<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What MSM stalking looks like</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:12:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dodge truck bumper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-171407</link>
		<dc:creator>dodge truck bumper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-171407</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;dodge truck bumper...&lt;/strong&gt;

They will have crystal-clear sounds  no small feat inside of a car  and very little distortion....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>dodge truck bumper&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>They will have crystal-clear sounds  no small feat inside of a car  and very little distortion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-150199</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-150199</guid>
		<description>Jim M., you in particular should keep your day job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim M., you in particular should keep your day job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-150003</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-150003</guid>
		<description>watershed - I&#039;m not sure how many times I have to say it - forget the comparison.  I wasn&#039;t talking about the Frosts.

You will not answer the basic question - therefore I conclude you can not.

I appreciate your &quot;I feel&quot; as an answer - but who are you to say your &quot;feel&quot; is any more valid than mine?

My position is backed up by observation of history and human behavior, logic, a moral underpinning that in fact (although you choose not to see it) is compassionate and a cohesive world view (and others).

As far as you have demonstrated here - your position is &quot;I feel&quot;.

When you actually want to have a discussion - feel free.  In the meantime, please go back to your music and leave debate and discussion to the intellectually capable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watershed &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure how many times I have to say it &#8211; forget the comparison.  I wasn&#8217;t talking about the Frosts.</p>
<p>You will not answer the basic question &#8211; therefore I conclude you can not.</p>
<p>I appreciate your &#8220;I feel&#8221; as an answer &#8211; but who are you to say your &#8220;feel&#8221; is any more valid than mine?</p>
<p>My position is backed up by observation of history and human behavior, logic, a moral underpinning that in fact (although you choose not to see it) is compassionate and a cohesive world view (and others).</p>
<p>As far as you have demonstrated here &#8211; your position is &#8220;I feel&#8221;.</p>
<p>When you actually want to have a discussion &#8211; feel free.  In the meantime, please go back to your music and leave debate and discussion to the intellectually capable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149981</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149981</guid>
		<description>#232

Oh my God, you sail. You have enough money to think that maybe you want to sail for a JOB. 

And you think your sailing comparison really &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; somehow carry weight in your arguments about schip and the Frosts.

And NO-ONE here sees the disconnect?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#232</p>
<p>Oh my God, you sail. You have enough money to think that maybe you want to sail for a JOB. </p>
<p>And you think your sailing comparison really <em>does</em> somehow carry weight in your arguments about schip and the Frosts.</p>
<p>And NO-ONE here sees the disconnect?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149972</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149972</guid>
		<description>#233

Let&#039;s look at this quote-

&quot;Again, nobody ever said that whether or not you have or pay for insurance is a qualifier as to whether or not you should be able to discuss it.&quot;

But my credibility was questioned, right?

As if a lack of credibility doesn&#039;t automatically disqualify me from discussion? 

Seriously, THINK about that, rather than just automatically gainsay everything I put out.

I know you throw out that &quot;reading comprehension&quot; nonsense a lot, and I hate to do it back, but in this case the charge can be thrown your way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#233</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at this quote-</p>
<p>&#8220;Again, nobody ever said that whether or not you have or pay for insurance is a qualifier as to whether or not you should be able to discuss it.&#8221;</p>
<p>But my credibility was questioned, right?</p>
<p>As if a lack of credibility doesn&#8217;t automatically disqualify me from discussion? </p>
<p>Seriously, THINK about that, rather than just automatically gainsay everything I put out.</p>
<p>I know you throw out that &#8220;reading comprehension&#8221; nonsense a lot, and I hate to do it back, but in this case the charge can be thrown your way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: governmentdrone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149928</link>
		<dc:creator>governmentdrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149928</guid>
		<description>watershed:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Then see #210 where you say NO-ONE has questioned my credibility. (And that I’m a troll, whiner, twister of facts, etc)

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Post #210 says nothing of the sort.  In fact, here&#039;s #210 IN IT&#039;S ENTIRETY: (and if you&#039;d like to follow that thread back up to #207 and #205, you&#039;ll see that you were the one who brought up the use of the words &quot;nutroots&quot; and &quot;moonbat&quot; - so don&#039;t even go there)

&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 19th, 2007 at 9:10 am, governmentdrone said: 
watershed:

#207 - The only person who ever said anything remotely like this is . . .

YOU!

Again, nobody ever said that whether or not you have or pay for insurance is a qualifier as to whether or not you should be able to discuss it.

Please, no more diversions. No more twisting of questions or answers.

Simply answer the question:

Do you carry insurance on yourself/family, or do you depend on the government to take care of your needs? Please note that a choice simply not to carry insurance most likely puts you in the latter category, unless you are choosing to pay cash for your health care.

A lack of a simple, straightforward answer will force me to proceed from the assumption that you do NOT carry insurance, and that you do indeed see this as a function of government.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not a word in there about credibility.  Nor is there even the slightest suggestion in that post of the words troll, whiner, etc., although later events did convince me to use the word troll (something which you now richly deserve) and I have told you that you are coming dangerously close to entering the territory of KOOK MOONBAT, which for some reason you seem to see as a point of honor (I&#039;m not sure why).

Dude (and I think that word is the right one here - your previous use of &quot;pwn&quot; and &quot;!!!11!!!&quot; seem to justify that), I think you&#039;re the one who just got &quot;pwned&quot;.  

How old are you?  15?  16? 17?  Or are you one of those geeks that lives in your parent&#039;s basement?

Tick Tock.  KOOK MOONBAT clock is now at 1 minute till midnight.

Now, let&#039;s have the snappy comeback post wherein you play the poor, aggrieved party whom everybody hates for no reason.

Buh bye watershed.  Hurl as many insults as you like now.  I, for one, won&#039;t be playing with you any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watershed:</p>
<blockquote><p>Then see #210 where you say NO-ONE has questioned my credibility. (And that I’m a troll, whiner, twister of facts, etc)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Post #210 says nothing of the sort.  In fact, here&#8217;s #210 IN IT&#8217;S ENTIRETY: (and if you&#8217;d like to follow that thread back up to #207 and #205, you&#8217;ll see that you were the one who brought up the use of the words &#8220;nutroots&#8221; and &#8220;moonbat&#8221; &#8211; so don&#8217;t even go there)</p>
<blockquote><p>On October 19th, 2007 at 9:10 am, governmentdrone said:<br />
watershed:</p>
<p>#207 &#8211; The only person who ever said anything remotely like this is . . .</p>
<p>YOU!</p>
<p>Again, nobody ever said that whether or not you have or pay for insurance is a qualifier as to whether or not you should be able to discuss it.</p>
<p>Please, no more diversions. No more twisting of questions or answers.</p>
<p>Simply answer the question:</p>
<p>Do you carry insurance on yourself/family, or do you depend on the government to take care of your needs? Please note that a choice simply not to carry insurance most likely puts you in the latter category, unless you are choosing to pay cash for your health care.</p>
<p>A lack of a simple, straightforward answer will force me to proceed from the assumption that you do NOT carry insurance, and that you do indeed see this as a function of government.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not a word in there about credibility.  Nor is there even the slightest suggestion in that post of the words troll, whiner, etc., although later events did convince me to use the word troll (something which you now richly deserve) and I have told you that you are coming dangerously close to entering the territory of KOOK MOONBAT, which for some reason you seem to see as a point of honor (I&#8217;m not sure why).</p>
<p>Dude (and I think that word is the right one here &#8211; your previous use of &#8220;pwn&#8221; and &#8220;!!!11!!!&#8221; seem to justify that), I think you&#8217;re the one who just got &#8220;pwned&#8221;.  </p>
<p>How old are you?  15?  16? 17?  Or are you one of those geeks that lives in your parent&#8217;s basement?</p>
<p>Tick Tock.  KOOK MOONBAT clock is now at 1 minute till midnight.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s have the snappy comeback post wherein you play the poor, aggrieved party whom everybody hates for no reason.</p>
<p>Buh bye watershed.  Hurl as many insults as you like now.  I, for one, won&#8217;t be playing with you any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149918</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149918</guid>
		<description>watershed - you are ignorant on this...&lt;/blockquote&gt;NO-one goes and tries to make sailing their job (?!) without having a lot of dough first. its a (very) rich person’s activity. Its pretty telling that its your choice of analogy. And it has literally NOTHING to do with the families involved with schip.&lt;blockquote&gt;
sorry to say - but you have no idea what you are speaking about.

And funny how you still haven&#039;t answered the question.  You might understand this as a teacher - you get an F for leaving the blank space after the question when you  turned in your paper.
I&#039;ve been far too generous on this - given you multiple chances - but you never filled in the blank.  FAIL

jsr is right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watershed &#8211; you are ignorant on this&#8230;NO-one goes and tries to make sailing their job (?!) without having a lot of dough first. its a (very) rich person’s activity. Its pretty telling that its your choice of analogy. And it has literally NOTHING to do with the families involved with schip.<br />
<blockquote>
sorry to say &#8211; but you have no idea what you are speaking about.</p>
<p>And funny how you still haven&#8217;t answered the question.  You might understand this as a teacher &#8211; you get an F for leaving the blank space after the question when you  turned in your paper.<br />
I&#8217;ve been far too generous on this &#8211; given you multiple chances &#8211; but you never filled in the blank.  FAIL</p>
<p>jsr is right</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149912</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149912</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hardly think this family of six on 45K a year goes sailing much. They probably worry about their next meal, or if their kids will awaken from their coma.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And exactly how would you know they don&#039;t also go sailing in addition to their new vehicles and larger than average home?  I&#039;m glad you know these things.
But as is lost on you - I never ever was talking about them going sailing....Reading comprehension my friend.  It&#039;ll do a person good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hardly think this family of six on 45K a year goes sailing much. They probably worry about their next meal, or if their kids will awaken from their coma.</p></blockquote>
<p>And exactly how would you know they don&#8217;t also go sailing in addition to their new vehicles and larger than average home?  I&#8217;m glad you know these things.<br />
But as is lost on you &#8211; I never ever was talking about them going sailing&#8230;.Reading comprehension my friend.  It&#8217;ll do a person good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149897</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149897</guid>
		<description>#228

NO-one goes and tries to make sailing their job (?!) without having a lot of dough first. its a (very) rich person&#039;s activity. Its pretty telling that its your choice of analogy. And it has literally NOTHING to do with the families involved with schip.

I&#039;ve also already said that schip prevents people from having to make sacrifices like slling off assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#228</p>
<p>NO-one goes and tries to make sailing their job (?!) without having a lot of dough first. its a (very) rich person&#8217;s activity. Its pretty telling that its your choice of analogy. And it has literally NOTHING to do with the families involved with schip.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also already said that schip prevents people from having to make sacrifices like slling off assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149895</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149895</guid>
		<description>#226

(This is one of the guys that only comes at me with agression and insults. He/she is a peach!)

PS- it&#039;s &quot;academy&quot;, with an E, not that I call it that. And dubious apparently only applies to your spelling skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#226</p>
<p>(This is one of the guys that only comes at me with agression and insults. He/she is a peach!)</p>
<p>PS- it&#8217;s &#8220;academy&#8221;, with an E, not that I call it that. And dubious apparently only applies to your spelling skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149893</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149893</guid>
		<description>Watershed....I said if I go sailing and try to call that my job..
Two steps I&#039;d like you to do now.
1) As I have already requested, forget the analogy (since you completely missed the point of it).  2) Answer the question.  They already make lots of sacrifices is not an answer.
We&#039;ve asked questions here like &quot;should they get a 2nd job/change jobs&quot; or &quot;sell vehicle(s)&quot; or (heaven forbid) &quot;their house&quot;
You have now successfully evaded answering this simple question for many days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watershed&#8230;.I said if I go sailing and try to call that my job..<br />
Two steps I&#8217;d like you to do now.<br />
1) As I have already requested, forget the analogy (since you completely missed the point of it).  2) Answer the question.  They already make lots of sacrifices is not an answer.<br />
We&#8217;ve asked questions here like &#8220;should they get a 2nd job/change jobs&#8221; or &#8220;sell vehicle(s)&#8221; or (heaven forbid) &#8220;their house&#8221;<br />
You have now successfully evaded answering this simple question for many days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149890</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149890</guid>
		<description>Pwn is funny, and applicable.

And no need to lecture me any further on any slang or vocabulary, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pwn is funny, and applicable.</p>
<p>And no need to lecture me any further on any slang or vocabulary, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsr</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149888</link>
		<dc:creator>jsr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149888</guid>
		<description>govdrone, conrus,

you two are wasting your time with this yo-yo.  He is clearly here to bait us.  He really didn&#039;t tell you he has bought insurance, only that is insured (By whom, his parents?).  His claim to run a music acadamy are dubious, at best.  Does he ever spend any time with his students, considering the vast amount of time he spneds bloging (not thatthere is anything wrong with that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>govdrone, conrus,</p>
<p>you two are wasting your time with this yo-yo.  He is clearly here to bait us.  He really didn&#8217;t tell you he has bought insurance, only that is insured (By whom, his parents?).  His claim to run a music acadamy are dubious, at best.  Does he ever spend any time with his students, considering the vast amount of time he spneds bloging (not thatthere is anything wrong with that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watershed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149884</link>
		<dc:creator>watershed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149884</guid>
		<description>#221

You actually quoted the question that was so desperate I answer.

See post #189

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149238

That quote of yours is the from the very same person who said it went to my credibility. Again, full post, #169.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149144

Then see #210 where you say NO-ONE has questioned my credibility. (And that I&#039;m a troll, whiner, twister of facts, etc)

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149788

Why don&#039;t you just say you were wrong, and I&#039;m being kinda unfairly questioned here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#221</p>
<p>You actually quoted the question that was so desperate I answer.</p>
<p>See post #189</p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149238" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149238</a></p>
<p>That quote of yours is the from the very same person who said it went to my credibility. Again, full post, #169.</p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149144" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149144</a></p>
<p>Then see #210 where you say NO-ONE has questioned my credibility. (And that I&#8217;m a troll, whiner, twister of facts, etc)</p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149788" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149788</a></p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you just say you were wrong, and I&#8217;m being kinda unfairly questioned here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: governmentdrone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/comment-page-3/#comment-149874</link>
		<dc:creator>governmentdrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/18/what-msm-stalking-looks-like/#comment-149874</guid>
		<description>watershed:

One other thing.

Who are you to lecture someone about class?

Frankly that is a quality that you have NEVER exhibited.


Tick tock.  Tick tock.  Moonbat clock keeps ticking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watershed:</p>
<p>One other thing.</p>
<p>Who are you to lecture someone about class?</p>
<p>Frankly that is a quality that you have NEVER exhibited.</p>
<p>Tick tock.  Tick tock.  Moonbat clock keeps ticking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
