<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reports: Benazir Bhutto placed under house arrest; in Burma, faint hope for Aung San Suu Kyi; Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:33:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NHMagenta</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-168708</link>
		<dc:creator>NHMagenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-168708</guid>
		<description>IMO, Allowing Benazir Bhutto to return to Pakistan was a move of sheer insanity!
She should be put on the next plane out of Pakistan back to Dubai...and should face a World Court tribunal for conspiracy to rob the nation of Pakistan (see the Wikipedia article for starters).
I don&#039;t think there will ever be a successful Western style republican democracy in any Islamic-majority country; Islam and our concepts of governance are simply incompatible .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, Allowing Benazir Bhutto to return to Pakistan was a move of sheer insanity!<br />
She should be put on the next plane out of Pakistan back to Dubai&#8230;and should face a World Court tribunal for conspiracy to rob the nation of Pakistan (see the Wikipedia article for starters).<br />
I don&#8217;t think there will ever be a successful Western style republican democracy in any Islamic-majority country; Islam and our concepts of governance are simply incompatible .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-168344</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-168344</guid>
		<description>All you who want to bomb Iran, why not invade Pakistan instead.  They already have nuclear weapons and seem to be on the verge of an Islamic fundamentalist revolution.  

The martial law in Pakistan is a direct result of Bush blundering.  How?  Bush committed too few troops to overthrowing the Taliban in Afganistan.  They quickly withdrew most US forces so they can invade Iraq.  That allowed many of them to go to the tribal areas in western Pakistan, where they destabilize the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you who want to bomb Iran, why not invade Pakistan instead.  They already have nuclear weapons and seem to be on the verge of an Islamic fundamentalist revolution.  </p>
<p>The martial law in Pakistan is a direct result of Bush blundering.  How?  Bush committed too few troops to overthrowing the Taliban in Afganistan.  They quickly withdrew most US forces so they can invade Iraq.  That allowed many of them to go to the tribal areas in western Pakistan, where they destabilize the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonewolf</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-168095</link>
		<dc:creator>lonewolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-168095</guid>
		<description>I usually have a solution for all international quandries but damned if I know what to do about Pakistan. Stick with Musharraf, I think, I guess, I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually have a solution for all international quandries but damned if I know what to do about Pakistan. Stick with Musharraf, I think, I guess, I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyc123me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167612</link>
		<dc:creator>nyc123me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167612</guid>
		<description>@conservativesRus #21: of course we are (or at least I am) aware they are different countries. Did you actually read Michelle&#039;s entry at all - Michelle writes regarding both countries.. or did you just read the title and assume the rest? There are certain similarities in the two situations mentioned.

@sivapragasam #20: what what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@conservativesRus #21: of course we are (or at least I am) aware they are different countries. Did you actually read Michelle&#8217;s entry at all &#8211; Michelle writes regarding both countries.. or did you just read the title and assume the rest? There are certain similarities in the two situations mentioned.</p>
<p>@sivapragasam #20: what what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlieT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167565</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlieT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167565</guid>
		<description>I guess what goes around, comes around.  Before you start shedding too many crocodile tears for Bhutto, check out this excerot form a New York Times January 30, 1997 story (caution:  I can’t remember how dishonest the NYT was back then).

&lt;blockquote&gt;High Court Finds Bhutto Corrupt, Ending Her Bid to Block Election
 
Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto lost her bid to regain office when the Supreme Court ruled today that her ousted Government was corrupt. New elections will be held as planned on Monday. 

Nawaz Sharif, whose earlier Government was also dismissed on corruption charges, in 1993, is the front-runner in the elections.
 
President Farooq Leghari dismissed Ms. Bhutto&#039;s Government in November, two years before her term was to expire. He accused her of driving Pakistan toward economic ruin, stealing billions from the national treasury and using the police in Karachi to quash a rival political movement. 

Ms. Bhutto denied the charges. 

But Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah told the court there was abundant evidence to support the charges, and in a 6-1 ruling, the judges upheld the President&#039;s actions and ordered the general elections to go ahead as scheduled.
 
&#039;&#039;There is significant proof of corruption,&#039;&#039; Justice Shah said. &#039;&#039;There is enough evidence which shows the Government was involved in extrajudicial killings.&#039;&#039; Ms. Bhutto&#039;s Government was accused of allowing police squads to kill members of an opposition political group, the Mohajir Qami Movement. The movement represents Indian Muslims who fled to Pakistan when British India was divided in 1947. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what goes around, comes around.  Before you start shedding too many crocodile tears for Bhutto, check out this excerot form a New York Times January 30, 1997 story (caution:  I can’t remember how dishonest the NYT was back then).</p>
<blockquote><p>High Court Finds Bhutto Corrupt, Ending Her Bid to Block Election</p>
<p>Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto lost her bid to regain office when the Supreme Court ruled today that her ousted Government was corrupt. New elections will be held as planned on Monday. </p>
<p>Nawaz Sharif, whose earlier Government was also dismissed on corruption charges, in 1993, is the front-runner in the elections.</p>
<p>President Farooq Leghari dismissed Ms. Bhutto&#8217;s Government in November, two years before her term was to expire. He accused her of driving Pakistan toward economic ruin, stealing billions from the national treasury and using the police in Karachi to quash a rival political movement. </p>
<p>Ms. Bhutto denied the charges. </p>
<p>But Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah told the court there was abundant evidence to support the charges, and in a 6-1 ruling, the judges upheld the President&#8217;s actions and ordered the general elections to go ahead as scheduled.</p>
<p>&#8221;There is significant proof of corruption,&#8221; Justice Shah said. &#8221;There is enough evidence which shows the Government was involved in extrajudicial killings.&#8221; Ms. Bhutto&#8217;s Government was accused of allowing police squads to kill members of an opposition political group, the Mohajir Qami Movement. The movement represents Indian Muslims who fled to Pakistan when British India was divided in 1947.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SircleMemphis</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167515</link>
		<dc:creator>SircleMemphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167515</guid>
		<description>Be careful about drawing parallels between Bhutto and Suu Kyi. Ms. Suu Kyi is the genuine article, a voice and beacon of democracy in a totalitarian state.  Bhutto has been run out of her country for looting it blind not once, but twice, actively supported the formation of the Taliban, and is directly challenging an ELECTED official trying to save his nuclear armed country from Islamic extremists. She shouldn&#039;t get a free pass just because she&#039;s a woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful about drawing parallels between Bhutto and Suu Kyi. Ms. Suu Kyi is the genuine article, a voice and beacon of democracy in a totalitarian state.  Bhutto has been run out of her country for looting it blind not once, but twice, actively supported the formation of the Taliban, and is directly challenging an ELECTED official trying to save his nuclear armed country from Islamic extremists. She shouldn&#8217;t get a free pass just because she&#8217;s a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167495</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167495</guid>
		<description>Folks...Burma (Myanmar) and Pakistan are two different countries dealing with two different problems.  No they don&#039;t &quot;touch&quot; each other.  India is a rather large country in between the two.
Apparently world geography (lack thereof) was (un)successfully taught by our public schools but the children all felt good about themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks&#8230;Burma (Myanmar) and Pakistan are two different countries dealing with two different problems.  No they don&#8217;t &#8220;touch&#8221; each other.  India is a rather large country in between the two.<br />
Apparently world geography (lack thereof) was (un)successfully taught by our public schools but the children all felt good about themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sivapragasam</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167494</link>
		<dc:creator>sivapragasam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167494</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;nyc123me&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;...I use ‘Burma’ as a kind of acknowledgment to pre-Musharraf times..... &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What.

P.S. MM, please avoid posting together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>nyc123me</strong><br />
<blockquote>&#8230;I use ‘Burma’ as a kind of acknowledgment to pre-Musharraf times&#8230;.. </p></blockquote>
<p>What.</p>
<p>P.S. MM, please avoid posting together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg.conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167492</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg.conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167492</guid>
		<description>I would suggest wikipedia,long read. I need to study it a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest wikipedia,long read. I need to study it a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanddog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167477</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanddog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167477</guid>
		<description>Why is it that the media never reports on her acceptance, funding and use of the Taliban when she was last in office?  Is                    that and the charges of corruption from the French, Swiss, Polish and Spanish off limits because she&#039;s a leftist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that the media never reports on her acceptance, funding and use of the Taliban when she was last in office?  Is                    that and the charges of corruption from the French, Swiss, Polish and Spanish off limits because she&#8217;s a leftist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyc123me</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167475</link>
		<dc:creator>nyc123me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167475</guid>
		<description>@ #11: I can&#039;t speak for Michelle, but I use &#039;Burma&#039; as a kind of acknowledgment to pre-Musharraf times. I believe though that Myanmar is the written name of the country, while Burma is the oral name of the country, or something like that. Here, I looked it up:

In 1989, the military regime of Burma set up a commission in charge of reviewing the place names of Burma in the English language.. and decided to replace the English name Burma with Myanmar. There were three reasons for that:

First, Myanma is the official name of the country in the Burmese language, and the aim of the commission was to have English place names aligned with Burmese place names and pronunciation (another example, Rangoon was changed to Yangon to reflect the fact that the &quot;r&quot; sound was abandoned long ago in Burmese and replaced with a &quot;y&quot;). 

Second, the military thought that the name Myanma was more inclusive of minorities than the name Bama, and so they wanted the English name of the country to reflect this. 

Finally, the military regime has long been suspicious of the colloquial Burmese language, which it perceives as subversive (this is probably the main reason imho). The regime is promoting the literary language, and so it wanted to get rid of the English name &quot;Burma&quot; which mirrors the colloquial Burmese name Bama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #11: I can&#8217;t speak for Michelle, but I use &#8216;Burma&#8217; as a kind of acknowledgment to pre-Musharraf times. I believe though that Myanmar is the written name of the country, while Burma is the oral name of the country, or something like that. Here, I looked it up:</p>
<p>In 1989, the military regime of Burma set up a commission in charge of reviewing the place names of Burma in the English language.. and decided to replace the English name Burma with Myanmar. There were three reasons for that:</p>
<p>First, Myanma is the official name of the country in the Burmese language, and the aim of the commission was to have English place names aligned with Burmese place names and pronunciation (another example, Rangoon was changed to Yangon to reflect the fact that the &#8220;r&#8221; sound was abandoned long ago in Burmese and replaced with a &#8220;y&#8221;). </p>
<p>Second, the military thought that the name Myanma was more inclusive of minorities than the name Bama, and so they wanted the English name of the country to reflect this. </p>
<p>Finally, the military regime has long been suspicious of the colloquial Burmese language, which it perceives as subversive (this is probably the main reason imho). The regime is promoting the literary language, and so it wanted to get rid of the English name &#8220;Burma&#8221; which mirrors the colloquial Burmese name Bama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uhangtight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167469</link>
		<dc:creator>uhangtight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167469</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m curious, too, cause just because she is preacing feedom and democracy could it be to gain sympathy and backing from the world?  i don&#039;t trust islam, they are told to lie to their enemies, it is good and acceptable.  

i hear she prefers Sharia law, too.  i am keeping my judgements for now but watching cautiously.  do not want to see the nukes in the hands of taliban or islamic sharia bent crazies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m curious, too, cause just because she is preacing feedom and democracy could it be to gain sympathy and backing from the world?  i don&#8217;t trust islam, they are told to lie to their enemies, it is good and acceptable.  </p>
<p>i hear she prefers Sharia law, too.  i am keeping my judgements for now but watching cautiously.  do not want to see the nukes in the hands of taliban or islamic sharia bent crazies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativesRus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167467</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativesRus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167467</guid>
		<description>#14...she might be a heroine to the corrupt Islamic ideologues.  And since we know that Islamic interpretation of all history is correct, then she&#039;s a heroine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14&#8230;she might be a heroine to the corrupt Islamic ideologues.  And since we know that Islamic interpretation of all history is correct, then she&#8217;s a heroine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iowavette</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167463</link>
		<dc:creator>iowavette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167463</guid>
		<description>Is Bhutto actually a heroine or is she a corrupt, Islamic ideologue?  I hear both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Bhutto actually a heroine or is she a corrupt, Islamic ideologue?  I hear both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antaradus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/comment-page-1/#comment-167453</link>
		<dc:creator>Antaradus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/09/reports-benazir-bhutto-placed-under-house-arrest/#comment-167453</guid>
		<description>notanexpert #11, I believe both &quot;Burma&quot; and &quot;Myanmar&quot; are correct and acceptable, like &quot;Britain&quot; and &quot;UK&quot; are often used interchangeably (although there is a subtle difference between the two).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notanexpert #11, I believe both &#8220;Burma&#8221; and &#8220;Myanmar&#8221; are correct and acceptable, like &#8220;Britain&#8221; and &#8220;UK&#8221; are often used interchangeably (although there is a subtle difference between the two).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
