<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy: Why appeasing Democrats gets you nowhere; Update: Bush defends Mukasey, Teddy Kennedy on the attack; Update: Democrat scalp-hunters salivate, Schumer &#8220;agitated&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:56:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: November, 2007 Archive &#171; Right Minded Online</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-399747</link>
		<dc:creator>November, 2007 Archive &#171; Right Minded Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-399747</guid>
		<description>[...] is not torture    President Bush&#8217;s attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey is facing an uphill confirmation battle with Senate Democrats because of his refusal to say whether he considers waterboarding illegal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not torture    President Bush&#8217;s attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey is facing an uphill confirmation battle with Senate Democrats because of his refusal to say whether he considers waterboarding illegal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy, Pt. II</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161788</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy, Pt. II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161788</guid>
		<description>[...] told you the Mukasey attorney general nomination was in jeopardy yesterday. More signs of trouble today: The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Friday he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told you the Mukasey attorney general nomination was in jeopardy yesterday. More signs of trouble today: The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Friday he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161466</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161466</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy: Why appeasing Democrats gets you nowhere;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Right!  So why get someone who might be &quot;middle of the road&quot; and deal with this crud?  Her Mr. President, get someone real conservative and show the people - once again - how the dimocraps are not willing to work with the you.  It should get their numbers in the sub-ten range and the Presidents back over forty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy: Why appeasing Democrats gets you nowhere;</p></blockquote>
<p>Right!  So why get someone who might be &#8220;middle of the road&#8221; and deal with this crud?  Her Mr. President, get someone real conservative and show the people &#8211; once again &#8211; how the dimocraps are not willing to work with the you.  It should get their numbers in the sub-ten range and the Presidents back over forty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just A Grunt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161455</link>
		<dc:creator>Just A Grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161455</guid>
		<description>My plan for handling the Mukassey confirmation hearing. In the debate leading up to his confirmation I would have the Sgt-At-Arms of the Senate deliver a message to the whoever is holding the gavel. On the message would be this.
We have detained a suspected Al-Queda member. Doing his initial contact with our forces he claimed that we were too late. At least a dozen bombs had been planted at various places around the USA, including at least 4 residences of members of congress as well various malls, stores and other public places around the country. The bombs are all set to explode in 4 hours. At this time we do not know the locations or the veracity of the claim.
We can imagine the actions of the congress. They would no doubt go into recess, pull out their phones call their families to get them out of the house and no doubt leave the rest of us ignorant of the threat and left to fend for ourselves. 
At this point I would ask them can we waterboard the suspect. Let&#039;s see how sincere their &quot;moral authority&quot; is then. If they did the above imagine the inevitable investigation when the question &quot;What did you know and when did you know it&quot; comes up. How many regular Americans would they be willing to sacrifice to maintain their moral high ground?
Folks when it comes to any sympathy towards the Islamo-fascists cult followers I would hand people a dictionary and tell them to look it up. It is right between shit and syphillis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My plan for handling the Mukassey confirmation hearing. In the debate leading up to his confirmation I would have the Sgt-At-Arms of the Senate deliver a message to the whoever is holding the gavel. On the message would be this.<br />
We have detained a suspected Al-Queda member. Doing his initial contact with our forces he claimed that we were too late. At least a dozen bombs had been planted at various places around the USA, including at least 4 residences of members of congress as well various malls, stores and other public places around the country. The bombs are all set to explode in 4 hours. At this time we do not know the locations or the veracity of the claim.<br />
We can imagine the actions of the congress. They would no doubt go into recess, pull out their phones call their families to get them out of the house and no doubt leave the rest of us ignorant of the threat and left to fend for ourselves.<br />
At this point I would ask them can we waterboard the suspect. Let&#8217;s see how sincere their &#8220;moral authority&#8221; is then. If they did the above imagine the inevitable investigation when the question &#8220;What did you know and when did you know it&#8221; comes up. How many regular Americans would they be willing to sacrifice to maintain their moral high ground?<br />
Folks when it comes to any sympathy towards the Islamo-fascists cult followers I would hand people a dictionary and tell them to look it up. It is right between shit and syphillis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puhiawa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161399</link>
		<dc:creator>puhiawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161399</guid>
		<description>What does an agitated Schumer do? Gnaw at the foundations of America faster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does an agitated Schumer do? Gnaw at the foundations of America faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puhiawa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161383</link>
		<dc:creator>puhiawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161383</guid>
		<description>Kennedy will be the ultimate measure of all Senatorial Stupidity. In the future, if we have one, people will say, &#039;Is he dumb as Kennedy?&#039;. And the audience will laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kennedy will be the ultimate measure of all Senatorial Stupidity. In the future, if we have one, people will say, &#8216;Is he dumb as Kennedy?&#8217;. And the audience will laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161348</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161348</guid>
		<description>Hope ya feel better john but your lucky you wernt standing close I hear venom shoots out of her eyes. 
 LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope ya feel better john but your lucky you wernt standing close I hear venom shoots out of her eyes.<br />
 LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161345</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161345</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Feebie.  I&#039;ve been under the weather, and really putting out junk and typos.  

Da Bears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Feebie.  I&#8217;ve been under the weather, and really putting out junk and typos.  </p>
<p>Da Bears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161343</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161343</guid>
		<description>more vitamin b dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more vitamin b dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161336</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2007.11.02 Politics and National Defense Roundup ...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s top reads:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2007.11.02 Politics and National Defense Roundup &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s top reads:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161335</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161335</guid>
		<description>geez, now I know I&#039;ve had to much chocolate, I mentioned the M word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geez, now I know I&#8217;ve had to much chocolate, I mentioned the M word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161334</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161334</guid>
		<description>Jim m
 If I was a girl I&#039;d marry you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim m<br />
 If I was a girl I&#8217;d marry you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161332</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161332</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Soooo, excited. I hope DA BEARZ win!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 The feebalator threw the first dart subtle but cause for action. :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Soooo, excited. I hope DA BEARZ win!!!</p></blockquote>
<p> The feebalator threw the first dart subtle but cause for action. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161331</guid>
		<description>Water boarding should be the least of anyone&#039;s worries.  Frankly, I am getting sick and tired of hearing the same whine about the humanity of it all.

For some inexplicable reason, our elected officials decided to unilaterally expand the Geneva Conventions, and to parties that are not even signatories, no less.

As they stand, the Geneva Conventions protect soldiers of a country when fighting in the uniform of that country.  Those engaged in armed conflict who are not part of a particular nation&#039;s armed forces are not covered.  Those engaged in armed conflict who are not wearing the designated uniform of that country are not covered.  

The &quot;detainees&quot; or prisoners we are pulling out of combat are neither fighting for a country nor in any uniform of a country.  In short, they can be treated as spies and saboteurs, which have no rights under the Conventions.  They can be summarily executed, or subjected to any available interrogation techniques.

As to what the rest of the world thinks, why should we care?  The rest of the world is not the prime target in a global war.  And as to the argument that we need to use caution due to the potential abuses our servicemen may be subjected to, that way of thinking borders on insane.  Look at what our military and civilians are subject to now.  The torture and mutilation of those soldiers captured during raids, decapitations and desecration of their corpses.  I am sure our personnel would have been happy to have been boarded than sliced piece by piece while still alive.

While I do appreciate Senator McCain&#039;s personal views on this, we are not talking about the type of torture (and it was torture) used on him.  

I am all for humanely treating human beings.  But these zealots we are facing bear not the remotest resemblance to anything human.  Beheading others just because they are &quot;infidels&quot;.  Blowing up civilians in the name of religion.  Sitting down with a family to convince them to support your cause, and to emphasize the benefits, unveiling the special dish you have brought for the family - their cooked child on a plate.  

We are facing an inhuman foe here.  And in their culture and in their thoughts, every &quot;humane&quot; thing we do is viewed as a sign of weakness.  Which only further emboldens them to engage in more heinous tactics.

Congress had the opportunity to declare techniques like water boarding as off limits.  They refused to do so.  And rightly so. Now, they are looking to offload their cowardice on someone who is only there to interpret the law, not make it.  If they really cared about what the rest of the world thought, they should be red with embarrassment; because they look like the biggest bunch of cowardly, hypocritical fools to ever walk the earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water boarding should be the least of anyone&#8217;s worries.  Frankly, I am getting sick and tired of hearing the same whine about the humanity of it all.</p>
<p>For some inexplicable reason, our elected officials decided to unilaterally expand the Geneva Conventions, and to parties that are not even signatories, no less.</p>
<p>As they stand, the Geneva Conventions protect soldiers of a country when fighting in the uniform of that country.  Those engaged in armed conflict who are not part of a particular nation&#8217;s armed forces are not covered.  Those engaged in armed conflict who are not wearing the designated uniform of that country are not covered.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;detainees&#8221; or prisoners we are pulling out of combat are neither fighting for a country nor in any uniform of a country.  In short, they can be treated as spies and saboteurs, which have no rights under the Conventions.  They can be summarily executed, or subjected to any available interrogation techniques.</p>
<p>As to what the rest of the world thinks, why should we care?  The rest of the world is not the prime target in a global war.  And as to the argument that we need to use caution due to the potential abuses our servicemen may be subjected to, that way of thinking borders on insane.  Look at what our military and civilians are subject to now.  The torture and mutilation of those soldiers captured during raids, decapitations and desecration of their corpses.  I am sure our personnel would have been happy to have been boarded than sliced piece by piece while still alive.</p>
<p>While I do appreciate Senator McCain&#8217;s personal views on this, we are not talking about the type of torture (and it was torture) used on him.  </p>
<p>I am all for humanely treating human beings.  But these zealots we are facing bear not the remotest resemblance to anything human.  Beheading others just because they are &#8220;infidels&#8221;.  Blowing up civilians in the name of religion.  Sitting down with a family to convince them to support your cause, and to emphasize the benefits, unveiling the special dish you have brought for the family &#8211; their cooked child on a plate.  </p>
<p>We are facing an inhuman foe here.  And in their culture and in their thoughts, every &#8220;humane&#8221; thing we do is viewed as a sign of weakness.  Which only further emboldens them to engage in more heinous tactics.</p>
<p>Congress had the opportunity to declare techniques like water boarding as off limits.  They refused to do so.  And rightly so. Now, they are looking to offload their cowardice on someone who is only there to interpret the law, not make it.  If they really cared about what the rest of the world thought, they should be red with embarrassment; because they look like the biggest bunch of cowardly, hypocritical fools to ever walk the earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/comment-page-2/#comment-161330</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/01/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-why-appeasing-democrats-gets-you-nowhere/#comment-161330</guid>
		<description>Give me the Blind Sheik&#039;s coordinates. Please.  And his fat lawyers while you are at it.

Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me the Blind Sheik&#8217;s coordinates. Please.  And his fat lawyers while you are at it.</p>
<p>Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
