“Ten Little Indians” play cancelled after NAACP protest

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 27, 2007 01:13 PM

***See update***

***

Following on the heels of the Denver diversity debacle, here’s another p.c. brouhaha of the day (via the Cincinatti Enquirer, hat tip – OrbusMax):

A widely performed school play has been canceled by Lakota officials after a recent meeting with a local NAACP official.

The internationally acclaimed play – Agatha Christie’s “Ten Little Indians” – was to be performed by students at Lakota East High School this weekend.

But Gary Hines, president of the local NAACP branch, recently complained to Lakota officials that the play, based on Christie’s 1939 mystery novel, was inappropriate for a school production.

Hines said the book’s original title and cover illustration used for its initial publishing that year in England was a racial slur toward blacks and included a cover illustration of a black person and a hangman’s noose.

“The original title was ‘Ten Little (N – - – - – -),’ and it is important to say that because that was the actual title,” Hines said Monday.

The title of the international bestseller was widely changed after 1939, and school theater productions in America have performed the murder mystery play as either “Ten Little Indians” or “And Then There Were None” for decades since.

Hines claims that a lack of racial diversity among Lakota’s students and teachers allowed the play to be chosen despite the history surrounding its original title.

“It’s a lack of diversity knowledge on their part. Diversity is not a way of life in Lakota,” Hines said.

Hines has a vested interest in manufacturing p.c. outrage. Guess what he does for a living? He’s a diversity consultant “who operates GPH Consultants – a diversity training company – in West Chester Township.” Of course!

I smell a cheesy diversity training video in the works…

***

Dan Riehl has some background on the evolution of the title of Christie’s play.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Riehl World View
  2. Michelle Malkin » Update: Lakota High School teen asks for help to put on “Ten Little Indians”
  3. La Shawn Barber's Corner
  4. Mike's Noise
  5. Movies With Numbers in Their Titles » Blog Archive » Michelle Malkin » “Ten Little Indians” play cancelled after NAACP …
  6. 6d7ae082e38cab331646

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #180603
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, John Ansell said:

    Just do a play called 10 little lesbians and you’re covered. No complaints

  2. #180604
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:18 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    What a load of p.c. garbage. Agatha Christie’s play is wonderful and the several movie versions (in black and white) are awsome.

    To turn around and not perform a true work of lititure(?) is the real crime. All this false indignation over so called insults and what may or may not be offensive is a crock.

    The real losers in this are the students for not geting to perform.

  3. #180606
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:19 pm, SHoward said:

    New Title suggestion: Ten Little Liberals.
    Plot: how dollars mysteriously keep disappearing from our wallets whenever they are around. That’s diverse, right?

  4. #180607
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:20 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Manufactured outrage about racism to line the company’s coffers. Yeah, that sounds about right.

  5. #180608
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:20 pm, WarTip said:

    Conflict of interest? Only if it is a conservative. Nothing to see here folks. Move along now!

  6. #180609
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:21 pm, WarTip said:

    (Afterthought) I knew we were in trouble once they started banning Samuel Clemens. If he were alive today, I bet money he would be jumping well clear of Calaveras County.

  7. #180610
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:22 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:17 pm, John Ansell said:
    Just do a play called 10 little lesbians and you’re covered. No complaints

    Rosie O’ showed how to hang from nooses.

    Oh, for goodness sake. If the NAACP is going to use history as an excuse, why are they not fighting for;

    The Bible being a text book in school
    Prayer in school
    The Ten Commandments in school

    I mean, by their reasoning, the children should know.

  8. #180611
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:22 pm, frizzbee said:

    Err…..pay me or else, or as this clown sells it, diversity…
    tsk, tsk……

  9. #180615
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:24 pm, right_on said:

    Now here’s a title for the play that no one (on the left) could object to…Ten Height-Challenged Whitey’s…

  10. #180620
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:28 pm, Buck I said:

    Was the original title “10 Little nig–rs” offensive, or are people after 1939 just cowtowing to the diversity/PC police. “Come on,it was just a title, loosen up”. How far should you take the anti-PC agenda. Cleaning up a pig, and changing it’s name doesn’t take the stank off of it. I wouldn’t complain to the press, or protest, but I wouldn’t watch this play, or let my kid be in it.

