The curse of Larry Craig

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 15, 2007 01:35 PM

Bane of the Republican Party:

U.S. Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday in his ongoing attempt to withdraw his guilty plea in connection with an arrest in an airport bathroom sex sting.

Craig’s appeal was filed at the court in St. Paul less than two weeks after Hennepin County Judge Charles Porter refused to overturn the guilty plea, saying it “was accurate, voluntary and intelligent, and … supported by the evidence.”

Craig, a Republican, pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in August after he was accused of soliciting sex in a bathroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in June.

The four-page filing did not detail the basis for the appeal.

In an interview on Sunday with KTVB-TV in Boise, Idaho, Craig repeated he will not resign his post in the Senate and said he had the right to pursue his legal options.

“It is my right to do what I’m doing,” said Craig. “I’ve already provided for Idaho certainty that Idaho needed — I’m not running for re-election. I’m no longer in the way. I am pursuing my constitutional rights.”

But legal experts have predicted Craig would have a hard time winning on appeal.

“What’s the likelihood of success? Even less likely of prevailing in the appeal than he had in prevailing before Porter,” Steve Simon, a legal defense expert at the University of Minnesota Law School, said earlier this month.

Do I have to pull out my Photoshop scribble again? Yes, yes I do:

larrygonow1.jpg

Posted in: GOP

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Seriously, why should Larry Craig resign? « Cowardly political musings…
  2. Malkin's Curse on U.S. Sen. Larry Craig - Southern Maryland Community Forums
  3. Larry On! « Subject to Complete Defeasance
  4. Michelle Malkin » Another GOP Cone of Shame Award

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #146184
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It’s my legal stance, and it’s a wide one!

  2. #146186
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “Senator Larry Craig Plays Footsie with the Legal System”

  3. #146188
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “Your honor, may I see you in ‘Chambers’?”

  4. #146190
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    “Senator Craig Tires Another Stall Tactic”

  5. #146191
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:42 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Trys not Tires, sigh….OK enough for now.

  6. #146192
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:44 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Would you believe…I’m giving up after two misspellings of the same word.

  7. #146194
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:46 pm, terrig said:

    Reminds me of the old Motley Crue song-Craig don’t go away mad, just go away.

  8. #146196
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:49 pm, Jaded said:

    I always say that We The People continue to elect the most narcissistic people on the planet to Congress and the White House.

    We have no one to blame but ourselves.

  9. #146197
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:49 pm, Rogue said:

    Would it be wrong of me to wonder aloud if an investigation should be started as to why Craig wants to remain in power so much? What kind of other shady-ness is in his closet?

  10. #146199
    On October 15th, 2007 at 1:52 pm, ajmontana said:

    In closet? Tap shoes of course.

  11. #146208
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, Dr. Lead Based Paint said:

    STOP!! We keep losing our creeps & criminals but THEY keep theirs!

    It’s time Republicans demand a criminal swap: for every Republican thug that gets caught, the Demofascists will have to give up one of theirs. It’s only fair to keep it even.

  12. #146211
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    In closet? Tap shoes of course.

    :)

  13. #146212
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:09 pm, BB said:

    Well, Craig is a disingenuous creep, but he does appear to have only come to a recent understanding that you can be a flithy moral reprobate convict and still serve in the US Senate.

    Too bad for him he’s not a Democrat, though.

  14. #146216
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:13 pm, Darrylw said:

    Just another politician who likes to abuse power.

    a total disgrace

  15. #146218
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:16 pm, Skeptic said:

    Look for Craig to change parties so that he can keep his senate seat. The Dems only out people on the other side.

  16. #146220
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:18 pm, jcbeckman said:

    Doesn’t the party have some means for tossing out people like him?

  17. #146231
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:26 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    THESE are the kinds of ‘conservative Republicans’ that make Rudy’s claim of being Republican look almost accurate.

    I’m not all about the ‘religious right’ so to speak. But I do wish there was a conservative party to offset the liberal values of the Democrats.

    As it stands he seems to have taken conservative stances on votes. But this and the Foley case are hardly ‘conservative’ in nature.

    There needs to be a conservative party.

  18. #146244
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:40 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    There needs to be a conservative party.

    There will be as soon as politicians can figure out how to mine gum balls and get the tax payer to fund the operation. After politicians figure out how to waste the tax dollars, it will be cost prohibitive for Republican politicians to acquire said gum balls. Of course, some of the Republican politicians will latch on to some gum balls only to have to admit later that the gum balls belong to someone else. There may even be an occasion where a Republican will get some brass gum balls like Kennedy’s but will get caught having someone polishing them, admit they were guilty and remembering they are brass and denying the whole ordeal.

  19. #146248
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:45 pm, slp said:

    Its just a stall.

    It will take more than 100 days for both sides get to submit their legal briefs.

    The Court of Appeals will not make a decision for another six months after that.

    There will be no decision until the fall of 2008.

    The probability that the Court of Appeals will find that the trial court abused his discretion in finding that Senator Craig knowingly and intelligently plead guilty, 0.00000000000000000000001%

  20. #146251
    On October 15th, 2007 at 2:48 pm, miker said:

    I honestly don’t care if Senator Craig is gay or not, but he ALREADY said he would resign, and then he goes back on his word!

    Typical crap-weasel!

  21. #146265
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:07 pm, Gabe said:

    I think he should resign, but if he were Democrat this wouldn’t even have been a story in the MSM, and no one would be asking him to resign.

    The only reason liberals want him gone is because he is against gay “marriage.” If you believe in gay “marriage” they applaud this type of gay behavior in bathrooms. If you don’t, they make it into a scandal.

  22. #146269
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:12 pm, ACHefty said:

    What ever happened to simply living a decent life by example? Isn’t that the purest definition of leadership? This “leader” should now get out of the way. Time to take the tarnish off of the Congress by cleaning it out.

    NOW!

  23. #146272
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Larry Craig makes my skin crawl. His influence has become so warped I find myself standing at the urinal with heels together.

  24. #146273
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:21 pm, purplepeep said:

    While I don’t think Craig is the Great Satan, both he and the Frosts failed to learn the same basic truth. Choices you make sometimes come back and bite you in the backside.

  25. #146276
    On October 15th, 2007 at 3:23 pm, purplepeep said:

    slp said:
    Its just a stall.

    Heh, you said “stall”. :)

  26. #146323
    On October 15th, 2007 at 4:17 pm, feebiebabe said:

    me thinks Larry doth protest too much.

  27. #146372
    On October 15th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, Boomer said:

    “Happy Feet” Craig needs to go now. I was talking to several of my Idaho neighbors about him this weekend. We don’t care about his orientation, but we do care that he is a lying crapweasel that promised to resign and did not. Many of us and me included feel he is an embarrassment to the State and citizens of Idaho.

  28. #146375
    On October 15th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, ajmontana said:

    To be honest Id take one Larry for a Boxer and a Feinstein.

  29. #146408
    On October 15th, 2007 at 5:30 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    To be honest Id take one Larry for a Boxer and a Feinstein.

    I’ll raise you a Kennedy and Kerry!

  30. #146417
    On October 15th, 2007 at 5:40 pm, ajmontana said:

    And I’ll trump ya with a Pelosi!

  31. #146707
    On October 16th, 2007 at 6:26 am, DaveC said:

    I’ll call with the empty skirt, Stabenow and librarian glasses, Karl(carl? actually, don’t know the spelling of his first name, don’t care, either) Levin..

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Gay Patriot

» The O So Hip Obama
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook