S-CHIP Watch: Newsweek goes nutroots, Pelosi blames “hate radio,” Mikulski barks at Rush; Update: Bush addresses S-CHIP, Dems trot out…singer Paul Simon; Update: MoveOn cashes in its S-CHIP; Update: House Democrats warm up; Update: Republicans to introduce S-CHIP alternative

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 17, 2007 07:00 AM

Update 10:45pm Eastern. Rob Bluey reports:

As Democrats stage the ultimate political stunt Thursday with an override vote of President Bush’s SCHIP veto, Republicans are actually planning to do something about saving the children’s health care program.

Sens. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio) will join Reps. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.), Tom Price (R-Ga.), Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) and Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) to introduce an alternative to the Democrats’ $35-billion expansion. The lawmakers plan an afternoon news conference in the Capitol around the time of the veto vote.

Their alternative, based on a proposal crafted by the Heritage Foundation, consists of three elements:

1) A full reauthorization of SCHIP. The program would continue to cover children in families with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level;

2) A child health care tax credit. Rather than putting more people on a government-run program, the legislation advances tax credits to families with incomes between 200% and 300% of the poverty level; and

3) A health care “federalism” initiative. This piece would complement both the reauthorization and the tax changes in expanding health care coverage, and would encourage even more dramatic health care experimentation at the state level with different approaches to coverage expansion.

Update 9:21pm Eastern. House Democrats are warming up for the veto override vote tomorrow. There are three Dems on the floor right now forming an echo chamber. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz boils down the “debate:”

“It’s who’s for kids versus who stands with the President.”

File under “Death of the Grown-up,” Part 99,999.

Interestingly, one of the Democrats on the floor says blatantly that their fight is indeed about getting government-subsidized health insurance for the middle-class. He said it several times.

After degenerating into a Democrat jokefest about their baseball teams, GOP Rep. Steve King–adult–takes the floor. “What they’re not saying is that the question is: ‘Are we going to lay down the cornerstone for socialized medicine or not?’”

Update 8:20pm Eastern. Here’s my chat with John Gibson this evening about S-CHIP and some choice words from Allahpundit to top it off.

Update 1:15pm Eastern. Well, well. Read this: MoveOn Threatens Republicans With New SCHIP Ads.

And now read this fund-raising letter from the MoveOn thugs cashing in on S-CHIP (via S.M.)…

From: Noah T. Winer, MoveOn.org Political Action mailto:moveon-help@list.moveon.org
Sent: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:46:30 -0400
Subject: Meet Bethany

We’re down to the wire on kids’ health care—a few votes away from victory. USAction is highlighting one of the best reasons to override Bush’s veto—Bethany, a 2-year-old girl who might not be here today without SCHIP. Click below to see the ad—it’s powerful—and donate $25 to get a 30-second version on the air.
Contribute Now

Dear MoveOn member,

We’re just a few votes short of overriding President Bush’s veto and allowing millions of kids to see a doctor when they’re sick. The vote is tomorrow.1 It’s time to pull out all the stops.

We need to remind Republicans there will be dramatic consequences if they stand with Bush on this one. The consequences aren’t just political: this means real health problems for millions of real kids.

One of those kids is Bethany, a 2-year-old girl born with a heart defect who’s only healthy today because of the SCHIP children’s health program. Our friends at USAction put together an ad with her story, and we want to raise money to tell that story in the districts of representatives who vote wrong.

Our goal is to raise at least $200,000 today to run the ad. Can you chip in $25? Our ad will be a slightly shorter version of the video you can see by clicking here—you should check it out:

[URL]

The more we raise today, the more members of Congress will think twice about our ad campaign before they vote.

Bethany Wilkerson was born with several holes in her heart. Her family lives in St. Petersburg, Florida, on an annual income of $34,000—not poor, but unable to afford private health insurance. Even if they could, Bethany’s “pre-existing condition” makes it impossible to qualify. Only because of SCHIP is Bethany healthy today.

With children’s lives hanging in the balance, this is a politically risky vote for Republicans, and they’re watching public reaction closely to decide what to do. We’re announcing our ad to the local press in the districts of our top targets. No member of Congress will be able to vote against our kids without knowing they will be held accountable by voters.

But this isn’t just about scaring Congress into voting the right way. Some people will vote wrong, and it’s critically important to let their constituents know they abandoned our kids.

At last night’s vigils, we lit candles for the millions of children who are one vote away from having health insurance. Here are a few of your highlights:

Chanting, connecting with others, and responding to MANY supportive honks from passing drivers.—Margaret N., East Lansing, MI
Having children deliver hand written message to the congressman’s office.—Jim G., Chico, CA
We started the action in the wind and rain with candles blowing out immediately. Mid-way through a magnificent rainbow appeared and grew brighter. At the end the sun was shining. —Judy T., Lopez Island, WA

President Bush vetoed SCHIP because it’s such a successful public program—and the right-wing’s ideology is about running the government into the ground to keep it from serving the common good. But children’s health care has so much popular support that Bush’s supporters are paying a heavy political price for defending this failed ideology.

Together—with phone calls, rallies, vigils, letters, and TV ads—we can make the political price too high for opponents of children’s health care to stomach.

Can you contribute $25 to pressure House members to override Bush’s veto of children’s health care? Click here:

[URL]

Thank you for all you do.

–Noah, Adam G., Jennifer, Carrie, and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007

Source:
1. “Poll Reflects Republican Divisions on SCHIP,” NPR, October 17, 2007

http://www.moveon.org/r?r=3060&id=11416-7005627-DY4c2t&t=4

PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Update 11:25am Eastern. Bush briefly addressed S-CHIP at his morning press conference, noting that he supports covering 500,000 children who are eligible for the current program and questioning the creeping entitlement in states where more adults than children are now covered by S-CHIP. Bush complains that “we weren’t dialed in” on the legislative process. Reporters whining about lack of bipartisanship. “Isn’t it your responsibility to work with Congress to make sure you don’t get to the veto point?” And I’m so sure the White House press corps would hammer a Democrat president with the same indignant question.

Last Bush comment on S-CHIP: “I don’t like plans that encourage people to move from private plans to the public. And that’s what that bill would do.”

Meanwhile, the Dems traded in tots for singer Paul Simon, who called President Bush’s veto, what else, “a heartless act:”

***

Several readers e-mailed to inform me that I’ve earned a down arrow from the “Conventional Wisdom” charters at Newsweek.

Or is it KOSweek now?

newsweekcw2.jpg

***

Meanwhile, doing her own best Kossified Kabuki act, Nancy Pelosi lashed out at “hate radio” in advance of Thursday’s S-CHIP veto override vote. Amanda Carpenter reports:

This reporter asked Pelosi “Is it appropriate for opponents of SCHIP expansion to openly question the circumstances that led some children to become spokespeople for that expansion?”

Pelosi replied that she “would not censor” critics and “I can’t control what they have to say,” but much of it was “beneath the integrity of the debate.”

She classified many of the “attacks that impugn children” as coming from “hate radio.”

Are our questions and arguments “beneath the integrity of the debate?” Impossible. The “integrity of the debate” hit rock-bottom last night with Olbermann goading the Frost family to post photos of their children in their hospital beds after their horrible accident in order to score cheap political points.

Democrat Sen. Barbara Mikulski played Pelosi’s mini-me and piled on Rush Limbaugh. He’s laughing out loud:

I’m not mad. This is parallel universe time like it’s never been. The other side does not want to get it right. This is a great illustration, folks, of what they use the media monopoly for. They have their narratives; they have their templates. The truth is the most inconvenient thing to them. Fiction is what they need to survive, and in order to sell and peddle fiction, you need a monopoly and they don’t have their monopoly anymore, but they’re still peddling their fiction and they don’t understand how it is destroying them and discrediting them — and, for that, ladies and gentlemen, I celebrate, and I say, “I’m happy,” because it’s succeeding.

Indeed. But don’t take it for granted. Call your congressman and make your voice heard.

Capitol switchboard – 202-224-3121.

House Republican Leader John Boehner:
(202) 225-6205 phone
(202) 225-0704 fax

***
More:

- My column today – Slick S-CHIP sanctimony
- Catholic United’s deceitful S-CHIP ads

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Graeme Frost

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #201
    On October 18th, 2007 at 8:26 am, cjean said:

    I don’t have health insurance any more. I was laid off from my job with health insurance and now cannot (up to this point have not) found a job providing it. I don’t blame my employer, it’s his choice. It’s my choice to have this job. I like this job. Why am I not entitled like any child to health insurance? I haven’t been able to find anyone to insure me due to pre existing conditions. I don’t want an “entitlement”…can we get away from the government taking our money and deciding how we can receive a portion of it back?

    No matter my circumstance, I will not agree with universal health care. This SCHIP is one of a number of programs by which we will see universal health care and more governmental control in our lives.

    I’ll die first.

  2. #202
    On October 18th, 2007 at 8:40 am, governmentdrone said:

    watershed,

    Congratulations. You manage to use more words and address the point less than just about anybody I’ve ever encountered.

    But I’ve finally got my answer. You feel there is no level of sacrifice that should be necessary for anyone to make in this type of situation.

    Fair enough. That’s your opinion. However, I would say this: It should be patently obvious to you that there are a significant number of people who don’t feel that same way. We feel that there is still something to be said for fending for ourselves – making sacrifices in order to get things done without putting the burden on our fellow citizens through an increased tax load.

    As has been pointed out – by myself and others – the Frosts WERE COVERED by SCHIP. My problem, along with some others, is that the Democrats want to expand the program even further to families that by all rights should have the means to insure themselves.

    BTW, it’s been pointed out here that the Frosts could have obtained medical insurance for their family for approximately the same amount as a payment and monthly operating expenses for one of their vehicles. Frankly, I see nothing wrong with asking for that “sacrifice” – after all, that would leave a family with two licensed drivers with two vehicles.

    Which brings me to this point: My understanding is that the Frost children were injured in an auto accident. I know that my own auto insurance includes $1,000,000.00 worth of medical coverage. I set it up that way on purpose – JUST IN CASE an accident should occur. It really doesn’t cost that much more – just a few dollars more a month (and I really do mean just a few).

    Couldn’t the Frosts have done that? My own answer is – yes indeed they could have.

    But then again, we’re talking about a family that seemingly thinks things like insurance are optional. What a shame, especially since they could afford it. But then again, they qualify for SCHIP – why should they bother with pesky little things like insurance?

    The point being: A family with the means of the Frosts could very easily have provided enough coverage for themselves NOT to have had to rely on the government for help – and yet they STILL QUALIFY for SCHIP. Where does it end? How far up the ladder would you have us go, watershed? If it’s good enough for the Frosts, why shouldn’t it cover Bill and Melinda Gates? Or Donald Trump? And please don’t say that it’s ridiculous to talk about the Gates or Trump. Who decides where that cut-off will be? And if we wind up with socialized medicine in this country, then yes indeed, the Gates and Trump most assuredly WILL have their medical bills being paid for by the government – i.e., the taxpayers, i.e., you and me. Then again, maybe not. They’ll be the ones that will be able to afford to go someplace where the practice of medicine is still done in a free market – but that’s a whole separate debate for another time.

    How much of my money are you willing to take, watershed, in order to pay for something that people can and should do for themselves?

  3. #203
    On October 18th, 2007 at 8:45 am, cjean said:

    ConservativeRus…I agree with you completely. Our tax system is completely broke. I am a tax preparer and the use of deductions for some and not for all doesn’t work. It affects behavior. This is wrong.
    I would favor a value added tax (in lieu of income tax) if I trusted our goverment which i don’t.
    I just don’t see a way out. I am encouraged and thankful for the MM’s and Laura Ingrahams of this world and know they will endeavor to make the changes that our irresponsible electorate won’t.

  4. #204
    On October 18th, 2007 at 9:26 am, James Felix said:

    After reading all your posts, I would first like to comment on the number of people who have mocked me outright and my profession as a (music) teacher, rather than respond to my posts. You only bolster people’s opinions that perhaps personal attacks outweigh reasoned debate here.

    You’ve finally said something I agree with. I’m not a big fan of the ad hominem (with the possible exception of Rosie O’Donnel, about whom I cannot say enough terrible things).

    As literally one of the ONLY liberals I can find here, I expected maybe a curiosity factor would help me receive slightly more decorum.

    I know of at least four regular liberal commenters here, which is four more than the number of conservatives tolerated on Kos on DU.

    I was wrong. You’re cowardly, because you know more about me than I about you, and there you mock from your anonymous hiding place. (Flame away.)

    Unless “watershed” is what is says on your driver’s license you’re every bit as anoymous as we are, and this complaint makes even less sense than your other arguments.

    I think the Frosts are a family, like most American families, in search of the American dream. I think they have took every step to attain this goal…

    …every step, that is, except carry health insurance. Insurance that everyone here, you included, recognizes as being vital. Insurance that, as has been shown here more than once, they could easily have afforded before their accident by making a few responsible choices.

    I think then something happened and the dream became more difficult to acheive.

    Join the freaking club.
    I was making a really, really good living in downtown Manhattan until one September morning when some lunatics literally murdered all my clients. Put me out of business, overnight. I didn’t turn up at the county clerks office with my hand out.

    (They say, in an interview, that among other burdens, their business couldn’t handle the costs of medical insurance, and they had to end the business. I believe them. Maybe you don’t.)

    I believe them. I also believe that means they had a poor business plan and should have just gotten jobs with benefits. Instead they decided that pursuing their entreprenurial dream was worth the risk. Fine. Had that risk paid off I’d want them to reap the benefits. Since it didn’t pay off I want them to shoulder the consequences.

    I think more families, in similar situations (hard working class familes who cannot feasibly afford insurance) should be covered by schip.

    You have a bizarre definition of “working class”.

  5. #205
    On October 18th, 2007 at 9:54 am, conservativesRus said:

    I’ve been accused of mocking, being mean, condescending and arrogant… Some of those descriptions were accurate in a couple of cases where I did attack the person instead of the idea. The rest of the time I was accused of any of those, I believe they were just because it is a natural response to having your position shown to be inferior.
    With that said, what really really really annoys me about the liberal blogs – they can’t put together any thoughts without resorting to profanity. Something completely missing here. Thank you MM (and the moderator team) for keeping it that way.

  6. #206
    On October 18th, 2007 at 10:12 am, supersean said:

    Bump response #202…. The Frost’s made 2 poor decisions for insuring the well being of their family.

  7. #207
    On October 18th, 2007 at 10:16 am, supersean said:

    #205… I agree with you mostly but there have been some extreme posts regarding the actions of the vocal minority in San Francisco that includes posters advocating for terrorists to attack SF with nuclear weapons and also for an earthquake to wipe out the entire San Francisco Bay Area.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Doing the health care anecdote-vetting the Left won’t do

March 16, 2010 11:27 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments

Nanny State Gone Wild: Defining dependency up

December 24, 2009 04:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments

Obama’s classroom campaign: No junior lobbyist left behind

September 2, 2009 05:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

231 Comments

Senate moves forward with government tobacco takeover

June 11, 2009 05:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments

Up in smoke.

Dems: Hey, let’s take over tobacco industry! Obama: Great idea!

June 2, 2009 12:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

92 Comments

Up in smoke.


Categories: Graeme Frost

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook