Did You Know...

   

White House praises Gore for Nobel Peace Prize

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  October 12, 2007 12:29 PM

Update: Video: The Goracle takes his bow

Just when you thought Al Gore’s head couldn’t get any bigger, Part III. From the Associated Press:

The White House lauded former U.S. Vice President Al Gore on Friday for winning the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 for his contributions to raising awareness of the threat of climate change. “The president learned about it this morning,” said White House spokesman Tony Fratto, who is traveling with President George W. Bush in Florida. “Of course he’s happy for Vice President.”

Too bad he didn’t have the balls to say what the Czech president said.

Flashback…

Czech president Vaclav Klaus, “Freedom, not climate, is at risk,” June 13, 2007:

In the past year, Al Gore’s so-called “documentary” film was shown in cinemas worldwide, Britain’s – more or less Tony Blair’s – Stern report was published, the fourth report of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was put together and the Group of Eight summit announced ambitions to do something about the weather. Rational and freedom-loving people have to respond. The dictates of political correctness are strict and only one permitted truth, not for the first time in human history, is imposed on us. Everything else is denounced.

The author Michael Crichton stated it clearly: “the greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda”. I feel the same way, because global warming hysteria has become a prime example of the truth versus propaganda problem. It requires courage to oppose the “established” truth, although a lot of people – including top-class scientists – see the issue of climate change entirely differently. They protest against the arrogance of those who advocate the global warming hypothesis and relate it to human activities.

As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not in communism. This ideology wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning.

The environmentalists ask for immediate political action because they do not believe in the long-term positive impact of economic growth and ignore both the technological progress that future generations will undoubtedly enjoy, and the proven fact that the higher the wealth of society, the higher is the quality of the environment. They are Malthusian pessimists.

The scientists should help us and take into consideration the political effects of their scientific opinions. They have an obligation to declare their political and value assumptions and how much they have affected their selection and interpretation of scientific evidence.

Does it make any sense to speak about warming of the Earth when we see it in the context of the evolution of our planet over hundreds of millions of years? Every child is taught at school about temperature variations, about the ice ages, about the much warmer climate in the Middle Ages. All of us have noticed that even during our life-time temperature changes occur (in both directions).

Due to advances in technology, increases in disposable wealth, the rationality of institutions and the ability of countries to organise themselves, the adaptability of human society has been radically increased. It will continue to increase and will solve any potential consequences of mild climate changes.

I agree with Professor Richard Lindzen from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who said: “future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age”.

The issue of global warming is more about social than natural sciences and more about man and his freedom than about tenths of a degree Celsius changes in average global temperature.

***
Previous:

Just when you thought Al Gore’s head couldn’t get any bigger, Part II
Just when you thought Al Gore’s head couldn’t get any bigger…

Posted in: Al Gore

Newsweek hails Al Gore for predicting eventual-but-inevitable powerful hurricane

September 10, 2017 08:14 AM by Doug Powers

NostraDUHmus

Update on 2 bombs-in-the-making: N. Korea’s nuke & Al Gore’s new movie

August 9, 2017 07:49 AM by Doug Powers

An Inconvenient Box Office

Media finds hot new angle for sounding global warming alarm in Trump era

August 8, 2017 11:37 AM by Doug Powers

The “leak” that wasn’t very leaky

Al Gore must be trying to make his own ‘rain bombs’

August 2, 2017 05:32 PM by Doug Powers

But what about “hypocrite bombs”?


Categories: Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits, global warming