Comments on: The push for the Law of the Sea Treaty http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:23:37 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Hp Pavilion AMD 2.8ghz 5600 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-216563 Hp Pavilion AMD 2.8ghz 5600 Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:31:50 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-216563 <strong>Hp Pavilion AMD 2.8ghz 5600...</strong> receptacle stiles... Hp Pavilion AMD 2.8ghz 5600…

receptacle stiles…

]]> By: Tel-Chai Nation http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-149830 Tel-Chai Nation Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:48:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-149830 <strong>Dubya turns against the state he governed, by tryi...</strong> Dubya continues to be a disgrace in his second presidential term by trying to intervene in the case of Jose Medillin, who raped and murdered two teenage girls in Texas and is now facing the death sentence (Hat tip: Michelle Malkin):... Dubya turns against the state he governed, by tryi…

Dubya continues to be a disgrace in his second presidential term by trying to intervene in the case of Jose Medillin, who raped and murdered two teenage girls in Texas and is now facing the death sentence (Hat tip: Michelle Malkin):…

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » More on the meddling Land of the Sea Treaty http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-144749 Michelle Malkin » More on the meddling Land of the Sea Treaty Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:42:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-144749 [...] mentioned the Senate’s push for the Law of the Sea Treaty a week ago. It’s a sovereignty-undermining measure that would, as Frank Gaffney puts it, [...] [...] mentioned the Senate’s push for the Law of the Sea Treaty a week ago. It’s a sovereignty-undermining measure that would, as Frank Gaffney puts it, [...]

]]> By: Oppose The Law Of The Sea Treaty | PeteRepublic.org http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-139427 Oppose The Law Of The Sea Treaty | PeteRepublic.org Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:58:03 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-139427 [...] UPDATE 1: Michelle Malkin chimes in on LOST….. [...] [...] UPDATE 1: Michelle Malkin chimes in on LOST….. [...]

]]> By: Plains Feeder http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138994 Plains Feeder Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:51:17 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138994 <strong>Law of the Sea Treaty: more power for the UN...</strong> You might think Americans would catch on to the fact that the entire United Nations experiment in globalization has been a dangerous bust.... Law of the Sea Treaty: more power for the UN…

You might think Americans would catch on to the fact that the entire United Nations experiment in globalization has been a dangerous bust….

]]> By: yodleman http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138395 yodleman Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:12:52 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138395 It amazes me that we still pander to the U.N. What amazes me more is that we bankroll all the nonsense It amazes me that we still pander to the U.N. What amazes me more is that we bankroll all the nonsense

]]> By: Ombre Rose http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138293 Ombre Rose Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:00:04 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138293 <blockquote>On October 2nd, 2007 at 1:17 pm, Leatherneck said: I can only guess what the U.N. will do with all that money, and no over site.</blockquote> It doesn't take a GUESS to know that America will STILL REMAIN their FIRST TARGET.

On October 2nd, 2007 at 1:17 pm, Leatherneck said:
I can only guess what the U.N. will do with all that money, and no over site.

It doesn’t take a GUESS to know that America will STILL REMAIN their FIRST TARGET.

]]> By: Ombre Rose http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138292 Ombre Rose Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:57:49 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138292 <blockquote>On October 2nd, 2007 at 12:22 pm, purplepeep said: Just seing the terms “UN” and “law” in the same sentence brings on projectile vomiting. Things like this makes me wish we had a national referendum voting option simce we the people - unlike many of our “leaders’ - are able to use our God-given common sense.</blockquote> Isn't a national referendum supposed to be the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT of "WE THE PEOPLE"???????? ESPECIALLY on something with the power to SUBJUGATE a FREE PEOPLE???????????

On October 2nd, 2007 at 12:22 pm, purplepeep said:
Just seing the terms “UN” and “law” in the same sentence brings on projectile vomiting.

Things like this makes me wish we had a national referendum voting option simce we the people – unlike many of our “leaders’ – are able to use our God-given common sense.

Isn’t a national referendum supposed to be the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT of “WE THE PEOPLE”????????
ESPECIALLY on something with the power to SUBJUGATE a FREE PEOPLE???????????

]]> By: Ombre Rose http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138287 Ombre Rose Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:48:56 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138287 On October 2nd, 2007 at 12:02 pm, momwrites72 said: <blockquote>On October 2nd, 2007 at 11:56 am, ThackerAgency said: Again, while I am completely against anything concerning a ‘new world order’ or ‘one world government’, there’s little we can do about it.</blockquote> <em>Yes, I agree. Prophecy is only being fulfilled, and once that happens, we’re all screwed, and yet, it seems our political leaders want to speed it up as fast as they can. Hmmm…</em> Isn't it simply AMAZING, nobody is working harder to fulfill prophecy than LIBERALS, who claim they don't believe it. :lol: On October 2nd, 2007 at 12:02 pm, momwrites72 said:

On October 2nd, 2007 at 11:56 am, ThackerAgency said:

Again, while I am completely against anything concerning a ‘new world order’ or ‘one world government’, there’s little we can do about it.

Yes, I agree. Prophecy is only being fulfilled, and once that happens, we’re all screwed, and yet, it seems our political leaders want to speed it up as fast as they can. Hmmm…

Isn’t it simply AMAZING, nobody is working harder to fulfill prophecy than LIBERALS, who claim they don’t believe it. :lol:

]]> By: walterc http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138286 walterc Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:47:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138286 Stock up on food, water and ammo, the End of Days approacheth. Stock up on food, water and ammo, the End of Days approacheth.

]]> By: gayle http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138281 gayle Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:43:32 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138281 michiganmom; well said! Bush has been taken over, possessed, something not of this world. Perhaps he's made a pact with.....should I dare say it? You know what I'm talking about. michiganmom; well said!

Bush has been taken over, possessed, something not of this world.

Perhaps he’s made a pact with…..should I dare say it? You know what I’m talking about.

]]> By: michiganmom http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138270 michiganmom Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:23:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138270 Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US! Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!

]]> By: dadog http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138159 dadog Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:41:50 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138159 #27 Presto...I think you're right....It amazes me on how on some issues he is just way off. #27 Presto…I think you’re right….It amazes me on how on some issues he is just way off.

]]> By: CommentGuy http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138113 CommentGuy Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:22:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138113 <a href="http://eaglespeak.blogspot.com/2007/09/questioning-law-of-sea-treaty.html" rel="nofollow">Another blog</a> has a good read on this <blockquote>In the past, writers on international law acknowledged that states could not be expected to submit the most sensitive political questions--those most vital to national security--to international arbitration. Most of the world seems to have abandoned this view, but most nations no longer make great efforts to provide for their own defense. So, even as the United States has substantially reduced the scale of its naval forces, since the peak years of the Reagan build-up we have acquired a larger and larger share of the world's naval capacity. Others have shrunk their forces further and faster. In past centuries, rules about the conduct of ships at sea emerged from agreements among major naval powers, and there were always a number of naval powers engaged in challenging, enforcing, and accommodating agreed-upon standards. Now, when the United States (by some estimates) actually deploys a majority of the world's naval capacity, we are told that our security requires us to participate with 150 other states in electing international judges to determine, in the last analysis, what rules our Navy must accept. To find this convincing, one must be awed by the moral authority of the U.N. majority. To think that way means that we seek consensus at almost any price. Why do we claim to be independent, why do we invest so many billions in defense capacities, if we are prepared to go along with an international consensus, articulated (and -readjusted) by international jurists? The Senate should think long and hard before making the U.S. Navy answer to the U.N version of the Law of the Sea. </blockquote> Another blog has a good read on this

In the past, writers on international law acknowledged that states could not be expected to submit the most sensitive political questions–those most vital to national security–to international arbitration. Most of the world seems to have abandoned this view, but most nations no longer make great efforts to provide for their own defense. So, even as the United States has substantially reduced the scale of its naval forces, since the peak years of the Reagan build-up we have acquired a larger and larger share of the world’s naval capacity. Others have shrunk their forces further and faster.

In past centuries, rules about the conduct of ships at sea emerged from agreements among major naval powers, and there were always a number of naval powers engaged in challenging, enforcing, and accommodating agreed-upon standards. Now, when the United States (by some estimates) actually deploys a majority of the world’s naval capacity, we are told that our security requires us to participate with 150 other states in electing international judges to determine, in the last analysis, what rules our Navy must accept.

To find this convincing, one must be awed by the moral authority of the U.N. majority. To think that way means that we seek consensus at almost any price. Why do we claim to be independent, why do we invest so many billions in defense capacities, if we are prepared to go along with an international consensus, articulated (and -readjusted) by international jurists? The Senate should think long and hard before making the U.S. Navy answer to the U.N version of the Law of the Sea.

]]> By: James Felix http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-138106 James Felix Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:05:22 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-138106 <blockquote>Thomas Jefferson did not have 12 Carrier Battle Groups at his command. </blockquote> Oh, if only he had....

Thomas Jefferson did not have 12 Carrier Battle Groups at his command.

Oh, if only he had….

]]>