See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On October 19th, 2007 at 7:02 pm, DirkBelig said:

   If the information in #86 is accurate, then shouldn’t that moot the blackmail material Hillary! may have on the other candidates? They could respond with, “Yeah? Look what the Commie sympathizer is trying to say about us Americans.”

2. #102
   On October 19th, 2007 at 7:22 pm, JWS said:

   Obviously the MSM wants her in at any cost. But the idea that not only will none of the stuff she’s been up to derail her-like it would any of the Repubs running-but also approx 50% of the American population will actually vote for this openly corrupt POS, points to a very stupid public…

3. #103
   On October 19th, 2007 at 7:53 pm, brooklyn red said:

   And our Governor wants to give driver’s licences (& voter registration) to illegal aliens. Hmmmmm,

   I think I am going to be sick.

4. #104
   On October 19th, 2007 at 10:06 pm, beenthere said:

   Anyone who thinks any aspect of this latest scandal-in-waiting will have any impact on the candidacy of Ms. Clinton is . . . in error. The Clinton’s are, like you-know-who, surrounded by a bodyguard of demons and their destiny to destroy this country is not to be denied. Examples abound: consider this latest, almost coherent piece by Peggy Noonan:

   “One has to do with what it is to be a woman in the world. To be active on any level in the life of the nation is to be immersed in controversy. If you are a woman, the to and fro, the fights you’re in, will to some extent be sharpened or shaped by what used to called sexism. There isn’t a woman in America who hasn’t been patronized–or worse–for being a woman, at least to some degree, and I mean all women, from the nun patronized by the bullying bishop to the congresswoman not taken seriously by the policy intellectual to the school teacher browbeaten by the school board chairman to the fare collector corrected by the huffy businessman. It happens to every woman.

   Conservative women tend not to talk about it except to each other, and those conversations are voluble and pointed. They don’t go public with their complaints because they’re afraid it will encourage liberals to pass a law, and if you wanted more laws, or thought laws could reform human nature and make us all nice, you wouldn’t be a conservative. Their problem is sharpened by the fact that some conservative men are boorish and ungentlemanly to show how liberated they are. But I digress.

   Or rather I don’t. The point is there are many women who will on some level be inclined to view Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy through the lens of their experience as women, and there is real latent sympathy there if she could tap it, which is what she’s trying to do.”

   The point appears to be that all women will respond to Ms. Clinton both out of empathy and a desire for revenge. Cobbling this emerging women’s bloc vote with the usual ethnic grievience groups will result in something unstoppable. Lame as the piece is, Noonan may well be right.

5. #105
   On October 19th, 2007 at 10:57 pm, JWS said:

   On October 19th, 2007 at 10:06 pm, beenthere said:

   Agree. The utter stupidity of the citizens of this country is beyond belief. This ENEMY of our country may well be elected….just because…

6. #106
   On October 20th, 2007 at 1:07 am, 29Victor said:

   If 100 Gs in a freezer can’t hurt a Dem. congressman then this sure as heck isn’t going to hurt a Clinton.

   For her to be hurt by it not only would the MSM have to report on it over and over again, they would have to explain it to people and show black and white clips of Hillary while playing scary music in the background. Or put it on the front page with a huge headline saying something like “Hill’s Fundraisers Extort Money From Poor Immigrants.”

   You know, like they do every time a Republican does something wrong.

   But they won’t. For the same reason that ABC tried to give the Democrats credit for the money that Rush raised.

7. #107
   On October 22nd, 2007 at 7:41 am, Bhishma said:

   On October 19th, 2007 at 10:42 am, geminicontender said:
   She needs to held to the fire. This woman must be ‘found out’ before the primaries. The American people deserve to know how corrupt this woman is and her followers. We have many more decent people in this country than she does followers. Let’s keep it that way.

   Hillary lost all credibility not only as a politician, but as a woman, when she had no problem with her husband’s adultry. All self-respecting women should note that. As for her husband, here is his contribution: http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Embracing%20Islam%20selling%20out%20children.htm

   But coming to elections, 2008, Tom Tancredo stands out as a patriotic statesman that he is. Am in the process of reading his book “In Mortal Danger”: http://www.ontheissues.org/Mortal_Danger.htm and find it quite thought-provoking.

   Tom Tancredo’s record speaks for himself: http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com

8. #108
   On October 25th, 2007 at 4:51 pm, Tantor said:

   “Forget it, Jake. It’s Chinatown.”