The centrifuges working at Natanz can only be producing ingredients for nuclear warheads. Baradei should tell that truth to the Iranian people and the world at large.”

Baradei’s ruse has become evident to US war planners. Only Condi believes what that guano purveyor says. I am glad he is ham fistedly manipulating the deck in Iran’s favor. It’s one more reason to unleash hell.

Take Katie Couric and the View Crew while they are at it.

War is not the answer, but it certainly raises far more interesting questions than the garden variations of “How far do you want us to bend over?”

Don’t hose me, Bro.

Marshall Russ said:
I love the bumper sticker that says,”WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER” I want a bumper sticker that says,”THAT DEPENDS ON WHAT THE QUESTION IS”. Haven’t found one yet.

How about “SO WHAT IS THE ANSWER?”
That sum’s it up because they have no answer’s.

My brother gave me a t shirt during Desert Storm I, from 53rd TFW it has a skull with a pilot’s helmet and an f-16 flying through the eye socket it reads

Desert Storm
When Diplomacy Failed

sorry folks that’s the answer war in some form.

“He should also expose Ahmadinejad’s bogus claim that Iran is enriching uranium as fuel for power stations. Iran has no nuclear power plants and thus has no need of enriched uranium. The only nuclear plant under construction is to be completed by Russians at an unspecified date. But the uranium enriched by Iran at Natanz isn’t suitable for that plant, which needs a specific type of fuel – the specifications for which Moscow has refused to give to Tehran.

Because nuclear fuel has a lifespan of three to four years, the Natanz uranium can’t be intended for any of the 22 nuclear power plants that Ahmadinejad says he wants to build in Iran over the next 25 years. If told that the centrifuges are working to train Iranian scientists, Baradei should know that, at the level of scientific research, Iran already could enrich uranium in 1978.

The centrifuges working at Natanz can only be producing ingredients for nuclear warheads. Baradei should tell that truth to the Iranian people and the world at large.”

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11142007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/a_blind_eye_on_irans_nukes_619604.htm?page=0

You got that right.

This unwillingness to confront the real troublemakers manifests itself in another type of behavior that really bugs me–people getting all over the cops when a high speed chase ends tragically, and not saying a word about the ones who were running from them. High speed chases would be avoided altogether if the people with the blue lights behind them would just pull over.

No, people like these wimps on the left would rather dish out their wrath on the good guys, secure in the knowledge that they won’t come come to harm from doing so.

You mentioned in comment #28 that you want to hear their answers. You were right to use the plural, “answers.” Every anti-war knucklehead to whom you pose the question will give you a different answer, because none of them actually know what war is.

(Speaking generally now)

I am not pro-war, but I am pro-this-war, and I am pro-stopping-Iran. No one WANTS to go to war just for the sake of going to war, but sometimes you need to speak their language, and it seems that they don’t speak “dialogue,” “diplomacy,” “sanctions,” or “six party talks.” They did show us in Beirut, Africa, NYC (twice), DC, and Shanksville that they do speak “war,” so that’s what it’s gotta be. We need to end all the red tape and let loose with a fury the world has never seen before.

Trinity Tim,

God bless you. Thank you for your heroic service. Marine? Army?

But they won’t. They are cowards who haven’t a clue as to the real reasons we are at war. It just shows that their real issue is a fundamental and deep rooted hatred of this country, and that inside, they actually support everything our enemies are doing, including the long awaited mass genocide of Israel and those darn pesky Jews. They just don’t know when they aren’t wanted, apparently. How dare they try to live in the land of their ancestors in peace.

On November 14th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, DesertLover said:
Toes

Actually Stanford changed their team name to “The Cardinal” … as in a cardinal number rather than an ordinal number … has nothing to do with birds or the color red …

And I am not a Stanford graduate …

I agree – you are not a Stanford graduate. Good joke, though, if that was intended. Do I smell a Cal bear??

Cardinal is offically the color.

And The Farm gets mentioned twice today. What is the world coming to??

From the Stanford Review: How Are We Doing in Iraq?

bnelson44 on November 14, 2007 at 1:00 PM

Stangrad ‘61

Just fyi: Tristan is a guy.

Good, you caught it. I’m a little late with this, but:
Tristan, Gaelic for Tumult. Quite the pot stirrer, eh? Living up to his name. Good on him.