<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mukasey nomination in jeopardy, Pt. II; Update: Schumer, Feinstein to vote yes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:19:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin dominates the ladies on The View &#171; Olive Spin</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-772526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin dominates the ladies on The View &#171; Olive Spin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-772526</guid>
		<description>[...] a long list of unaccountable &#8220;Czars&#8221; and a first one hundred days of appointments that became a litany of embarrassments as would-be appointee after would-be appointee was exposed as a tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a long list of unaccountable &#8220;Czars&#8221; and a first one hundred days of appointments that became a litany of embarrassments as would-be appointee after would-be appointee was exposed as a tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; California Democrat meltdown over Feinstein censure attempt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-177150</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; California Democrat meltdown over Feinstein censure attempt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-177150</guid>
		<description>[...] nutroots are unhinged over Calif. Sen. Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s recent votes to confirm Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey and federal appeals court judge Leslie Southwick. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nutroots are unhinged over Calif. Sen. Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s recent votes to confirm Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey and federal appeals court judge Leslie Southwick. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake D.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-164107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-164107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Mukasey will be confirmed, but the moonbats are still not giving up -- Larry C. Johnson (and gang) have a couple interesting posts over here:

http://noquarterusa.net/

He also says &quot;We don&#039;t care if you agree or disagree with us. We only care that you think about what we write.&quot;  However, they banned me for simply writing about the doubt that lesser forms of waterboarding are &quot;torture&quot; -- now that Michelle has open registration, her site is even better than that -- I assume we would gladly debate someone here even if they were against all forms of waterboarding, as long as they remained civil, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Mukasey will be confirmed, but the moonbats are still not giving up &#8212; Larry C. Johnson (and gang) have a couple interesting posts over here:</p>
<p><a href="http://noquarterusa.net/" rel="nofollow">http://noquarterusa.net/</a></p>
<p>He also says &#8220;We don&#8217;t care if you agree or disagree with us. We only care that you think about what we write.&#8221;  However, they banned me for simply writing about the doubt that lesser forms of waterboarding are &#8220;torture&#8221; &#8212; now that Michelle has open registration, her site is even better than that &#8212; I assume we would gladly debate someone here even if they were against all forms of waterboarding, as long as they remained civil, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old War Dogs</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-162206</link>
		<dc:creator>Old War Dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-162206</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2007.11.03 Politics and National Defense Roundup...&lt;/strong&gt;

Haider Ajina: Good news from Iraq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2007.11.03 Politics and National Defense Roundup&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Haider Ajina: Good news from Iraq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinitytim</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-162053</link>
		<dc:creator>trinitytim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-162053</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll admit I&#039;m shocked. Thrilled but shocked.

I would have bet a &quot;Recess Appointment&quot; was the only way we would have had an AG. Imagine that. First time I&#039;ve been wrong all year. NOT!! Just ask my wife. She&#039;ll verify that I am wrong quite often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;m shocked. Thrilled but shocked.</p>
<p>I would have bet a &#8220;Recess Appointment&#8221; was the only way we would have had an AG. Imagine that. First time I&#8217;ve been wrong all year. NOT!! Just ask my wife. She&#8217;ll verify that I am wrong quite often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almeehan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-162044</link>
		<dc:creator>almeehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-162044</guid>
		<description>I think the CIA should employ a new tact for obtaining information and breaking down terrorist who threaten us.  Since the D controlled committees feel it is ok to hold inquisitions on any Republican nominee, how about putting a terrorist alone in a room with Schumer, Biden, Kennedy, Leahy, Turbin, Boxer (oops maybe no females) and have them discuss the merits of liberalism for 5 hours with no breaks.  I&#039;m sure this would yield all the information we would ever want, especially if they were threatened with 5 more hours alone with these &quot;patriots.&quot;  I do believe after Bush&#039;s veiled threats along with a lot of pushback from the public, they had to yield on this confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the CIA should employ a new tact for obtaining information and breaking down terrorist who threaten us.  Since the D controlled committees feel it is ok to hold inquisitions on any Republican nominee, how about putting a terrorist alone in a room with Schumer, Biden, Kennedy, Leahy, Turbin, Boxer (oops maybe no females) and have them discuss the merits of liberalism for 5 hours with no breaks.  I&#8217;m sure this would yield all the information we would ever want, especially if they were threatened with 5 more hours alone with these &#8220;patriots.&#8221;  I do believe after Bush&#8217;s veiled threats along with a lot of pushback from the public, they had to yield on this confirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blues</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161965</link>
		<dc:creator>blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161965</guid>
		<description>A Democrat talking about no one being above tha law--precious,no priceless.Sandy,pull your pants up.Hillary put your Hsus on.
      I like the guy,but can&#039;t vote for him because he doesn&#039;t condemn waterboarding.Amazing how Democrats will use one issue just to try to make Republicans look bad.As others here have said--waterboarding is no big deal,especially considering the way the jihadis treat their captives.
     Nice to seee Charlie Schumer caught betwee a rock and a hard place though.I guess he decided to support Mukasey because he couldn&#039;t stand being &quot;uncharacteristically quiet&quot; for long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Democrat talking about no one being above tha law&#8211;precious,no priceless.Sandy,pull your pants up.Hillary put your Hsus on.<br />
      I like the guy,but can&#8217;t vote for him because he doesn&#8217;t condemn waterboarding.Amazing how Democrats will use one issue just to try to make Republicans look bad.As others here have said&#8211;waterboarding is no big deal,especially considering the way the jihadis treat their captives.<br />
     Nice to seee Charlie Schumer caught betwee a rock and a hard place though.I guess he decided to support Mukasey because he couldn&#8217;t stand being &#8220;uncharacteristically quiet&#8221; for long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161956</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161956</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Breaking: Sen. Dianne Feinstein will support the nomination of Mukasey...&lt;/strong&gt;

Things weren&#8217;t looking good for Mukasey as recently as a few hours ago, but Senator Dianne Feinstein has announced that she will support Bush&#8217;s nominee for AG Michael Mukasey:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein has come through for Republicans again.
Th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Breaking: Sen. Dianne Feinstein will support the nomination of Mukasey&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Things weren&#8217;t looking good for Mukasey as recently as a few hours ago, but Senator Dianne Feinstein has announced that she will support Bush&#8217;s nominee for AG Michael Mukasey:<br />
Sen. Dianne Feinstein has come through for Republicans again.<br />
Th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Russ</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161947</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161947</guid>
		<description>Business as usual in La La land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business as usual in La La land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmkeith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161943</link>
		<dc:creator>tmkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161943</guid>
		<description>So it&#039;s all going along to the Dems&#039; script.  Their virtually hand-picked candidate will go through, so they don&#039;t lose face.  In the meantime, they can have a few of their own (Leahy, Kennedy...) throw some more jabs at the administration.

Is this even news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s all going along to the Dems&#8217; script.  Their virtually hand-picked candidate will go through, so they don&#8217;t lose face.  In the meantime, they can have a few of their own (Leahy, Kennedy&#8230;) throw some more jabs at the administration.</p>
<p>Is this even news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161940</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161940</guid>
		<description>Well bunch my britches and slap my cow, Feinstein did a solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well bunch my britches and slap my cow, Feinstein did a solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplepeep</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161939</link>
		<dc:creator>purplepeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161939</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jonathan said: 
Torture…ridiculous! Isn’t “surfing” waterboarding?…I think we should take some Democrats “waterboarding”; Namely, Leahy, Pelosi, Kennedy, and the rest of their clan. Many folks who “waterboard” notice a change in attitude their first time out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wouldn&#039;t work to change their minds, Jonathan. You have to remember these people believe it&#039;s &quot;torture&quot; or &quot;American terrorism&quot; if Al Qaeda mass murderers at Gitmo are served Honey Glazed Chicken more than once in one week. The Democrat bar for what is &quot;torture&quot; is located at approx 5000 ft below sea level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jonathan said:<br />
Torture…ridiculous! Isn’t “surfing” waterboarding?…I think we should take some Democrats “waterboarding”; Namely, Leahy, Pelosi, Kennedy, and the rest of their clan. Many folks who “waterboard” notice a change in attitude their first time out.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t work to change their minds, Jonathan. You have to remember these people believe it&#8217;s &#8220;torture&#8221; or &#8220;American terrorism&#8221; if Al Qaeda mass murderers at Gitmo are served Honey Glazed Chicken more than once in one week. The Democrat bar for what is &#8220;torture&#8221; is located at approx 5000 ft below sea level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161937</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161937</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:&lt;/strong&gt;

KEY DEMOCRATS, SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER, D-N.Y., AND SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, D-CALIF., CROSS PARTY LINES TO PLEDGE SUPPORT FOR BUSH ATTORNEY GENERAL NOMINEE, CLEARING WAY FOR CONFIRMATION

&lt;em&gt; This is not a Faux News Alert&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:</strong></p>
<p>KEY DEMOCRATS, SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER, D-N.Y., AND SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, D-CALIF., CROSS PARTY LINES TO PLEDGE SUPPORT FOR BUSH ATTORNEY GENERAL NOMINEE, CLEARING WAY FOR CONFIRMATION</p>
<p><em> This is not a Faux News Alert</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chard402003</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161931</link>
		<dc:creator>Chard402003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161931</guid>
		<description>Leahy and his kind are much more interested in furthering their political agenda and the comfort of terrorists than they are about securing the safety of Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leahy and his kind are much more interested in furthering their political agenda and the comfort of terrorists than they are about securing the safety of Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-161925</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/02/the-mukasey-nomination-in-jeopardy-pt-ii/#comment-161925</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the question of torture is one that our elected officials should consider.  Every time they bring it up it makes America look bad.  It is as though they want people to think that America TORTURES people.

Go to the tower of London and do some research on TORTURE.  What we do is NOT torture.  We bend over backwards to NOT torture.  Any discussion about whether or not America TORTURES should be held in private and secret because any discussion of it does out country no good.

This is just another &#039;gotcha&#039; moment by the increasingly childish Congress that can&#039;t do anything if it makes the president look like a president capable of making executive decisions for this nation.

That said, I can NOT look at this blog and see the picture of those pigs in swimming hats without laughing my behind off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the question of torture is one that our elected officials should consider.  Every time they bring it up it makes America look bad.  It is as though they want people to think that America TORTURES people.</p>
<p>Go to the tower of London and do some research on TORTURE.  What we do is NOT torture.  We bend over backwards to NOT torture.  Any discussion about whether or not America TORTURES should be held in private and secret because any discussion of it does out country no good.</p>
<p>This is just another &#8216;gotcha&#8217; moment by the increasingly childish Congress that can&#8217;t do anything if it makes the president look like a president capable of making executive decisions for this nation.</p>
<p>That said, I can NOT look at this blog and see the picture of those pigs in swimming hats without laughing my behind off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
