<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleaning service tarleton</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1255867</link>
		<dc:creator>cleaning service tarleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1255867</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sources...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sources&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Rated Weight Loss Products</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1249329</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Rated Weight Loss Products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1249329</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Great website...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great website&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Lurch to the Left Could Jeopardize Internet Freedom and Accelerate New Regulations &#160;&#124;&#160;NetRight Daily</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1238857</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Lurch to the Left Could Jeopardize Internet Freedom and Accelerate New Regulations &#160;&#124;&#160;NetRight Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1238857</guid>
		<description>[...] Federal records show that Google donated just over $800,000 to President Obama’s election campaign, federal records show. Executive Director Eric Schmidt campaign with Obama in the final weeks of the 2008 campaign and is reportedly in the running to become commerce secretary. Google has also boosted its lobbying efforts in recent years. The company spent over $5 million in lobbying fees last year, according the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). 2011 donations include $90,000 to the Podesta Group, which is run by Tony Podesta, a prominent Democratic operative. Google has also been aligned with the far left group Moveon.org, blogger Michelle Malkin has noted. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal records show that Google donated just over $800,000 to President Obama’s election campaign, federal records show. Executive Director Eric Schmidt campaign with Obama in the final weeks of the 2008 campaign and is reportedly in the running to become commerce secretary. Google has also boosted its lobbying efforts in recent years. The company spent over $5 million in lobbying fees last year, according the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). 2011 donations include $90,000 to the Podesta Group, which is run by Tony Podesta, a prominent Democratic operative. Google has also been aligned with the far left group Moveon.org, blogger Michelle Malkin has noted. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yolk chicago</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1232314</link>
		<dc:creator>yolk chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1232314</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You should check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You should check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plumbers Houston</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1206363</link>
		<dc:creator>plumbers Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1206363</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gems form the internet...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gems form the internet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Transcription Services by Landmark</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1204479</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Transcription Services by Landmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1204479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free backlink software</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1191709</link>
		<dc:creator>free backlink software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1191709</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sites we Like…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sites we Like…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook123</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1184960</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-1184960</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Websites we think you should visit...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Websites we think you should visit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google weighs in on the anti-MoveOne.org ads - RazorPress</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-561880</link>
		<dc:creator>google weighs in on the anti-MoveOne.org ads - RazorPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-561880</guid>
		<description>[...] Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro General Petraeus, Anti Betray Us Editorial Cartoons &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-298702</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro General Petraeus, Anti Betray Us Editorial Cartoons &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-298702</guid>
		<description>[...] And Google is aiding MoveOn by banning ads critical of MoveOn&#8217;s Betray-Us smear! So much for free speech - it&#8217;s all one-way street here. Pic below via Michelle Malkin: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Google is aiding MoveOn by banning ads critical of MoveOn&#8217;s Betray-Us smear! So much for free speech &#8211; it&#8217;s all one-way street here. Pic below via Michelle Malkin: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorblue</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-177951</link>
		<dc:creator>directorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-177951</guid>
		<description>I give Cafe Press and anyone else permission to &lt;a href=&quot;http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/10/official-moronorg-logo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;use my new logo&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Cafe Press and anyone else permission to <a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/10/official-moronorg-logo.html" rel="nofollow">use my new logo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On David All at Maine blog - Maine Web Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-155663</link>
		<dc:creator>On David All at Maine blog - Maine Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-155663</guid>
		<description>[...] the blogosphere erupted. Starting with Matt Drudge and running down the ranks through Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, Newsbusters, RedState, Little Green Footballs, Patrick Ruffini, Dan Reihl, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blogosphere erupted. Starting with Matt Drudge and running down the ranks through Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, Newsbusters, RedState, Little Green Footballs, Patrick Ruffini, Dan Reihl, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Gets Political at The Lunch Counter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-145306</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Gets Political at The Lunch Counter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-145306</guid>
		<description>[...] They refuse to run an ad that points out Moveon.org&#8217;s participation in campaigning against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). Oh really? Suddenly, Google is more than a platform. I don&#8217;t like what I&#8217;m seeing. Here&#8217;s the ad. What&#8217;s the problem? Wouldn&#8217;t have anything to do with their tax status as a non-political 501c would it? Well it should.  More at Michelle Malkin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They refuse to run an ad that points out Moveon.org&#8217;s participation in campaigning against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). Oh really? Suddenly, Google is more than a platform. I don&#8217;t like what I&#8217;m seeing. Here&#8217;s the ad. What&#8217;s the problem? Wouldn&#8217;t have anything to do with their tax status as a non-political 501c would it? Well it should.  More at Michelle Malkin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-145076</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-145076</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Bows To MoveOn.org...&lt;/strong&gt;

An anti-Move.org ad was recently banned by Google, stating it was &quot;copyright infringement.&quot; With all the tacky linkbait that floats around in their ads I have to laugh at that statement. We&#8217;re dealing with an obvious defense of MoveOn, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Bows To MoveOn.org&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An anti-Move.org ad was recently banned by Google, stating it was &quot;copyright infringement.&quot; With all the tacky linkbait that floats around in their ads I have to laugh at that statement. We&#8217;re dealing with an obvious defense of MoveOn, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday fun: Newsbusted parodies MoveOn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144834</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday fun: Newsbusted parodies MoveOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144834</guid>
		<description>[...] They used the MoveOn logo!!! C&amp;D letter on the way in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They used the MoveOn logo!!! C&#38;D letter on the way in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

