Nancy Pelosi brings out the White Flag again: Iraq withdrawal returns to the House floor

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 8, 2007 03:11 PM

whiteflagbok.jpg

Reprinted by permission of Chip Bok and Creators Syndicate

Code Pink is getting to “Madame Glam” Nancy Pelosi. She announced today that the House will debate Iraq troop withdrawals again:

Democrats controlling the House of Representatives will try again to bring American combat in Iraq to an end when it debates legislation this week tying new war funds to troop withdrawals, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday.

The legislation, similar to a bill President George W. Bush vetoed earlier this year, “gives voice to the concerns of the American people” over a war that is now in its fifth year and “with no light at the end of the tunnel,” Pelosi, a California Democrat, said.

As early as Friday, the House will debate the plan that would give Bush only $50 billion of the $196 billion in new funds he has asked for to continue fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Most of the money would go to Iraq.

The House repeatedly this year has passed legislation aimed at ending the Iraq war, only to see it die in the Senate or killed by Bush.

Congress is expected to consider the rest of the funding sometime next year.

Pelosi said the money would fund the war for another four months. But as they have done in the past, House Democrats will try to attach conditions requiring the Pentagon to immediately begin withdrawing some of the 169,000 troops in Iraq and with the goal of completing the withdrawal by December, 2008.

Pelosi sidestepped a reporter’s question on whether congressional support for the idea has grown enough to overturn an inevitable veto by Bush.

Perhaps this is meant to assuage the impeachment mob. You cannot, however, assuage the un-assuageable.

Holding troop funding hostage to the Code Pink agenda. Nice way to usher in Veterans’ Day weekend, eh?

***

Brian Faughnan
at the Standard: “Anyone think this bill will get the 223 votes that the last surrender measure got?”

***
Meantime, Bill Ardolino has interviewed senior military and intelligence officials for a comprehensive round-up explanation of “Why the violence has declined in Iraq.” The conclusion:

Officials are cautiously optimistic about the trends of the last two months, but they are quick to caveat the improvement in security. The long-term danger of an al Qaeda resurgence remains a possibility, as al Qaeda in Iraq remains a significant franchise of the broader terrorist network safely based in Pakistan, which it’s believed will attempt to resupply and redouble its efforts to destabilize Iraq. Officials stress that continued momentum is required to solidify gains, specifically maintained targeting of extremist groups, successful border interdiction, the official employment of a portion of CLCs in the Iraqi Security Forces and, most importantly, a mid-term commitment to American brokerage of reconciliation between the national government and tribal and former insurgent groups

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:17 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    They’re back to cut and run after they funded the war? Why don’t these people make up their minds? I was for the 87 billion before I was against it.

  2. #2
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:17 pm, Sniper One said:

    What else would you expect of Madame Thérèse Defarge.

  3. #3
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:17 pm, jcflindsay said:

    If the Republicans cannot exploit these traitors and cowards on this issue then they are completely incompetent. I won’t be holding my breath.

  4. #4
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:18 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Apparently the woman is in pork euphoria right now, coming off of her latest conquest!

    I hope her momentum comes to a very abrupt and not so pleasant halt.

  5. #5
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:18 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    In the cartoon pic, who’s the guy in front of Nancy? Does anyone know?

  6. #6
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:19 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Feinstein…er, whoops. I mean Feingold.

    Easy mistake.

  7. #7
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:21 pm, J S Ragman said:

    San Fran Nan has apparently not consulted with her party’s presidential candidates, who seem to think we’ll be in Iraq a little longer.

  8. #8
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:22 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    What is it Bear calls her that cracks me up every time – Pelosi GaWhore?

    Can we surrender our congress and replace them with their secretary’s?They really run the place!

  9. #9
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:23 pm, Alan-of-Vermont said:

    Pull the plug, just when significant progress is being made. Very significant progress. What is wrong with these idiots.

  10. #10
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    josetheguerilla said:
    In the cartoon pic, who’s the guy in front of Nancy? Does anyone know?

    murtha

  11. #11
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #10 – FEINGOLD

  12. #12
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, ajmontana said:

    On-my-soap-box said:
    What is it Bear calls her that cracks me up every time

    Pelosi Galore, but yours works. lol

  13. #13
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, ACHefty said:

    Haven’t they tried this before — several times already? Or is General Pelosi worried that General Sheehan may overtake her seat at the junior Pentagon known as the US House of Representatives?

    From FoxNews:

    After that, troops left behind should be restricted to a narrow sets of missions, namely counterterrorism, training Iraqi security forces and protecting U.S. assets.

    Isn’t that what is being done already?

  14. #14
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:26 pm, ajmontana said:

    opps murtha in the front , i think sheesh.

  15. #15
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:27 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #14 – Reid is in front.

    lol, AJ, Im dying over here.

    PS, the names are written in small print on their jackets…and skirt.

  16. #16
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:27 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    In the cartoon pic, who’s the guy in front of Nancy? Does anyone know?

    Reads “Coward” to me.

  17. #17
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:28 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Skirt and jackets being in no particular order of course….

  18. #18
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:30 pm, ajmontana said:

    ok geez im seeing reid, murtha feingold and pelosi? soory these aqua dots are a boitch.

  19. #19
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:30 pm, benparker758 said:

    FNG here. When is a poll question going to be about Victory vs. defeat? “Do you want a victory in Iraq or a defeat?” vs. “Do you want the American military presence in Iraq to cease to cause turbulance in the middle east and further tarnish the appearance of America being a fair and just nation because of the Bush administration’s actions?”

  20. #20
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:33 pm, MTNEER said:

    Nancy Pelosi madly dashing to catch up to Medea Benjamin and Cindy Sheehan:
    “Hey wait for me, I’m your leader!

  21. #21
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:34 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    There goes AJ eating dots. All that guy thinks about is what he can eat! :)

  22. #22
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:35 pm, ajmontana said:

    life is good soap. :)

  23. #23
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:35 pm, neo-connette said:

    josetheguerilla, it could be any of them.

    The phrase “cluebat” comes to mind

  24. #24
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:36 pm, hatelibs said:

    The cartoon is almost too perfect. If it wasn’t so stinking true is would be funny.

    Now we need to pin down Hitlary on her feelings about Nancy’s newest surrender attempt. Oops, I forgot, you can’t ask the “witch who wants to be President” anything tough.

  25. #25
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:37 pm, ArmoredCAV said:

    From #13 above. Yes, those are the missions we are doing, only we call it COIN (counterinsurgency) and it is working. And, we periodically kill or capture home grown insurgent punk thugs. Very little AQI influence remains, where I am. The budget is critical to us because a lot of what the money goes for is funding projects that bolster local confidence in Iraqi Security Forces, as well as the Government of Iraq (this is a hard one). And, by the way, it costs a lot to do daily operations. Call your Representatives!
    Regards,

  26. #26
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, ajmontana said:

    Keep the faith Armored, were tryin. 8)

  27. #27
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    House Democrats will try to attach conditions requiring the Pentagon to immediately begin withdrawing some of the 169,000 troops

    Funny thing about this–none of them have the title “Commander-in-Chief” in their job descriptions. If they want it, run for the job, otherwise, stay out of the way.

  28. #28
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:42 pm, MTNEER said:

    New Caption: Nancy Pelosi: “Hey I need that for my new Burkha!”

  29. #29
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:43 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    What is WRONG with these people? Why can’t they be proud to be American? Why can’t they let the military do the fighting? They wouldn’t want the military to pass legislation for them.

    How much damage to this country do these people think they need to do? We are winning. We will win. We will come home when we are finished. END OF DISCUSSION.

  30. #30
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:44 pm, TMoney said:

    Let our men and women win, and they WILL – every time.
    If a definite victory is not reached, it is because of our legislators and administration.

  31. #31
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:46 pm, MTNEER said:

    Better yet, “Dhimmi that, I need it for my new burkha.”

  32. #32
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:48 pm, ArmoredCAV said:

    Roger, AJ
    Access to news is so prevalent here that it really gets depressing to see some of the antics with our elected leadership. Well, disgusting is probably a better word. That is why I enjoy this site so much. Best place to check in. Most people just ignore the news and drive on, but it sure gets old.

    Regards,

  33. #33
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:50 pm, conservativesRus said:

    After that, troops left behind should be restricted to a narrow sets of missions, namely counterterrorism, training Iraqi security forces and protecting U.S. assets.

    Darn – and I thought our troops taking out terrorists in Iraq before they get to the US was protecting US assets. My bad.

  34. #34
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:52 pm, hatelibs said:

    #29
    I’m sure you and the rest of us know what’s wrong with these people (and yes, I ask the same question). They put politics, which leads to power and control, above everything. I’m sure Soros and the other big money brokers are demanding this.

    What is sickening about everything the treason-o-crats do is that the best interest of the United States and the American people do NOT matter to these people at all beyond votes and money. Hey, they love to claim everything is about “the children” but abortion on demand is sacred to the left.

    Losing my hair because I scratch my head so much in amazement that people vote for these traitors.

  35. #35
    On November 8th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah (#10) the mound, errah, they are standing on errah, would be me! . . .

  36. #36
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah, is that one of my t-shirts on that pole?

  37. #37
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:01 pm, sausage said:

    $196 billion in new funds he has asked for to continue fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Most of the money would go to Iraq.

    $196 billion! Unbelievable…

  38. #38
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Teddy! Are you a surrender monkey?

  39. #39
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:02 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah, I prefer the term primate!

  40. #40
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:04 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Sausage.

    I guess, you feel funds are better spent elsewhere? That is a matter of opinion.

    Just curious, are you as outranged about the earmarks on the latest water(pork) bill?

  41. #41
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, Mercutio said:

    Sure, let’s eff the troops after it’s been proven that what they’re doing now is working. I’ve got an idea, let’s stop spending money where it works and start wasting it on pork!

  42. #42
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:05 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    LOL – sorry, I forgot you are politically correct.

  43. #43
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:06 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah Mr. Box, . . . you are correct about my correctness.

  44. #44
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:08 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah, did someone mention pork??!!

  45. #45
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:09 pm, Boomer said:

    ArmoredCAV stay safe over there and thanks for all you do to keep us safe here in Garrison. We are almost at a work stoppage at our Wing due to funding restrictions during this Continuing Resolution Authority which runs out next Friday. Good to hear you guys are getting what you need over there, because it makes it a lot easier to suck it up and barely operate stateside. The upside our F-15 fleet is grounded due to required structural inspections after Missouri Air National Guard crash this weekend helping to keep some operating costs down. I love the way the liberals are showing their respect to our serving Military personnel and the memory of all those of us that have served in the past during this Veteran’s Day weekend.

  46. #46
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:12 pm, purplepeep said:

    jcflindsay said:
    If the Republicans cannot exploit these traitors and cowards on this issue then they are completely incompetent. I won’t be holding my breath.

    Indeed, jcf. The White-Flag Democrats keep leading with their jaw on this. Were I an office holder, or even just a press secretary, the phrase “Democrat surrender to Al Qaeda” would be repeated ar every opportunity.

  47. #47
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, WarTip said:

    Political partiers pushing past their primary purpose, proudly known as we the people primarily for the purpose of pilfering profit and power.

    What a bunch of Ps coming from these … people.

  48. #48
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:15 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    $196 billion! Unbelievable…

    Because the reast of have a clue.

    The POTUS asks for more as he knows:

    1. It will get trimmed down.
    2. 25% will be pork and the POTUS does not have a line item veto.

  49. #49
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:18 pm, lonewolf said:

    Left to Right: Pelosi, Edwards, Murtha, Reid.

  50. #50
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:19 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, but bacon tastes good. Pork taste good. Hey, a democ-rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I’d never know ’cause I wouldn’t eat the . . .

  51. #51
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:19 pm, John Ansell said:

    Look at them serving moveon pandercakes. At a time when the Green Zone is now called the Intl. Zone soon to be diplomatic quarter. What a bunch of loseres.

    The liberals are against anything Bush does and against our military at every step, I’m starting to think the only way we can get them to go along is have Bush come out and say he’s for surrender. If he did, the lefties would cry that we need to stay until victory is achieved.

  52. #52
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Here is a partial list of the smoked bacon on the last Iraqi supplemental bill:

    PORK

  53. #53
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, LC said:

    This will only serve to further drive the Congress approval rating to the ground. What a waste of time, especially considering that we are making actual progress in the war. I just don’t understand why they believe the best idea is a cut-and-run policy???

  54. #54
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah, Mister Box, I just fried that list up and put it on two slices of toast with a slathering of mayo and a tomato. How does that commercial go . . . Umm Umm Ummm Umm Umm, Tasty!

    That ad genius is worth every penny he was paid!

  55. #55
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:34 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Teddy, give AJ a break. All this talk about food made him go get a bite. I miss him!

  56. #56
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, tacodawn said:

    Ever since I was little my Dad would scream at the tv.

    The screams were for a variety of things like idiots or sports but 90% of the time it was over politics.

    I am my father’s daughter.

    He also taught me to never hate anyone, but to pity them instead.

    I have a hard time pitying these evil-doers.

  57. #57
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:35 pm, feebiebabe said:

    lonewolf – you sure its Edwards? I will correct myself, but the hair doesn’t look poofy enough to be edwards. :-)

  58. #58
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:36 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    errah that bill/sandwich is filling! . . . Tastes great!

    errah that reminds me, I need something to wash this all down!

  59. #59
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, feebiebabe said:

    taco – same here.

    I still vent at the tv. but I am just curious, are the idiots in your scenario above included or excluded from your 90% statement. politicians v. idiots….dunno, thats a tough call.

    :-)

  60. #60
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, bear1909 said:

    Pelosi Galore spends more on her botox treatments.

    What’s the issue sausage? It’s called financing the peace. We are spending alot on the “defense” of the EuroWeenies, the UN’s House of ill repute in Turtle Bay, and a heckuva lot on that house of chickensh*ts in the State Department.

    We are wasting money on the Department of Education. We are wasting money on corn subsidies for ethanol because Al Gore said it was a holy thing to do.

    The ROI on the war in Iraq is roughly 4 trillion gross. If Bush spends a trillion on the war, then I’d say that’s a good investment economically.
    Payout a trillion to retool the Army, Navy and Marines. It’s still a good investment. Spend another trillion on military infrastructure, it’s still 100 per cent return on the money.

    That ROI by the way creates tax revenue as part of the peace dividend that Pelosi Galore and Company can go out and spend on their socialist delusions of grandeur.

    In the meantime, we clean out Persia for the last time and kill Bin Laden’s men.

    In 8 short years, a “village idiot” (something the Moon Loons love to call Bush) President manages to do what the socialists in America haven;t been able to do in one single neighborhood in the US- remove the obstacles to freedom.

  61. #61
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The budget is critical to us because a lot of what the money goes for is funding projects that bolster local confidence in Iraqi Security Forces

    Sorry Armored, Nancy needs the money to fix up the San Francisco waterfront around her real estate – which brings in millions in rent. You guys in Iraq will just have to get paper routes to pay for Iraqi infrastructure…;)

    Seriously, thanks for the good work!

  62. #62
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:43 pm, The Revoultion said:

    They still don’t know what makes the muslim world tick and they never will…even if we god forbid lose a city one day they will try and blame G.W.B’s policies for making them do it.

  63. #63
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:43 pm, Boomer said:

    We are seriously talking about having a bake sale or better yet we could set-up a toll booth on I-84 to extort a dollar per vehicle to keep the Wing operational.

  64. #64
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:47 pm, feebiebabe said:

    I say we have a pie throwing contest.

    First volunteer up – Pelosi, (then maybe the rest of these surrender monkeys.)

    Bet we’ll have enough in a matter of days! People will clammoring to pay to pie that lil’ commi in the punam!

    Then there is always the dunk tank…oh that might be fitting. Pork and water…hmmmm.

    ahhhhhhhhhhh (wake up feebs!)

  65. #65
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:48 pm, uhangtight said:

    I guess they feel because they have judges out their legislating and doing their jobs from the bench, they can squeeze in a few moments as Commander In Chief? I guess when you live in a gray world things are so murky you can’t tell the difference between right and wrong. Constitutionally what your job is versus the Executive Branch…

    She has to appease her constituents by consistently crying out for surrender to the Terrorsits to retain her seat in Congress.

    The job of the federal government is to maintain an army. Defend our borders and the citizenry. I would rather that I can stipulate where my tax dollars are going to be spent, and yes, I would prefer all my money to be spent on The Military. Period. War or no war, I want the Military well taken care of; and for their families to be provided a good living, too.

    I am tired of being a Tax Slave to The Congress and The Senate.

  66. #66
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:49 pm, bear1909 said:

    A BIG SHOUT OUT

    To every soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan reading this site:

    You each get three full Rosaries a day from our family.

    Prayer is the most powerful thing a God fearing citizen can do during war-time besides taking up arms and killing our enemies.

    A Rosary is especially powerful because every bead has an intention attached to it. Yours. Mine. Ours. And every “Glory Be” in that rosary gives me a chance to ask for the utter defeat and destruction of our enemies- foreign and domestic.

    Every “Our Father” in the Rosary (there are 8), is an opportunity to say to God Himself, that We, as a Nation, are willing to be guided by His Love to do what is right at great cost to ourselves.

    And all of these prayers are devoted to the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Intercessor, the One Who Asks on our pathetic and humble behalf- to make it so in the eyes of Our Creator.

    Happy Veterans Day to One and All. May you hold your families in the warmest places of your heart.

    We believe in you and what you do for us so we may live in peace and freedom- warts and all.

    Thank-you for routing the enemy and doing your jobs so faithfully.

    We pray for your safe keeping and speedy return on the best of terms to the best of worlds.

    Remember this message when you are hanging by a thread. There is at least one family back home that is praying for YOU! And hopefully you will feel your thread strengthened 3 times each day.

    Bear1909 out.

  67. #67
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Wow. Should we just skip to the point and give Osama the Constitution, liberal democrats? I would throw in the EU in that mix, but they seem to have that part of the West under control.

    Surrender is not an option, and can never be. We are fighting the most dangerous enemy since the Nazis, and if we let them, they will run us over.

  68. #68
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, bear1909 said:

    Let a pack of carnies loose on Pelosi Galore’s front lawn.

    Straight to YouTube

  69. #69
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:50 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    GREAAAAAAAT

    Pork, taco, pie – now I’m hungry.

  70. #70
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:52 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Soap likes the way feebs thinks.

    *slaps down a fiver at the dunk tank

  71. #71
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:53 pm, bear1909 said:

    Gimme a roll of them tix, Feebeastie! 8)

  72. #72
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:54 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Feebeastie – that’s gonna stick!

  73. #73
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, tacodawn said:

    feebie

    Well of course the 90% political part includes idiots, but other idiots include:
    Losers like the kind that get busted on COPS, Environmentalists and Dumb as a Post types.

    (off the top of my head)

  74. #74
    On November 8th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, bear1909 said:

    Yeowsa- only if the Feebiebabe say it’s so. :LOL:

    Image: Bear duckin roll of tickets flyin at his noggin. 8)

  75. #75
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, bear1909 said:

    :lol: tacodawn- cuz i yell in traffic while my little one sits in the shotgun seat watching me.

    my rants are never (whisper) commm-paaassionate (whisper off). they are rabid death wishes, all for serious moving traffic violations.

    i even have a dash-mounted rpg launcher. he gets to operate it because i am not supposed to multi-task.

    ahhhh kids. we never knew what we would keep and what we would innovate into more effective retaliatory measures.

  76. #76
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, ajmontana said:

    “Faux News Alert”
    Congress passes the Defense Bill without Pork!
    All pork projects to be taken from frivolous Grants handed out for tests regarding if the sky is blue.
    film at 11:00

  77. #77
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:02 pm, bear1909 said:

    time for parent teacher conference and a quick pass at the Monte Cristo for some asada. BAYYYYYYYYYBEEEEEEEEEEEE YA!!!!!

  78. #78
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, Chard402003 said:

    Running / Surrendering / or “redeploying” is the worst thing to do now for America and for Iraqis. Unfortunately, like the pork barrel spending (i.e. the water bill), it’s the best thing for Pelosi’s (soon to be over) career as Speaker. Her actions are those of a desperate politician. I just hope the traitor doesn’t end up getting a bunch of our boys killed.

  79. #79
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:06 pm, Isnala said:

    I want to know why are they spending time on this when it’s almost the Veteran’s Day Weekend and they still haven’t passed the either the Defense or Veteran’s Benefits Appropriation Bills yet. So can some one please tell me exactly how they support the men and women in our military again??

    O yeah, with a knife in the back!

    Ish

  80. #80
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:07 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Feebeastie. Yeah, that makes me sound REALLY attractive. lol.

    Call me whatever you wants, just don’t call me late for dinner…. :-)

  81. #81
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    me either… lol

  82. #82
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:13 pm, MTNEER said:

    feebiebabe: Pls put Murtha in your dunk tank. You’d get a muuuuuch bigger splash and pork fat floats so you could save on paramedic bills.

  83. #83
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    I fear for you Feebs. This is not good. It may start out cute then get ugly.

    Feebeastie

    Beastie

    Beast

    Just because we get tired at the end of the day and just don’t feel like typing any more. ;)

    You had better draw the line.

  84. #84
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:18 pm, John Ansell said:

    Bear #65, I forwarded that to my cousin and friend who are serving in Iraq now. Thanks to all our troops.

    I wonder who does the upkeep on Pelosi’s land? $1 says she has illegals working on them.

  85. #85
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:18 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #80 – who says paramedics need to be there?

    tsk tsk…yes, a joke…

  86. #86
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:22 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #82 – SF is a “sanctuary” city. so, really, it doesn’t count.

