<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fred/NRLC poll results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:36:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dandapani</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-171003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dandapani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-171003</guid>
		<description>Fred is Dead, or simply DOA!  We have no viable CONSERVATIVE candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred is Dead, or simply DOA!  We have no viable CONSERVATIVE candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170660</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Thompson Reveals Social Security Plans...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson yesterday proposed slowing the growth of Social Sec...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Thompson Reveals Social Security Plans&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson yesterday proposed slowing the growth of Social Sec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepdiver</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170594</link>
		<dc:creator>deepdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170594</guid>
		<description>Fred&#039;s stances overall are the closest to mine of any of the candidates.  I absolutely agree with him that abortion should be a state issue not a federal one.  As long as it remains a federal issue abortion is not going away.  To waste time fighting it and using abortion as a litmus test for candidates is futile and simply makes a lot of moderates antsy about the republican party being hijacked by the religious right.  The only way abortion should play into presidential politics is regarding SCOTUS nominees.  And even then I don&#039;t think it necessary that the SCOTUS nominee be pro-life, but rather that s/he be a  constitutionalist.  I can&#039;t see a constitutionalist juror failing to over turn RvW on the grounds that it was a bad decision that created constitutional rights not evident in the document.  Such a decision kicks the issue back to the states where it belongs and removes it from national politics as it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred&#8217;s stances overall are the closest to mine of any of the candidates.  I absolutely agree with him that abortion should be a state issue not a federal one.  As long as it remains a federal issue abortion is not going away.  To waste time fighting it and using abortion as a litmus test for candidates is futile and simply makes a lot of moderates antsy about the republican party being hijacked by the religious right.  The only way abortion should play into presidential politics is regarding SCOTUS nominees.  And even then I don&#8217;t think it necessary that the SCOTUS nominee be pro-life, but rather that s/he be a  constitutionalist.  I can&#8217;t see a constitutionalist juror failing to over turn RvW on the grounds that it was a bad decision that created constitutional rights not evident in the document.  Such a decision kicks the issue back to the states where it belongs and removes it from national politics as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin_Udall</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170488</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin_Udall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170488</guid>
		<description>Who the anti-abortionists back for President is of no interest to me.  

I am, however, for Thompson.  One of the reasons is because he recognizes RvW is bad law, which is my conern in regard to a President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the anti-abortionists back for President is of no interest to me.  </p>
<p>I am, however, for Thompson.  One of the reasons is because he recognizes RvW is bad law, which is my conern in regard to a President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylork</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170468</link>
		<dc:creator>taylork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170468</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What a bunch of Judases.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Not sure that&#039;s an apt comparison.

Fred&#039;s no Jesus, and most of us weren&#039;t his followers fro the get go either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What a bunch of Judases.</p></blockquote>
<p> Not sure that&#8217;s an apt comparison.</p>
<p>Fred&#8217;s no Jesus, and most of us weren&#8217;t his followers fro the get go either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_ekco</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170462</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_ekco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170462</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OT, but I have a conservative friend who REALLY likes Ron Paul. I don’t know much about him, but I’ve read enough on her to get the impression that he’s sort of a dummy. Why is that?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think alot of people think he is a dummy because that is the way he is being portrayed on alot of media outlets, not necessarily MSM but blogs too. People go with the issue that he wants us out of Iraq and say ok, i&#039;ve heard enough. But on every other issue he is by far the most conservative of the bunch IMHO. I like Ron and Fred at this point. But I think too  many people, me included, read about the candidates and form their opinions based on that. It&#039;s just so easy to do even when you are trying not to. I at first liked Paul, then read lots of comments on blogs, including this one where people thought he was screechy and crazy and so that became my way of thinking for awhile. Then I thought more about it and talked to a friend who is a big Paul supporter and reassessed him and he really has the issues nailed down. I agree with his non-interventionist policty too (not, NOT isolationist), but I do not agree with getting out of Iraq now. We are there, we need to continue and finish the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OT, but I have a conservative friend who REALLY likes Ron Paul. I don’t know much about him, but I’ve read enough on her to get the impression that he’s sort of a dummy. Why is that?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think alot of people think he is a dummy because that is the way he is being portrayed on alot of media outlets, not necessarily MSM but blogs too. People go with the issue that he wants us out of Iraq and say ok, i&#8217;ve heard enough. But on every other issue he is by far the most conservative of the bunch IMHO. I like Ron and Fred at this point. But I think too  many people, me included, read about the candidates and form their opinions based on that. It&#8217;s just so easy to do even when you are trying not to. I at first liked Paul, then read lots of comments on blogs, including this one where people thought he was screechy and crazy and so that became my way of thinking for awhile. Then I thought more about it and talked to a friend who is a big Paul supporter and reassessed him and he really has the issues nailed down. I agree with his non-interventionist policty too (not, NOT isolationist), but I do not agree with getting out of Iraq now. We are there, we need to continue and finish the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schweggie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170459</link>
		<dc:creator>Schweggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170459</guid>
		<description>And let me also include Ms. Schlussel&#039;s comment from yesterday&#039;s thread:
&lt;strong&gt;AHEM!&lt;/strong&gt;
 &lt;blockquote&gt;On November 12th, 2007 at 6:46 pm, Debbie Schlussel said:

Michelle:
What about the fact–which you, yourself, pointed out in a previous post–that Fred does not have an opinion on Terry Schiavo? “Didn’t know enough about it.” I love how NRLC suddenly now doesn’t think that’s a life issue. Incredible.
DS&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was the last nail in the coffin for me with Fred as a viable candidate. True Blue Pro-lifers were completely wired in to the Schiavo crisis...to not know the details is just inexcusable for a presidential candidate running a pro-life platform. Sorry. It&#039;s comments like that, &quot;I don&#039;t know the details about the Schiavo case&quot; that make me wonder where Fred&#039;s lip service on Pro-life ends and where his sincerity begins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let me also include Ms. Schlussel&#8217;s comment from yesterday&#8217;s thread:<br />
<strong>AHEM!</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>On November 12th, 2007 at 6:46 pm, Debbie Schlussel said:</p>
<p>Michelle:<br />
What about the fact–which you, yourself, pointed out in a previous post–that Fred does not have an opinion on Terry Schiavo? “Didn’t know enough about it.” I love how NRLC suddenly now doesn’t think that’s a life issue. Incredible.<br />
DS</p></blockquote>
<p>That was the last nail in the coffin for me with Fred as a viable candidate. True Blue Pro-lifers were completely wired in to the Schiavo crisis&#8230;to not know the details is just inexcusable for a presidential candidate running a pro-life platform. Sorry. It&#8217;s comments like that, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know the details about the Schiavo case&#8221; that make me wonder where Fred&#8217;s lip service on Pro-life ends and where his sincerity begins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24Klady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170454</link>
		<dc:creator>24Klady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170454</guid>
		<description>Failed to add, ontheissues.org has info on the House/Senate critters too.  From a quick scan, Hunter&#039;s been consistant and maintains his conservative values down the line.  Doesn&#039;t waver much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failed to add, ontheissues.org has info on the House/Senate critters too.  From a quick scan, Hunter&#8217;s been consistant and maintains his conservative values down the line.  Doesn&#8217;t waver much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unamused</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170449</link>
		<dc:creator>unamused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170449</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of Judases.

So, you can&#039;t attack Fred on his positions so you attack him on the voracity of his campaign?

I see the liberal media has already corrupted most of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of Judases.</p>
<p>So, you can&#8217;t attack Fred on his positions so you attack him on the voracity of his campaign?</p>
<p>I see the liberal media has already corrupted most of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24Klady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170415</link>
		<dc:creator>24Klady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170415</guid>
		<description>Might want to wander over to numbersusa.com and check out the report cards on those serving in the House or Senate running for POTUS.  Hunter got an A-, due in part to a recent position he took to increase visas.  Up to that point he&#039;d always been graded A+?  Need to investigate that more, but I like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to wander over to numbersusa.com and check out the report cards on those serving in the House or Senate running for POTUS.  Hunter got an A-, due in part to a recent position he took to increase visas.  Up to that point he&#8217;d always been graded A+?  Need to investigate that more, but I like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schweggie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170414</link>
		<dc:creator>Schweggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170414</guid>
		<description>Testing, anyone else having difficulty getting your posts to display? Grrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing, anyone else having difficulty getting your posts to display? Grrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patchthebun</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170413</link>
		<dc:creator>Patchthebun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170413</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always liked Fred from the beginning.  

OT, but I have a conservative friend who REALLY likes Ron Paul.  I don&#039;t know much about him, but I&#039;ve read enough on her to get the impression that he&#039;s sort of a dummy.  Why is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always liked Fred from the beginning.  </p>
<p>OT, but I have a conservative friend who REALLY likes Ron Paul.  I don&#8217;t know much about him, but I&#8217;ve read enough on her to get the impression that he&#8217;s sort of a dummy.  Why is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170403</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170403</guid>
		<description>Especially Immigration Laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially Immigration Laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longbow</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170394</link>
		<dc:creator>longbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170394</guid>
		<description>Boomer said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Their stance on illegal immigration and other no brainer issues will continue to cost them contributions and votes &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Boomer you got that right!  Illegal immigration is a hot button issue and rightly so.  And so far the Republican power structure seems to be on the side of the illegals, RINO light or more like DemocRAT lite!

I want to see a return to real conservative principles - namely limited Federal government, lower taxes, and vigorously enforce ALL our laws including immigration laws!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boomer said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Their stance on illegal immigration and other no brainer issues will continue to cost them contributions and votes </p></blockquote>
<p>Boomer you got that right!  Illegal immigration is a hot button issue and rightly so.  And so far the Republican power structure seems to be on the side of the illegals, RINO light or more like DemocRAT lite!</p>
<p>I want to see a return to real conservative principles &#8211; namely limited Federal government, lower taxes, and vigorously enforce ALL our laws including immigration laws!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-170391</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/13/frednrlc-poll-results/#comment-170391</guid>
		<description>From what I can see the GOP appears to want to sell the American people their version of a RINO light instead of falling back on the conservative principals that brought them into power.  Their stance on illegal immigration and other no brainer issues will continue to cost them contributions and votes if they continue on this current course.  They are no better than the DNC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can see the GOP appears to want to sell the American people their version of a RINO light instead of falling back on the conservative principals that brought them into power.  Their stance on illegal immigration and other no brainer issues will continue to cost them contributions and votes if they continue on this current course.  They are no better than the DNC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
