely appalling. If these creeps are willing to bring children to an event like this one and put dog collars on them, you gotta wonder if they’re peddling their kids out to pedophiles or putting them in homemade kiddie porn.

    But like the British foster care agency that kept quiet on molestation by a same sex couple because of “diversity” purposes, I doubt CPS will care. Spank your child or give him too much junk food, and the gendarmes will kick down your door and haul junior away. Take him to a sex fair and you’ll be Parent of the Year.

  87. #137693
    On October 1st, 2007 at 9:42 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    If Kruse IS a “well-respected” figure in San Fran, then he SHOULD be investigated.

    It’s unacceptable – regardless of whether one is straight or gay – to expose children to this or dress them in this sexual manner. They’re TWO YEARS OLD?

    Spank your child or give him too much junk food, and the gendarmes will kick down your door and haul junior away. Take him to a sex fair and you’ll be Parent of the Year.

    Pretty spot-on, sadly. Wasn’t California the state that wanted to make SPANKING a crime?

    Oh, yeah. It was. The bill would have made it a MISDEMEANOR to spank a child up to the age of 3. So surely this has to be slightly more severe than that.

    I thought it was a felony to play pornographic movies in places where children could see them. What about taking children to pornographic sexual “fairs”?

  88. #137699
    On October 1st, 2007 at 9:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    Didnt they just take Britney’s kids away for her being fat drunk and stupid?

  89. #137702
    On October 1st, 2007 at 9:52 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    It’s any wonder why vile evils like child porn and sex trafficking are so prevalent today. Liberals should take note that the same scientific method that gives them their precious theory of evolution also says that human beings exposed to porno-fiestas like this are more likely to commit sex crimes. I guess the feminists missed the memo on that though.

    I won’t be buying miller anytime soon–or going to san fran.

  90. #137704
    On October 1st, 2007 at 9:59 pm, jsr said:

    In a normal world these sickos would be prosecuted for child endangerment and/or corruption of a minor. Imagine the uproar if they had been exposed to second-hand smoke in the car on the way to this porn-fest. (Tobacco smoke that is.)

  91. #137720
    On October 1st, 2007 at 10:16 pm, ajmontana said:

    Funny how the Miller High Life commercials have delivery guys going in taking their beer out of restaurants because they sell cheeseburgers for $11.00. But sell dildos and invite children and you’re A.O.K. and let the beer flow.

  92. #137760
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:41 pm, BOB said:

    This crap is almost enough to make it understandable why many Muslims hate our, “culture.”

  93. #137763
    On October 1st, 2007 at 11:50 pm, purplepeep said:

    BOB said:
    This crap is almost enough to make it understandable why many Muslims hate our, “culture.”

    That’s not my culture, BOB.

    This disgusting and shameful public display of human degradation is distinctly lacking in “culture”.

  94. #137801
    On October 2nd, 2007 at 1:26 am, Romeo13 said:

    Sooo… I have to guess that this whole thing would NOT impede traffic???

    Because, you know thats the reason they gave for NOT letting the Marines film there… on a Early Sunday Morning…

    Sad… very sad… and I grew up near the Bay Area…

  95. #137813
    On October 2nd, 2007 at 2:20 am, Pat said:

    I hope Child Protective Services is going to investigate those two, or is that politically incorrect in SF?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Meanwhile, back in San Francisco…

September 30, 2008 01:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“Stinging pleasure.”

Calculate Nancy Pelosi’s carbon footprint

August 4, 2008 09:21 AM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Store owner boycotts Miller Beer

October 12, 2007 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Taking a stand.

Introducing MillerCoors

October 9, 2007 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Political brew.

Miller Beer filters out photos of its own company-sponsored public indecency

October 5, 2007 08:08 PM by Michelle Malkin

30 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Public flogging.

Miller-sponsored, Miller-approved: The Folsom Street Fair, uncovered

October 4, 2007 07:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

120 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Breaking taboos.

Miller: The beer of open-borders and S&M

October 2, 2007 12:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bad taste.

Miller-sponsored leather/bondage fest: Underage guests welcome!

September 28, 2007 08:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Fun. Frolic. Fetish.


Categories: Folsom Street Fair



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom