<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drudge: The Beauchamp transcripts; Foer to Beauchamp: &#8220;Let us control the way this story proceeds;&#8221; Foer exploits Beauchamp&#8217;s wife: &#8220;Ellie sent me an e-mail to tell you that it&#8217;s the most important thing in the world for her that you say that you didn&#8217;t recant;&#8221; Update: Foer whines, attacks the military again; Update: WaPo gets spun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Soldiers and puppies: Two narratives</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-259017</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Soldiers and puppies: Two narratives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-259017</guid>
		<description>[...] Will TNR bring back fabulist Scott Thomas Beauchamp for a special assignment to cover the YouTube [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will TNR bring back fabulist Scott Thomas Beauchamp for a special assignment to cover the YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Bombshell&#8230;TNR &#8216;fesses up: The Beauchamp stories are bullcrap</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-185450</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Bombshell&#8230;TNR &#8216;fesses up: The Beauchamp stories are bullcrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-185450</guid>
		<description>[...] to remind you of Foer&#8217;s pathetic attempt to &#8220;control the story&#8221; as exposed in the Army transcripts leaked in October. It&#8217;s all about the CYA at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to remind you of Foer&#8217;s pathetic attempt to &#8220;control the story&#8221; as exposed in the Army transcripts leaked in October. It&#8217;s all about the CYA at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Our Prosperity Threatens Itself</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-158954</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Our Prosperity Threatens Itself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-158954</guid>
		<description>[...] his account in ways that a) painted our soldiers in the worst possible light, and b) were easily discredited, presumably to ingratiate himself with the leftist anti-war intelligentsia that stands ever ready [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his account in ways that a) painted our soldiers in the worst possible light, and b) were easily discredited, presumably to ingratiate himself with the leftist anti-war intelligentsia that stands ever ready [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foer comes out from under his desk&#8230; &#171; The Foxhole</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-157879</link>
		<dc:creator>Foer comes out from under his desk&#8230; &#171; The Foxhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-157879</guid>
		<description>[...] Beauchamp&#8217;s own words (http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/) or the lack of factual evidence wasn&#8217;t enough to convince Foer that he&#8217;s been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beauchamp&#8217;s own words (<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/</a>) or the lack of factual evidence wasn&#8217;t enough to convince Foer that he&#8217;s been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Beauchamp alert: The New Republic comes out from under its desk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-156391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Beauchamp alert: The New Republic comes out from under its desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-156391</guid>
		<description>[...] TNR has &#8220;endeavored with good faith?&#8221; Go re-read the transcripts. You be the judge.  Posted in: Scott Thomas Beauchamp  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TNR has &#8220;endeavored with good faith?&#8221; Go re-read the transcripts. You be the judge.  Posted in: Scott Thomas Beauchamp  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soldiers' Angel - Holly Aho</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155588</link>
		<dc:creator>Soldiers' Angel - Holly Aho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beauchamp and Bobby Caina Calvan...&lt;/strong&gt;

In the past few days there have been two stunning examples of newspapers with egg on their faces, and writers they can&#039;t seem to control. The odd contrast is that one writer is a &#039;professional&#039; reporter, and the other is a soldier looking for his 15...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beauchamp and Bobby Caina Calvan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In the past few days there have been two stunning examples of newspapers with egg on their faces, and writers they can&#8217;t seem to control. The odd contrast is that one writer is a &#8216;professional&#8217; reporter, and the other is a soldier looking for his 15&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155548</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scott Thomas Beauchamp All But Recants...&lt;/strong&gt;

Although all-but-recanting is not exactly the same as actually recanting, it&#039;s the next best thing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scott Thomas Beauchamp All But Recants&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Although all-but-recanting is not exactly the same as actually recanting, it&#8217;s the next best thing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Beauchamp and The New Republic hung by their own petard</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155202</link>
		<dc:creator>This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Beauchamp and The New Republic hung by their own petard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155202</guid>
		<description>[...] added: Michele Malkin has the whole story on the Beauchamp leaked documents in detail and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] added: Michele Malkin has the whole story on the Beauchamp leaked documents in detail and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfcmac</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155198</link>
		<dc:creator>sfcmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155198</guid>
		<description>TNR is still trying to cover their ass.  Admitting they f***ed up beyond belief might have saved at least a shred of credibility.  Just reading the interview and Beauchamp’s blithe responses makes me want to vomit.  So far, there’s been a deafening silence on the TNR website. I can hardly wait to read their final sorry-assed excuse.

Foer&#039;s interview with the NY Observer indictates he wants some cheese with that &#039;whine&#039;. How &lt;em&gt;dare&lt;/em&gt; the Army interfere with our efforts to censor and spin this story the way we see fit? How &lt;em&gt;dare&lt;/em&gt; they leak documents that prove Beauchamp was the fraud everyone knew?

TNR has claimed throughout this sordid espisode that the Army forbid Beauchamp to comment or speak to the media. That, as evidenced by the transcripts, is an out and out lie. Beauchamp was free to talk, TNR knew this, but told him to keep quiet. Then they turn around and accuse the Army of gagging him.

Foer and company need to step back, take a breath and write a detailed apology for their journalistic malfeasance. Redactions have become nothing more than cover-ups and lame excuses instead of dignified, truthful explainations.

Foer, you’ve been Glass’d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TNR is still trying to cover their ass.  Admitting they f***ed up beyond belief might have saved at least a shred of credibility.  Just reading the interview and Beauchamp’s blithe responses makes me want to vomit.  So far, there’s been a deafening silence on the TNR website. I can hardly wait to read their final sorry-assed excuse.</p>
<p>Foer&#8217;s interview with the NY Observer indictates he wants some cheese with that &#8216;whine&#8217;. How <em>dare</em> the Army interfere with our efforts to censor and spin this story the way we see fit? How <em>dare</em> they leak documents that prove Beauchamp was the fraud everyone knew?</p>
<p>TNR has claimed throughout this sordid espisode that the Army forbid Beauchamp to comment or speak to the media. That, as evidenced by the transcripts, is an out and out lie. Beauchamp was free to talk, TNR knew this, but told him to keep quiet. Then they turn around and accuse the Army of gagging him.</p>
<p>Foer and company need to step back, take a breath and write a detailed apology for their journalistic malfeasance. Redactions have become nothing more than cover-ups and lame excuses instead of dignified, truthful explainations.</p>
<p>Foer, you’ve been Glass’d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swj719AWG</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155169</link>
		<dc:creator>swj719AWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155169</guid>
		<description>lolz.

I missed that.

Foer really doesn&#039;t understand &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; about the military, does he.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lolz.</p>
<p>I missed that.</p>
<p>Foer really doesn&#8217;t understand <em>anything</em> about the military, does he.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pressto</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155167</link>
		<dc:creator>pressto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155167</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While Beauchamp “didn’t stand by his stories in that conversation, he didn’t recant his stories,” Foer said in an interview. “He obviously was under considerable duress during that conversation, with his commanding officer in the room with him.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
A Squad Leader is NOT his Commanding Officer and in fact not an Officer at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While Beauchamp “didn’t stand by his stories in that conversation, he didn’t recant his stories,” Foer said in an interview. “He obviously was under considerable duress during that conversation, with his commanding officer in the room with him.”</p></blockquote>
<p>A Squad Leader is NOT his Commanding Officer and in fact not an Officer at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foer Still Spinning at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155146</link>
		<dc:creator>Foer Still Spinning at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155146</guid>
		<description>[...] Air Michelle Malkin Power Line Instapundit Bob [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Air Michelle Malkin Power Line Instapundit Bob [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain's Quarters</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155122</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain's Quarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155122</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foer Still Spinning...&lt;/strong&gt;

Franklin Foer has perfected his impersonation of a gyroscope in a vacuum -- he can&#039;t stop spinning. The editor of The New Republic spoke with Howard Kurtz yesterday about the release of the transcript of his conversation with Scott Beauchamp......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foer Still Spinning&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Franklin Foer has perfected his impersonation of a gyroscope in a vacuum &#8212; he can&#8217;t stop spinning. The editor of The New Republic spoke with Howard Kurtz yesterday about the release of the transcript of his conversation with Scott Beauchamp&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swj719AWG</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155117</link>
		<dc:creator>swj719AWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155117</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While the discussion “was extremely frustrating and engendered doubts,” Foer said, Beauchamp defended his story in a subsequent conversation that was conducted with no superiors present.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

And that woman meant nothing to me honey...  She was just flying around teh room naked, and fell on my *ahem*.

The scary thing is, the conversation he&#039;s talking probably only happened in his head.

I&#039;d be interested to talk to STB, and ask him myself what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While the discussion “was extremely frustrating and engendered doubts,” Foer said, Beauchamp defended his story in a subsequent conversation that was conducted with no superiors present.</p></blockquote>
<p>Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.</p>
<p>And that woman meant nothing to me honey&#8230;  She was just flying around teh room naked, and fell on my *ahem*.</p>
<p>The scary thing is, the conversation he&#8217;s talking probably only happened in his head.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to talk to STB, and ask him myself what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCgramma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/comment-page-2/#comment-155109</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCgramma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/24/drudge-the-beauchamp-transcripts/#comment-155109</guid>
		<description>This whole episode is an insult to everyone, but especially to those in military service. They deserve better than how the media treats them or ignores their accomplishments.  Our grandson&#039;s squadron works 12hr/7 day shifts in Iraq while the media at home defends the indefensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole episode is an insult to everyone, but especially to those in military service. They deserve better than how the media treats them or ignores their accomplishments.  Our grandson&#8217;s squadron works 12hr/7 day shifts in Iraq while the media at home defends the indefensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
