See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Michelle Malkin » Free advice: Don’t take LATimes’ fire advice

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #158141
   On October 28th, 2007 at 9:57 pm, Brendan said:

   Doh, a broken link.

2. #158142
   On October 28th, 2007 at 9:59 pm, Michelle Malkin said:

   Fixed!

3. #158149
   On October 28th, 2007 at 10:17 pm, DesertLover said:

   Guess I was more up to date on this one than I realized after reading the links above to Bob Owens … also liked the American Digest article comparison to “Shattered Glass” … really liked their descriptive term “treason without consequences” as it seems a valid description of what we are bombarded with from the MSM …

   I definitely liked some of the comments posted after the Owens article … especially the one saying the Rutten has to work for the L.A. Times because his skills weren’t good enough for him to make it in the blogosphere … that was very appropriate …

4. #158175
   On October 28th, 2007 at 11:12 pm, swj719AWG said:

   MM, The woman who needs no sleep!

   Anyone keeping track of Glen Greenie’s melt down over the e-mail bitch-slap he got from the army?

   The irony he built into it is priceless…

5. #158312
   On October 29th, 2007 at 9:29 am, lgm said:

   You might want to look at that the other side says before deciding. For example, select facts about the Army “investigation” are”leaked” to Drudge.

   Meanwhile, US forces are calling air strikes against occupied apartment buildings in Baghdad. Imagine a comparable situation in the US: a sniper starts shooting from an apartment window. The police blow up the building, residents and all, to stop the sniper.

   Bottom line: the Beauchamp “controversy” is a diversion from the real issues of the conduct of the war in Iraq. If you had a case on the real issue, you wouldn’t have to wallow in these distractions.

6. #158451
   On October 29th, 2007 at 1:01 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   lgm, didn’t you leave out Halliburton, Blackwater and Global Warming?

   Stop trolling, if you have something enlightening to say about the subject fine, otherwise…

7. #158505
   On October 29th, 2007 at 2:14 pm, Yashmak said:

   In WWII, cities and all were blown up to stop an arms factory.

   I’m not saying civilian deaths are something we should want to inflict, but they happen in war, they help persuade civilians to ‘out’ the insurgency, and most of all. . . .they have absolutely nothing to do with the story here.

8. #158541
   On October 29th, 2007 at 2:53 pm, blues said:

   lgm: In reference to your comment about sniper in apartment bldg. and police blow up building,residents and all.One question.”Your point is?”
   Am I the only person here who thinks we’ve beaten this dead horse enough? Another liberal lying sack of sh*t got gaught in in his lies.I applaud Michelle and the other bloogers who showed this guy for the a$$hat he is,but I think the story is over.

9. #158677
   On October 29th, 2007 at 5:53 pm, Frumious Bandersnatch said:

   Hey lgm, buddy, nice going on trying to pull a TNR by changing the subject.

   Too bad it didn’t work.

   Just a wee quick question. How do you know that anything TNR prints is accurate?

10. #158874
    On October 30th, 2007 at 12:02 am, BrianNY said:

    #5 said:

    Meanwhile, US forces are calling air strikes against occupied apartment buildings in Baghdad.

    Occupied by whom?