Did You Know...

   

SCOTUS takes up the D.C. gun case

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  November 20, 2007 01:15 PM

Yes. After waiting a week on pins and needles, the Supreme Court has decided to take up the D.C. handgun case:

The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will decide whether the District of Columbia can ban handguns, a case that could produce the most in-depth examination of the constitutional right to “keep and bear arms” in nearly 70 years.

The justices’ decision to hear the case could make the divisive debate over guns an issue in the 2008 presidential and congressional elections.

The government of Washington, D.C., is asking the court to uphold its 31-year ban on handgun ownership in the face of a federal appeals court ruling that struck down the ban as incompatible with the Second Amendment. Tuesday’s announcement was widely expected, especially after both the District and the man who challenged the handgun ban asked for the high court review.

The main issue before the justices is whether the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects an individual’s right to own guns or instead merely sets forth the collective right of states to maintain militias. The former interpretation would permit fewer restrictions on gun ownership.

Gun-control advocates say the Second amendment was intended to insure that states could maintain militias, a response to 18th century fears of an all-powerful national government. Gun rights proponents contend the amendment gives individuals the right to keep guns for private uses, including self-defense.

Alan Gura, a lawyer for the D.C. residents who challenged the ban, said he was pleased that the justices were considering the case.

Allah: “Two hundred seventeen years after ratification, we finally get to find out what ‘well regulated militia’ means.”

SCOTUSblog:

After a hiatus of 68 years, the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to rule on the meaning of the Second Amendment — the hotly contested part of the Constitution that guarantees “a right to keep and bear arms.” Not since 1939 has the Court heard a case directly testing the Amendment’s scope — and there is a debate about whether it actually decided anything in that earlier ruling. In a sense, the Court may well be writing on a clean slate if, in the end, it decides the ultimate question: does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual right to have a gun for private use, or does it only guarantee a collective right to have guns in an organized military force such as a state National Guard unit?

Posted in: Guns

Joe Biden still go-to guy for making a fool of himself about guns

November 14, 2017 07:57 PM by Doug Powers

“Shotgun Joe” at it again

Yowza: USA Today confirms why media and gun tutorials are a toxic mix

November 8, 2017 06:26 PM by Doug Powers

Embarrassing

Dems’ NRA/GOP-bashing narrative collapses under weight of reality

November 7, 2017 10:23 AM by Doug Powers

Inconvenient facts

Chuck Schumer knows when attacks should and shouldn’t be politicized

November 2, 2017 09:02 AM by Doug Powers

Big time

Nancy Pelosi speaks the truth (!?)

October 8, 2017 09:52 AM by Doug Powers

Pass her gun control measures to find out what’s in them


Categories: Guns, Nancy Pelosi