“Which one of the 2008 presidential candidates would you trust most to babysit your children?”
Someone representing Parents magazine e-mailed me this morning about new poll results on parenting and politics. These were amusing:
Which one of the 2008 presidential candidates would you trust most to babysit your children?
• Hillary Rodham Clinton: 26%
• None: 19%
• Barack Obama: 13%
• Don’t know: 12%
• Rudy Giuliani: 9%
• Fred Thompson: 6%
• John Edwards: 5%
• Mitt Romney: 5%
• John McCain: 4%
• Refused: 2%
Which one of the 2008 presidential candidates would you trust least to babysit your children?
• Hillary Rodham Clinton: 25%
• Don’t know: 19%
• None: 13%
• Rudy Giuliani: 13%
• John McCain: 7%
• Barack Obama: 6%
• Fred Thompson: 6%
• John Edwards: 5%
• Mitt Romney: 4%
• Refused: 2%
Source: Parents magazine
Yes, there are 5% of poll respondents out there who trust this guy the most to babysit their children:
Two Americas indeed.
***
Commenter englishqueen1: “I wouldn’t let Hillary anywhere my son. She’d take toys from him and redistribute them to other kids in the neighborhood, while admonishing my son for using disposable diapers and having a large carbon footprint. Although…sometimes his diapers are pretty wicked. I suppose I wouldn’t mind letting Hillary deal with that mess…”
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: 2008 campaign
protein wisdom
» A Nannystatist Emily Litella moment [Darleen Click]
Ed Driscoll
» The University ArchipelagoNewsBusters.org
» The War on Terror Made Him Do ItEd Driscoll
» First We Take Chicago, Then We Take BerlinNewsBusters.org
» Matthews on Ft. Hood Suspect Warning Signal: 'That's Not a Crime to Call al Qaeda, Is It?'Pundit & Pundette
» Westboro haters have enough to go around for everyoneTigerHawk
» Abortion and health care "reform"Weekly Standard
» The Federal Bureau of Non-Investigation
Well we know for sure which politician we wouldn’t let toilet train our children…
These people must not know about what Hitlary did with Socks the cat…
Why would anyone trust their child with Hill? I mean, it’s been rumored that she lures children to her candy house, shoves them into the oven, and then eats them!
If I had to choose, I’d say that I would trust Fred the most. He’s got children that are roughly my children’s ages, so he’s probably better with them than any of the others.
But that’s just my opinion.
Hahaha – that picture cracks me up every time! I can just see it now; “hold the mirror a little higher, Johnny, that’s it. Aren’t I just the most prettiest babysitter evah! I mean, my hair alone…”
The kids would have nightmares forever. Can you image the therapy bill?
On a serious note, it does scare me that 26% of the people responded Hillary. Hillary didn’t even raise her own daughter – she left that up to others while pursuing her “career.”
What kind of person logs onto an on-line poll and then refuses to answer?
I would chose Hillary in short burts. My kids would be afraid of her, so I know they’d behave.
# 6
its bursts stupid
Better still, what in the world are we coming to with polls like these? I think the more appropriate question is “What candidate do you trust to safely and responsibly run the federal government and protect our vital national interests (borders, anti-terror, etc.)?
It really is frightening to read that so many would entrust their kids with Hillary.Especially with Fred,Mitt and McCain so low on the list.Maybe its because she’s”just a girl”.
On November 9th, 2007 at
I can’t listen to Prager if you’re going to make me laugh like that
I wouldn’t let Hillary anywhere my son. She’d take toys from him and redistribute them to other kids in the neighborhood, while admonishing my son for using disposable diapers and having a large carbon footprint.
Although…sometimes his diapers are pretty wicked. I suppose I wouldn’t mind letting Hillary deal with that mess…
Yeah, I know. I’m evil.
i’m with achefty, maybe they feel that babysitting is the only job Shrillary is capable of; and not running the country?
Let’s hope that is what they were thinking, cause I can’t imagine anyone thinking she would be a good babysitter.. GEESH.
Which one of the 2008 presidential candidates would you trust most to babysit your children?
• Hillary Rodham Clinton: 26%
None: 19% + Don’t know: 12% = 31%
ROFL
I would sooner leave them home to swallow dots before I would choose from this list as well.
Don’t worry, she’s had to take care of Bill…
I’d rather have my kids watched by rabid, 3/4 starved, dog-fight trained pitbulls…
The problem with that is the Hildabeast only knows how to deal in bovine feces. She wouldn’t know what to do with a real human problem…..
…..Unless, it was to tax you to pay for someone else to deal with it.
How could Hillary be a good babysitter by herself? By her own admission it takes a village. Sorry, I don’t have the space at my house.
And this matters because?
Since none of them would ever “physically” babysit..who cares.
OTOH – since they all will affect policy greatly which will affect the children…The better question is who best will enact policies which are in the best interest of your child’s wellbeaing (both short term and long term)?
A few categories for thought: Safety/Security (both domestic and foreign threats), Financial (allowing/promoting and environment which will to prosper), Morally…etc
Glad my kids are all grown and I don’t have to make this type of decision. But I do know “she-who-must-not-be-named” scares them as young adults.
Only a liberal would conceive of or ask that poll question.
caption for the photo:
“are my horns showing?”
errah, what about me??!!
errah Barney Frank and Sen’ Craig are available and at reasonable rates! ($10/hr. + drinks)
I wouldnt let them watch my dog(if I had one) yet alone my kid. sheesh.
Umm Where is Kucinich and Ron Paul ?
I can just imagine what bed time stories they’d tell children.
#24
yup, with you there. Clinton would probably eat the kids.
Stupidest poll ever….Billary watch your kids? Hold on to your piggy banks.
They’ll be available soon.
Of course, that’s the beauty of having 13 children. Three of them are old enough to babysit…and willing to send the wife and me on a date.
See that? A solution without government! WOW!
AC…. doesnt stand for,
alota condoms…
AC – Forget the poll – 13 kids? Goodness, if I were your kids I’d ban you two from being alone! Hats off to you both for keeping your sanity and raising fine upstanding citizens.
no kidding 24k, I told him once before he deserves a medal.
Klady,
Things got better when his wife started using a different bar of soap than him…
Seriously AJ, do tribes in Africa have small statues of your wife to pray to??
That is to say, do some cultures regard her a a symbol of fertility?
that should have been “Seriously, AC”
The idea of AJ spawning terrifies me.
Thank you Michelle for bringing us the hard news that the MSM won’t print. This is mindless drivel. I expect more.
There is an upside to letting Hillary babysit. After she leaves, you can request that the donations made to her campaign in the names of your children be refunded. Depending on the number of children, that can be quite a windfall.
lighten up shootthewad its friday….
1) Let a candidate babysit your child!
2) Social Services removes your child to protect it!
3) Parents go to jail to be reeducated.
4) The village (idiot) continues raising the children without the interference of concerned parents.
5) An entire generation of children raised to believe in socialist utopia where everybody feels good about themselves and no one must suffer except those few of us whom are still capable of thinking enough to be able to continue being productive despite the liberal socialist pro(di)gression?
Sound far fetched? So did preventing people from engaging in legal activity within the confines of their homes until recently. (Cali smoking bills?)
You know we make jokes about their conspiracies …. but … just saying.
SWJ
Answered your question over on the Columbia U thread. Just took me a while to make it show up. Way down at the bottom.
Regards,
Ya think Hillary has some negative baggage to carry around?
I need to vote more then once…
I’d be afraid of what Hillary would do to my kids if they started nibbling on her gingerbread house.
Not a freakin one of them. Wouldn’t even want them in the same room with me in it, let alone have them watch them.
Besides, my youngest two are more versed on global politics that the entire Dem candidacy combined.
Sorry, none of the Dems. I wouldn’t mind Fred or Mitt at all. Rudy I think would be too distracted.
Huckabee is the only one I would trust and he’s not on the list!
I think Hillary’s look of consternation would snap the kids into line. But, then again, time with Hill could be construed as inhumane punishment. That would be far worse than waterboarding in my book.
I wouldn’t have Hillary in my house if they paid me…or at least tried to convince people they tipped me. I have some nice stuff that I couldn’t afford to have replaced, and with her sticky fingers when it comes to home furnishings…
Apparently Rudy would contract the job out and get someone who shouldn’t be babysitting.
Duncan Hunter would surround your kids in a double-fence.
Hillary will dispose of them after the photo op.
John Edwards is too busy watching himself.
Tom Tancredo would feed your kids lettuce. (sounds like he’s winning this one)
Fred Thompson hasn’t decided whether or not he’ll babysit yet.
Ron Paul won’t do it because it’s not in the constitution.
Joe Biden’s too busy putting his foot in his mouth.
Nobody cares about Chris Dodd.
I can’t think of anything funny to say about Mitt, Mike, or Obama.
Your children will beat up Bill Richardson, so that’s no good.
# 48
Mitt really doesnt want the job
Obama would take everthing off the table
and mike….who cares
That depends. Would I have to worry about B. Hussein Obama marrying my nine-year-old daughter?
I took this seriously and thought about my six kids. Who to leave in charge while I go see “Bella” with my dear husband?
I’m more familiar with “Don’t Know” than the other candidates.
Who broke the clock? I’ll ask. The kids say Don’t Know.
Who ate the rest of the ice cream? Again, it’s that darn Don’t Know.
“Don’t Know” is better than the alternatives.
Make mine a write-in for Huckabee.
The only one I’d even remotely trust to babysit my kids (and only if they were toddlers) would be Ron Paul.
He’s kinda like a clown, and kids like clowns. Er. . .maybe not.
Whenever someone serves up that old “it takes a village” bromide, I taste bile.
“urp”
Thanks a heap, Heartland Perspective.
Hillary would be most likely to scare the crap out of my children, and that not even with my sentiments being imbued into their beliefs. They have a natural understanding of just how unctuous and bad she really is.
John Edwards, a guy that is obesessed with his own appearance(hair) is the scariest to me.
Talk about a “Girlie Man”……actually that might make him a good babysitter.
Kids like ice cream. Ice cream makers like John Edwards. Therefore, kids should like Silky Pony. Heh.
Gotta go with McCain, especially if he brings his Momma along.
Well, I’m glad I cancelled my subscription to Parents a few months ago. Another dumb, meaningless poll.
How can you trust Hillary and NOT trust Romney? Just play a track of each voice and see which one kids run away from.
I think I’d rather leave my kids with the 10-year old across the street.