BDS at the world bridge championships

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 14, 2007 10:08 AM

Call them the Dixie Chicks of the bridge world. Make sure you check out the photo and whole story at the NYT (yes, it’s worth it):

In the genteel world of bridge, disputes are usually handled quietly and rarely involve issues of national policy. But in a fight reminiscent of the brouhaha over an anti-Bush statement by Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks in 2003, a team of women who represented the United States at the world bridge championships in Shanghai last month is facing sanctions, including a yearlong ban from competition, for a spur-of-the-moment protest.

At issue is a crudely lettered sign, scribbled on the back of a menu, that was held up at an awards dinner and read, “We did not vote for Bush.”

What next? The world shuffleboard champions showing up in these?

2arrest.jpg

Guess we should be glad the bridge gals weren’t showing off “Impeach Bush” socks, keffiyehs, or Truther gear.

You’ll love the BDS-infected player’s explanation:

“What we were trying to say, not to Americans but to our friends from other countries, was that we understand that they are questioning and critical of what our country is doing these days, and we want you to know that we, too, are critical,” Ms. Greenberg said, stressing that she was speaking for herself and not her six teammates.

Reminiscent of the “Sorry everybody” antics of the last presidential election, remember?

The French are backing the whiners:

“By trying to address these issues in a nonviolent, nonthreatening and lighthearted manner,” the French team wrote in by e-mail to the federation’s board and others, “you were doing only what women of the world have always tried to do when opposing the folly of men who have lost their perspective of reality.”

The proposed sanctions would hurt the team’s playing members financially. “I earn my living from bridge, and a substantial part of that from being hired to compete in high-level competitions,” Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

But as the bridge federation head points out:

“This isn’t a free-speech issue,” said Jan Martel, president of the United States Bridge Federation, the nonprofit group that selects teams for international tournaments. “There isn’t any question that private organizations can control the speech of people who represent them.”

Next time: Shut up and play cards.

***

Related: The Insanity of Bush Hatred.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Jon Swift
  2. Sister Toldjah
  3. The ‘can I speak my mind’ litmus test « Cowardly political musings…
  4. The Gun Toting Liberal™
  5. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » They were in the minority who didn’t vote for Bush,
  6. BDS at the world bridge championships | Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives
  7. Martini Revolution » George Bush vs. America

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #171459
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:14 am, DesertLover said:

    Glad to see there are still some organizations that feel they and their members should stay out of politics and stick to what their organization is about … good to see … thanks Michelle …

    Also … saw and enjoyed your column on TownHall as always … ululations? … wow … gotta admit I had to look that one up … :lol:

  2. #171462
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:17 am, bloghooligan said:

    What ever happened to being willing to pay the consequences of ones actions? Had I chosen to ‘make a nonviolent statement’ in such a venue, I would have fully expected to be banned by life. If they are only being suspended for a year, get a job at Walmart for a year. It’s getting off light as far as I’m concerned.

    Not to mention, they choose communist China??

    Whatever happened to prosecuting seditious behavior?? They should have stayed.

  3. #171467
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:21 am, Tennessee Dave said:

    “I earn my living from bridge, and a substantial part of that from being hired to compete in high-level competitions,” Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    These folks need to think through what the results of their actions might be–before they commit to the act. I don’t feel sorry for these idiots and besides, I didn’t vote for these folks to represent me in the “bridge world.”
    It’s one thing for Americans to argue about things while we’re at home, but to go abroad and do it is like discussing intimate family problems with a non-family member. It’s just not good manners.

  4. #171478
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:27 am, MTNEER said:

    If this is part of the “bridge” to the 21st century, I’ll Pass.

  5. #171479
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:27 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Politics and cards, entertainment or visits to the proctologist don’t mix.

  6. #171480
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:28 am, Boomer said:

    I am pleasantly surprised someone is finally being held accountable for their childish behavior. It appears the United States Bridge Federation is chaired by adults. I never voted for Clinton or Carter, but was still able to perform my duties under them as my Commander-in-Chief no matter how incompetent their leadership or badly we in the Military were treated during their administrations.

    Shut-up and deal!

  7. #171481
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:29 am, travis said:

    Ewww… is there anything less attractive than brainless women? No, there is not.

  8. #171484
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:34 am, ajmontana said:

    It looks like they took “theory of vacant spaces” literally and tried to engage their brains.

  9. #171489
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:36 am, Marshall Russ said:

    You can go to any town square anywhere in the U.S. and get on a soap box and rail against the government without fear of arrest. Someone can get up on the soap box after you and call your opinion moronic. That does not mean that you have the right to say anything you want anywhere, anytime. When liberals are confronted with reality they always retreat behind their misunderstanding of the 1st Amendment.

  10. #171490
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:37 am, Pulchritudinous Patriot said:

    “I earn my living from bridge, and a substantial part of that from being hired to compete in high-level competitions,” Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    Erm, these are called CONSEQUENCES. You know, what you suffer for your actions. Didn’t your mom ever teach you about this? Even my 8 year-old knows that there are consequences for your actions.

  11. #171494
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:39 am, Peejz said:

    My Great-Grandmother was a Life Master at bridge…she didn’t achiece this by stupity

  12. #171498
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:40 am, frizzbee said:

    I’ll reserve judgment until any penalty is really assessed. Until these people are held responsible, and pay a price for their actions, this type of behavior will continue, and accelerate. A public thrashing and a loss of any benefits they expect to reap is the very least they should suffer.

  13. #171501
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:42 am, TimDenchanter said:

    GOD! Would I love to see THIS:

    After one of these displays,
    another American displays a slightly different sign,

    “We didn’t vote for Clinton, either!”

    or

    “We certainly didn’t vote for GORE!”

    Ah … pipe dreams … and I don’t even smoke.

  14. #171503
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:42 am, conservativesRus said:

    Sounds to me like she has enrolled in the Michael Vick school of consequences. Seems Vick’s behavior kinda affected his income earning potential too.

  15. #171504
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:42 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    B RIDGE

    D oth

    S uck

  16. #171505
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:43 am, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    Had the team from the People’s Republic of China won the world bridge championships, they could have held up a sign that read “We did not vote for anyone.” Of course, they would have been taken out back and shot, but the point would have been made.

  17. #171512
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:47 am, conservativesRus said:

    Kevin – I don’t think the point would have been “published/broadcast”. The chinese would have done what they do – scrub the tapes. The MSM everywhere would have willingly scrubbed their tapes too – just so they could continue to have “access”. Guess what – it didn’t happen.

  18. #171513
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:48 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    I bid 6 clubs.

    M6 care to join me in some fun?

  19. #171517
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:50 am, Cosmo said:

    I’d like to serve this group of idiots a large mug of STFU.

    The funny thing in all this is that NO ONE in America would even KNOW about this stupid tournament and these losers who waste away their days playing a dumb card game built for the 90 year-old mind if not for this puerile publicity stunt and shameless narcissism.

    SHUT UP. Seriously. SHUT UP. It’s over. No one plays bridge. No one of consequence.

  20. #171520
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:52 am, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    Hey, conservativesRus. It was a silly joke. My IQ exceeds that of a slice of pizza. It was just… a… joke.

  21. #171526
    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:57 am, JammieWearingFool said:

    The slightest criticism of the Clintons during their term in office was met angrily with conspiratorial accusations and condemnation.

    The left acts like little babies for seven years now and we’re supposed to accept this as rational political discourse.

    If the dragon lady is elected, just watch how these same people react when she’s criticized.

    And she will be, trust me.

  22. #171528
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:03 am, PBoilermaker said:

    Next time: Shut up and play cards.

    Enough said.

  23. #171529
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:05 am, Dandapani said:

    “Live by the Sword; Die by the Sword!”

  24. #171534
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:08 am, locomotivebreath1901 said:

    Ever notice how these juvenile, seditious twits seemingly always choose to shat themselves while on foreign soil?

    Bridge?

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAACKKK*HOCK ~PHFFTWEEEE

  25. #171538
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:14 am, Dandapani said:

    Robert S. Wolff, one of the country’s pre-eminent bridge players, who has served as an executive and board member of several bridge organizations, said that he understood that the women might have had a legal right to do what they did but that they had offended many people.

    “While I believe in the right to free speech, to me that doesn’t give anyone the right to criticize one’s leader at a foreign venue in a totally nonpolitical event,” he wrote by e-mail.

    Yup. That’s about it.

  26. #171540
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:15 am, conservativesRus said:

    Kevin: What you said was absolutely true. And it made your point perfectly. No lack of IQ even contemplated from my end – I thought your comment was quite insightful.

  27. #171541
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:16 am, keylime said:

    I, as a player that plays bridge at the North American Bridge Championships and regional events (the largest ones we hold yearly), am pleased to see that the USBF has not lost sight of the most important concept of this discussion: the fact that politics has no place in sport. Regardless of whether you are for or against Bush, to state in all places China that you are against your own country is both criminal and deserving of sanction. Furthermore, the regulations are quite specific with regards to this – it is part of the agreement tendered between the USBF and the players before the trials concluded.

    I think a year’s ban would set the correct tone that as representatives of the United States you represent all of us, not just the obnoxious minority that refuses to let go of the past. Additionally, the cost to the players are not just for the year they would be gone – their reputations have already become sullied and stained as a result of their actions.

    Keep in mind as far as I am aware of, three of the seven involved (six players form a team, then there’s the non-playing captain) have written formal apologies, while the other four have to quote a poster on Bridge Base Forums’ bulletin board, “…take a flying flip”.

    The punishment may include:

    1. Banishment from all USBF and ACBL events for one calendar year.

    2. Disqualified from competition for a spot on the World Team Olympiad team in 2008 in Beijing.

    3. 1 year of probation after the banishment is completed.

    4. The team en masse must write a letter of apology. The USBF and/or ACBL reserves right to publish it.

    5. 200 hours of community service, half which must be accomplished before probation begins.

    6. The team must write a record of facts that can be used in a court of law.

    7. There is rumor that the suspension may also enter American Contract Bridge League play as well (the sanctioning body for bridge in the U.S. for tourney play).

    All in all, a strong message being sent.

  28. #171542
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:16 am, Hurricanes said:

    If she says she is “only speaking for herself” then why does her sign say “We”??

    Can’t these people at least not have to lie about their reasons for doing something so stupid?

  29. #171544
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:17 am, MDH3 said:

    “you were doing only what women of the world have always tried to do when opposing the folly of men who have lost their perspective of reality.

    How condescending. How utterly, utterly condescending. Ugh.

  30. #171549
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:27 am, traveler49 said:

    My first thought was to comment on how ugly these women are. Then I thought , that wouldn’t be very Christian of me. What would I look like if I was 90 years old and sat under artificial lights for hours on end. It also runs the risk of enticing Southernboy to the conversation.

  31. #171550
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:28 am, DesertLover said:

    keylime

    how about we add suspending their passports for a couple of years and put them on a no-fly and no-drive list to prevent them from leaving the country during that time …

  32. #171551
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:29 am, T J Green said:

    On November 14th, 2007 at 10:29 am, travis said:

    Ewww… is there anything less attractive than brainless women? No, there is not.

    Yep – photo verification optional.

  33. #171553
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:31 am, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    INSIGHTFUL?! It was supposed to be funny…

  34. #171557
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:33 am, keylime said:

    No, I don’t think banning them from travel is appropriate. Just because they had an error in judgment does not exclude them from coming to and fro.

    What I do think tho is, the USBF’s funding comes directly from the ACBL, and thusly there is a strong notion of damage to reputation and status for U.S. bridge in general, which is starting to make a comeback with youth and mid-aged (I am nearly 32 for the record) coming into and staying in the agme.

  35. #171560
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:33 am, 2manybooks2littletime said:

    #10, I totally agree. I have an 8 yr old and a 5 year old and they have both heard me talk to them about the consequences of their actions.

    She looses income~she’ll think next time before she does this again won’t she?

  36. #171562
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:34 am, Antaradus said:

    I’m French. I can reassure everybody on this site that this has gone unreported here in France, so whatever these card players were hoping to achieve it has certainly gone unnoticed on this side of the Atlantic.

    As a Frenchman, I would also like to call upon US liberals to stop using our country for airing their weedy opinions about how they want the US to be run.

    They don’t seem to realise that their opinions carry little to no interest here.

  37. #171567
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:38 am, John Lee Pedimore said:

    “Doc,those little blue pills you gave me work really good,in fact a little too good,I’ve had an erection for 3 days.”

    “Don’t worry,we have a cure for that now,I want you too look at this photo…..”

    JLP

  38. #171570
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:39 am, Armigerous said:

    Sounds like these airheads bid 7 no trump and were set 6 tricks,doubled,redoubled and vulnerable

  39. #171572
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:41 am, RyanInSanJose said:

    I guess Laura Ingraham has another book to write..

  40. #171573
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:41 am, backwoods conservative said:

    Kevin, I think it’s one of those things that’s too painfully true to be funny. One of the reasons I’m so eternally grateful to our military is they keep me from living in a country where protesters would be treated like that.

  41. #171581
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:48 am, traveler49 said:

    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:38 am, John Lee Pedimore said:
    “Doc,those little blue pills you gave me work really good,in fact a little too good,I’ve had an erection for 3 days.”

    “Don’t worry,we have a cure for that now,I want you too look at this photo…..”

    Stop it, I can’t quit laughing. Oh yah, I’ll look at the photo. Good advice.

  42. #171591
    On November 14th, 2007 at 11:59 am, puhiawa said:

    I do not need this moonbat apologising for me or my country. Can you imagine? This woman is apologising for her country to a communist Chinese regime. Is she crazy?

  43. #171607
    On November 14th, 2007 at 12:14 pm, gippergirl said:

    Ahhhh yes, Shanghai, China…….a lovely place where freedom is highly valued. The moonbat should stay there. They deserve each other.

  44. #171608
    On November 14th, 2007 at 12:16 pm, gippergirl said:

    I do not need this moonbat apologising for me or my country. Can you imagine? This woman is apologising for her country to a communist Chinese regime. Is she crazy?

    did you not read her little sign???

  45. #171621
    On November 14th, 2007 at 12:32 pm, Radiojoe1470 said:

    Aww c’mon folks. These ladies were taking a lot of heat about our country’s actions, and they just didn’t want to be viewed as “Ugly Americans.”

    Their mistake was that what they really needed was a much bigger sign to stand behind!

  46. #171628
    On November 14th, 2007 at 12:38 pm, greenfairie said:

    “I earn my living from bridge, and a substantial part of that from being hired to compete in high-level competitions,” Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    I hear Code Pink is hiring.

  47. #171635
    On November 14th, 2007 at 12:44 pm, feebiebabe said:

    The proposed sanctions would hurt the team’s playing members financially. “I earn my living from bridge, and a substantial part of that from being hired to compete in high-level competitions,” Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    Not so BRAVE are you know there, Debbie? That’s right, you have freedom of speech….but it comes with a price tag- Boo Freakin’ Hoo. What a moron!

    What could have been said instead of the BS sign to all those “other” countries questioning American Politics:

    1. “Thank you for your concern, but I do not wish to engage in a political discussion. Care for a mint?”

    2. “I don’t feel this is an appropriate forum to discuss politics, care for a mint?”

    3. “I don’t talk politics in public, thank you”.

    4. “You worry about my country, I’ll worry about mine”.

    5. “Kiss my grits”.

    On another note, just to clarify, this is a women’s bridge team right, ….oh, no, no I can’t….its just too easy….:-D

  48. #171661
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:08 pm, trinitytim said:

    I think these girls went A Bridge Too Far

  49. #171666
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:13 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    backwoods conservative,

    Most good humor has a grain of truth to it. This one has more than a grain. I am not sorry.

    ****UPCOMING ATTEMPT AT HUMOR ALERT****

    Marines, as well as members of the other “lesser” branches of service, (now laugh, relax, and begin to breathe normally again) sometimes find the humor in things that others either don’t see, can’t see, or refuse to see. Sometimes we military folks even laugh at things that shouldn’t be funny. I don’t think that this was one of those things, but I could be wrong.

    At least conservativesRus thought I was being “insightful”… GEEZ.

  50. #171668
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:14 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    And by “this one” I didn’t mean the upcoming one, I meant my previous one, to which you referred earlier.

  51. #171671
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:18 pm, ajmontana said:

    trinitytim said:
    I think these girls went A Bridge Too Far

    I’m thinkin,
    A bridge over troubled waters

  52. #171675
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:24 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Bridge to Terabithia

  53. #171679
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:26 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Lost bridge while flappin’ jaws?

  54. #171685
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:32 pm, trinitytim said:

    Instead of trying to Bridge the Gap, they should’ve just “Run Silent, Run Deep”

  55. #171691
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:37 pm, PeterX said:

    I play poker as a serious side. There’s a strict rule at all tables: No politics, period.

    Bridge players, be the Dem. Rep., Lib, whatever, should should STFU and play cards.

  56. #171692
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:38 pm, PeterX said:

    And if you’re going to punny people:

    A Bridge That’s Gone Too Far

  57. #171694
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:39 pm, gippergirl said:

    methinks this is a great photoshop opportunity………I ask the great people of MM: what SHOULD her sign say???

  58. #171700
    On November 14th, 2007 at 1:43 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #57 – oh again, no, no, I just can’t…its just too easy!

    bbwwwwaaaahhhhh ha ha ha :-D

  59. #171721
    On November 14th, 2007 at 2:01 pm, TexasTiger said:

    They say every dog has its day…

  60. #171730
    On November 14th, 2007 at 2:07 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    We didn’t vote for Bush.

    So, they would rather have had that self proclaimed “meteorologist” and “inventor of the internet”, Al Gore, to have been president. Good Grief!

  61. #171736
    On November 14th, 2007 at 2:09 pm, Gator70 said:

    I had no idea one could make a living playing bridge, and the money is good enough for it to be your principle income. What the he** have I been doing with my life? Oh and I tried to do a bridges of madison county joke, but couldnt think of anything.

  62. #171747
    On November 14th, 2007 at 2:14 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #61 – that was probably because Meryl Streep was in the movie…. ;-)

  63. #171755
    On November 14th, 2007 at 2:24 pm, Laree said:

    I was a registered Democrat and I didn’t vote Dem…that’s sad..sadder for the Dems, I still wouldn’t change my vote.

  64. #171799
    On November 14th, 2007 at 3:12 pm, Radiojoe1470 said:

    On a side note, I thought Jamie Farr stopped crossdressing when M*A*S*H* stopped filming.

    I will say he looks good for 73, though.

  65. #171857
    On November 14th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    My God! they are ugly. Just went back to the top and saw them. ” The horror…..The horor”

  66. #171860
    On November 14th, 2007 at 4:22 pm, lonewolf said:

    They get no sympathy from me that they jeopardized their livelihood. Anyone who exploits a non-political forum to make a political statement should expect undesireable consequences.

  67. #171889
    On November 14th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, DesertLover said:

    aj and trinitytim

    More like they were standing on The Bridge on the River Kwai or were on The Bridges at Toko-Ri … both of which fell out from under them …

  68. #171940
    On November 14th, 2007 at 5:10 pm, Rational Thought said:

    Send the board members of the bridge federation that sent them there as representatives of the US a message. I just did. This is what I said:

    Dear Sirs and Madams:

    As an American, I am appalled at the actions of your American team at the world bridge championships regarding the slur about President George Bush. They were there playing as representatives of our nation, and George Bush is our president. They showed an extreme lack of class, decorum, and basic manners. They are, in short, a national embarrassment. They proved themselves to be unfit representatives of our nation who have wholly trivialized the endeavors of your organization. Quite frankly, they should play for another country, one of which they can be proud representatives. You do not travel abroad to represent your nation, and then spit on your nation to the glory of the foreign press in attendance. What nasty, petty people these women are. I hope your sanctions of them are swift and severe. They do not deserve the honor you have bestowed upon them as ambassadors of our nation in the bridge-playing world.

    board@usbf.org

  69. #172019
    On November 14th, 2007 at 6:13 pm, zorro said:

    Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    Too late to worry about that now.

  70. #172141
    On November 14th, 2007 at 8:27 pm, 29Victor said:

    “What we were trying to say, not to Americans but to our friends from other countries, was that we understand that they are questioning and critical of what our country is doing these days, and we want you to know that we, too, are critical,”

    This was not at all them trying to let anyone “know that we, too, are critical.” It wasn’t critical of Bush at all.

    This was an attempt by the ladies to distance themselves from the criticism that they had heard at the tournament, an attempt to “wash their hands” of what America is doing right now.

    It was an appology for being an American.

  71. #172461
    On November 15th, 2007 at 10:25 am, Wade said:

    It continues to amaze me that any American Jew would be against the war against very people who want the destruction of Israel. Is this another case of I have mine the hell with everyone else?

  72. #172468
    On November 15th, 2007 at 10:34 am, Wade said:

    Debbie Rosenberg, a team member, said. “So being barred would directly affect much of my ability to earn a living.”

    So would being exterminated which the enemy of the USA wants to do to you.

  73. #199346
    On December 19th, 2007 at 2:55 pm, jungatheart said:

    What I don’t get is most liberals seem proud to be liberal. If I was a liberal, I’d keep my mouth shut about it fearing someone would ask me what I do believe in.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Charlie Sheen demands meeting with Obama on ‘9/11 cover-up’

September 9, 2009 03:37 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Wild thing

Selective outrage of the MSM

August 13, 2009 07:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 36 Trackbacks

How quickly they forget

August 4, 2009 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 35 Trackbacks

Diagnosis: Advanced stage of BDS

March 16, 2009 10:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“Patriot or crackpot?”

Post-traumatic BDS syndrome

February 2, 2009 05:16 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Missing W.

Parting shot

January 20, 2009 11:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

116 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

BDS lives.

Iraqi shoe-thrower seeks asylum in Switzerland

January 19, 2009 11:40 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Give me your poor, your tired, your Bush-deranged.

AP’s final dig at President Bush

January 15, 2009 09:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments | 18 Trackbacks


Categories: Bush Derangement Syndrome



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom