Comments on: The Annapolis photo-op; Update: A “joint understanding” unveiled

By: Surak

Surak — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:51:21 +0000

#8: “neither of whom negotiate[s] from a Christian position”. Would that be the Christian position of unconditional surrender, as in World War 2? On second thought, that worked out pretty well for all parties.

#26: “there has to be a Palestinian state”. The Arab state of Jordan occupies about 77% of the British Mandate of Palestine, recognized as the Jewish national home in the Balfour Declaration, and to this day it is a capital crime to sell land to a Jew. Not enough Judenrein for you? Try Gaza. While about 20% of Israel is Arab, the Palestinian-Arabs couldn’t bear that 0.1% of the population of Gaza was Jewish.

“war cannot answer this one…” War answered slavery in America, and German, Italian and Japanese fascism. War will settle this quite well.

By: JABbering Stooge :: Yeah, THAT’S restoring honor and integrity to the White House for ya! :: November :: 2007

Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:36 +0000

[...] The Most Holy George W. Christ is doing the same thing wingnuts lambasted Clinton for doing. Well, the far-right is trashing the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., not for trying to pad his legacy, but for believing that Muslims belong anywhere other than a [...]

By: sausage

sausage — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:53:27 +0000

walterc – I know what you are saying…. but let’s not doubt the army of Israel is vast compared to the other side…

I really do support Israel but there has to be a Palestinian state…. will the people there stand up and work towards it? I really hope so…war cannot answer this one….

By: Tel-Chai Nation

Tel-Chai Nation — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:53:26 +0000

“Joint understanding” is only going downhill…

Just more negotiations it is, and a forced handshake. At the Washington Times, Frank Gaffney calls the Annapolis folly a “gang rape”…

By: blogagog

blogagog — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:01:23 +0000

They should have issued a few ‘concerns’, and maybe ‘condemned’ something. Then they would have been just as useful as the UN!

By: feebiebabe

feebiebabe — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:44:07 +0000

OK, Billy Goat…why don’t you find yourself a nice little troll and pick fleas off each other under a smelly bridge.

My PC comment for the day to you…You are hopeless. Why don’t you go BUY a life.

By: Bonsai Billy

Bonsai Billy — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:00:28 +0000

So today the “Abu Dhabi Investment Authority” bought up a good sized chunk of Citibank. The cost? 1.5 months of Iraq War budget. Do you think things like that don’t have longterm implications for America’s relationship with Israel, let alone the war on terror? With our low dollar, baby boomer entitlements and unabated (by taxes) oil consumption, why should the Arabs fight us when they can just buy us?

By: jungatheart

jungatheart — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:59:48 +0000

I keep remembering how often the news would report on another Palestinian suicide bomber blowing up Israelis then, Israel built a wall that everyone criticized and hated. I can’t remember the last time I heard about a suicide bomber in Israel so it seems to me that the way to deal with Palestinians is to keep them the **** away from you.

By: walterc

walterc — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:59:20 +0000

#15 Sausage: Other than giving up land won in defending itself, giving millions in aid, allowing Arabs to live in Israel and practice their religion as equal citizens (try that in Saudi Arabia), short of conceding everything to the arabs and committing mass suicide, what would you have them do to obtain peace?

The only time Israel has shown any agression towards the arabs has been in response to being attacked.

If the paleostinians would spend less time trying to destroy Israel and more time in building infrastructure and a sustainable economy (something Israel and the U.S. would gladly help with), they would live in peace and prosperity.

But they insist on keeping up the fight to eradicate Israel from the face of the Earth, and live in a shithole.

Look at how fast they destroyed the greenhouses in Gaza. From thriving business to trashpile in hours.

By: feebiebabe

feebiebabe — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:13:09 +0000

This is just about as bad as when Clinton hosted that meeting and Arafat and Raben shook hands….yeah, that went SO well.

YOU CAN’T TALK TO TERRORISTS….THEY DON’T GET IT!!!

By: On-my-soap-box

On-my-soap-box — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:43:49 +0000

I say turn Israel loose on them. It would be a short war. People underestimate Israel’s army and the desire of an Israeli soldier’s heart. It would be a mistake for any nation to think they can remove Israel from the earth. It has been tried many times and I am sure it will never happen.

Israel tried giving land for peace. I say let them take their peace by force.

By: frayed

frayed — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:39:51 +0000

Not only are the barbarians at their gate but they are inside ours.

By: frayed

frayed — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:37:48 +0000

If we quit giving Israel weapons to protect themselves just how long do you think they would last?

By: malkin_fan

malkin_fan — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:27:00 +0000

“I think we would make a lot more progress if we quit giving Israel money and weapons.”

Yeah….We wouldn’t want them to be able to defend themselves!!!!!! Idiot.

By: Solomonia

Solomonia — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:16:33 +0000

Annapolis…

Pajamas Media has a round up. Jules Crittendon: the best promise of Annapolis is that it could see the formalizing of the estrangement of Hamas, initiated by the summer’s revolting Palestinian-on-Palestinian violence, and the formal recognition by mo…