<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:17:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: google weighs in on the anti-MoveOne.org ads - RazorPress</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-561880</link>
		<dc:creator>google weighs in on the anti-MoveOne.org ads - RazorPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-561880</guid>
		<description>[...] Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro General Petraeus, Anti Betray Us Editorial Cartoons &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-298702</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro General Petraeus, Anti Betray Us Editorial Cartoons &#171; BUUUUURRRRNING HOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-298702</guid>
		<description>[...] And Google is aiding MoveOn by banning ads critical of MoveOn&#8217;s Betray-Us smear! So much for free speech - it&#8217;s all one-way street here. Pic below via Michelle Malkin: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Google is aiding MoveOn by banning ads critical of MoveOn&#8217;s Betray-Us smear! So much for free speech &#8211; it&#8217;s all one-way street here. Pic below via Michelle Malkin: Why did Google ban anti-MoveOn.org ads?: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorblue</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-177951</link>
		<dc:creator>directorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-177951</guid>
		<description>I give Cafe Press and anyone else permission to &lt;a href=&quot;http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/10/official-moronorg-logo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;use my new logo&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Cafe Press and anyone else permission to <a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/10/official-moronorg-logo.html" rel="nofollow">use my new logo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On David All at Maine blog - Maine Web Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-155663</link>
		<dc:creator>On David All at Maine blog - Maine Web Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-155663</guid>
		<description>[...] the blogosphere erupted. Starting with Matt Drudge and running down the ranks through Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, Newsbusters, RedState, Little Green Footballs, Patrick Ruffini, Dan Reihl, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blogosphere erupted. Starting with Matt Drudge and running down the ranks through Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, Newsbusters, RedState, Little Green Footballs, Patrick Ruffini, Dan Reihl, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Gets Political at The Lunch Counter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-145306</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Gets Political at The Lunch Counter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-145306</guid>
		<description>[...] They refuse to run an ad that points out Moveon.org&#8217;s participation in campaigning against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). Oh really? Suddenly, Google is more than a platform. I don&#8217;t like what I&#8217;m seeing. Here&#8217;s the ad. What&#8217;s the problem? Wouldn&#8217;t have anything to do with their tax status as a non-political 501c would it? Well it should.  More at Michelle Malkin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They refuse to run an ad that points out Moveon.org&#8217;s participation in campaigning against Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). Oh really? Suddenly, Google is more than a platform. I don&#8217;t like what I&#8217;m seeing. Here&#8217;s the ad. What&#8217;s the problem? Wouldn&#8217;t have anything to do with their tax status as a non-political 501c would it? Well it should.  More at Michelle Malkin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-145076</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-145076</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Bows To MoveOn.org...&lt;/strong&gt;

An anti-Move.org ad was recently banned by Google, stating it was &quot;copyright infringement.&quot; With all the tacky linkbait that floats around in their ads I have to laugh at that statement. We&#8217;re dealing with an obvious defense of MoveOn, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Bows To MoveOn.org&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An anti-Move.org ad was recently banned by Google, stating it was &quot;copyright infringement.&quot; With all the tacky linkbait that floats around in their ads I have to laugh at that statement. We&#8217;re dealing with an obvious defense of MoveOn, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday fun: Newsbusted parodies MoveOn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144834</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday fun: Newsbusted parodies MoveOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144834</guid>
		<description>[...] They used the MoveOn logo!!! C&amp;D letter on the way in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They used the MoveOn logo!!! C&#38;D letter on the way in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric_CharlotteNC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144758</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric_CharlotteNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ConservativeBelle said: 
Maybe conservative bloggers could boycott Google Ads in a show of our disapproval?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You should have done this long ago
&lt;em&gt;I can not believe Michelle uses their service!&lt;/em&gt;
Google is much more dangerous than MoveOn because people are not aware of there agenda. Read some articles on them at WND.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ConservativeBelle said:<br />
Maybe conservative bloggers could boycott Google Ads in a show of our disapproval?
</p></blockquote>
<p>You should have done this long ago<br />
<em>I can not believe Michelle uses their service!</em><br />
Google is much more dangerous than MoveOn because people are not aware of there agenda. Read some articles on them at WND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonage Political Webdream &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rafsanjani, Hitler, and Ann Coulter?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144710</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonage Political Webdream &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rafsanjani, Hitler, and Ann Coulter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144710</guid>
		<description>[...] wonder why &#8220;Ann Coulter&#8221; would even come up in an article that never mentions her.  More politics by Google?  Or, is Ann&#8217;s name now so synonomous with &#8220;Jew&#8221; that Google&#8217;s engine just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wonder why &#8220;Ann Coulter&#8221; would even come up in an article that never mentions her.  More politics by Google?  Or, is Ann&#8217;s name now so synonomous with &#8220;Jew&#8221; that Google&#8217;s engine just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29Victor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144639</link>
		<dc:creator>29Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144639</guid>
		<description>Old google motto:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Don&#039;t be evil.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

New google motto:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Don&#039;t be evil*.

&lt;em&gt;*Evil being a relative word.  Relative, of course, to your culture, party affiliation and how much you are willing to pay us.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old google motto:</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t be evil.</p></blockquote>
<p>New google motto:</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t be evil*.</p>
<p><em>*Evil being a relative word.  Relative, of course, to your culture, party affiliation and how much you are willing to pay us.</em></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29Victor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144637</link>
		<dc:creator>29Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144637</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google:&lt;/strong&gt;
Now blocking for MoveOn and the Government of China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google:</strong><br />
Now blocking for MoveOn and the Government of China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144581</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144581</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Denies Republican Ads That Counter MoveOn&#039;s Message...&lt;/strong&gt;

George Soros and company up to their tricks once again.&#160; This time they ban some internet advertisements from Rep. Susan Collins, who is a Republican as I&#039;m sure you figured out by now, that mention MoveOn.org.&#160; Internet giant Google has......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Denies Republican Ads That Counter MoveOn&#8217;s Message&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>George Soros and company up to their tricks once again.&nbsp; This time they ban some internet advertisements from Rep. Susan Collins, who is a Republican as I&#8217;m sure you figured out by now, that mention MoveOn.org.&nbsp; Internet giant Google has&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mngirl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144577</link>
		<dc:creator>mngirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144577</guid>
		<description>Hey all is not lost, &lt;strong&gt;Google&#039;s stock dropped almost $4 tonight - ~$3.35 or .5%.&lt;/strong&gt;

Not a bad start.  

Now, I doubt its due to their banishment of MoveOn.org ads, but its a place to start.  I noticed at least one media outlet picked up the story, I&#039;m watching one of the others now to see if they mention it.  Let&#039;s hope it gets more attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all is not lost, <strong>Google&#8217;s stock dropped almost $4 tonight &#8211; ~$3.35 or .5%.</strong></p>
<p>Not a bad start.  </p>
<p>Now, I doubt its due to their banishment of MoveOn.org ads, but its a place to start.  I noticed at least one media outlet picked up the story, I&#8217;m watching one of the others now to see if they mention it.  Let&#8217;s hope it gets more attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144567</guid>
		<description>The proposed ads are NOT copyright violations.  No one is likely to confuse the fact that someone other than Google placed the ad.

If the ad were structured in a way that led people to believe MoveOn placed the ad, then that would be a copyright violation.  In that case, there would be an intention to profit from the MoveOn copyright.

Google wants to hold iteself as a news site, yet does not want to adopt standards of good journalism.

First they sell out to China and now they censor conservative ads.  While the left is quick to sling around the term &quot;neocon&quot;, I think Google and the Soros cabal have just earned the moniker &quot;neocom&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed ads are NOT copyright violations.  No one is likely to confuse the fact that someone other than Google placed the ad.</p>
<p>If the ad were structured in a way that led people to believe MoveOn placed the ad, then that would be a copyright violation.  In that case, there would be an intention to profit from the MoveOn copyright.</p>
<p>Google wants to hold iteself as a news site, yet does not want to adopt standards of good journalism.</p>
<p>First they sell out to China and now they censor conservative ads.  While the left is quick to sling around the term &#8220;neocon&#8221;, I think Google and the Soros cabal have just earned the moniker &#8220;neocom&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-144481</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-google-ban-anti-moveonorg-ads/#comment-144481</guid>
		<description>I have a Google e-mail account and like the layout as well as the size of files I can tranfer as well as the size of things I can store.  i also like the fact that, unlike Hotmail, they do not delete the account after a month of non-use.

Following this information, I now wish to scrap my e-mail account with them, but do not know of any other e-mail accounts that are offering similar services.  

Does anyone have any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Google e-mail account and like the layout as well as the size of files I can tranfer as well as the size of things I can store.  i also like the fact that, unlike Hotmail, they do not delete the account after a month of non-use.</p>
<p>Following this information, I now wish to scrap my e-mail account with them, but do not know of any other e-mail accounts that are offering similar services.  </p>
<p>Does anyone have any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
