…

Hillary’s not exactly picky come it comes to collecting campaign money. Presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has taken thousands of dollars in cash donations from Islamists under federal investigation for terror-financing, money launde…

Hillary lost all credibility not only as a politician, but as a woman, when she had no problem with her husband’s adultry. All self-respecting women should note that. As for her husband, here is his contribution: http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Embracing%20Islam%20selling%20out%20children.htm

But coming to elections, 2008, Tom Tancredo stands out as a patriotic statesman that he is. Am in the process of reading his book “In Mortal Danger”: http://www.ontheissues.org/Mortal_Danger.htm and find it quite thought-provoking.

Tom Tancredo’s record speaks for himself: http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com

“Sometimes, It’s Too Late To Tell The Truth.” Hillary dare not attempt to explain away the corrupt fundraising practices she currently is embroiled in. To do so is to expose her to more crap than her campaign can tolerate, even with Bill doing the…

For her to be hurt by it not only would the MSM have to report on it over and over again, they would have to explain it to people and show black and white clips of Hillary while playing scary music in the background. Or put it on the front page with a huge headline saying something like “Hill’s Fundraisers Extort Money From Poor Immigrants.”

You know, like they do every time a Republican does something wrong.

But they won’t. For the same reason that ABC tried to give the Democrats credit for the money that Rush raised.

Agree. The utter stupidity of the citizens of this country is beyond belief. This ENEMY of our country may well be elected….just because…

“One has to do with what it is to be a woman in the world. To be active on any level in the life of the nation is to be immersed in controversy. If you are a woman, the to and fro, the fights you’re in, will to some extent be sharpened or shaped by what used to called sexism. There isn’t a woman in America who hasn’t been patronized–or worse–for being a woman, at least to some degree, and I mean all women, from the nun patronized by the bullying bishop to the congresswoman not taken seriously by the policy intellectual to the school teacher browbeaten by the school board chairman to the fare collector corrected by the huffy businessman. It happens to every woman.

Or rather I don’t. The point is there are many women who will on some level be inclined to view Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy through the lens of their experience as women, and there is real latent sympathy there if she could tap it, which is what she’s trying to do.”

The point appears to be that all women will respond to Ms. Clinton both out of empathy and a desire for revenge. Cobbling this emerging women’s bloc vote with the usual ethnic grievience groups will result in something unstoppable. Lame as the piece is, Noonan may well be right.

I think I am going to be sick.