About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Joy-less Behar’s health care analysis

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 13, 2007 07:29 PM

behar.jpg

There was an infantile, pea-flinging discussion of the Graeme Frost case on the Real Time with Bill Maher show last night. Blogger Ms. Underestimated sent word that the classy Joy Behar–a comedian or something–offered her penetrating analysis of why I’m focusing more on opposing middle-class entitlement expansion than stopping the Iraq war.

If you can’t stand the blather, just forward to 2:53 into the segment of the video here. Behar’s side-splitting punchline about me:

“Because she’s a selfish bitch, probably.”

***

Allahpundit: “The one nice thing about leftist-approved attacks like this is that they reset the bar for what constitutes civilized political discourse. File “selfish bitch” away somewhere safe for future use.”

More here.

Posted in: Graeme Frost

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Joy Behar: Michelle’s “a selfish bitch, probably”
  2. MsUnderestimated
  3. THE SPADE
  4. Michelle Malkin » S-CHIP and the Democrats’ human shield campaign
  5. sports car club
  6. Michelle Malkin » My best friend, Joy Behar
  7. Michelle Malkin and Joy Behar Must Be Friends! : The American Pundit

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On October 13th, 2007 at 7:36 pm, 29Victor said:

    The kindergarden Left-wing credo:

    When logic fails call names and fling peas.

  2. #2
    On October 13th, 2007 at 7:51 pm, smfoushee said:

    Before the View did anybody know who this moonbat was? Comedian? In all of the clips AP has posted over at Hotair I don’t believe she even rated a small snicker.

    Stay with it Michelle, the truth makes for great entertainment when its used to confront these idiots.

  3. #3
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:00 pm, zorro said:

    What a brainless non-thinker, it’s like the sound of your name throws them into some sort of Voodoo, zombie trance where they then spout curses.

  4. #4
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:03 pm, OneofThem said:

    I call the fallacy of ignoring the question by appealing to the person, a.k.a. ad hominem! :P

  5. #5
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:32 pm, JammieWearingFool said:

    Joyless Behar: Reinventing stupidity.

  6. #6
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:34 pm, d1carter said:

    Joy “probably” hears that “b” word alot…

  7. #7
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:42 pm, Jim M. said:

    Joy Behar is not exactly Rhodes Scholar material (Rocky Road perhaps).

    It is sad in a way - this is what passes for intelligent discourse on the left. Trot out a celebrity or faux celebrity and hope the people are blinded by their starlight from seeing the facts.

    If she’s on TV, it must be true. The truth here is that MS. Behar is but another citizen living in the land of make believe, where things are what you wish them to be.

    I think I may have mentioned this before, but it is relevant here. Up until fairly recent times, the left controlled the flow of information. And that situation existed for so long they began to believe that anything they put out there would be swallowed hook, line and sinker.

    Now that there is a world wide web that allows people to find their own information and check the facts of what is being reported to them, the MSM and their minions cannot figure out how to respond.

    It reminds me of that scene from “The Wizard of OZ” when the great and powerful is called upon to make good on his promises. The bluster and volume of the Wizard’s voice booms throughout the room, while the flames of wrath shoot ever higher at the commoners who would dare to challenge a wizard. Until the smallest of the party boldly pulls back a the curtain concealing a common man pushing all the buttons.

    Despite the admonition to “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain”, the truth is out.

    The MSM and our elected representatives seem to be at the “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain stage”. The light of day has penetrated into the carefully built facade of superiority and omnipotence, and has revealed for the very first time the deception that was the absolute unquestioned authority on all information.

    They do not know how to deal with truth or facts, and it scares the hell out of them. Get used to it.

    As for Joy Behar, a good bucket of water should solve that problem. It worked for Dorothy.

  8. #8
    On October 13th, 2007 at 8:42 pm, skma said:

    So just to clarify…those of us who believe in personal responsibility and national security are selfish and uncaring. Right? Thanks, Joy.

  9. #9
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:06 pm, teresafromtejas said:

    Every time I see the view she has old jokes that I’ve heard before.

  10. #10
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:09 pm, tim zank said:

    His show isn’t any kind of discussion or a political forum of ANY kind. It’s just a soap box for Bill to espouse his version of things and get a few laughs.

    There are no thoughtful questions or legitimate discourse, just insults and opinions laced with hateful barbs at all things not Maher and the lingering smirk of King Bill as he ponders what a deep thinker he is. How proud Hef must be!

    As angry as these simpletons make me, I refuse to let them ruin my Saturday night! I’ll take the high road like MM and let the thinking people decide. It’s an easy decision, isn’t it??

  11. #11
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:12 pm, DelosWorld said:

    It’s a shame Michelle Malkin declined being on The View. What? They didn’t ask her? No way!

  12. #12
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:27 pm, allrsn said:

    1)They are talking about hating instead of debating and whats her name is not called for using the b word (hating) on international tv.

    2) Mauher states how the government is so inefficient in Iraq, but is not asked to explain how a trillion dollar socialized health care system could be efficient??

    I guess this must be what socialists call honest debate. Ya right.

    At this point I could watch no more.

  13. #13
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:35 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Ticking off the moo-bats that the Republicans won’t tick off! Great job Michelle. I would wear that title from that moo-bat like a badge of honor. Kinda like I would wear a target on my forhead if I wear you around Gerad-who?.

  14. #14
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:41 pm, T J Green said:

    The point of the issue is what - if anything - to do about parents who make very poor choices. Graeme Frost had no insurance because his parents chose to not buy any, not because they lacked the resources to do so.

    The is a repeat of the “welfare queen” battles and reforms that began during the Reagan era.