  11. #180622
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:29 pm, John Ansell said:

    Soon there will be no Goldie locks and the three little (Mohammed) Bears. Redheads will be upset as well as peta.

  12. #180624
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:32 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Life is hard and -everyone- discriminates. Let’s be honest.

    Conveniently, however, only caucasians seem to be capable of discrimination.

  13. #180625
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:33 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    Okay – I drive past this high school every day on my way to work, and it is a good school and in the ‘in demand’ school district in the area. Personally, I just think the outrage is manufactured over jealousy that Mr. Hines & his LULAC & CAIR buddies don’t have more control over the district.

    Although, I guess they’ve gained a smidgen more control now, haven’t they? :roll:

  14. #180626
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:34 pm, cmw2204 said:

    This happened near my hometown. It is crazy. Many are upset about the cancellation and you have the usual diversity drumbeaters screaming about racism. The big problem is that the area is affluent, mostly upper middle / upperclass. Given that, of course they are all racists. I have seen the play, the movie and read all of Agatha Christies novels. I didn’t see racism in any of them, but I look at the world with a different set of glasses.

  15. #180630
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:37 pm, RetFireman said:

    Wow…so now we get to pick and choose when we change the history of the country to suit our needs? Since when is it important to change the titles of things back to the original racist form to show how bad it was?

    Does this mean we need to change all the restaurants named Lyons back to the original “Sambos” just so we can have manufactured protests to change the name of the restaurants to something less offesive like, say, Lyons?

    It is unbelievable that the school district, the local paper, the school board and parent association went along with this bullying. It is a completely pre-fabricated excuse to protest something that had already been taken care of. The school should re-instate the play and ban any member of the NAACP from admittance for having a racist title for an organization (using the term “Colored People” in their name. Very offensive.)

  16. #180631
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:37 pm, hatelibs said:

    In the idiotic PC world/country we live in today, Ten Little “Anythings” would draw fire because somebody somewhere can find a negative or offensive spin to it.

    This country better chill and fast on this nonsense or we really will have riots over stupid meaningless drivel. If you think about it, we are getting closer to the Religion of Perpetual Outrage as Michelle as calls it. At least we aren’t barbaric in response to this crap but that might not be too far off.

    Stop caving in to the race pimps, PC police, and diversity whores….or else America.

  17. #180635
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:41 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    #15 — if the restaurants change names back, do you think we could get the Girl Scouts to go back to calling the best cookie ever invented Samoas instead of that sissy little replacement name “Caramel DeLites”?

  18. #180637
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:42 pm, CharlieT said:

    Maybe it was the use of the word “little” that offended them – could be construed as an assault on their manhood.

  19. #180642
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:51 pm, John Ansell said:

    #18, I think you just endangered Little Bo Peep. They will be going after that one next.

  20. #180643
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:51 pm, Danny B said:

    The title refers to the island that the story takes place on, not the people in the story.

    “An oddly assorted company isolated in the only house on Nigger Island are one by one murdered and there are thrills and suspense in plenty”

    The shame here is the school district succumbing to hyper-boil and manufactured offense. 10 minutes of research on the internet would have shut down the complaint and the students would have been able to enjoy putting on and watching a wonderful story.

  21. #180646
    On November 27th, 2007 at 1:53 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    In 2002, Hines accused Lakota schools of widespread, systemic racism and recommended that more than 2,000 Lakota employees be required to enroll in diversity and cultural sensitivity training similar to what was offered by his company. He promised to compile a report months later detailing his accusations against the schools but never produced a document.

    Hines, however, has continued to allege racism in the school district.

    Most recently in a Nov. 20 e-mail to Powell and other Lakota school board members, he wrote: “Given the history of the district, anything short of involving the NAACP in planning, developing, and executing a systemic approach to diversity is not acceptable and certainly not good enough for the district’s students, faculty, and staff.”

    Powell countered that “Gary Hines has a certain vested interest in district’

    I question everything this man has to say.

  22. #180652
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:02 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
  23. #180654
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:03 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    How about Ten Little Rose Law Firm Files?

    And then there were none.

  24. #180655
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:05 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Did the Lakotas give permission to name the High School after their “tribe”?

  25. #180656
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:05 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    30 pcs — NICE!!

  26. #180659
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:11 pm, CharlieT said:

    AlohaGuy said:

    How about Ten Little Rose Law Firm Files?

    And then there were none.

    Those files (with Hillary’s prints all over them) are like Jason – everytime she thinks they are dead and buried, they just keep coming back to life.

  27. #180662
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:15 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    Yesterday it was about bears and the Religion of Perpetual Outrage.
    Maybe the NAACP should change their name to the National Organization of Perpetual Outrage (NOPO).
    It’s just another way to keep the racism candle lit so they can justify their existance.

  28. #180666
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:18 pm, ackrite55 said:

    10 Million Little Illegal Aliens
    And then there were none. Just may be there’s a way after all.

  29. #180667
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:18 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Thanks MissMarciLyn!

  30. #180670
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:20 pm, blues said:

    This is stupid, squared.First,banning a piece of theater for any reason is an outrage in a country that values freedom of speech,and self-expression.Second (as Dan points out,Christy was English.Third,how many people knew what the original was?
    How far will the race-baiters go to get some notoriety?

  31. #180671
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:21 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    However some rap “artist” can name a song the same thing and it will shoot straight to the top of the charts. I wonder if it was the nooses that he really objected to?

  32. #180672
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:21 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    You are most welcome.

    I’m recently local with this guy (he’s in my county) and I already can’t stand him, but I didn’t know about the 2002 rigamarole — not that I’m surprised!

  33. #180673
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:22 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Just A Grunt,

    It’s a lack of diversity training that he objects to. If only we would all sign ourselves up for a class or two – all of our problems would just disappear. Poof and they are gone…

  34. #180676
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:25 pm, Reggie Dunlop said:

    Note how Hines says “Diversity is not a way of life in Lakota.”

    If you read the forward in Orwell’s 1984 (I forget which edition), it says how newspeak is supposed to erase the ability to even think crimes against the state. The language describing diversity as “a way of life” certainly is reminiscent of that feeling.

    I suggest that Mr. Hines look at freedom as a way of life. Also, I wonder if GPH is exactly 51% female, and a direct cross section of America racially. If not, I guess it’s not “a way of life” for GPH either.

  35. #180680
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Gary Hines is the Douglas Ford of the diversity-training industry.

  36. #180683
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:29 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I’m sure the wonder people of Lakota felt like their “way of life” was just fine until Mr. Hiney blew into town. People like him care nothing about race relations. But you can bet bottom dollar that he’ll use it as his platform. What a disgrace.

  37. #180684
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:30 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    wonderful people

  38. #180685
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:31 pm, LarryD said:

    Hmm, by not supporting his allegations of racism against the district, is not Hines now an accessory to their racism?

    Actually, I suspect Hines is racist all on his own, but I’m thinking of ways to counter sue.

  39. #180687
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:33 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Harassment should be viable means used to counter sue.

  40. #180689
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Charlie, #26, yes, I love it.

    The noose on the cover reminds me, it could be called Ten Little Columbia Security Videos

    …and then there were none.

  41. #180699
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:53 pm, Boomer said:

    I guess he felt like he had to protect his phony baloney job by inventing an outrage. Maybe we can send him to Darfur, Sudan, Saudi Arabia to impart a little diversity training there with as many of his colleagues as we could send with him. A diversity final solution program (great way to thin the liberal herd).

  42. #180700
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, bit_boy said:

    When the NAACP so involved in education we need not wonder why 60% of their favorite minority will be high school drop outs. Or the value of having two N words that require redact in a country that has laws guaranteeing freedom of speech (and for those so offended freedom of speech is much more important than their callus feelings). Or the diversity enrichment the NAACP introduced by explaining Michael Vicks sub-culture of dog training.

    Indeed, the NAACP is an organization worthy of disrupting the education process with their feelings and perfect example of diversity being the mother of incompetence.

  43. #180701
    On November 27th, 2007 at 2:54 pm, orlandocajun said:

    Were they “ten little black indians”?

    Why does anyone give the NAACP the time of day anymore? They’re the biggest group of racists in the country. Maybe they’re the ones who need diversity training. It’s time for them to leave the 19th and 20th centuries and catch-up with the rest of the world. Of course, that would cut off their source of income.

  44. #180706
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:10 pm, right_on said:

    Maybe the NAACP should change their name to the National Organization of Perpetual Outrage (NOPO).

    How about, National Organization of Militant Oliogarchy and Perpetual Outrage? NO-MO-PO. Even Sharpton, and Jackson could rally around that…even if they don’t know what NOMOPO stands for…it just sounds so good!

  45. #180709
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pm, Boomer said:

    right_on I think you’ve got it!

  46. #180713
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:16 pm, ammo john said:

    I’m glad I moved out of West Chester. My sister graduated from the original Lakota HS before things became PC. (speling correction: Cincinnati)

  47. #180714
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:18 pm, ammo john said:

    aarrggh! (SPELLING)

  48. #180721
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:25 pm, Armigerous said:

    In order to satisfy the NAACP’s ‘cultural concerns’, the play when performed,henceforth will be presented as “Ten Little Pickaninnies”

  49. #180723
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:26 pm, malkin_fan said:

    Call it “10 little girls on birth control from school” and it will win awards.

  50. #180743
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:38 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    ammo john — I know what you mean; I’m in Fairfield Twp and have friends with kids in Lakota, and they said in the last 5-7 years it’s gotten terrible with all the PC-ism and propaganda

  51. #180744
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:39 pm, geminicontender said:

    I played Anthony Marston (the first dead Indian:)at a local dinner theatre back in 1982. The whole cast was white:):):) Lovely people, lovely mystery. Agatha Christie beauty.
    Screw diversity if this is what it conjures up.

  52. #180745
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:40 pm, geminicontender said:

    Think what would happen if it were called “10 Little Mohammeds?”

  53. #180748
    On November 27th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, MissMarciLyn said:

    gemini….would that then be worth 400 lashes??

  54. #180776
    On November 27th, 2007 at 4:25 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Is there anything left that is not viewed as “racist” anymore?

  55. #180808
    On November 27th, 2007 at 4:51 pm, leepro said:

    E Pluribus Unum (out of many, ONE) is the opposite of “diversity.”

    I get madder every day!

  56. #180819
    On November 27th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, graysonret said:

    “10 Little Conservatives”. That way, each one that dies, will get a standing ovation! A hit play, sure to get bids from all the hollywood studios. Or, if that is too obvious, how about “10 Army Soldiers”. That would surely get the support from the Dems…not to mention Code Pink. The next debate will be full of questions to Obama and Hillary on how they would have killed them….oh, yes, and supported them at the same time.

  57. #180822
    On November 27th, 2007 at 5:00 pm, ackrite55 said:

    The original reasoning behind the book sounds racist to me. Not to mention the spook on the book cover.

  58. #180892
    On November 27th, 2007 at 6:10 pm, Buck I said:

    Change the title back to “10 Little Nigg—”. It’s just a name right, why give in to those with the victim mentality? What about all the easily offended diversity and political correctness bobledeboo? Why the political correct name change after 1939? When is it okay to be offended without being called a professional victim or a hustler? Isn’t anyone OUTRAGED about the cowtowing to political correctness by changning it to “indians”?
    Hmmmmmmm, whatever, I’m just entertaining myself here, I know what comes next. Post over.

  59. #180914
    On November 27th, 2007 at 6:35 pm, RyanInSanJose said:

    I’d just like to chime in and say welcome to Reggie Dunlop! Do you know where the Palm Isle is in this town? :)

  60. #180936
    On November 27th, 2007 at 7:01 pm, RetFireman said:

    While I cannot understand why the “N” wod was found offensive by this race-baiter, yet the Indian word was not, I still want to know the reasoning why, after nearly 70 years he felt the need to tell everyone what the original name of the play was and then have it cancelled and banned based on that concept. It seems to me it would have saved him a great deal of time and effort to have it banned on the current name alone, though it does not serve his purpose. It also does not have anything to do, necessarily, with the show.

    this is a prime example of ignorance running amuck. It is the knee-jerk Liberalism at it’s finest. It is what happens when a bunch of busy-bodies get together and decide to do something about something in order to prevent a problem from never happening that has never happened in 70 years.

    I wouldn’t recommend holding your breath for this to change any time soon. I am afraid you will just turn a funny blue color. And I do not believe you are covered by the National Association for the Advancement for Colored People at that point. they are a pretty select group. I will only support them when they elect a white person as their president to show just how inclusive they are.

  61. #180937
    On November 27th, 2007 at 7:02 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Change the title back to “10 Little Nigg—”. It’s just a name right, why give in to those with the victim mentality?

    I for one never knew it was originally called that. I know times were different then, but still, very odd. I have seen at least one of the movies, and there’s nothing racist about it that I remember. I love Agatha Christie and it’s disappointing that she called the book by that name.

    How about “10 Honest Politicians”? And then there were none… It would be a very short play.

  62. #180975
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:24 pm, brooklyn red said:

    30pcs re: #36,

    Forgive my ignorance, I went to public schools in Blue York. But is Mr. Hiney what was called a “carpetbagger”? I never really understood the term, but I heard it used a lot when the Clinton’s moved in.

  63. #180978
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:27 pm, Bigurn said:

    I did a search on this to determine the nature of the racist title (shown in other comments). Even though a little shocked, I noticed that the offensive title was only used in *England*, and was changed prior to entry in the U.S. due to sensitivity about the term. Can anyone confirm this? If correct, and given the time since this happened, doesn’t this deserve a little discretion?

  64. #180983
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:31 pm, dakine said:

    Buck I, I suspect there are a couple of posters here who would be more than happy with a return to the original name.

  65. #180985
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:34 pm, Buck I said:

    I love Agatha Christie and it’s disappointing that she called the book by that name.

    Yeah. I’ve been there. For years I though “Sweet Home Alabama” was a racist song. A Youtube commenter set me straight, and I did some research. I was so glad to be wrong. Now, I don’t have to feel like and Uncle Tom when I rock out to Skynard.

    People you look up to can disappoint sometimes though.(I’m looking at you Woody Allen).

  66. #180990
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:43 pm, geminicontender said:

    #58/Buckeye…..
    Stanford Indians had to be changed to Cardinals. I’d be upset now that it relates to the Church…..ooops…wrong Cardinal:):)

  67. #180991
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:44 pm, Buck I said:

    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:31 pm, dakine said:
    Buck I, I suspect there are a couple of posters here who would be more than happy with a return to the original name.

    Could be, they must be closeted. Or there are no anti-Black racists on MM which is refreshing.

    Hey what’s with Coach Dorrell, his team can beat the Big Boys, but lose to the bottom feeders. If he wins against USC and then the bowl, he might save his job. It’s a curious situation. My Buckeyes may get a shot at the title afterall, but I’m afraid either WV or Missouri would run us off the field.

  68. #180996
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:49 pm, Buck I said:

    #66

    Wrong Cardinal…I just spit a little bit of water on my keyboard. I hope it ain’t broke. Funny though.

  69. #181002
    On November 27th, 2007 at 8:54 pm, geminicontender said:

    Next we will lose the Dallas Cowboys because of what they did to Stanford. Not PC enough.

  70. #181054
    On November 27th, 2007 at 11:12 pm, garyt said:

    Hey Buck as a Native American I do not take offense of the subject at hand. We often call each other “Indians” and there is no problem and there is no problem when Non-Indians refer to us as Indians. We have been called Indians for centuries and I am sure there are some natives that do take offense, but here the majority do not. As I said in an earlier post few weeks ago I am glad that the Euros conquered North America and not a muslim power that really would have made things worse.

  71. #181091
    On November 28th, 2007 at 12:17 am, RetFireman said:

    As 25% Native American I was not taking offense at the title either. As far as the comment about people wanting a return to the original title, I would like to know what made you think that, as i am not aware of any racists, closeted or otherwise, on this site. As a matter of fact, in past postings, there has only been showings of outrage towards any showings of racism in the past, so I think that statement of yours might just be more telling than you want it to be.

  72. #181092
    On November 28th, 2007 at 12:17 am, RetFireman said:

    Remember, it isn’t just whites that are the racists.

  73. #181096
    On November 28th, 2007 at 12:31 am, Buck I said:

    Interesting Garyt: (Wait a minute you’re THAT Garyt…nah, nevermind that’s in the past)

    I have joked above about mascots, but I’ve often wondered about the “indian” mascots. I look at the Cleveland Indians mascot, Chief Wahoo.(not to mention the flippin “redskins”) He’s red in color with a feather, and a bit stupid spit eating grin on his face. I think it’s ridiculously offensive.
    Imagine:
    The Cleveland Blacks- Dark, dark, brown, big pink lips, kinky afro, and a sambo grin.

    The Cleveland Jews- big nose,big lips stereotypical curly sides, and maybe go the hasidic jew route

    Cleveland Yellowmen- extra slanted eyes, yellow skin, stereotypical bowl cut, cheesy smile.

    Cleveland Mexicans- Stereotypical speedy Gonzales hat, goofy grin.

    I think every group and description I listed would be extremely offensive, and politically incorrect if you must, but no city or organization could ever, ever get away with it. I think it’s because these groups are respected for their political influence. Why do you think Native Americans get the shaft? How are you able to get away with a Chief Wahoo cariacature, and and a Redskins, name, but nobody would dare try something similar with another minority group. I don’t know many Native Americans, so I’d like to hear your take. I think the disparate treatment is abysmal, but I gave up getting excited about it, because nobody seems to care. What’s your take?

  74. #181098
    On November 28th, 2007 at 12:37 am, Buck I said:

    Could be, they must be closeted. Or there are no anti-Black racists on MM which is refreshing.

    Get hooked on phonics at your local Walmart Ret, or maybe the sight is faulty in your right eye. My bad if that’s the case.

  75. #181115
    On November 28th, 2007 at 1:14 am, Buck I said:

    On November 28th, 2007 at 12:17 am, RetFireman said:
    Remember, it isn’t just whites that are the racists.

    I agree, or my god I agree, I agree. I had a little tongue and cheek with Dakine, but my original 2 posts have to do with the question of when it’s okay to be offended. If some people here are treating the former title as trully offensive, why? When is it okay on MM.com for conservatives to be offended, by White on Black racism? If the former title applies, then why isn’t it considered cowtowing to political correctness by changing the name. Is racial offense only non-mocked if it takes place over 50 yrs ago. Obviously my question was treated as rhetorical by all, but a couple people, but Oh well, I guess it only entertained or interested me. That’s okay.

    Go ahead with the Billy goat, bridge schtick. I’m just responding to your post to impeach any possible lies about non-responsiveness in the future.

    Back to the bridge deal now.

  76. #181137
    On November 28th, 2007 at 2:21 am, garyt said:

    Well Buck as a believer in Christ, He takes away alot of the sting of what the world offeres. Knowing we have eternal salvation and that knowing Peace about it makes me not to worry about your worldly problems. Sure natives blame others for the booze, unemployment, drugs, but there is away out of that life without blaming the whiteman.

  77. #181154
    On November 28th, 2007 at 3:34 am, hadsil said:

    The US Constitution at one time indicated Black People were worth 3/5th a person for the purpose of the number of Representatives a state may have in the House. Therefore, the US Constitution has a racist history. Therefore, the US Consitution is an inappopriate document. Therefore, the Constitution is now annulled. Because the Constitution is now annulled, Slavery of Black People shall return, Women lose the right to vote, hecek, everyone lsoes the right to vote, All Newspapers and TV news channels shall cease to exist. All other television networks now belong to the Government. Everyone must pay 75% of the their income in taxes, and all Gays and Lesbians are to be killed on sight.

    (The sad thing is, some people believe this will really happen tomorrow, except for the reason the Consitution is annulled.)

  78. #181265
    On November 28th, 2007 at 9:47 am, JohnnyNJ said:

    I wonder if the University of Delaware would help out with the production of the play, they could donate the use of their theater….

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Beerestroika: Drinking to distraction

July 30, 2009 10:27 AM by Doug Powers

216 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Healing time for the Fighting Irish

Guess who wants Asians to change their names?

April 21, 2009 08:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Unhinged at UMass

March 12, 2009 12:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Holder: “A nation of cowards”

February 18, 2009 03:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 44 Trackbacks

Speak for yourself.

The Keith John Sampson story

December 26, 2008 01:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 1 Trackback

Anti-Christmas moron of the day: Ban Rudolph!

December 15, 2008 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

It’s the PC time of year…


Categories: Nooses, Political Correctness



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom