<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kucinich leads the impeachment circus: Introducing a Cheney impeachment resolution next week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:32:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; All aboard the impeachment bandwagon: Cheney first, Bush next</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-164132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; All aboard the impeachment bandwagon: Cheney first, Bush next</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-164132</guid>
		<description>[...] told you on Friday about Dennis Kucinich&#8217;s privileged resolution to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney. Well, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told you on Friday about Dennis Kucinich&#8217;s privileged resolution to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney. Well, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-163334</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-163334</guid>
		<description>#39  Actuality Congress can impeach any officer of the Federal Government for any reason it **** well pleases, &lt;em&gt;as long as it dares face the voters for it&lt;/em&gt;.  That is the Check on Impeachment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#39  Actuality Congress can impeach any officer of the Federal Government for any reason it **** well pleases, <em>as long as it dares face the voters for it</em>.  That is the Check on Impeachment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle53</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-163329</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-163329</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t Bush be able to replace him? This doesn&#039;t make sense if the object is to get to the Queen Bee for POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t Bush be able to replace him? This doesn&#8217;t make sense if the object is to get to the Queen Bee for POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommad</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-163266</link>
		<dc:creator>tommad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-163266</guid>
		<description>Say, isn&#039;t that &quot;ribbon&quot; at the top really a noose???? 

I thought nooses were forbidden now.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say, isn&#8217;t that &#8220;ribbon&#8221; at the top really a noose???? </p>
<p>I thought nooses were forbidden now&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Democrat Promise Broken &#171; Waste Of My Oxygen</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162687</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Democrat Promise Broken &#171; Waste Of My Oxygen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162687</guid>
		<description>[...] to beat Hillary or Obama for the Democrat Nomination for the next Presidential election now is trying to impeach Dick Cheney&#8230; Why not Bush, Dennis? This is nothing more than posturing, trying to make Dennis look [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to beat Hillary or Obama for the Democrat Nomination for the next Presidential election now is trying to impeach Dick Cheney&#8230; Why not Bush, Dennis? This is nothing more than posturing, trying to make Dennis look [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Conservative_Cat</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Conservative_Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162662</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think this is to distract from Senator Hillary Clinton’s poor performance during the last Democrat Debate. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Possibly, but more importantly, I think, is that the exchange between Russert and Clinton is a minor but telling illuetration of what would happen to Clinton were she to find herself in a debate on Fox News - the venue of which they&#039;re all absolutely terrified.

Yes, I&#039;m beating the &quot;Democrat candidates must be shamed or held to task for not debating on Fox News&quot; mantra again, but whether we take it for granted or not, we are talking about the next leader of the most powerful nation on earth with the capability to improve or ruin you and your children&#039;s futures with their tax policies and judicial appointments. And the stark reality as we know is that that&#039;s no exaggeration. 

Admit it - wouldn&#039;t you just love to see 90 minutes of Hillary the way she was in front of Russert, whing xhilsihly about he &quot;playing gotcha&quot; 9he wasn&#039;t, the question was completely legit) and self-destructing beyond any ability of the MSM to whitewasher her?

I don&#039;t know what anyone can do but make much noise, but you know what? Making alot of noise often works. The Dems debating on Fox News. Why not? After all, if they want to be President(s) of the United States Of America, let them then show a modicum of courage. Talk radio, newspapers, e-mails to Republican candidates to press the issue hard. Any way you can think of to get the word out and press the issue hard. Now&#039;s the time. Think about it - before it&#039;s too late. And no fatalism please - Reagan wouldn&#039;t like it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think this is to distract from Senator Hillary Clinton’s poor performance during the last Democrat Debate. </p></blockquote>
<p>Possibly, but more importantly, I think, is that the exchange between Russert and Clinton is a minor but telling illuetration of what would happen to Clinton were she to find herself in a debate on Fox News &#8211; the venue of which they&#8217;re all absolutely terrified.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m beating the &#8220;Democrat candidates must be shamed or held to task for not debating on Fox News&#8221; mantra again, but whether we take it for granted or not, we are talking about the next leader of the most powerful nation on earth with the capability to improve or ruin you and your children&#8217;s futures with their tax policies and judicial appointments. And the stark reality as we know is that that&#8217;s no exaggeration. </p>
<p>Admit it &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t you just love to see 90 minutes of Hillary the way she was in front of Russert, whing xhilsihly about he &#8220;playing gotcha&#8221; 9he wasn&#8217;t, the question was completely legit) and self-destructing beyond any ability of the MSM to whitewasher her?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what anyone can do but make much noise, but you know what? Making alot of noise often works. The Dems debating on Fox News. Why not? After all, if they want to be President(s) of the United States Of America, let them then show a modicum of courage. Talk radio, newspapers, e-mails to Republican candidates to press the issue hard. Any way you can think of to get the word out and press the issue hard. Now&#8217;s the time. Think about it &#8211; before it&#8217;s too late. And no fatalism please &#8211; Reagan wouldn&#8217;t like it. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162537</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162537</guid>
		<description>1 shy of 1/3 swj.....  the dirtbags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 shy of 1/3 swj&#8230;..  the dirtbags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swj719AWG</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162517</link>
		<dc:creator>swj719AWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The measure has 21 of the most rabid left-wing Democrat sponsors in the House:&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There&#039;s a whole lot of CA on that list...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The measure has 21 of the most rabid left-wing Democrat sponsors in the House:</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s a whole lot of CA on that list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maximus delirious</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162502</link>
		<dc:creator>maximus delirious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162502</guid>
		<description>I think it could turn into a great move. It might make their fringe elements happy, but I don&#039;t think you&#039;re average voter is going to appreciate the three-ring with an election just around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could turn into a great move. It might make their fringe elements happy, but I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re average voter is going to appreciate the three-ring with an election just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162499</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162499</guid>
		<description>I think this is to distract from Senator Hillary Clinton&#039;s poor performance during the last Democrat Debate. Media Matters can&#039;t get the American Public to bite anymore so...they pull out old reliable George W Bush and Dick Cheney message &quot;They are really BAD&quot;..really this is pathetic this is how they are going to win more seats in the Congress and win the Presidential election. It is mind boggling how, when the Dems have the advantage in the MSM, that they can still screw up their chances at successfully re gaining somekind of POWER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is to distract from Senator Hillary Clinton&#8217;s poor performance during the last Democrat Debate. Media Matters can&#8217;t get the American Public to bite anymore so&#8230;they pull out old reliable George W Bush and Dick Cheney message &#8220;They are really BAD&#8221;..really this is pathetic this is how they are going to win more seats in the Congress and win the Presidential election. It is mind boggling how, when the Dems have the advantage in the MSM, that they can still screw up their chances at successfully re gaining somekind of POWER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milwaukee Mike</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162498</link>
		<dc:creator>Milwaukee Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162498</guid>
		<description>Why?.....Because a double digit approval rating is just too damned high for this congress!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?&#8230;..Because a double digit approval rating is just too damned high for this congress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dandapani</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162484</link>
		<dc:creator>Dandapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162484</guid>
		<description>Move along now, nothing to see here. Just the feeding of the Nutroot Squirrels...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move along now, nothing to see here. Just the feeding of the Nutroot Squirrels&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklyn red</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162480</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklyn red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162480</guid>
		<description>The Dems are so fixated on going after Bush/Cheney they have overlooked the fact that neither of them are running.

It is kinda like &quot;fighting the last war&quot;
and the MSM are supportive because they are in denial &amp; desperately trying to uphold the illusion that they are still relevant... personally, I love it.

I can count, &amp; 2008 ends our 40 years in the wilderness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems are so fixated on going after Bush/Cheney they have overlooked the fact that neither of them are running.</p>
<p>It is kinda like &#8220;fighting the last war&#8221;<br />
and the MSM are supportive because they are in denial &amp; desperately trying to uphold the illusion that they are still relevant&#8230; personally, I love it.</p>
<p>I can count, &amp; 2008 ends our 40 years in the wilderness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Romano</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162460</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162460</guid>
		<description>I hope this brings those Dems who are supporting this negative numbers -- what a pathetic congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this brings those Dems who are supporting this negative numbers &#8212; what a pathetic congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groundhunter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-162422</link>
		<dc:creator>groundhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/kucinich-leads-the-impeachment-circus-introducing-a-cheney-impeachment-resolution-next-week/#comment-162422</guid>
		<description>People should be asking the Hill how she stands on this move for impeachment.  That would really put her in an awkward position. Love to see the look on he face as she tries to waffle that one.  Her party is her worse enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People should be asking the Hill how she stands on this move for impeachment.  That would really put her in an awkward position. Love to see the look on he face as she tries to waffle that one.  Her party is her worse enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
