The Annapolis folly: No handshakes

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 23, 2007 05:20 PM

annapolis summit
Logo credit: Ellen Horowitz

The build-up to the letdown continues. I’m talking about the Annapolis Mideast Peace Capitulation Summit. Arab nations, including Saudi Arabia, have announced they’ll “grudgingly” attend. But they are already warning they won’t be publicly shaking any hands. Of course not:

Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations grudgingly agreed Friday to attend next week’s U.S.-sponsored Mideast peace conference, despite failing to get any guarantee of Israeli concessions.

In a sign of the skepticism, even among close U.S. allies, the Saudi foreign minister cautioned that there would be no public handshakes with Israeli officials at the gathering Tuesday in Annapolis, Md.

Still, the Arab League’s decision to participate marked a success for the United States, which had pushed hard for regional powerhouse Saudi Arabia to attend the conference.

It was unclear whether another key player, Syria, would show up, even though it was part of the Arab League’s collective decision to participate.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said his government was waiting to see if the agenda addressed its priority issue β€” the return of the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war. U.S. officials have said Syria would be free to raise any issue it wants.

The meeting will include discussions on a “comprehensive” Arab-Israel peace deal. But it is mainly intended to launch Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations after a lull of seven years, and Washington had pushed for a strong Arab presence to show support.

Arab leaders made clear they were on board in part to ensure that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas does not make any damaging concessions to Israel in any negotiations on a final peace deal. Israel has dangled the possibility of an accord as early as the end of 2008.

The NYSun wisely warns against Clintonian legacy-seeking:

As Mr. Bush and his state secretary near their final year in office, there is a natural tendency to grasp for a legacy. But we have been down that road before, to disastrous effect. President Clinton’s desperation at Camp David demonstrated that a final Arab-Israeli settlement with this Palestinian Arab leadership is chimerical. Better to invest the energy and time of the principals in dealing with the Iranian, Saudi, and Syrian threats, while leaving the details between the Israelis and the Palestinian Arabs to lower-level functionaries, and pursuing β€” at a strategic level β€” the standing of those Palestinian Arabs who are prepared to place a bet on free markets and liberal democracy.

* * *

Our own hope for Mr. Bush’s final year in office lies with his second inaugural, in which he picked up on themes laid down by President Kennedy, in his own inaugural (as we discussed in an editorial at the time that ran under a the headline “John Fitzgerald Bush.” The most stirring phrases from Mr. Bush’s speech were those that seemed aimed almost directly at the unfree people’s overseas, those in the dungeons who were looking for signs from America that it understood their plight and was on their side. We recall the writings of Natan Sharansky about how he took inspiration from the hard line being pursued by President Reagan. The danger at Annapolis will be in sending the opposite signal, that America is prepared, while people are still in dungeons, to meet with the tyrants who are keeping them there. It may be true that Israel herself is desiring a dialog with its enemies. But quite apart from the workaday details of the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, Mr. Bush and his envoys will need to be careful of the signals they send at Annapolis, lest dispirit the very partisans of freedom we want to be helping.

***

Dore Gold asks: “Is U.S. Policy Changing on Israel’s Rights in a Peace Settlement?”

At the Jerusalem Post, Ehud Olmert gets a turkey award.

Caroline Glick
: American Folly

Posted in: Israel

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Tel-Chai Nation
  2. Rhymes With Right
  3. Einladung nach Annapolis « abseits vom mainstream
  4. Annapolis: La taza de recuerdo: Si Annapolis falla rompeme! « NUEVA EUROPA
  5. The Radio Patriot

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #178435
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 5:31 pm, Grayhawk said:

    I’ll just wait for Al Jazeera West (NYT, etc) to tint the facts. Newspapers you would only grab for use with your left hand. Oops, tint–>taint

  2. #178438
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 5:36 pm, et said:

    No handshakes, then I suppose kisses are out of the question.

  3. #178466
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 6:41 pm, brooklyn red said:

    This is the one issue I just can not joke about. Dialogue with an enemy is nothing short of surrender. Soon we will be negotiating a caliphate in Europe. Then in Canada. This is an outrage!

    To arms!, to arms!

    Whew! I feel better now.

  4. #178469
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 6:47 pm, Nancy said:

    If I had a million dollars, i would not hesitate to bet, that this summit will fail miserably. Such a waste of time.

  5. #178477
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 7:00 pm, beenthere said:

    Legacy seeking is just one more service the ClinBush administration offers. As we watch, we get to see Condi Rice doing her Mad Albrite impression one more time (and she’s become quite good at it over the years) along with all the other hopeless Peter-Principle State Department eunuchs who view Carter as their moral ideal. This is as gross and nauseating a spectacle as we could ever fear to see. What is so exasperating is not that the Republicans (the Party of Stupid) never learn, but that they are incapable of learning.

    Maybe we need a Putin ourselves, or at least a military takeover. Sorry if that offends. Got any better ideas?

  6. #178481
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 7:05 pm, DaMav said:

    It is hard for me to complain that Bush and Rice are selling Israel down the river when Olmert is in the captain’s cabin demanding more steam for the trip over the falls.

  7. #178494
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 7:36 pm, graysonret said:

    Reminds me of the Carter attempts at mideast peace…

  8. #178500
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 7:46 pm, Boomer said:

    Talk about a waste of freaking time! I full expect this peace conference to be a successful as any other (i.e. a total failure).

  9. #178511
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 8:10 pm, bit_boy said:

    guarantee of Israeli concessions

    May we call this mess Bush’s last betrayal (jpost.com/Glick: pre-conference leaked documents show the US firmly backs the Palestinians against Israel).

    The Arab arguments always demand land for nothing, and then kill the Jews, push them into the sea. Nothing has changed in this Mideast Peace Capitulation Summit. What should be offered is a Palestinian State in Australia. Already the largest assembly of Palestinians in the world.

    It just makes me wonder how stupid are Bush and Condo. A pair of matching hammers in a bag.

  10. #178535
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 8:41 pm, brooklyn red said:

    There is a Palestinian state it is called Jersey City Jordan.

    There are also defense treaties in place that should be honored.

    This is such BS.

  11. #178536
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 8:42 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Does ANYONE in BIG government remember 9-11-2001?!!!The Saudis are NOT our friends.

  12. #178565
    On November 23rd, 2007 at 10:01 pm, zorro said:

    I am willing to allow the Bush Administration to surprise me for change. There have been threats against this meeting. They must be taken seriously. Annapolis is one of my favorite old cities, I’d hate for something terrible to happen that would be forever associated with that beautiful city. I, for one, will be praying for success. And Michelle, if you are going to cover the meeting, please keep you head down and your eyes up.

  13. #179320
    On November 25th, 2007 at 5:36 pm, Prime Director said:

    Speaking of appeasement, Check out this classic Zuckerman ad .

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Keep digging, Rev. Wright: Them Zionists

June 11, 2009 04:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

Clarifying.

Picture of the day: Burning Obama’s flag

January 13, 2009 11:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

91 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

Yes, they can.

“It’s Israeli Double Standard Time, which only occurs on days that end with a ‘y.’”

January 9, 2009 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

74 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Plus: A warning about UNICEF.

Joe the Plumber heads to Israel

January 7, 2009 12:52 PM by Michelle Malkin

83 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

About that Israeli strike on the UN “school” Updated

January 6, 2009 12:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

215 Comments | 28 Trackbacks

The old human shield ploy.

Sunday morning round-up

January 4, 2009 07:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

61 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Jew-hatred in San Francisco

January 3, 2009 10:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Another one bites the dust in Gaza

January 3, 2009 11:38 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 7 Trackbacks


Categories: Israel



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom