A Democrat for immigration enforcement: For real

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 29, 2007 02:06 PM

There are, believe it or not, a few Democrats who have their heads screwed on straight when it comes to immigration enforcement. Several were elected last fall; the open-borders lobby has conveniently ignored them.

At their peril.

Numbers USA brings words that one of the pro-enforcement Dems is readying a worthwhile piece of legislation with bipartisan support:

A new immigration enforcement bill that would remove the jobs magnet for illegal immigration is expected to be introduced in the House very soon. The SAVE Act (Secure America with Verification Enforcement) will be sponsored by Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.) and is expected to have bi-partisan support. NumbersUSA believes this bill originating on the Democratic side of the House is just the vehicle to give us a chance to actually pass immigration legislation through a Democratic-controlled Congress that would significantly improve the lives of most Americans. Specifically, The SAVE Act would eventually require every employee in America to go through the E-Verify system, identifying all illegal aliens and removing any “glitches” that once allowed them to pass through the system and into the workforce undetected.

Shuler was a staunch opponent of the Bush/Reid shamnesty:

“This is an issue that Democrats and Republicans should stand together on,” said Rep. Shuler. “We should stand for the rule of law and what is right. We cannot, we must not, and we should not reward those who have broken the law.”

“It is unfair to those who have gone through and are continuing to go through the process of legal immigration to grant amnesty and citizenship to those who have entered our country illegally,” Rep. Shuler continued

He can say that again.

Now, if only more of our GOP lawmakers and DHS bureaucrats in the Bush administration would do the same.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » Miami Herald writer threatens open-borders intifada

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #158503
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:11 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Good. Rule of law is what these guys are supposed to be about. I don’t care D or R right is right and wrong is wrong. Hopefully we’ll get some security along our borders.

  2. #158508
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:17 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Dems are on the chopping block. We’ll see where they stand. Securing our borders first, no?

  3. #158513
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:23 pm, michiganmom said:

    Must be a DINO.

  4. #158515
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:23 pm, iamsaved said:

    Well I sure hope this is one lost soul who makes it to the light before the demoncrats guide him back into the darkness.

    I had a feeling there were a few of these Democratic Nicodemus’s out there but haven’t heard from many in a long while.

  5. #158517
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:24 pm, tony the tiger said:

    Dems are on the chopping block. We’ll see where they stand: Securing our borders first? No!
    *fixed that for ya’…

  6. #158518
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:26 pm, zorro said:

    Wow, the world is full of surprises! But he may now be the target of democrap intervention!

  7. #158520
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    He’s an NC rep. He’ll get thrown out if he isn’t for securing the borders. In NC only about 20% of people favor amnesty of any kind. . . that is one of the reasons Rudy will have trouble here.

  8. #158522
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:29 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Thanks tony! :-)

  9. #158524
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:31 pm, mike volpe said:

    I blogged about this as well.

    There is one major potential problem I have with this bill. This may infact bloat government substantially. I have not heard the specifics of how Shuler plans to prevent that.

    That said, if this bill gets a full and fair debate, then that problem can be worked out. It is the job of people like us, who abhor illegal immigration, to demand that this bill see the light of day so that people can debate it so that it can be improved.

    I am also a bit concerned that I couldn’t find anything about it on Shuler’s site. If he isn’t publicizing it himself then how is the rest of the country going to know.

  10. #158531
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:39 pm, JW2 said:

    We should stand for the rule of law and what is right. We cannot, we must not, and we should not reward those who have broken the law.

    Wait… their job is not to do whatever it takes to get future dem. voters into the country? Well now I just don’t know what to think.

  11. #158536
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, JW2 said:

    Not exactly about the proposed bill, but someone sent me a forward today with this quote from Theodore Roosevelt.

    In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.
    -Theodore Roosevelt 1919

    In case I wasn’t the last person to receive this, I thought I’d share it. I looked up some other things Roosevelt had to say on immigration, there’s some great stuff there.

  12. #158537
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, JW2 said:

    whoops, didn’t mean to block that last part. Oh well.

  13. #158538
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:51 pm, Anil Petra said:

    call me skeptical. party is as party does

  14. #158542
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:53 pm, tony the tiger said:

    OT – but…
    #12
    Yeah – what ever happened to the “Preview” comment… was I just imagining that?

  15. #158543
    On October 29th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    Mr Shuler is a former University of Tennessee quarterback. In his years under center he was used to fighting adversity. Maybe that experience will do him some good in his quest to do the right thing and not just be a “follow the herd” democrat.
    Go for the long bomb Heath!

  16. #158545
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:01 pm, JW2 said:

    #14 – I know, I rely heavily on the preview button (for obvious reasons)…I hope it’s only temporarily out of service. In the meantime I guess I’ll just use Word and cut and paste, but that clearly didn’t help with my quote.

  17. #158548
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:13 pm, ajmontana said:

    Enforcement is key for any Immigration policy being made. All the laws on the books might as well have been written in Braille.

  18. #158553
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, Raving Lunatic said:

    He’ll probably get shunned and belittled like Leiberman did.

    What district is he from? He cant be from around the Raleigh-Durham-Charlotte Triagle of Delusion…

  19. #158556
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:28 pm, Buck I said:

    This immigration issue has make numerous strange bedfellows. Regardless of party, there has been mixed allegiances on the immigration issue. Others simply want to enforce the rule of law.
    If one of the democratic candidates had the guts to be tough on illegal immigration, he’d surely gain on Hillary.

  20. #158561
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:35 pm, blues said:

    Wish we had some of those kind of Democrats here in Murthaland.

  21. #158565
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    I’ve got it worse than you Blues.

    Here it’s Durbinland AND Obamaland!

    God help us!

  22. #158568
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:51 pm, Speakup said:

    Both parties should own this issue, The Democrats for the jobs and the middle class and the Republicans for the sovereignty and the rule of law.

    Americans benefit should always come before foreigners and the loyalty of our leaders should never be in doubt.

    The public has had it with politicians selling our interests out from under us.

  23. #158569
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, Grey Fox said:

    Heath is from the Asheville area in Western North Carolina. As he is my US Rep., I am glad to see he is on the right side of this – he is supposed to be a “Blue Dog” Democrat. I believe he signed the Limbaugh Letter, so I had just about put him into the “Running Dog” Democrat category. I may have to rethink that!

  24. #158573
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:57 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    30 pcs of silver said in a earlier comment, “Dems are on the chopping block.” Tru, even a large number of dems want illegal immigration stopped. For my comment, I would revise that to “Dem Shuler is on the chopping block”…and his fellow dems will be holding the act. If this proposal of his gets any legs, they will punish him in some fashion.

  25. #158575
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:58 pm, DesertLover said:

    Tennessee Dave

    Heath Shuler was also a QB for the
    Washington Redskins … suspect he got some insight as to what was going on in DC while living there …

    mike volpe said:

    potential problem I have with this bill. This may infact bloat government substantially. I have not heard the specifics of how Shuler plans to prevent that

    I see your concern but if the agencies that are already in place start living up to their responsibilities and doing their jobs by enforcing ALL the laws already on the books there won’t be a need to add a bunch of new bureaucracy …

  26. #158576
    On October 29th, 2007 at 3:58 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    geez! I gotta watch my spelling.

  27. #158577
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    Go to Numbers USA. They already have faxes ready to send in support of this bill.

  28. #158581
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:06 pm, Buck I said:

    #22
    That’s an outstanding comment. I agree 100%.

  29. #158587
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:08 pm, blues said:

    Mr.VIBEMAN;I feel your pain,but I’ll see your Durbinland and Obamaland and raise you a Spectorland and a Caseyland.Around here the only thing that matters is the big D next to ANY candidate’s name.W.Pa–third ring of H*ll for an American.

  30. #158593
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:13 pm, nbarry said:

    I am from New York and 3/4 of us purported flaming liberals oppose Governor Spitzer giving driver’s licenses to illegals. Sometimes, people can’t be pidgeonholed.

  31. #158612
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, uhangtight said:

    well let’s beat this one if you can, i’ll see your spectorland, caseyland, durbinland and obamaland and raise you a boxerland, feinsteinland and sanfrannanland… paleease..

    and you would think that living here in california, they would be especially aware of the damage the lack of enforcing laws has done to the educational system and the health care system. NOPE.. They just keep on pandering to the foreign interests…

    It doesn’t do me any good to fax my representatives, they are the ones usually leading the charge for amnesty. I just wish that the rest of California would wake up and stop voting for these democraps.

  32. #158622
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:43 pm, tony the tiger said:

    “Preview iswas my friend.”

    “Alas, poor Preview, I knew him well.”

    “I come not to praise Preview, but to bury him.”

    Ach… Ist Montag.

  33. #158623
    On October 29th, 2007 at 4:46 pm, tony the tiger said:

    #25 DesertLover
    look here.

  34. #158636
    On October 29th, 2007 at 5:05 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    He can say that again.

    Would Rudy? Rudy will kill us on immigration. Could be as bad as Bush.

  35. #158649
    On October 29th, 2007 at 5:15 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    Blue @ #8….Personally, I think W.PA still has quite a way to fall before it hits to lows of California and some other places. : )

  36. #158650
    On October 29th, 2007 at 5:16 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    Oh my, the page reloaded to a different one!! Sorry…please ignore the post. : (

  37. #158682
    On October 29th, 2007 at 6:00 pm, leepro said:

    OT

    What’s happened to Michelle’s web page? Is anybody else getting what I’m getting… all text, no HTML (except links)? It’s been this way since yesterday.

    I’ve reloaded page, rebooted Firefox, rebooted computer. Still the same. Other web pages are coming in just fine (including Hot Air).

    Also NO PREVIEW BUTTON!

  38. #158686
    On October 29th, 2007 at 6:06 pm, tony the tiger said:

    #37 leepro
    No HTML! G-d, man, how can you take it?!
    ;^P

    but to answer your question… just the preview seems inop to me. YMMV. Hope we survive…

    tony

  39. #158694
    On October 29th, 2007 at 6:19 pm, leepro said:

    #38 tony the tiger said:

    #37 leepro
    No HTML! G-d, man, how can you take it?!
    ;^P

    but to answer your question… just the preview seems inop to me. YMMV. Hope we survive…
    _____________________________

    Can’t even do blockquote to quote you!
    To answer YOUR question:
    “G-d, man GIRL, how can you take it?!

    Can’t!!! Leaving now.

    ;^P back

  40. #158773
    On October 29th, 2007 at 8:34 pm, tony the tiger said:

    *and on that note, I bow to a true master!

  41. #158807
    On October 29th, 2007 at 9:44 pm, garyt said:

    Have not the fires in California shown us anything about over crowding in the USA?. How long must we have illegal immigrattion. It has to be controlled because I don’t even think most Democrats want this nation to be as crowded as India or China. Legal Immigration should be slowed and Illegal immigration has to be stopped but I don’t think it will because there is already too much of a fifth column here now.

  42. #159119
    On October 30th, 2007 at 10:26 am, misterbee241 said:

    I hope Schuler makes a better congress critter than he did a quarterback.

  43. #165174
    On November 6th, 2007 at 8:00 pm, NHMagenta said:

    Sad to say I see E-Verify as something that is marginally helpful.
    To pass it a worker just needs matching information; if E-Verify comes into broader use, there will simply be more identity theft UNLESS an additional check is added – that being how many other employers are making payments into the account.
    The applicant is asked for 7 years of employment history (including current);
    if for example applicant says “not currently employed” and enhanced E-Verify shows the SSN has been paid into recently, the check fails.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom