Remember that even some intellectually honest pro-choicers believe that Roe vs. Wade was wrongly decided? I guess Fred Thompson is supposed to fit that category, even though he still wants to label himself as pro-life. As reported here, in his…

Debbie! Where have you been??? You’re a few chapters behind in the anti-Fred play book. Fred is careful about what he says and why would he give some knee-jerk answer that can be used to hang him with later? As you know Fred lost an adult daughter and was involved as a family member in her end-of-life decisions. He said he doesn’t feel that issue should be up to the Federal government.

Um, I’ve been following it, actually. And I think his first answer was his answer. He doesn’t get a million bites at the apple. Sorry, but unlike you, I don’t fall for his “I voted for it before I voted against it” John Kerry act. Pity that you do. He’s given several knee-jerk and idiotic statements over the past few months, actually. Pity you missed them. Fredheadism does that to ya.

He can however make decisions that affect trade.

Ok – you all can fire away.

Well I’m sure you’ve heard all the arguments already. Just remember, none of these guys are running for Jesus.

I’m sorry, but there are many more important things to base a candidacy on than abortion issues.

While I agree there are many more things to be concerned about, I dont know of one that’s much more important than the killing of American citizens in the womb. Who will stand up for the most defenseless among us? It used to be the Republicans. If we cant expect a candidate to protect the unborn, they why should we expect him to do his best for the country?

I’m just one man and one vote. But I’ll state it here – I will NOT support any candidate regardless of party or religion that does not support the right of the unborn to live.

For too long I’ve voted for the lesser of two evils. But I came to the conclusion that the lesser evil is still evil. That goes for the RINOs Rudy and Mitt.

Ok – you all can fire away.

Fred voted pro-life for his entire eight year career in the Senate while Willard Romney changed his mind about every subject his entire career…what a tough choice it was to make eh??

RazmehbecauseI’mPompous was betting that WrongwayRomney was going to get that endorsement, I guess he felt he had to announce it as quickly as he could before he got it taken to him…What a donkey that schnook is. I wonder when he’ll decide to observe our custom of taking an American name since he has his nose so far up our business.

Keep repeating it, Jim. Maybe it will get through eventually.

Yeah, but he better do it somewhere else. He’s just preaching to the choir here.

On November 12th, 2007 at 3:03 pm, Jim M. said:
People really need to give Duncan Hunter a close look. He’s not a RINO, not a democrat running as a republican, and seems to be the only one in the current field that is a true conservative.

Keep repeating it, Jim. Maybe it will get through eventually.

Rudy just has too much support from conservatives, moderates, and some liberals who hate Hillary.

The latest Rasmussen poll shows Hillary beating Thompson by 48% to 42%.

It shows Hillary leading Giuliani by 48% to 42%. Big difference there, yes?

If conservatives and moderates LOVE Rudy, it does not show up in the polls.

And from Pew, we see this.

Clinton’s supporters are much more positive about her candidacy than are Giuliani’s. Roughly three-quarters of voters who favor Clinton (76%) say their choice is more a vote for the New York senator, compared with 20% who say their choice is mostly a vote against Giuliani. By contrast, Giuliani’s support is divided fairly evenly between those who see their choice as a vote for Giuliani (46%) and those who say it is a vote against Clinton (50%).

The concept of caring where a President stands on abortion is absurd.

No more absurd than the concept of caring where he stands on taxes or trade.

There are two candidates vying for the Republican nomination, Mitt and Rudy. Rudy is pro-choice and Mitt is pro-life.

Thompson is at least as pro-life as Mitt is. When did Mitt come around on this?