<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire moves up primary to January 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:18:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 78c94ba9e616be317608</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-189885</link>
		<dc:creator>78c94ba9e616be317608</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-189885</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;78c94ba9e616be317608...&lt;/strong&gt;

78c94ba9e616...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>78c94ba9e616be317608&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>78c94ba9e616&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The TIW Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Hampshire: Earliest Primary</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-178201</link>
		<dc:creator>The TIW Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Hampshire: Earliest Primary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-178201</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more about that HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more about that HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-178200</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-178200</guid>
		<description>This is a freaking waste of our time. I am sick of all these liars (especially the Democrat liars) and criminals (especially the Democrat criminals). All these date changes are making a mockery of a system that has already earned the disdain of intelligent Americans.

As far as the conventions go, they are nothing but a useless charade (for both sides). They are scripted, predictable, boring, and useless. So don&#039;t have conventions and have the primaries at reasonable and traditional intervals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a freaking waste of our time. I am sick of all these liars (especially the Democrat liars) and criminals (especially the Democrat criminals). All these date changes are making a mockery of a system that has already earned the disdain of intelligent Americans.</p>
<p>As far as the conventions go, they are nothing but a useless charade (for both sides). They are scripted, predictable, boring, and useless. So don&#8217;t have conventions and have the primaries at reasonable and traditional intervals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertLover</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-178087</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-178087</guid>
		<description>I would like to pose a question ... 

There is a strong probability that the candidates for the general election will be selected by sometime in February ... so what happens immediately after that ... 

They can not qualify for nor receive any federal election matching funds until after their conventions because that is when they are officially named as their party&#039;s candidate ... 

So ...

Does that mean we might get a lull in the BS ads and such until after the conventions in the summer? ... 

These idiots kept pushing these dates up as a means of keeping their Bush bashing on the front pages of the MSM ... that isn&#039;t working because we are winning in Iraq ... and the word is getting out despite their efforts to keep that from happening ... 

So ...

It made me wonder if they have even taken into consideration what they are going to do between these ridiculously  early primaries and the conventions ... 

Anyone seen anything regarding that side of this stupidity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to pose a question &#8230; </p>
<p>There is a strong probability that the candidates for the general election will be selected by sometime in February &#8230; so what happens immediately after that &#8230; </p>
<p>They can not qualify for nor receive any federal election matching funds until after their conventions because that is when they are officially named as their party&#8217;s candidate &#8230; </p>
<p>So &#8230;</p>
<p>Does that mean we might get a lull in the BS ads and such until after the conventions in the summer? &#8230; </p>
<p>These idiots kept pushing these dates up as a means of keeping their Bush bashing on the front pages of the MSM &#8230; that isn&#8217;t working because we are winning in Iraq &#8230; and the word is getting out despite their efforts to keep that from happening &#8230; </p>
<p>So &#8230;</p>
<p>It made me wonder if they have even taken into consideration what they are going to do between these ridiculously  early primaries and the conventions &#8230; </p>
<p>Anyone seen anything regarding that side of this stupidity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-178073</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-178073</guid>
		<description>I am looking forward to a December Meltdown, whose campaigns are going to make it through ???? Whose campaigns are in trouble but the MSM, has been covering their collective tails? Whose going to be left standing, when the dust clears, these political folks are getting their knives out. Be careful what you ask for Christmas. GAME ON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking forward to a December Meltdown, whose campaigns are going to make it through ???? Whose campaigns are in trouble but the MSM, has been covering their collective tails? Whose going to be left standing, when the dust clears, these political folks are getting their knives out. Be careful what you ask for Christmas. GAME ON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan-of-Vermont</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-178013</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan-of-Vermont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-178013</guid>
		<description>Vermont should be the same day as New Hampshire, but I&#039;m not sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vermont should be the same day as New Hampshire, but I&#8217;m not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At this rate, the 2008 election will be held yesterday &#171; THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177990</link>
		<dc:creator>At this rate, the 2008 election will be held yesterday &#171; THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177990</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177932</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177932</guid>
		<description>Is it the day after election day--the general, not the primaries--yet??  I&#039;m sick of all the selfish political pandering stuff by the candidates and their parties NOW.  I may have to try to get deployed overseas somewhere in the next few months to escape.

The rule we should implement is that nobody can run until the actual year of the election (for a regular November election).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it the day after election day&#8211;the general, not the primaries&#8211;yet??  I&#8217;m sick of all the selfish political pandering stuff by the candidates and their parties NOW.  I may have to try to get deployed overseas somewhere in the next few months to escape.</p>
<p>The rule we should implement is that nobody can run until the actual year of the election (for a regular November election).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertLover</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177927</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177927</guid>
		<description>backwoods conservative 

true ... but I can still dream ... :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>backwoods conservative </p>
<p>true &#8230; but I can still dream &#8230; <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backwoods conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177913</link>
		<dc:creator>backwoods conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177913</guid>
		<description>#3 DesertLover

Nobody&#039;s going to put a plan like that into effect. It makes too much sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 DesertLover</p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s going to put a plan like that into effect. It makes too much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177911</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177911</guid>
		<description>This backward crawl of the primaries will effectively shorten the next president&#039;s term by forcing the campaigns to begin in early 2011.  In other words, the sitting POTUS will have to stop governing and start campaigning halfway through his term.

On the other hand, earlier primaries would justify holding an earlier general election.  I propose a constitutional amendment that all Federal elections be held on April 15.

chsw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This backward crawl of the primaries will effectively shorten the next president&#8217;s term by forcing the campaigns to begin in early 2011.  In other words, the sitting POTUS will have to stop governing and start campaigning halfway through his term.</p>
<p>On the other hand, earlier primaries would justify holding an earlier general election.  I propose a constitutional amendment that all Federal elections be held on April 15.</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177897</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177897</guid>
		<description>To me, the length of the campaign is quite insane, so I humbly submit my suggestions for change &lt;a href=&quot;http://monoblogue.us/?p=729&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

The lag time we have in 2008 between the selection and conventions will feature some of the worst mudslinging we&#039;ll ever see, and it&#039;s all so not necessary. I predict the pundits will be wringing their hands next November wondering why turnout was so low, when the answer is the complete burnout on the campaign the average voter will have. Here in Maryland we may do a little better because of two hot ballot issues (legalizing slot machines and adopting early voting) but nationally people will likely skip the process and that&#039;s a crying shame.

Michael Swartz
www.monoblogue.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the length of the campaign is quite insane, so I humbly submit my suggestions for change <a href="http://monoblogue.us/?p=729" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>The lag time we have in 2008 between the selection and conventions will feature some of the worst mudslinging we&#8217;ll ever see, and it&#8217;s all so not necessary. I predict the pundits will be wringing their hands next November wondering why turnout was so low, when the answer is the complete burnout on the campaign the average voter will have. Here in Maryland we may do a little better because of two hot ballot issues (legalizing slot machines and adopting early voting) but nationally people will likely skip the process and that&#8217;s a crying shame.</p>
<p>Michael Swartz<br />
<a href="http://www.monoblogue.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.monoblogue.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 43 campaigning days left to the caucuses</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177891</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 43 campaigning days left to the caucuses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177891</guid>
		<description>[...] from the one year mark to the 2008 general election (next November 4th), and read (thanks to Michelle Malkin) that the Iowa caucuses will be held January 3rd and the first primary in New Hampshire January [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the one year mark to the 2008 general election (next November 4th), and read (thanks to Michelle Malkin) that the Iowa caucuses will be held January 3rd and the first primary in New Hampshire January [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbarry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177871</link>
		<dc:creator>nbarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177871</guid>
		<description>It means that the states with primaries close behind the first states will enjoy only brief advertising blitzes before the media return to normal. Hallelujah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means that the states with primaries close behind the first states will enjoy only brief advertising blitzes before the media return to normal. Hallelujah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/comment-page-1/#comment-177863</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/21/new-hampshire-moves-up-primary-to-january-8/#comment-177863</guid>
		<description>I hope it ends up a tie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it ends up a tie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
