Comments on: “It’s news to me”

By: November, 2007 Archive « Right Minded Online

November, 2007 Archive « Right Minded Online — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:19:28 +0000

[...] the same way one avoids rattlesnakes. But it turns out that her campaign has been accused of planting questions in the audience. Of course, the smartest woman in the world says she knew nothing about it. If Senator Clinton were [...]

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:32:55 +0000

Better watch out. If she keeps having to put on that “It’s news to me” face, she’s going to pull a few muscles.

Faux-tox?

By: Laree

Laree — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:01:33 +0000

Hillary, Imus is back in 19 days, and counting down. I think he might have some questions for you, and some answers. 77WABC 6:00 A.M. eastern standard time…it is my hope that he devotes a whole show or more to Senator Hillary Clinton.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIt6k8xj6Qo

By: misterbee241

misterbee241 — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:47:47 +0000

Maybe the flags falling was an omen. Remember in the movie Omen, when Mom took Damien through the drive through zoo, and animals went nuts?
Maybe something evil about Hillary tipped over the flags.

By: Beaker1214

Beaker1214 — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:06:46 +0000

Remember politics fans, planted questions are a Clinton M/O. I remember during the ‘92 race an incident in which Bill Clinton was “interviewed” by a “reporter” on current prices. He was asked the price of a gallon of milk, a loaf of bread, etc. He answered the questions quite accurately. It was to portray him as “in touch” with the common guy. This was during his “I feel your pain” era. The brief clip was shown on all the news outlets (naturally). The “reporter” turned out to be a campaign worker and the questions were all scripted. None of this came out until after the election (again, naturally). Fast forward to another Clinton, in another campaign, but with similar tactics. Any questions?

By: » A Hillary round up, with cartoons » Leaning Straight Up » Blog Archive »

Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:35:47 +0000

[...] has had a tough week. Falling poll numbers, falling flags and more importantly a loss of her sense of invulnerability. For weeks her attitude and that [...]

By: brooklyn red

brooklyn red — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:20:04 +0000

Me thinks not.

By: "SLICK WILL(ar)Y" Taints a Minister! - The Fighting GOP

"SLICK WILL(ar)Y" Taints a Minister! - The Fighting GOP — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:09:16 +0000

[...] UPDATE: And then there’s this from Michelle Malkin (and this): [...]

By: RetFireman

RetFireman — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:42:18 +0000

If a flag falls in front of and on a Democrat, does she win the Presidency?

By: brooklyn red

brooklyn red — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:24:29 +0000

Flag falls for Veterans Day… Hmmm, mysterious ways indeed.

By: Lars

Lars — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:16:29 +0000

“Well it was news to me” Clinton said.

Yes, bad news for you Mrs.Clinton. Just one more piece of bad news in the long string of mishaps that surround her. None of it, of course, being her fault.

By: MTNEER

MTNEER — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:49:21 +0000

#42TXRose, the image of Shrillary in a WWII German helmet saying “I know NOTHINK” is absolutely hilarious. That would make a great T-shirt!

By: Prime Director

Prime Director — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:35:33 +0000

re: 57

RetFireman, you’d better hose off out, because you are on FIRE.

You’re right. There’s some serious hypocracy coming from the moonbat side of the spectrum.

Just remember: A progressive pays when he gets caught with his hand in the till, a conservatives pays when he gets caught with his pants down. So naturally, Bubba gets a pass on his infidelity while Rudy does not.

In addition, as citizens of the world, the left is hostile to the very notion of patriotism, so naturally Bubba gets a pass on draft-dodging; while W, as a conservative, depends heavily on the flag-waving vote and is thus vulnerable to the chickenhawk smear.

By: HANKDKRANK

HANKDKRANK — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:26:02 +0000

I wish Hill would pull a few face muscles. She sure must be stifling a lot.

By: RetFireman

RetFireman — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:16:31 +0000

Awe geee…Guiliani cheated on his second wife, and you are all bent out of shape about it, claiming he cannot be trusted to run the country because of it. Wow, how hypocritical of you. After all, it was YOU guys that declared that to be a private, personal issue that has nothing to do with being President. When Bill was raping, groping and getting afternoon quickies in the Oval Office, you all came unglued that people made such a big deal about it, and that it was nobody’s business.

then again, Billy-Bob was also a draft dodger who left the country and protested against the united States on foreign soil. At the time, you people all said that military service, especially actually dodging the draft, should have no bearing on whther or not someone could or should be President, and we can’t hold that against someone who actively spoke out against the military and now wanted to be their Commander in Chief. then, Bush got out of the Guard legally and early after serving and you guys have been having fits ever since.

So tell me, which way is it going to be? Either disown your god, based on all the things you are holding against Bush and Guiliani, or shut the heck up about it. You cannot have it both ways, hypocrite.

As for her being perfect, no, no one is perfect. The problem is, she thinks she is and so do her supporters. She is a lying, cheating, condescending low life scum who has carpetbagged her way into the Senate after her own home-state refused her. She has ridden her husbands coat tails as long as she could, and now that she has to actually go on her own merit, she just can’t hold up. You can defend her all you want, but it doesn’t make her a good, honest person. In the race of the front runners, she is the least trustworthy of the bunch, and followed closely by Edwards. So rationalize away, but the facts are what they are, and facts mean a hell of a lot more than your emotional diatribe.