Comments on: 107 criminal counts against Planned Parenthood in Kansas

By: Michelle Malkin » Planned Parenthood’s obscene profits

Michelle Malkin » Planned Parenthood’s obscene profits — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:19:47 +0000

[...] Parenthood clinics in Kansas, where Johnson County District Attorney Phill Kline has filed a 107-count criminal complaint against the abortion racket with charges ranging from falsifying documents to performing illegal [...]

By: Republican Law & Order « his vorpal sword

Republican Law & Order « his vorpal sword — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:59:47 +0000

[...] And Michelle Malkin reveals with considerable glee that NOTHING will stop the anti-abortion agenda: 107 criminal counts against Planned Parenthood in Kansas By Michelle Malkin • October 23, 2007 09:03 [...]

By: leepro

leepro — Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:27:14 +0000

#15 englishqueen01

You arer so absolutely right… on every point you make!

/just had to say

By: Love and Kisses from the Land of the Freed Balloons « his vorpal sword

Love and Kisses from the Land of the Freed Balloons « his vorpal sword — Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:31:21 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin reveals with considerable glee that NOTHING will stop the anti-abortion agenda: 107 criminal counts against Planned Parenthood in Kansas By Michelle Malkin • October 23, 2007 09:03 [...]

By: AdvanceUSA Blog

AdvanceUSA Blog — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:00:40 +0000

Resources on Planned Parenthood Scandal…

…

By: L.N. Smithee

L.N. Smithee — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:02:38 +0000

Re: Margaret Sanger - Planned Parenthood only discusses her in the most vague terms as being a pioneer feminist, decades ahead of her time as a promoter of contraception. True, they don't want to talk her racism, elitism, and pro-eugenicist activism. But what Planned Parenthood fears most of all is the publicizing of the fact that Sanger was herself against abortion. From Page 188 of her autobiography, archived on Google Book Search:

...But the ideas of wise men and scientists were sterile and did not affect the tremendous facts of life among the disinherited. All the while their discussions had been proceeding, the people had been and still were blindly, desperately practicing birth control by the most barbaric methods -- infanticide, abortion, and other crude ways...

By: 29Victor

29Victor — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:17:53 +0000

#40 englishqueen01

I wondered, a couple years ago, why certain people were beginning to complain about “non-medical use of ultrasound machines” when they had been being used as long as I could remember and were considered safe.

Then I discovered that a HUGE percentage of women will choose life after seeing their child on an ultrasound. And that, because of this, pro-lifers were aquiring ultrasound machines to show women their babies.

Now I understand.

Informed choice indeed.

By: 30 pcs of silver

30 pcs of silver — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:17:00 +0000

Thanks englishqueen and granite.

By: englishqueen01

englishqueen01 — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:15:08 +0000

I’m sure you understand that in my post I was in no way implying that anyone else was being wordy!

I understand, granite! I thought my post was a little long.

feebs – thank you. And best regards to you as well.

By: feebiebabe

feebiebabe — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:00:00 +0000

english queen. re: #30 – i agree. hats off to you my dear…respectfully, feebs,

By: granite

granite — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:40:37 +0000

Err… #40.

By: granite

granite — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:40:14 +0000

P.S.

Good post #41.

By: granite

granite — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:39:34 +0000

englishqueen01:

I’m sure you understand that in my post I was in no way implying that anyone else was being wordy!

By: englishqueen01

englishqueen01 — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:25:00 +0000

30 pieces – great post. Perfect example.

By: englishqueen01

englishqueen01 — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:23:10 +0000

granite: I tend to be a little passionate - and wordy - about something like this. Re: Ultrasounds. Back in 1989, Harrison Hickman said the following to NARAL:

"Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as which have the advances in technology [that have] allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because now people talk about that fetus in much different terms than they did fifteen years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure."

So much for an informed "choice"...especially when women see - as Boomer said - that a baby, even at 8 weeks gestation, is clearly not a "lump of cells", they're more likely to CHOOSE not to have an abortion. And clearly NARAL, in the same league as Banned Parenthood, finds ultrasound techonology damaging to their "cause"...