  15. #15
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:45 pm, allrsn said:

    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:35 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Good idea we could make a badge defending from hate and b witches and comic books and maybe a few other moonbats! LOL

  16. #16
    On October 13th, 2007 at 9:52 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    allrsn,

    It is a shame Michelle has a face shield to protect her from a spittin goof-ball. This moo-bat needs one that will supress the noise that comes from below her nose. I guess since R.O. left, someone has to take up the stupid on the Spew.

  17. #17
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:02 pm, allrsn said:

    It strikes me odd that the ‘know nothing party’ (deceased 1850 or so)became the Republican party of equality. The old Democratic party of supression, has now become the ‘know nothing party’ of suppression.

  18. #18
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:19 pm, SnowyOwl said:

    Gotta love the Left… whirled peas through superior dialogue name calling.

    }8-

  19. #19
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:25 pm, Mookie said:

    So everyone reacts to the immature name-calling with more immature name-calling? Odd.

  20. #20
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:26 pm, willcate said:

    (with apologies to Barry Goldwater):

    Selfishness in the defense of liberty is never bitchy.

  21. #21
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:29 pm, allrsn said:

    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:25 pm, Mookie said:
    So everyone reacts to the immature name-calling with more immature name-calling? Odd.

    Can you be a bit more specific?

  22. #22
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:36 pm, allrsn said:

    ahhh crap I guess not.

  23. #23
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:37 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I’m doing the immature name calling our hostess won’t do. As a matter of fact, I like to think of it as defending her. What did she do to deserve what she was dealt? The same thing she did for getting a spit wad threat - nada.

    Besides, these moo-bats need to take a pill.

    *pbtttt :P

  24. #24
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:44 pm, allrsn said:

    The left needs no excuse soap. Had my callange had been accepted, that would have been one of my points.

    IE: good job

  25. #25
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:46 pm, trinitytim said:

    There’s too much sports on TV to worry what this ignorant woman thinks or says.

    We all know Michelle knows more than all of those left wing women combined.

    I’m going back to the TV and I do not intend to even think about this issue until at the earliest, Monday.

    Ok, where to start, MLB Playoffs, NCAA football, or NASCAR.

  26. #26
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:47 pm, allrsn said:

    TIM watching NASCAR???? Did you get your shots?????

    foflmao

  27. #27
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:48 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    LSU beaten!!!

    J. Johnson hit the wall!

    Thank GOD the Yankees are gone!!!

  28. #28
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:49 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Rabies?
    Go Jimmy

  29. #29
    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:54 pm, katieanne said:

    I am hoping Gordon wins the Championship. IMO, he deserves it. I hate the Chase though. Wish they had just fixed the points system…more points for wins, etc.

  30. #30
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:02 pm, trinitytim said:

    allrsn,

    The only shot I need is the democrapweasel vaccine. Otherwise I’m good.

    Katieanne..

    I’m with you. 24’s looking good so far.

  31. #31
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:05 pm, ajmontana said:

    Times like this I wish I was a Doctor in Hollywierd, there is difinetly a need for Surgeons skilled in the removal of Head Up A**.

  32. #32
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:06 pm, katieanne said:

    trinitytim, Talladega was something else, wasn’t it? Cool move at the end. Been a Gordon fan from his beginning in the Cup and Jr is my second favorite. Odd, I know, but there you go. Next year ought to be something with Jr at Hendricks.

  33. #33
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:07 pm, ajmontana said:

    Trinity,
    I see smoke coming from you’re remote.

  34. #34
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:10 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Ummm, you are the farthest thing from selfish to agree with your hubby quitting his job to be a stay at home dad. It takes someone real selfless for that! That was awesome Michelle!

  35. #35
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:11 pm, trinitytim said:

    Same here Katieanne.

    I’ve been with Jeff and Jr. since they started. Also like Jimmie Johnson.

    I was at Daytona for Dale Sr.’s last complete race, the IROC on Friday and the 500 when we lost him. Also went to the Rock the week after.

    I once delivered a helicoter to Davey Allison in Birmingham, AL. Had lunch with him. He was great. I really miss him.

  36. #36
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:12 pm, trinitytim said:

    AJ,

    You could be right. I think I hit the wall with the right rear corner of the Time Warner remote.

  37. #37
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:13 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol, I had to use an oven mitt to work mine today. 8)

  38. #38
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:20 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    USC pulled it off eh?

    Go Jimmy, up to 8th!!!

  39. #39
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:23 pm, trinitytim said:

    soap,

    Looks like a good night for Hendricks all the way around.

  40. #40
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:24 pm, Mookie said:

    On October 13th, 2007 at 10:36 pm, allrsn said:

    ahhh crap I guess not.

    Moo-bat?

  41. #41
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    yes, but USC is proof that Trojans aren 100% reliable .

  42. #42
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:26 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    ‘cept for the 2 car.

    Caution. Jimmy in 7th and has made up some track. WooHoo!!!

  43. #43
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:28 pm, trinitytim said:

    AJ,

    Our USC won today also. Theat makes them tied with LSU for the SEC lead. The gaime to watch will be in a few weeks when Spurrier takes on Urban here in Columbia.

    Caution. Bummer.

  44. #44
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:28 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Moo-bat is mine. I will copy write it and you will have to pay me a dime every time you type it!!!

  45. #45
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:30 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    How about that Red-shirt freshman,Smelley, at S. Carolina? He is bad to the bone!

  46. #46
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:31 pm, trinitytim said:

    With a name like Smelley, you’d better be good and he is.

    Red Flag. On no.

  47. #47
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:31 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:25 pm, ajmontana said:
    yes, but USC is proof that Trojans aren 100% reliable .

    Not last week!!!!

    LSU was a barn burner of a game. Just kept us on the edge of our seats!

  48. #48
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:32 pm, ajmontana said:

    last week…. ouch. :(

  49. #49
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:34 pm, ajmontana said:

    Cal had a chance to be #1 and choked at the end … bigtime.

  50. #50
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:34 pm, trinitytim said:

    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat
    Moo-bat

    Soap, I owe you a dollar. Will you take a check?

  51. #51
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:37 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    tri

    LOL, sure. I will just put it on your tab.

    USC was going down anyhow. I feel about them like I feel about the Yankees - just get them gone.

    Sorry AJ. We still pals?

  52. #52
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:38 pm, jodella said:

    Michelle,

    J.B. has no class and cannot even manage to intellectually defend her own positions. You, on the other hand, are the exact opposite. I would rather listen to and read about your knowledge and opinions than anyone else on TV or the internet.

    It is so nice to see such a strong woman who is able to defend herself and her views without resorting to insults and name-calling. Watching you makes me proud of my gender, and inspires me to become a stronger woman myself.

  53. #53
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:39 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol,
    as long as you play nice soaper.

  54. #54
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:39 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    We should get an open thread on Sat nights so we don’t have to hijack one and take a chance on losing our posting privileges!

  55. #55
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:40 pm, ajmontana said:

    Well, that joy is worthless so I’m guessin Michelle is giving us a pass.

  56. #56
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:41 pm, trinitytim said:

    Good idea soap.

    Put me down for another dollar. I just uttered your copywright ten more times.

  57. #57
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:41 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    LOL, I pray you are right AJ. It would be bad for MM to lose a couple of her M6-ers.

  58. #58
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:42 pm, ajmontana said:

    Pay him in cookies so his mouth is full and cant trash my team. :lol:

  59. #59
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:43 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    No wrecks! Does the include Joy?

    See, I can keep it on topic!

  60. #60
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:44 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    USC? What does the S stand for, _ucks?

    LOL

  61. #61
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:45 pm, trinitytim said:

    Looks like Jr. hit an IED or something.

    Hope the track’s clean.

  62. #62
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:47 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Clean. Unlike Joy’s mouth? I would like to put some oil dry in her trap.

    MOO_BAT!

  63. #63
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:47 pm, maisy said:

    Joy Behar mocks Ann Coulter yet does her best to emulate her shock commentary in hopes of gaining some of her notoriety. Most people are left to ponder…Joy who?????

  64. #64
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:48 pm, ajmontana said:

    I love Ann Coulter.

  65. #65
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:49 pm, ajmontana said:

    but then theres always that nagging question…. does she love me? 8)

  66. #66
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:49 pm, trinitytim said:

    Maisy,

    That’s Joy Moo-bat. Staying on topic.

    $2.10 Soap

  67. #67
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:50 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Ann rocks!

    Malkin/Coulter ‘08

  68. #68
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:50 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Cha-ching $$$

  69. #69
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:51 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Let’s go racing!!!

  70. #70
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:53 pm, ajmontana said:

    wow!

  71. #71
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:53 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    What a wreck - like JOY!

  72. #72
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:53 pm, trinitytim said:

    Newman drives like my wife

  73. #73
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:54 pm, ajmontana said:

    lol tt

  74. #74
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:55 pm, trinitytim said:

    AJ,

    I wasn’t kidding

  75. #75
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    My wife would be kicked off the track for driving too slow. She runs slower than Joys mouth.

  76. #76
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    I was actually relating tt… :)

  77. #77
    On October 13th, 2007 at 11:58 pm, ajmontana said:

    gordons outa gas unlike j.. 8)

  78. #78
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:00 am, trinitytim said:

    Whew!!!! :lol:

  79. #79
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:01 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    WooHoo - Jeff is a winner. Unlike, well…

  80. #80
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:01 am, trinitytim said:

    Goodnight all. Midnight here in SC. Talk to ya’ll tomorrow.

    Enjoyed sharing.

  81. #81
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:02 am, ajmontana said:

    tc, tt

  82. #82
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:02 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Nite Tri

  83. #83
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:02 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Midnight here as well. Good night all

  84. #84
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:03 am, puhiawa said:

    Really, this woman is a dolt. And that is demonstrated by her failure to recognize the obvious.

  85. #85
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:03 am, ajmontana said:

    soaper fi.

  86. #86
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:23 am, katieanne said:

    Woo Hoo Gordon won!!

    Trinity, no matter how many times I watch the tape, I still can’t believe that wreck killed Dale Sr. It didn’t look that hard. It was so deceiving.

    Sounds like you have had some great times. So sad to have lost Davey Allison too. Never know when its our time.

    Good evening everyone. :)

  87. #87
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:47 am, Richard Romano said:

    Joy Behar — the perfect illustration of the clueless liberal: all emotion, no reason.

  88. #88
    On October 14th, 2007 at 1:51 am, garyt said:

    I would not even listen to her spew. I have total disgust with these so called liberals who are actually stalinists. They are the ones who have no tolerance and resort to name calling. Todays liberals can’t see any viewpoint other then their own.

  89. #89
    On October 14th, 2007 at 9:31 am, Bogtrotter said:

    Well, the on-air media people have not quite reached the level of hatred spewing that has been going on at websites. But give it time, sooner or later someone is going to slip up, lose control, get lost in the moment, etc., and use one of the vile racial slurs I have been reading all week.

  90. #90
    On October 14th, 2007 at 9:43 am, ajmontana said:

    bogtrotter said,
    and use one of the vile racial slurs I have been reading all week.

    Thats the reason I avoid public bathrooms, the stuff written in those heads is down right nasty.

  91. #91
    On October 14th, 2007 at 9:54 am, ajmontana said:

    If you look real close at the video you can actually see the little gears in Joys head trying to crank around and then a tiny little lightbulb pops up over her head and Bingo! out flings the B word.

  92. #92
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:33 am, Boomer said:

    The reason I watch neither show. Hateful useless idiots trying to use feelings instead of facts the left is totally unprepared for a battle of whit’s requiring the use of facts.

  93. #93
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:07 am, twall said:

    The Tolerance and Diversity people never let me down. There Hate precedes them. I live surrounded by them and if you disagree, you are a bigoted raciest homophobe.

  94. #94
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:37 am, jsr said:

    Something about that mug reminds me of the flying monkeys from the Wizard of Oz. She also makes about as much sense. Not that I want to smear the poor monkeys.

  95. #95
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:40 am, katieanne said:

    Joy Behar is a hater posing as a comedian and failing. She comes off shrill and clueless. Naturally, since she can’t rationally debate Michelle on the issues, she resorts to name calling. Why anyone would watch The View or any of the women on it is beyond my comprehension.

  96. #96
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:40 am, geminicontender said:

    I never liked the woman and comments like this pretty much sum up why. Of course the program itself is just a bunch of chatty no-nothings who have a platform provided for them by BABA WAWA. Another loser in my mind.

  97. #97
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:49 am, RhymesWithRight said:

    But then again, Behar has all the talent and intellect of a 2-dollar streetwalker.

  98. #98
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:15 pm, TheSev said:

    All it shows to me is that:

    They’re listening to you Michelle.

    And they know you’re Right.

    All of the Left’s dogma easily disappears in a puff of logic.

  99. #99
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:17 pm, beenthere said:

    I’m inclined to go with it. If that is their chosen rhetoric, fine, stand tall and proud and shout together: We need more “selfish bitches!” A lot more. The country would be much better off if they were the majority. As for the professional Liberal Sob (SOB?) Sisters, send the lot of them to the Middle East. Sounds to me like the road to peace.

  100. #100
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:18 pm, greenfairie said:

    With Rosie O’Donnell gone, Joy Behar thinks she now has The Fat Obnoxious One title on “The View.”

  101. #101
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:34 pm, pbachran said:

    When you have reduced them to name calling it’s because they have no factual or logical argument.
    You’ve won.

  102. #102
    On October 14th, 2007 at 12:50 pm, eaglehaslanded said:

    Name calling aside….if we can band together and defend our country, why can’t be band together and defend the health of our citizens? Why is sharing sooooo bad? Why are people left to fend for themselves with just a thought of “tough for them - glad it’s not me and I’m not spending a dime of MY money to help”? I am solidly middle class and solidly in debt because I have two sick kids. Is that just my bad luck? Why should I or any American have to play for health care? Are you just basically screwed when you get sick? Why does sharing work up until you’re an adult, then suddenly it’s called socialism?

  103. #103
    On October 14th, 2007 at 1:13 pm, sausage said:

    Perfectly put eaglehaslanded. The word “Socialism” is used to basically scare people by the far right into thinking providing a universal health care system is WORSE than the current mess.

    Margret Thatcher in the UK, as strong as a conservative you could get, funded the National Health Service - and every conservative politician has too.

    France has a conservative leader and is still supportive of their national health care system - although he has promised to cut some of it into shape.

    A national health care system is NEVER perfect and will always run at a loss. But that’s the point - it’s health care for all.. the sick, the poor, the middle class in debt from the huge deductibles…

  104. #104
    On October 14th, 2007 at 1:32 pm, Jim M. said:

    But that’s the point - it’s health care for all.. the sick, the poor, the middle class in debt from the huge deductibles…

    Which is socialized medicine.

    Why should people have to pay for their own car insurance? Everyone really has to have a car these days to make a living, even the high risk drivers, so why shouldn’t that same argument apply to any kind of insurance?

    And as long as the government is taking care of the insurance, why not provide people with cars?

    People too often confuse rights with priviledges in this Country. The left likes to label social causes as a “right” when they are not rights at all.

    You have a right to free speech. A right to practice your religion of choice. A right to equal protection. And those other rights spelled out in the Constitution.

    You do not have a right to health care. With the other rights and freedoms you have, you are expected to take personal responsibility for your own life and lifestyle. Your personal choices, which cannot and should not be dictated by the government.

  105. #105
    On October 14th, 2007 at 1:51 pm, sausage said:

    Why should the government be involved in social security? Why do we have a government run postal service? Why do we have government funded public libraries? Museums? What the freak - schools too??!

    Close them all down.

    Me, Me, Me, Me!

    /Welcome to our so-called Christian nation.

  106. #106
    On October 14th, 2007 at 1:56 pm, feebiebabe said:

    the woman is a banchee with absolutely no real argument skills, research and/or truth behind her. Of course she is a bitter hag who has to result to 10th grade insults.

    MM. If that was the best insult she could come up with to insult you, you know you are on the right track.
    Keep it up, thanks for doing what you do and taking so many “hits for the team”.

    She is a moron.

  107. #107
    On October 14th, 2007 at 2:12 pm, mngirl said:

    Hey mark your calendars, Behar will have to up against someone with a brain on November 12th when Laura Ingraham co-hosts The View in place of Elizabeth Hasselbeck.

    I think I saw it on HotAir first, I hope its still the plan.

  108. #108
    On October 14th, 2007 at 2:17 pm, Jim M. said:

    Why should the government be involved in social security? Why do we have a government run postal service? Why do we have government funded public libraries? Museums? What the freak - schools too??!

    Close them all down.

    Me, Me, Me, Me!

    /Welcome to our so-called Christian nation.

    There’s the level of hysteria we are used to seeing.

    I have not seen anyone here oppose the SCHIP program in its present form. There is a recognition that people do need help at certain times in their lives, and that help includes health care for people even at twice the official poverty level.

    What people ARE opposed to it the huge expansion of that program which would create de facto socialized medicine. People need to be responsible for their own lives, and frankly should not be rewarded for irresponsibility. Now if you don’t mind giving up some of your freedoms there is another way to have the government provide for you.

    This is available in all 50 states and will be funded by people who choose to maintain their freedoms and work in the private sector.

    Have yourself made a ward of the state. You can do this in one of two ways - commit a felony that gets you life in prison or have yourself declared legally incompetent and have the state appointed as your ward and guardian.

    You will get free health care, but someone else will make the decision who treats you and how much treatment you deserve. You will be fed 3 meals a day, but someone else will decide how much you need to eat and what you should be eating. You will be provided with lodging, but someone else will decide where you will live and how many other people will share your accommodations. It will not be your decision as to when, if ever, you are permitted to leave those accommodations. And, if you live in Florida, someone you don’t know nor never met will have the authority to tell you when you no longer meet their standards for remaining among the living.

    What you are really saying here is that people below a certain income level are legally incompetent when it comes to health care decisions. Just remember there are some pretty big tradeoffs - your choices and degree of treatment will be out of your control.

    Nothing in this world is free, and often those things that are seen as “free” come at a heavy price in terms of off your freedoms. If the government is to provide all of your needs, they will control all of your needs. Now, in regard to that statement, you are right in saying that is not socialism. It is not; THAT is communism.

  109. #109
    On October 14th, 2007 at 2:43 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    Keep it up Michelle; you know your getting to them when they start calling you names. I think being slandered by those moon-bats is a badge of honor.

  110. #110
    On October 14th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, TheSev said:

    eaglehaslanded said:

    Name calling aside….if we can band together and defend our country, why can’t be band together and defend the health of our citizens?

    Because, kind sir, we band together to defend our country Voluntarily and not at the point of law. That’s the difference.

    Engage people’s enthusiasm to donate to charities, and you’ll find folks lining up to help.

    Stick a gun in my back, don’t be surprised what my reaction is.

  111. #111
    On October 14th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Poor uninformed Joy Behar “a comedian or something”. But what do you expect when this is the context that the Dems and the MSM are trying to frame the debate in? Its just insane.

    I actually watched the entire video, and Bill Maher was getting pretty nasty towards Christians at the end. It was rather disgusting and offensive. I hate to say it, but I think he may be harder for me to watch then Keith Olbermann (D).

    Exit Question: If Bill Maher had said his offensive comments about Muslims instead of Christians, would there have been a public outrage???

  112. #112
    On October 14th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, RetFireman said:

    Seem to be late in getting into this. Sorry…gotta love those cool fall days with the fam.

    Anyway, what has alsways boggled my grape is why people in this country give such credence to actors and commedians. i mean, the Left’s answer to the Right-Wing dominated AM radio talk shows was an entire network helmed by failed and past-their-prime commedians and disc jockeys. The Liberal’s biggest voices are actors and music stars who have to be told where to stand, what to say and how to say it for a living.

    Not only that, but once someone becomes “famous”, they automatically think that anything they have to say on any subject is the most important thing in the world and they are instant experts, be it world conflicts, hunger, homelessness or what-have-you. They mock those that are truly experts and have been educated and become leaders in their fields, and declare themselves the true Masters of All Knowledge, mocking those with degrees on these said subjects.

    This show with Bill Maher is no different than the one he had previously. He trots out these “celebrities” and whatever they say on his show is LAW. Forget facts, the very nature of their careers in show biz trumps those, and the vast majority of Americans listen to and believe them. Not really sure what this says for your basic American, but it is not good.

    Until such time as this country treats these people for what they are…trrained monkeys who are paid to do nothing more than entertain us…then we will not ever have reasonable discourse done by educated and intelligent people. Instead, we will have such sageful statements like those from Goldberg and Behar when speaking of the Leader of the Free World etc., and the Jerry Springer mind-set will reign supreme.

    It reminds you of being in school when the stupid kids in class mocked and threatened the smart kids for making them look bad.

  113. #113
    On October 14th, 2007 at 3:36 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Yeah, government run schools are so much better than private.

    HEY! I had cancer and (because I am already considered a bigoted Christian, I will just tell you like it is!

    I went to the Social Security office because people with cancer are considered “disabled”. Did I get benefits? Nope. I could not even get in for an interview. Why? I have the wrong colored skin. I am a white southern boy. I watched while Mexicans and African Americans went behind door number one time and time again. I was denied the opportunity to go behind door number one. I had two options:

    1. Hire an attorney
    2. Sell my boat and car and deal with it.

    I sold my boat and truck and bought a 1972 ragged out VW bug and dealt with it. DO NOT give me this CRAP you have to have the government bail you out. You do what you have to do or you take the side of – yes, socialized medicine – and take your chances.

    My wife just had emergency appendectomy surgery in Haiti. She was taken to the hospital there and they treated her like a queen. The whole thing cost us less than $3000. Try that here and you will pay over $15,000. Why? Tort law and government involvement. Why does it cost $800 a night for a room here and $69 per night there? Greed.

    Oh, yes, we need the government to run things like they run congress whose approval rating is in the toilet!

    We will take our chances in Haiti – thank you.

  114. #114
    On October 14th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, conservativesRus said:

    eaglehaslanded #102. That’s so nice. Now that you’ve decided how I’m supposed to spend my money (share it with you)…now let me decide how you are supposed to spend yours. Or maybe I get to decide what kind of house you should live in. How about what groceries you get to eat. You can’t be a little bit pregnant any more than you can decide to be socialized just in this area. Sharing - such a nice word. When it’s mandated, it’s not sharing, it’s taking.

  115. #115
    On October 14th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, conservativesRus said:

    Jim M #104 ….and to further your argument. Am I supposed to fund those who choose to live unhealthy lifestyles? Maybe only the ones who don’t exercise, but don’t over-eat. I’m NOT saying that exercise and diet alone make for better outcomes - but statistically they do.