    #81 – oh, trust me. my family is REALLY big on nicknames, i’ve sported quite a few over the years. Not really a thin skinner when it comes to that. I can laugh at myself/with myself.. (I just try not to talk to myself too much…. ) :-)

    Have fun….

  87. #87
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:22 pm, Regulus said:

    I think Nancy believes she’s “falling behind the power curve.” The commanders in theater have already been discussing a troop draw-down for 2008, based on their assessment of the improved security situation and the ongoing hand-off of more responsibilities to the Iraqi army and police.

    What Nancy and her fellow donkeys want is to still be able to take credit for the draw-down when it begins, and to portray it in terms of defeat and humiliation instead of success. Always with an eye on motivating/placating their base voters, dontcha know.

    BTW, totally off-topic, but that’s a fine picture of you (scroll down a bit) in that 2008 calendar… you still look like the kind of young lady I wish I’d have met in college or law school. [sigh] Oh, well. Guess I’ll have to fork over $25, hmm?

  88. #88
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    john,
    I wonder who does the upkeep on Pelosi’s land? $1 says she has illegals working on them.

    Without trying to sound like a total smarta$$ but…. ya think? :roll:

  89. #89
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:24 pm, DavidHughes said:

    I’d be all for bringing the troops home now, on one condition— they surround the Capitol Building and free America from the tyranny of Congress (then of course they can re-up and/or redeploy to Iraq and Afghanistan and finish the job without having to listen to all the b!tching that comes from the “defeat at all costs” gasbags on the Senate floor).

    P.S. I’d even be willing to attach ZERO pork to that resolution.

  90. #90
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:30 pm, graysonret said:

    Well, at least that bunch in Congress wasn’t around during WW2. This site wouldn’t be here. Michelle, as well as my wife, would be speaking Japanese. Congress would be asking Germany if it was okay to pass a child health bill. German, instead of Spanish, would be the 2nd language. Ever since Vietnam, we want “instant gratification” in everything, including wars. Win in 1 or 2 months, or surrender.

  91. #91
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:35 pm, feebiebabe said:

    She’s a Philly-Gal! :-)

  92. #92
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:38 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL AJ.

  93. #93
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:56 pm, John Ansell said:

    http://www.globalincidentmap.com/map.php

    Check this out Aj. I like the IAATS one.

  94. #94
    On November 8th, 2007 at 5:59 pm, ajmontana said:

    john
    yikes!! are you talkin about the suspicious container in palm springs?
    cool site.

  95. #95
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    it would only be suspicious if it was marked in english…lol

  96. #96
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:09 pm, ajmontana said:

    OT-
    john,
    OK, interesting iiat one is busy today, the main map shows three abandoned containers with hazmat looking into it at our airport about 5 miles from here.

  97. #97
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:25 pm, John Ansell said:

    A Lot of stuff going on.

  98. #98
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:29 pm, gayle said:

    Congress has a stuttering problem.

    They need help.

  99. #99
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:34 pm, ajmontana said:

    They need straight jackets.

  100. #100
    On November 8th, 2007 at 6:43 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    BTW, totally off-topic, but that’s a fine picture of you (scroll down a bit) in that 2008 calendar… you still look like the kind of young lady I wish I’d have met in college or law school. [sigh]

    Regulus, Regulus, is there any chance a lawyer would meet a girl like that? ;)

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Caution: Clown congress at work

June 27, 2008 01:01 PM by Michelle Malkin

117 Comments

John Bolton lights into Obama

June 5, 2008 12:00 PM by see-dubya

112 Comments

“Breathtakingly naive”.

More foot-in-mouth from Rep. Kanjorski (D-Uuuuuuh)

June 2, 2008 10:19 PM by see-dubya

18 Comments

Wabbit season! Duck season!

Nancy Pelosi said what?!

May 29, 2008 05:47 PM by see-dubya

123 Comments

Thank goodness for Iran’s help in winning the war in Iraq!

Congressman admits Dems “stretched the facts” about stopping the war to get elected

May 23, 2008 08:47 AM by see-dubya

161 Comments

Hmmm…do you believe them when they tell you they’re lying?

Fred Thompson now blogging for Townhall

May 15, 2008 03:01 PM by see-dubya

65 Comments

Oh, baby. Plus more Dem bristling about appeasement.

A Conservative Soros?

May 9, 2008 01:02 PM by see-dubya

61 Comments

The Left tries a pre-emptive strike…


Categories: White Flag Democrats

Redstate

» Media Matters
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook