<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robertson to endorse Giuliani</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Robertson Recommends Rudy &#171; What Is Your Worldview?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-340499</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Robertson Recommends Rudy &#171; What Is Your Worldview?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-340499</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: Well, so much for religious conservatives abandoning the GOP. The question is whether Robertson’s followers will, well, follow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: Well, so much for religious conservatives abandoning the GOP. The question is whether Robertson’s followers will, well, follow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christ and Pop Culture &#124; Who Do Evangelical Leaders Support for the Presidency?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-184504</link>
		<dc:creator>Christ and Pop Culture &#124; Who Do Evangelical Leaders Support for the Presidency?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-184504</guid>
		<description>[...] Robertson Endorses Rudy Giuliani, surprisingly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robertson Endorses Rudy Giuliani, surprisingly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-167300</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-167300</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;flenser&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Sorry I messed up your name.  :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>flenser</em></strong></p>
<p>Sorry I messed up your name.  :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-167299</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-167299</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think that the MSM would like nothing better than for the GOP to nominate Rudy Giulaini.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course they would flensor!  The MSM is far to the left and they would like nothing more than for the conservatives to take a big step to the left as well.  Fox News is all too willing to take a step to the left to make Rudy look normal.  They&#039;re trying to create a &quot;new normal&quot; for conservatives.  MAKE NO MISTAKE!  And now Pat Robertson&#039;s endorsement out of nowhere... It&#039;s just like poetry for the Rudy crowd.  Well, I&#039;ve got their number and I won&#039;t be fooled.  I&#039;m disappointed that Rudy&#039;s ahead in the polls.  Instead of finding a candidate that stands for solid conservative principles, we&#039;re just trying to find someone quick enough to talk down Hillary.  The GOP should be solidly behind a strong conservative to rally the base.  We need a fiscal AND social conservative.  I&#039;m for Fred Thompson - he fits that bill and furthermore, he doesn&#039;t have to explain why he was a liberal once but has since changed his ways.  Rudy&#039;s a RINO, Mitt&#039;s a flipper, Huck is socially in the right spot, but fiscally a liberal.  I can&#039;t support McCain because of the Shamnesty he tried to ram down our throats.  Duncan Hunter would have been good too, but he&#039;s just too far down. I&#039;m just very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think that the MSM would like nothing better than for the GOP to nominate Rudy Giulaini.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course they would flensor!  The MSM is far to the left and they would like nothing more than for the conservatives to take a big step to the left as well.  Fox News is all too willing to take a step to the left to make Rudy look normal.  They&#8217;re trying to create a &#8220;new normal&#8221; for conservatives.  MAKE NO MISTAKE!  And now Pat Robertson&#8217;s endorsement out of nowhere&#8230; It&#8217;s just like poetry for the Rudy crowd.  Well, I&#8217;ve got their number and I won&#8217;t be fooled.  I&#8217;m disappointed that Rudy&#8217;s ahead in the polls.  Instead of finding a candidate that stands for solid conservative principles, we&#8217;re just trying to find someone quick enough to talk down Hillary.  The GOP should be solidly behind a strong conservative to rally the base.  We need a fiscal AND social conservative.  I&#8217;m for Fred Thompson &#8211; he fits that bill and furthermore, he doesn&#8217;t have to explain why he was a liberal once but has since changed his ways.  Rudy&#8217;s a RINO, Mitt&#8217;s a flipper, Huck is socially in the right spot, but fiscally a liberal.  I can&#8217;t support McCain because of the Shamnesty he tried to ram down our throats.  Duncan Hunter would have been good too, but he&#8217;s just too far down. I&#8217;m just very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Neutron Bomb Political Endorsement &#171; THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166884</link>
		<dc:creator>A Neutron Bomb Political Endorsement &#171; THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166884</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comments</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck I</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166798</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166798</guid>
		<description>Flenser:

   I&#039;m not a republican, but I find your takes and Rus&#039;s pretty interesting.  I admire the commitment, but I&#039;m sure you both know you&#039;ll catch hell from fellow Republicans if it simply comes down to Rudy and Hillary.  I certainly think Hillary can get more than 50% of the vote, against any candidate but Rudy.  The polls I read yesterday have her leading Rudy 51 to 45 nationally.( I don&#039;t know how to hyperlink, but I&#039;m sure you can google it with the 11.7.07 date).  Your Carter/ Reagan poll points are revealing, and it&#039;s still early. I guess we&#039;ll see.  You both may have be w/o a choice on election day if the current trend holds, but we&#039;ll see.  I guess you must think Robertson sold out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flenser:</p>
<p>   I&#8217;m not a republican, but I find your takes and Rus&#8217;s pretty interesting.  I admire the commitment, but I&#8217;m sure you both know you&#8217;ll catch hell from fellow Republicans if it simply comes down to Rudy and Hillary.  I certainly think Hillary can get more than 50% of the vote, against any candidate but Rudy.  The polls I read yesterday have her leading Rudy 51 to 45 nationally.( I don&#8217;t know how to hyperlink, but I&#8217;m sure you can google it with the 11.7.07 date).  Your Carter/ Reagan poll points are revealing, and it&#8217;s still early. I guess we&#8217;ll see.  You both may have be w/o a choice on election day if the current trend holds, but we&#8217;ll see.  I guess you must think Robertson sold out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike volpe</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166792</link>
		<dc:creator>mike volpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166792</guid>
		<description>I have no doubt that many on here will snicker and marginalize Robertson. Frankly, anyone in his sphere can have that done to them. The simple fact is that Rudy is a paradigm and at some point everyone will realize that. &lt;a href=&quot;http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/paradigm-that-is-rudy-giuliani.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I already have.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt that many on here will snicker and marginalize Robertson. Frankly, anyone in his sphere can have that done to them. The simple fact is that Rudy is a paradigm and at some point everyone will realize that. <a href="http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/paradigm-that-is-rudy-giuliani.html" rel="nofollow">I already have.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166737</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166737</guid>
		<description>flenser, don&#039;t know what rock you have been under but Ted Olson is regarded as an honest conservative man. He representedPresident Bush in the 2000 election debacle:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Olson
 
In response to your tiresome remarks,I do not have the time nor the desire to track down comments I have heard on the radio/TV about him by people I respect. I am talking of people such as Rush,Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Michelle Malkin who think highly of Ted Olson. 

A quick search of Michelle&#039;s blog shows this of her opinion of Mr. Olson as AG. I hope her opinion is good enough for you:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/18/lame-lame-duck-bushs-decision-not-to-nominate-ted-olson-for-ag/

With that, this is the end of my responding to your diatribes. I think you are new to this blog and I find you rather rude and insulting of other&#039;s opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flenser, don&#8217;t know what rock you have been under but Ted Olson is regarded as an honest conservative man. He representedPresident Bush in the 2000 election debacle:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Olson" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Olson</a></p>
<p>In response to your tiresome remarks,I do not have the time nor the desire to track down comments I have heard on the radio/TV about him by people I respect. I am talking of people such as Rush,Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Michelle Malkin who think highly of Ted Olson. </p>
<p>A quick search of Michelle&#8217;s blog shows this of her opinion of Mr. Olson as AG. I hope her opinion is good enough for you:<br />
<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/18/lame-lame-duck-bushs-decision-not-to-nominate-ted-olson-for-ag/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/09/18/lame-lame-duck-bushs-decision-not-to-nominate-ted-olson-for-ag/</a></p>
<p>With that, this is the end of my responding to your diatribes. I think you are new to this blog and I find you rather rude and insulting of other&#8217;s opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flenser</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166667</link>
		<dc:creator>flenser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166667</guid>
		<description>I just read the Olsen article, and my opinion of him has dropped sharply.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We also hear much these days about the type of judges a president would appoint — rightly so, as few things a president does have as lasting an effect as appointments to the federal courts. There is not a candidate, Republican or Democrat, who has close to the experience of Rudy Giuliani in this arena.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rudy Giulaini has no experience in this area, as Mark Levin has said over and over again. Rudy was not involved in selecting judges for Reagan. Olsen actually admits this, but uses lawyer speak to give the opposite impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the Olsen article, and my opinion of him has dropped sharply.</p>
<blockquote><p>We also hear much these days about the type of judges a president would appoint — rightly so, as few things a president does have as lasting an effect as appointments to the federal courts. There is not a candidate, Republican or Democrat, who has close to the experience of Rudy Giuliani in this arena.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rudy Giulaini has no experience in this area, as Mark Levin has said over and over again. Rudy was not involved in selecting judges for Reagan. Olsen actually admits this, but uses lawyer speak to give the opposite impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flenser</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166655</link>
		<dc:creator>flenser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166655</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Conservatives I read think Ted Olson is a fine and intelligent man.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Can you provide any cites for this? I suppose he is a fine and intelligent man. I don&#039;t know that he is especially conservative though.


&lt;blockquote&gt;I would love to see Ted Olson appointed for a Supreme Court Justice someday. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why? What do you actually know about him?


&lt;blockquote&gt;I think Olson has the country’s best interest at heart regarding who he would support for President&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think he has his own best interests at heart.


&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the MSM and Democrats worry more about Rudy than any other candidate and they will attempt to smear his words and past any way they can.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that the MSM would like nothing better than for the GOP to nominate Rudy Giulaini. They will certainly destroy him if nominated, which will not be hard to do given Rudy&#039;s history.

But for now, they are treating him with kid gloves. It would be no fun for them if people learned about Rudy ahead of time, would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Conservatives I read think Ted Olson is a fine and intelligent man.</p></blockquote>
<p>Can you provide any cites for this? I suppose he is a fine and intelligent man. I don&#8217;t know that he is especially conservative though.</p>
<blockquote><p>I would love to see Ted Olson appointed for a Supreme Court Justice someday. </p></blockquote>
<p>Why? What do you actually know about him?</p>
<blockquote><p>I think Olson has the country’s best interest at heart regarding who he would support for President</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he has his own best interests at heart.</p>
<blockquote><p>I think the MSM and Democrats worry more about Rudy than any other candidate and they will attempt to smear his words and past any way they can.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that the MSM would like nothing better than for the GOP to nominate Rudy Giulaini. They will certainly destroy him if nominated, which will not be hard to do given Rudy&#8217;s history.</p>
<p>But for now, they are treating him with kid gloves. It would be no fun for them if people learned about Rudy ahead of time, would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166584</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166584</guid>
		<description>Here is the National Review link by Ted Olson:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2NlNmM5MjRhMDYwMDdiMjM5NDFlYzYzNmYxNTg1ZWY=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the National Review link by Ted Olson:<br />
<a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2NlNmM5MjRhMDYwMDdiMjM5NDFlYzYzNmYxNTg1ZWY" rel="nofollow">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2NlNmM5MjRhMDYwMDdiMjM5NDFlYzYzNmYxNTg1ZWY</a>=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166583</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166583</guid>
		<description>I think I will trust &lt;a href=&quot;http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2N1NmM5MjRhMDYwMDdiMjM5NDF1YzYzNmYxNTg1ZWY=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ted Olson&#039;s opinion of Rudy&lt;/a&gt; as he worked with him in the Reagan Justice Department. I think Olson has the country&#039;s best interest at heart regarding who he would support for President--especially involving terrorism-- as his wife &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Olson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barbara Olson&lt;/a&gt; died on 9/11.

I would love to see Ted Olson appointed for a Supreme Court Justice someday. Conservatives I read think Ted Olson is a fine and intelligent man.

I think the MSM and Democrats worry more about Rudy than any other candidate and they will attempt to smear his words and past any way they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I will trust <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2N1NmM5MjRhMDYwMDdiMjM5NDF1YzYzNmYxNTg1ZWY=" rel="nofollow">Ted Olson&#8217;s opinion of Rudy</a> as he worked with him in the Reagan Justice Department. I think Olson has the country&#8217;s best interest at heart regarding who he would support for President&#8211;especially involving terrorism&#8211; as his wife <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Olson" rel="nofollow">Barbara Olson</a> died on 9/11.</p>
<p>I would love to see Ted Olson appointed for a Supreme Court Justice someday. Conservatives I read think Ted Olson is a fine and intelligent man.</p>
<p>I think the MSM and Democrats worry more about Rudy than any other candidate and they will attempt to smear his words and past any way they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Queen of All Evil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166520</link>
		<dc:creator>The Queen of All Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166520</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Two Peas in a Pod...&lt;/strong&gt;

Pat Robertson endorses Rudy Guiliani. 


Robertson on Wednesday said Giuliani is the best candidate to handle the War on Terror. He said Giuliani......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Two Peas in a Pod&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Pat Robertson endorses Rudy Guiliani. </p>
<p>Robertson on Wednesday said Giuliani is the best candidate to handle the War on Terror. He said Giuliani&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166500</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166500</guid>
		<description>What I hear here is a bunch of people who think Conservatism is a losing proposition.  I&#039;d argue that it is in fact the thinking person&#039;s position and it will win every time.

Liberal lite is the defeatist position.

Conservatism is logical, thought-out, sustainable, prosperous and attractive.  Liberalism is merely emotional and unsustainable.  The end result of liberalism is chaos and poverty every time.

Saying the goal is to get an (R) as president no matter what they believe, is defining things entirely incorrectly.  I honestly don&#039;t care what letter the person has after their name.  The issue is where will they take the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I hear here is a bunch of people who think Conservatism is a losing proposition.  I&#8217;d argue that it is in fact the thinking person&#8217;s position and it will win every time.</p>
<p>Liberal lite is the defeatist position.</p>
<p>Conservatism is logical, thought-out, sustainable, prosperous and attractive.  Liberalism is merely emotional and unsustainable.  The end result of liberalism is chaos and poverty every time.</p>
<p>Saying the goal is to get an (R) as president no matter what they believe, is defining things entirely incorrectly.  I honestly don&#8217;t care what letter the person has after their name.  The issue is where will they take the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/comment-page-2/#comment-166450</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/07/robertson-to-endorse-giuliani/#comment-166450</guid>
		<description>People - how clearly do I have to say it.   Will I pull the lever for Rudy.  Please read carefully and comprehend #163.  I fail to see how Rudy is better than any democrat.  They support the same stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People &#8211; how clearly do I have to say it.   Will I pull the lever for Rudy.  Please read carefully and comprehend #163.  I fail to see how Rudy is better than any democrat.  They support the same stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