  116. #116
    On October 14th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    exercise and diet alone make for better outcomes - but statistically they do.

    So, in their infinite wisdom, our government run schools took out exercising because being chased by someone might harm someone’s psyche! So, now, if they get hurt, we have to pay for it.

    Funny though, these rich Dimocraps do not want to “share” their wealth say – with me. Most of them could give me a million bucks and never miss it. Do you think they will? Nope but, they want us middle class folk to
    share”.

    Dimocraps do not play nice.

  117. #117
    On October 14th, 2007 at 6:58 pm, Bill DeFelice said:

    Come on! You are a big girl,Michelle.
    Any remarks from the left,is a compliment.I suspect if Joyless wanted to keep her coush gig ,on the view,she had to tow the commie/puke,al-Qeada line,or loose her gig.When she tried stand up comedy,she had enough produce thrown at her,to open a salad bar.Branson was full up,so the view was all that was left.

  118. #118
    On October 14th, 2007 at 7:38 pm, wytammic said:

    I hope Tucker got vaccinated before going on there. :)

  119. #119
    On October 14th, 2007 at 8:49 pm, RetFireman said:

    So, I go to school, work very hard, sacrifice, suffer, eat Ramen until noodles come out my ears until I am educated and trained enough to go out into the world, fight for a good job, starting at the bottom and working very hard, not calling in sick, staying late if need be, coming in on my days off until I finally get that good paying job I wanted and fought for with the bennies and such in order to be a responsible human being and member of my community…only to go and give so much of a percentage of my paycheck out to the government in order to ay for someone else who has decided that they do not need to do all those things because the government will take care of them? that “screw those rich people, they can afford to cover me. What right do they have to keep all the money they worked for when I need insurance but don’t want to put forth the effort to get it myself?” people? Where would the incentive be for people to exceed in life once the government starts providing things?

    they tried this out once on a grand scale. It was called The Soviet Union. I guess that 17 years is a very long time in people’s memories. It seems people in this country have forgotten all about the lines upon lines of people waiting for all those “government services” that are being fought for here. People have forgotten that the physicians that were there, had no incentive to become greater at their craft since greater knowledge DID NOT equal greater pay and thus, they could not prctice medic ine anywhere else BUT the USSR because they couldn’t qualify as physicians anywhere else. I guess people have forgotten how many Soviet children would have to be treated here on special Humanitarian Missions because they were unable to be treated for their afflictions in the greatest Socialist experiment of all time.

    You know, I am really sorry that some people do not carry health insurance. It is available for all people out there if they want it. Everyone pays for their own, including those with jobs. If you are so concerned and caring and loving of your families as you claim, then you would be doing everything you can to protect them, instead of all this whining about wanting other people to spend their hard earned and fought for pay to cover you.

    Like I said, I have been a Paramedic for quite a few years, and if you people think that the Emergency Rooms are over crouded now, just wait until people do not have to pay for it anymore and start using them like a clinic because it takes 3-4 months to get a doctors appointment.

    Just wait until the physicians here no longer get paid what they deserve for all the extra schooling and knowledge they acquire. Wait and see what happens to the care of patients in this country when people only learn the minimums of what they need to get by because it is not worth the expese and effort to learn more.

    It is very easy to want someone else to take care of you. The hard part is doing it on your own, but that is what it means to be an adult, and it is far past time for all these Liberals to grow up.

  120. #120
    On October 14th, 2007 at 9:31 pm, les said:

    Jim M #7.
    Up until fairly recent times, the left controlled the flow of information.

    I’d like to know your justification for this statement. How exactly did the left control the flow of information. What are the facts that lead you to what conclusion? Can you site specifics?

  121. #121
    On October 14th, 2007 at 9:36 pm, Jim M. said:

    I’d like to know your justification for this statement. How exactly did the left control the flow of information. What are the facts that lead you to what conclusion? Can you site specifics?

    You HAVE to be kidding!!!!

  122. #122
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:15 pm, les said:

    #121 Jim M. NO I AM NOT KIDDING. You make a very serious accusation, so what are the facts that lead you to that conclusion? FACTS, not a conspiracy theory about the left controlling all of the main stream media. Can you tell us when did it start, when did it end, can you site any specific instances? If one makes such a accusation, they should be able to substantiate it. So, what are your facts? An adult dialogue on your thoughts would be appreciated.

  123. #123
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:27 pm, blues said:

    Does Bill Mahr still have a t.v. show?I thought he disappeared long ago.

  124. #124
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:30 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Don’t do it Jim. Facts? And the media is not biased in the left direction.

    No win Jim. Don’t bother.

  125. #125
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:47 pm, Jim M. said:

    An adult dialogue on your thoughts would be appreciated.

    It is not possible to have an adult dialogue with someone either exceedingly naive, in perpetual denial or one that poses the question for the purpose of baiting another person.

    It is pretty obvious that your agenda here is to disrupt and shift the focus from the topic at hand. The way the question was asked, and certainly the follow-up, are strong indications that the question you asked was posed for purposes other than getting an answer. A reaction, yes, but an answer, no.

    I should ask what proof you have to offer as to why the conclusion is wrong. But I won’t waste the bandwidth, because there is no such proof.

  126. #126
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:47 pm, les said:

    On my soap box #124. I was raised to be responsible for both my actions and my words. We can damm the Frosts for being irresponsible for their inactions regarding not buying health insurance, and we can damm celebrities for their irresponsible words. Jim M makes a very serious accusation, so I am asking him to be responsible for his words. If he can’t substantiate his statement, then maybe next time he should phrase his comments more in the context that “it is my opinion that the left controlled the flow of information”.

  127. #127
    On October 14th, 2007 at 10:59 pm, les said:

    Jim M. Good try at trying to evade an answer. I am not naive, in denial (of what I may ask), don’t have an agenda, am not trying to disrupt anything or shift the topic of conversation. I am trying to have an inteligent discussion. You made the initial comment and all I am asking you to do is substantiate what you have said. You write very long detailed comments and are often quoted by other writers on this site. Therefore it would appear to me that you are someone that carries some credence with the audience. So you make a very broad, serious accusation. All I am asking you is what FACTS do you have to back it up. I take your evasion of the question to mean you in fact were expressing your opinion rather than an actual fact.

  128. #128
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:05 pm, les said:

    Jim M. #125 - I should ask what proof you have to offer as to why the conclusion is wrong. But I won’t waste the bandwidth, because there is no such proof.

    PS, I didn’t make the initial asertion. You show me your’s and I’ll show you mine.

  129. #129
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:14 pm, Jim M. said:

    You can take my comments any way you want. What you refer to as an “accusation” I call a statement of fact. There is more than ample information available to anyone who wants to make a minimal effort to look into the issue for themselves.

    You are the one attacking the statement I made claiming it to be nothing more than an accusation. You have an issue with it, rebut it and back it up. You cannot put forth any proof to the contrary, because there is none.

    So why not stop tossing that red herring around - makes your motives here seem a bit “fishy”.

    I will give you one thing - you are pretty good at baiting people. Keep working at it, and you will achieve “master” status.

  130. #130
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:31 pm, les said:

    Jim, Thanks for the “master” compliment. I’ll throw one back at you, you are a “master” at evading a question. Have you undertaken the “minimal effort to look into the issue”? I would suspect the answer is no. I think you’ve provided all the “facts” on this topic that are needed. Thanks for expression your OPINION.

  131. #131
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:43 pm, Jim M. said:

    Ah, you have achieved the next level.

    Les (aka “MasterB”), it is not an opinion it is a fact. And I have certainly expended more than minimal effort on the topic. You do not believe it is true, then it is incumbent on you to refute it.

    I’ll start you off: “Jim, I don’t agree with your statement that the left controlled the information flow. My research from 1960 to present day, indicates…”

    It is not evasive on my part to ask you to support your claims here. Frankly, that is the way adults converse.

  132. #132
    On October 14th, 2007 at 11:44 pm, RetFireman said:

    All you have to do is to look up the contributions towards which party was made by thesse organizations. You will see that it is by far and above in the Lib/Dem corner. The statement of “until recently…” is in referrence to people being able to get their information from other sources now via the internet and not just through the Left leaning MSM.

    It is a well known fact that for years and years, since at least the 60’s, the MSM has been leaning and reporting with Left-Wing and Liberal slants. The reporting on the current war itself is proof of their Liberal slant, as they have repeatedly refused to report anything good that has happened there every single day, have spread lies and disinformation, National Secrets, and generally have nothing good to say about a single REpublican. There is virtually no reporting on the Republican candidates at all while we are assaulted daily with the latest times that the three Dem front runners go to the bathroom.

    For you to even feign indignation and ignorance as to the Leftward leaning press just speaks volumes of your own predjudices and where you stand. Since it all speaks what you want it to do, you think it is just honky-dory. Thus, when one station out of the many doesn’t lean Left, it is attacked, ridiculed and called a “Propaganda machine for Bush”. Sorry you guys can’t handle the competition and having the mirror held up to your face.

  133. #133
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:18 am, les said:

    Jim M, let’s go back to square one. You initially made the assertion; in fact you said that you have said it before. I simply asked you to substantiate your position. For some reason you are unwilling or unable to do that. If you make such harsh accusations and you don’t want to be challenged, you should state your comments as opinion, not fact. In the real world, not the anonymity of the internet, one needs to be willing to back up what they say with facts. You are unwilling to do that, and I won’t take your bait of trying to turn it around for me to verify (some would call that a typical liberal avoidance tactic). Again I say, when you provide me your proof, I’ll provide you mine. I’ll end my discussion with you on this topic here.

    And RetFireman, thank you for the factoid. According to opensecrets.org, which tracks PAC money, you are correct in stating that the media gives more money to Democrats than to Republicans (media: ‘02 - R23%, D77%; ‘04 - R30%, D69%; ‘06 - R36%, D64%). That said, I’m not sure that this proves that “Up until fairly recent times, the left controlled the flow of information”. One can hope that the media’s higher contributions to Democrats has as minimal an impact on the flow of information as does the tobacco, insurance and pharmaceutical industries higher contributions to Republicans has on the current health care debate (tobacco: ‘02 - R79%, D21%; ‘04 - R74%, D26%; ‘06 R74%, D26%; pharmaceuticals: ‘02 - R74%,D26%; ‘04 - R66%, D34%; ‘06 - R67%, D31% and insurance: ‘02 - R69%, D31%; ‘04 - R68%, D32%; ‘06 - R64%, D34%). I provide this information at the risk of being called off topic, but I believe they are valid points to bring up in contrast to RetFiremans information. I may be naive, but I hope that our politicians be they Republican or Democrat, are looking out for our best interest, not for the interest of the industries that are giving them the big bucks. Thanks again RetFireman for stepping up with some facts and engaging in some intelligent discussion.

  134. #134
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:47 am, Jim M. said:

    Les,

    There you go again. You just provided information that supports and not disproves the original statement. While you were at it, you managed to toss another scarlet fish into the mix.

    Your persistent flailing reminds me of a knight of old:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMkth8FWno

    You made the challenge - back it up. That’s not turning anything around on you. It is asking you to apply some rational and cogent thought and support to your position rather than crying “liar, liar”. Say, you’re not related to Joy Behar, are you?

  135. #135
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:06 am, les said:

    Jim M, so now you have resorted to name calling. How old are you? I will end it here. I left childhood games long ago and I will not stoop to your level.

    As they say, put up or shut up. Let’s see how you twist that one around.

    Isn’t it past your bed time? What time do you have to be at school tomorrow morning?

  136. #136
    On October 15th, 2007 at 7:00 am, conservativesRus said:

    sausage #103. Let’s review. Socialism is getting the public (ie. everybody else) to pay for something that you don’t or won’t pay for. It is totally irrelevant whether or not any other country has it. Your argument is like a kid who says to their parents “well everybody else is doing it”. Just because everybody else is doing it does NOT make it right. A bad idea is still a bad idea.

  137. #137
    On October 15th, 2007 at 7:19 am, ajmontana said:

    Joyraldo Behrvira.

  138. #138
    On October 15th, 2007 at 7:32 am, conservativesRus said:

    les….I don’t want to really enter the middle of your squabble, but you might try looking at the reporting by the anchors of the three major television networks over the past 40 years. What stories do they report, what don’t they report? How do they report them? You also might try looking at the candidate endorsements of the major newspapers around the country.
    I will openly admit I am biased toward less government, personal responsibility, absolutes,and many other things considered conservative. If I were a reporter, it would be impossible for me not to have my personal worldview affect my reporting. Even if I didn’t purposely slant my reporting, my bias would still exist even in what I chose as newsworthy. Let me give you an example: I could report that the Peterson’s cat was up the tree, I could report how the Peterson’s didn’t keep their cat locked in their house, I could report how they didn’t de-claw their cat, I could report how they didn’t follow the leash laws, I could report how the fire dept. came to get the cat, I could report how much it cost for the fire dept to come get the cat. Don’t tell me there isn’t bias in the news.
    Jim M’s statement is well documented. The MSM is indeed left leaning and their reporting is left leaning.

  139. #139
    On October 15th, 2007 at 7:38 am, ajmontana said:

    LOL,
    The left would have gone after the person who planted the tree.

  140. #140
    On October 15th, 2007 at 7:43 am, conservativesRus said:

    oh but look at the carbon offsets. That presents some major kind of dilemma.

  141. #141
    On October 15th, 2007 at 8:58 am, jsr said:

    Les

    For proof of the left wing bias of the MSM I would suggest you go to the OpEd page of The New York Times, LA Times or practicaly any large city newspaper. It should be obvious to any intelligent reader that their opinions do influence their reporting. I’ll give you one example, which, years later still galls me. The Atlanta Journal Constitution, a very left wing paper, close to Christmas several years had several days before Christams its main headline: CLINTON GIFT TO HOMELESS: $500 MILLION. The story went on to gush about the generosity of Bill Clinton and how badly needed the money was.

    In reality, the gift was not from Bill Clinton but from the American people. Congress (at the time Republican) had to approve this gift. Nowhere was there any analysis whatsoever of the need for the money, or how it was to be spent.

    Sure , this is just one example. And surely by itself is not proof of left wing bias. But this happens all the time. I could list thousands of such stories if I took the time to document them.

  142. #142
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:29 pm, SeniorD said:

    As seen by Ms. Behar, the IQ of the Left is a constant. The population keeps increasing.

  143. #143
    On October 15th, 2007 at 4:09 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Real Time with Bill Maher show

    The what? Is this one of those community access things?

  144. #144
    On October 15th, 2007 at 4:13 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I may be naive, but I hope that our politicians be they Republican or Democrat, are looking out for our best interest, not for the interest of the industries that are giving them the big bucks.

    My laugh of the day so far.

  145. #145
    On October 16th, 2007 at 12:04 am, MiddleAgedKen said:

    Name calling aside….if we can band together and defend our country, why can’t be band together and defend the health of our citizens? Why is sharing sooooo bad? Why are people left to fend for themselves with just a thought of “tough for them - glad it’s not me and I’m not spending a dime of MY money to help”? I am solidly middle class and solidly in debt because I have two sick kids. Is that just my bad luck? Why should I or any American have to play for health care? Are you just basically screwed when you get sick? Why does sharing work up until you’re an adult, then suddenly it’s called socialism?

    It’s only called socialism when the government enforces sharing at gunpoint. More to the point, we can band together and defend our country (by which you mean raise an army and fight a war) because the Constitution expressly enumerates that power with respect to the federal government. Show me where the Constitution enumerates a specific power to the federal government to provide medical care to anyone indpendent at someone else’s expense.

    If you can’t do that, perhaps you would tell me why you think there is a written Constitution in the first place, and under what circumstances it should change.

  146. #146
    On October 16th, 2007 at 12:08 am, Jim M. said:

    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:06 am, les said:
    Jim M, so now you have resorted to name calling. How old are you? I will end it here. I left childhood games long ago and I will not stoop to your level.

    As they say, put up or shut up. Let’s see how you twist that one around.

    Isn’t it past your bed time? What time do you have to be at school tomorrow morning?

    Where on Earth did you get “name calling” from my last post? There seems to be a serious issue with reading comprehension here.

    Nice of you to finally show your true colors with the holier than thou posturing and the weak age retort.

    The information is not difficult to find. Do your own research. Since I truly doubt you would believe any information I posted, your only purpose in continuing to whine has noting to do with getting an answer, and everything to do with hearing yourself talk.

    Grow up and post your own thoughts with support rather than continuing your now ridiculous attack on a statement of fact that even most on the left would not question.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

It depends on the meaning of “working poor”

March 31, 2008 09:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sinking S-CHIP.

The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans

January 23, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

S-CHIP: Here we go again; Update: Override fails, roll call vote added

January 23, 2008 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Child exploitation.

The Democrats play their S-CHIP again

January 22, 2008 10:54 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Kiddie care.

Questions about the journalists on Mitt Romney’s lawn

December 4, 2007 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin