<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Pumpkin tax repealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:17:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jsr</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161486</link>
		<dc:creator>jsr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161486</guid>
		<description>Does this mean all thos horrible nut and fruit breads at Christmas won&#039;t be taxed since nobody ever eats them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean all thos horrible nut and fruit breads at Christmas won&#8217;t be taxed since nobody ever eats them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161267</guid>
		<description>All hail the victory of the punkinistas!

As for the joker who thought it was no big deal to sign a tax form affirming you were going to consume the pumpkin you were buying to get a tax exemption, WHAT THE &amp;#$% BUSINESS IS IT OF THE GOVERNMENT WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO WITH YOUR PUMPKIN!?  BACK OFF, ARROGANT BUREAUCRATS.  YOU WORK FOR US.  WE DON&#039;T HAVE TO REPORT AND JUSTIFY EVERY &amp;*@$ DETAIL OF OUR LIVES TO YOU.

There, I feel better now.  Isn&#039;t it funny that people who would complain the Patriot Act is trashing our rights have no problem with the government demanding we account to it for our vegetable use.  Sheesh!

Iowa is a liberal state that tends to be tax and form happy.  It&#039;s one of the few states that demanded that military members serving outside Iowa pay state income tax.  That&#039;s why Iowa boys like me turned Texan as soon as we were assigned to a base there.  Lots of Air Force guys become Texan or Floridian citizens because they have no state tax.

Iowa used to sell all liquor in state liquor stores which were a model of government incompetence.  Customers would read a board with all the liquor products on it, write down their order, and get in line to give it to the clerk.  The clerk would check it for correctness, sign off on it, and give it back to you.  Then you got in another line to give it to a clerk who picked your order.  The stock was all behind the long desk, off limits to customers.  Then you took your order to the cashier who rang it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All hail the victory of the punkinistas!</p>
<p>As for the joker who thought it was no big deal to sign a tax form affirming you were going to consume the pumpkin you were buying to get a tax exemption, WHAT THE &amp;#$% BUSINESS IS IT OF THE GOVERNMENT WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO WITH YOUR PUMPKIN!?  BACK OFF, ARROGANT BUREAUCRATS.  YOU WORK FOR US.  WE DON&#8217;T HAVE TO REPORT AND JUSTIFY EVERY &amp;*@$ DETAIL OF OUR LIVES TO YOU.</p>
<p>There, I feel better now.  Isn&#8217;t it funny that people who would complain the Patriot Act is trashing our rights have no problem with the government demanding we account to it for our vegetable use.  Sheesh!</p>
<p>Iowa is a liberal state that tends to be tax and form happy.  It&#8217;s one of the few states that demanded that military members serving outside Iowa pay state income tax.  That&#8217;s why Iowa boys like me turned Texan as soon as we were assigned to a base there.  Lots of Air Force guys become Texan or Floridian citizens because they have no state tax.</p>
<p>Iowa used to sell all liquor in state liquor stores which were a model of government incompetence.  Customers would read a board with all the liquor products on it, write down their order, and get in line to give it to the clerk.  The clerk would check it for correctness, sign off on it, and give it back to you.  Then you got in another line to give it to a clerk who picked your order.  The stock was all behind the long desk, off limits to customers.  Then you took your order to the cashier who rang it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texhoma</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161185</link>
		<dc:creator>Texhoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161185</guid>
		<description>A 6¢ tax reduction today, billions of $ tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 6¢ tax reduction today, billions of $ tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161183</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161183</guid>
		<description>People not taking time to fill out the form was the point from the Deptartment of Revenue standpoint.  Being a former Dept of Revenue Agent, I understand the thinking.  It wasn&#039;t the legislators that came up with this &quot;loophole&quot; in the food is except/decorations are taxable scheme.  

The legistors came up with the idea of exempting food from sales tax to keep lower income people from paying a high percentage of their meager incomes on taxes just to feed their families.  (This exemption is fairly new here in Wyoming.  And there are a few states that still tax food, pumpkins included.)

It was a bureaucrat at the Dept of Revenue that decided that pumpkins weren&#039;t food and should be taxed.  

It&#039;s nice to see the governor telling them otherwise.  Even though it took a public/blog firestorm to convince him.

And christmas trees are already subject to sales tax, assuming that you live in a state that has a sales tax (Montana is the only one I can think of that dosn&#039;t have a sales tax.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People not taking time to fill out the form was the point from the Deptartment of Revenue standpoint.  Being a former Dept of Revenue Agent, I understand the thinking.  It wasn&#8217;t the legislators that came up with this &#8220;loophole&#8221; in the food is except/decorations are taxable scheme.  </p>
<p>The legistors came up with the idea of exempting food from sales tax to keep lower income people from paying a high percentage of their meager incomes on taxes just to feed their families.  (This exemption is fairly new here in Wyoming.  And there are a few states that still tax food, pumpkins included.)</p>
<p>It was a bureaucrat at the Dept of Revenue that decided that pumpkins weren&#8217;t food and should be taxed.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see the governor telling them otherwise.  Even though it took a public/blog firestorm to convince him.</p>
<p>And christmas trees are already subject to sales tax, assuming that you live in a state that has a sales tax (Montana is the only one I can think of that dosn&#8217;t have a sales tax.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161141</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161141</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little late for this year.

Watch this come back next year like a bad burrito.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little late for this year.</p>
<p>Watch this come back next year like a bad burrito.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarhead</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-161102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-161102</guid>
		<description>Every time I hear the Federal, State, Town or Village Goverments placing a dumb tax on something... It reminds me of the Popeye movie when that idiot goes around on the bicycle taxing everything. The Taxing Idiot says: That will be a chewing gum tax of five cents, ect, ect, ect...(Sarcasm On) To pay for the S-CHIP. OOPS! OHHHH Nooooo! I might have given the idots an Idea.  Smokers who quit, chew gum don&#039;t they. Besides I like a Bazooka Joe bubble gum every now and then myself. (Sarcasm Off)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I hear the Federal, State, Town or Village Goverments placing a dumb tax on something&#8230; It reminds me of the Popeye movie when that idiot goes around on the bicycle taxing everything. The Taxing Idiot says: That will be a chewing gum tax of five cents, ect, ect, ect&#8230;(Sarcasm On) To pay for the S-CHIP. OOPS! OHHHH Nooooo! I might have given the idots an Idea.  Smokers who quit, chew gum don&#8217;t they. Besides I like a Bazooka Joe bubble gum every now and then myself. (Sarcasm Off)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160998</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160998</guid>
		<description>And, how many people are going to take the time and make the effort to file the claim to get reimbursed for the tax they paid on a pumpkin(s)?  Hmmm?  I&#039;m guessing very few.

So, I guess Iowa will still get the tax revenue it generated.

Taxing pumpkins.  How stupid can elected officials be?  No.  You don&#039;t have to answer that.  As was noted earlier in the comments, they have too much time on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, how many people are going to take the time and make the effort to file the claim to get reimbursed for the tax they paid on a pumpkin(s)?  Hmmm?  I&#8217;m guessing very few.</p>
<p>So, I guess Iowa will still get the tax revenue it generated.</p>
<p>Taxing pumpkins.  How stupid can elected officials be?  No.  You don&#8217;t have to answer that.  As was noted earlier in the comments, they have too much time on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee260</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160993</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee260</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160993</guid>
		<description>Will they try and tax Christmas trees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they try and tax Christmas trees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josetheguerilla</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160971</link>
		<dc:creator>josetheguerilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160971</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to have another Boston Tea party.  I say &quot;No taxation from moonbat representation!!!!&quot;  Tax pumpkins? Tell the headless horseman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to have another Boston Tea party.  I say &#8220;No taxation from moonbat representation!!!!&#8221;  Tax pumpkins? Tell the headless horseman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennessee Dave</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160965</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennessee Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160965</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On November 1st, 2007 at 12:58 pm, gayle said: 
Just wait.

Christmas trees will be next.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahhhh.....gayle,
If you&#039;re chowing down on a Christmas Tree com Dec 25, please don&#039;t invite me for dinner.  My doctor says I need some ruffage, but there&#039;s such a thing as taking things too far.  I&#039;ll stick with turkey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On November 1st, 2007 at 12:58 pm, gayle said:<br />
Just wait.</p>
<p>Christmas trees will be next.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahhhh&#8230;..gayle,<br />
If you&#8217;re chowing down on a Christmas Tree com Dec 25, please don&#8217;t invite me for dinner.  My doctor says I need some ruffage, but there&#8217;s such a thing as taking things too far.  I&#8217;ll stick with turkey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Russ</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160959</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160959</guid>
		<description>This whole argument was dependent on whose pumpkin gourd was being gored. Tee Hee.
And by the way Christmas trees are tasty. That&#039;s if you&#039;re a goat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole argument was dependent on whose pumpkin gourd was being gored. Tee Hee.<br />
And by the way Christmas trees are tasty. That&#8217;s if you&#8217;re a goat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkeye54</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160957</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkeye54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160957</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How in the world does some of this ____ get passed in the first place? Don’t these people READ these things before they sign off on them? Apparently not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Come now, you &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; liberals will keep burn the midnight oil coming up with tax schemes to part us from our money for them to throw at their constiuency.

This one was just &lt;em&gt;too&lt;/em&gt; funny to the blogosphere and talk radio to ignore.  Once exposed, they had to retreat.


It was an assinine tax for the Dems to come with in the first place, but then what is the party symbol after all?

Probably figured the revenue from a Pumpkin tax just wasn&#039;t worth the humiliation of being mocked:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How in the world does some of this ____ get passed in the first place? Don’t these people READ these things before they sign off on them? Apparently not.</p></blockquote>
<p>Come now, you <em>know</em> liberals will keep burn the midnight oil coming up with tax schemes to part us from our money for them to throw at their constiuency.</p>
<p>This one was just <em>too</em> funny to the blogosphere and talk radio to ignore.  Once exposed, they had to retreat.</p>
<p>It was an assinine tax for the Dems to come with in the first place, but then what is the party symbol after all?</p>
<p>Probably figured the revenue from a Pumpkin tax just wasn&#8217;t worth the humiliation of being mocked:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160945</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160945</guid>
		<description>Smashing good job.  Now let&#039;s get back to business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smashing good job.  Now let&#8217;s get back to business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WOW! - Report: Pumpkin tax repealed</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160944</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WOW! - Report: Pumpkin tax repealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160944</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin  Looks like the Iowa Department of Revenue listened to the massive backlash yesterday over its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin  Looks like the Iowa Department of Revenue listened to the massive backlash yesterday over its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie in FL</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160943</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie in FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/report-pumpkin-tax-repealed/#comment-160943</guid>
		<description>I would imagine that more pumpkins are made into pumpkin pie in IOWA than in many other states.  Isn&#039;t it good old farm country there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine that more pumpkins are made into pumpkin pie in IOWA than in many other states.  Isn&#8217;t it good old farm country there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
