Comments on: Open-borders Democrats mad at…open-borders Democrats

By: TXRose

TXRose — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:34:10 +0000

feebie, she’s had those upper eyelids tucked one too many times.
My company was taken to court in the early nineties because one
department had two hispanic women that spoke spanish to each
other often yelling it across the office. When they were told for the
third time, that the next time they would be let go because they
were making everyone else uncomfortable, they got an ambulance
chasing lawyer that advertises on tv and he took the company to
court for discrimination. Luckily, when the judge heard the
circumstances, the case was thrown out. Probably would have been
heard today.

By: idea seekers for kids

idea seekers for kids — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:02:48 +0000

idea seekers for kids…

…

By: Michelle Malkin » Foreign-language idiocy: A bipartisan problem

Michelle Malkin » Foreign-language idiocy: A bipartisan problem — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:29:09 +0000

[...] Last week, I noted the spat between Hispanic Democrats and the Dem leadership over a non-binding Republican motion instructing House conferees on an appropriations bill to accept a Senate-passed provision banning the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from suing employers over certain English-speaking requirements. John Fund has a related follow-up column: It’s been less than a week since New York’s Sen. Hillary Clinton and Gov. Eliot Spitzer had to climb down from their support of driver’s licenses for illegal aliens. Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has moved to kill an amendment that would protect employers from federal lawsuits for requiring their workers to speak English. Among the employers targeted by such lawsuits: the Salvation Army. [...]

By: Tennessee Dave

Tennessee Dave — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:15:58 +0000

On November 12th, 2007 at 1:48 pm, madchef said:
I can just picture Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi waiting at the day labor site.

All they’re qualified to do is to spread manure. That’s what they do now.

By: BarleyBear

BarleyBear — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:39:51 +0000

Personally, I’m hoping to see even more infighting on the left. I’d like to see some illegals start applying for the jobs that the WGA walked out on. Hey, the illegals would only be doing a job that Americans aren’t willing to do, right? Remember, it’s not the job, but the pay of the job and benefits, isn’t that what the strike is all about? This all spells out a recipe for a good infighting.

By: dfern

dfern — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:56:56 +0000

…who voted in favor of a non-binding Republican motion instructing House conferees on an appropriations bill to accept a Senate-passed provision banning the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from suing employers over certain English-speaking requirements…

What? No wonder people are apathetic about politics—that was totally incomprehensible.

By: zorro

zorro — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:22:02 +0000

Nice screencap, boy, if Pelosie has one more face lift… well, never mind.

By: brooklyn red

brooklyn red — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:02:02 +0000

Anyone care to have another look at Tancredo…

By: right_on

right_on — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:05:31 +0000

I just listened to the youtube clip referenced by Speakup, and I still don’t know what he was trying to say except, “We’re coming!” and “Si se puede!”

Okay, you’re coming, you’re here already, “yes you can” and then what?
(Can you believe he referenced Paul Revere’s ride and call to arms, to warn us [non-latinos] about the coming latino invasion?” Take over all government offices through elections, and then what?

Force all non-latinos out of California? Then what? Secede from the union, and ask for foreign aid?

Or better yet, secede, declare all private companies now property of the state (a la Venezula’s Chavez), create a bigger nanny state, and then demand foreign aid or else!

Or else you do the same to all the southwestern states? But you do it anyway, and then what? Ay carumba!

By: Speakup

Speakup — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:42:31 +0000

California Reconquista Joe Baca -The Tan Klan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uOVzQ2YE6Y

By: leepro

leepro — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:36:54 +0000

#39 right_on said:

Maybe, our congressional representsatives with a European heritage should form a Congressional White Caucus, and open up the race and prejudice discussion, once and for all.

It is, and has not been, about being simply “an American” for quite some time. I hope I live to see the day that perceived victimhood doesn’t qualify one for a “special” club. America, and Americans first!

I think you are right. It isn’t the United States of America anymore. It’s the United States of Diversity, and E Pluribus Unum (Out of Many, ONE) has become E Unum Pluribus — out of one, many!

By: right_on

right_on — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:08:43 +0000

Amen, brother! Semper Fi

By: DesertLover

DesertLover — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:49:18 +0000

right_on

My pleasure … that is an issue that divides us that I want to see put to an end … Ask someone in the military what he sees when he looks at the guy beside him when under fire … he sees his buddy … his fellow Marine, Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Etc. … he sees a fellow American … no hyphens …

By: right_on

right_on — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:33:21 +0000

desertlover said:

you are either an American or you are not an American … regardless of your ethnic background … American First … Ethnicity Second … period, exclamation point, end of discussion.

My point, EXACTLY! Unfortunately, it is their ethnic heritage that gets these people elected in the first place, and they are always the first ones to bring race into any argument.

I can’t tell you how many times over the years, when, as a policeman, I affected a car stop, not knowing what “race” was behind the wheel, and upon first contact I was met with the phrase, “The ONLY reason you stopped me, was because I’m ______! (Fill in the blank.) Only people from two ethnic backgrounds EVER gave me any grief for doing my job! EVER!!

Like you, DesertLover, I only want to see Americans! Racism, and bigotry sicken me, but it always seems to be the first card played by these “victims.”

By: Wade

Wade — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:19:55 +0000

Non-binding resolutions. Investigaions. Hearings. As the list of Congress’s failures grows:
No energy bill
No action on health care
No action on the mortgage crisis
No immigration reform
No progress on renewing No Child Left Behind
Precious little action on judges
Not enough on reducing trade barriers