<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Displays of Clinton Affection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Unicorns, Leprechauns, and Democrats Who Admire Fox News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-317395</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Unicorns, Leprechauns, and Democrats Who Admire Fox News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-317395</guid>
		<description>[...] in Philadelphia last October, the press treated Mrs. Clinton like Miss America on the day after winning her crown (with occasional help from a plant or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Philadelphia last October, the press treated Mrs. Clinton like Miss America on the day after winning her crown (with occasional help from a plant or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen444</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-182986</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen444</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-182986</guid>
		<description>Carole Simpson was the moderator of the 1992 presidential debate where the guy with the pony tail asked an idiotic question about looking to the president as a father who would take care of us like we&#039;re his children.  At the time, there was a lot of commentary that Bush I got sandbagged in that debate.  How did Bush I&#039;s team ever go along with Simpson being the moderator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carole Simpson was the moderator of the 1992 presidential debate where the guy with the pony tail asked an idiotic question about looking to the president as a father who would take care of us like we&#8217;re his children.  At the time, there was a lot of commentary that Bush I got sandbagged in that debate.  How did Bush I&#8217;s team ever go along with Simpson being the moderator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-180245</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-180245</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Oprah decided to campaign as a counter to Simpleton shilling for cHillary.  So who&#039;s got the badder mama jama vote getter? ;)

Plus, here&#039;s my Dennis Miller impersonation: &quot;Speaking of cajones; cHillary may have Blitzer&#039;s testicles in her lockbox, but apparently Oprah helped Obama find his.  Meanwhile, Edwards has blue one in each America.&quot;

Hehe, this is too funny watching the Dems duke it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Oprah decided to campaign as a counter to Simpleton shilling for cHillary.  So who&#8217;s got the badder mama jama vote getter? <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Plus, here&#8217;s my Dennis Miller impersonation: &#8220;Speaking of cajones; cHillary may have Blitzer&#8217;s testicles in her lockbox, but apparently Oprah helped Obama find his.  Meanwhile, Edwards has blue one in each America.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hehe, this is too funny watching the Dems duke it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mookie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-180127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-180127</guid>
		<description>#28 &amp; 29, relax, would you? It was a joke referencing Fred&#039;s interview with Chris Wallace where he complained about Fox cheering on Rudy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28 &amp; 29, relax, would you? It was a joke referencing Fred&#8217;s interview with Chris Wallace where he complained about Fox cheering on Rudy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-180051</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-180051</guid>
		<description>Supposedly Tucker is being axed for low ratings but this is MSNBC, he hardly has the only low rated show on this Network so why does the only Conservative voice on MSNBC have to go right now? We are getting close to the primarys and MSNBC is feeling the love for Hillary. Hillary&#039;s poll numbers are dragging. I am sure many of you watched the video of Tucker Carlson calling out Waldman about Hillary&#039;s taking credit for establishing Media Matters. We are all supposed to think that Media Matters, doesn&#039;t have anything to do with Tucker getting the axe at MSNBC? yeah right!

http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/save-tucker/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposedly Tucker is being axed for low ratings but this is MSNBC, he hardly has the only low rated show on this Network so why does the only Conservative voice on MSNBC have to go right now? We are getting close to the primarys and MSNBC is feeling the love for Hillary. Hillary&#8217;s poll numbers are dragging. I am sure many of you watched the video of Tucker Carlson calling out Waldman about Hillary&#8217;s taking credit for establishing Media Matters. We are all supposed to think that Media Matters, doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with Tucker getting the axe at MSNBC? yeah right!</p>
<p><a href="http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/save-tucker/" rel="nofollow">http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/save-tucker/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-180030</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-180030</guid>
		<description>....but they&#039;er chicken, sorry typing too fast but when the Democrats do go on Fox, they have so many ground rules for appearing, you would think they were visiting Syria or something...oh I forgot Nancy Pelosi, likes to visit Syria...the enemy of her enemy GRIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.but they&#8217;er chicken, sorry typing too fast but when the Democrats do go on Fox, they have so many ground rules for appearing, you would think they were visiting Syria or something&#8230;oh I forgot Nancy Pelosi, likes to visit Syria&#8230;the enemy of her enemy GRIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-180027</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-180027</guid>
		<description>I thought Fox liked Huckabee? I think they all get a turn on Fox if they ask for it? Then it is up to them how they come off to the public? The Dems could do the samething but their chicken!! to go on any network, that isn&#039;t provided with talking points from Media Matters...who took credit for establishing Media Matters, why Hillary Clinton at at Kos Convention. Tucker Carlson pointed it out and now the word is Tucker&#039;s neck is on the block...oh BIG SUPRISE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Fox liked Huckabee? I think they all get a turn on Fox if they ask for it? Then it is up to them how they come off to the public? The Dems could do the samething but their chicken!! to go on any network, that isn&#8217;t provided with talking points from Media Matters&#8230;who took credit for establishing Media Matters, why Hillary Clinton at at Kos Convention. Tucker Carlson pointed it out and now the word is Tucker&#8217;s neck is on the block&#8230;oh BIG SUPRISE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moran</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179989</guid>
		<description>Mookie:

First of all, stop parroting the talking points you find on liberal blogs. We can read them ourselves thank you.

Second, the idea that &quot;almost all of Fox&quot; is behind Rudy is absurd on its face. The Weekly Standard crew of Kristol and Barnes may be obvious about their support but I find no inherent bias FOR Rudy in their coverage.

He&#039;s the frontrunner so he&#039;s going to get a lot of coverage anyway. Plus, the idea that Murdoch or Ailes are actually reaching down to the reporter level and telling these guys what to write and say is ludicrous. It plays into the ridiculous &quot;corporate media&quot; narrative of the left and is just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mookie:</p>
<p>First of all, stop parroting the talking points you find on liberal blogs. We can read them ourselves thank you.</p>
<p>Second, the idea that &#8220;almost all of Fox&#8221; is behind Rudy is absurd on its face. The Weekly Standard crew of Kristol and Barnes may be obvious about their support but I find no inherent bias FOR Rudy in their coverage.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s the frontrunner so he&#8217;s going to get a lot of coverage anyway. Plus, the idea that Murdoch or Ailes are actually reaching down to the reporter level and telling these guys what to write and say is ludicrous. It plays into the ridiculous &#8220;corporate media&#8221; narrative of the left and is just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179970</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179970</guid>
		<description>Hey Mookie, all the rest of the media shills for the democrats don&#039;t you agree outside of Fox that is so does that mean you want all the TV media to shill for demos now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mookie, all the rest of the media shills for the democrats don&#8217;t you agree outside of Fox that is so does that mean you want all the TV media to shill for demos now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mookie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179869</guid>
		<description>Michelle, what about almost all of Fox News shilling for Rudy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, what about almost all of Fox News shilling for Rudy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suitably Flip</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179858</link>
		<dc:creator>Suitably Flip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179858</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Young Hillary&#039;s Communism Vitae...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Bush 41 campaign apparently knew most of this in 1992, but didn&#039;t use it because Hillary was the spouse of a candidate and therefore out of bounds (what a quaint notion)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Young Hillary&#8217;s Communism Vitae&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Bush 41 campaign apparently knew most of this in 1992, but didn&#8217;t use it because Hillary was the spouse of a candidate and therefore out of bounds (what a quaint notion)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 30 pcs of silver</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179829</link>
		<dc:creator>30 pcs of silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179829</guid>
		<description>News2Use, yes but she isn&#039;t supposed to come right out and say it. Lies and deception - well, those are staples of the Left. There is supposed to be an air of objectivity somewhere inside of her... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News2Use, yes but she isn&#8217;t supposed to come right out and say it. Lies and deception &#8211; well, those are staples of the Left. There is supposed to be an air of objectivity somewhere inside of her&#8230; <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclectic</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179821</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclectic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179821</guid>
		<description>Awesome article, Michelle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article, Michelle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179819</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179819</guid>
		<description>Speaking of love fest, Katie Curic is going to interview Hillary Clinton. I wonder what they will talk about? 

http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2007/11/katie-nails-hillary.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of love fest, Katie Curic is going to interview Hillary Clinton. I wonder what they will talk about? </p>
<p><a href="http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2007/11/katie-nails-hillary.html" rel="nofollow">http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2007/11/katie-nails-hillary.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/comment-page-1/#comment-179805</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/26/public-displays-of-clinton-affection/#comment-179805</guid>
		<description>I am confused because of the Nina Burleigh quote &quot;she would be happy to give President Clinton Oral Sex... Is Carole Simpson going to be stumping or humping for Clinton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused because of the Nina Burleigh quote &#8220;she would be happy to give President Clinton Oral Sex&#8230; Is Carole Simpson going to be stumping or humping for Clinton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

