Michelle Malkin » Seattle mayor warns kids: Take these eco-light bulbs or Santa and the reindeer will drown

Seattle mayor warns kids: Take these eco-light bulbs or Santa and the reindeer will drown

By Michelle Malkin • November 28, 2007 03:46 PM

Via Orbusmax, KVI talk show host Kirby Wilbur in Seattle heard from a listener who attended Mayor Greg Nickels’ ~~Christmas~~ holiday tree-lighting ceremony. All religious references are discouraged by the local government–except if the religion is environmentalism. So Nickels used the event to preach the evils of global warming to the kids in attendance. He warned the children that if they don’t use energy-efficient light bulbs (Gore bulbs), Santa and the reindeer will perish amid melting icecaps. Here’s the clip recounting Nickel’s grinchy lecture:

Leaning Straight Up points to Nickel’s “Letter to Santa“–an epistle of self-congratulation wrapped in eco-sanctimony:

Can’t Christmas be Christmas without Al Gore wannabes polluting the air and scaring the kids?

Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

Send to a Friend
Printer Friendly

comments (75)

trackbacks (15)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

#1

On November 28th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, malkin_fan said:

One can only pray that the San Andreas fault takes off the west coast from San Diego to the Canadian border.
#2

On November 28th, 2007 at 3:56 pm, StephC said:

Um, I live on the West Coast.
#3

On November 28th, 2007 at 3:59 pm, d1carter said:

What an idiot!!!
#4

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:00 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

Santa does not visit Soap’s house. We celebrate the birth of Christ so they can keep their bulbs and drowning deer.

That being said, that guy is but pure scum to do this to kids. I saw a TV interview with children and when asked about the end of the world, the majority said global warming would be the cause.

Thanks manbearpig.
#5

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:02 pm, Boomer said:

Obviously they don’t understand most of the Arctic region is ice floating on water. I guess the physics behind the displacement of water don’t apply in this new religion. All hail the Goreacle, a horrible drowning death to all blasphemers! Are there any sane people West of the Cascades anymore?
#6

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:03 pm, LarryD said:

StephC, my condolences. I suggest moving.
#7

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:03 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

I have purchased the pictured bulbs( not the red/green ones) and they went out after four months…. they stink! I’ll stockpile good old incandescents and to heck if I’m not “green”.
#8

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:06 pm, jsr said:

On the fifth day of Christmas Al Gore gave to me:

5 flourescent bulbs
4 veggie burgers
3 clothes lines
2 carbon credits
and new energy use tax.
#9

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, war9093 said:

funny thing they don’t tell you about those eco-lights

http://www.wfsb.com/news/14608470/detail.html

and

http://www.nbc30.com/news/14597080/detail.html

but hey what’s a little mercury poisoning compared to helping High Priest Gore save the enviroment.
#10

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, ajmontana said:

I know a place where they can put those light bulbs and wont use any energy at all.
Merry Christmas to all!
even the crapweasels.
#11

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:11 pm, StephC said:

LarryD, I fortunately live on the east side of Washington. Over here most people are conservatives, and dislike the western liberals in Seattle.
#12

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:12 pm, Yiddish Steel said:

One can only pray that the San Andreas fault takes off the west coast from San Diego to the Canadian border.

Yeah… Thanks, Malkin_fan… We appreciate your zealous contempt for the kooks here in San Diego (and the rest of the West Coast).
#13

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:12 pm, ajmontana said:

“People in Seattle deserve a big checkmark”

and the people in Olympia deserve the penitenciary.
#14

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

#7, I purchased one for the bathroom, and it burned out in less than one week.

Junk.

Needless to say, all the rest of the lighting in the house is the good old fashioned kind.
#15

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, Wade said:

What about the mercury in CFL’s?
#16

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:16 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, ajmontana said:
I know a place where they can put those light bulbs and wont use any energy at all.

…and they can screw them in from either end.
#17

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:20 pm, stevenpd said:

I fart in their general direction!

Their indecency knows no bounds . . .
#18

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:21 pm, EHeavenlyGads said:

MNUSMCDavid,

You’d better stockpile those incandescents now and hard. Following the EU and Australia bans by 2010 comes California’s Assembly Bill 722, et al.

Let’s preen, we’re so green! And grandmother on social security can take heart: she may not be able to afford to buy the CFLs that cost six times that of standard incandescents, but when she does, she will be saving the planet!
#19

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:24 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:14 pm, Wade said:
What about the mercury in CFL’s?

Mercury? I remember when , in high school chemistry class, we’d take mercury and rub dimes in it with our fingers. I’m not advocating this, of course, but if mercury is so dangerous why did they put it in those stupid bulbs?
#20

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:26 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

#17….. oh I will stockpile and I won’t obey such insipid laws afterwards.
#21

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:28 pm, Andy said:

The mayor is bragging of reducing Seattle’s pollution 8% below 1990’s level. 1) that has to be pure crap, 2) I challenge him to show what it actually is. I’m willing to bet that it has gone up, however slightly practically every year.

I believe that lying to Santa merits a lump of coal instead of a check for being good.
#22

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, Varilux said:

I too live between those two points that you mentioned and despite your prejudices against an entire region we’re not all nutty, we’re not even all liberal.

Try not to paint us with such a broad brush.
#23

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, uhangtight said:

i’m sorry, but i have purchased these lights and they are all still working and i have owned some of them for a year. but, that being said, these enviro nuts are really socialists/communists; and I wish they would just be honest about their intentions. I sure hope that the people vote this moron out of office, but alas, when you are too close to the west coast you are likely to stay in office no matter what kind of a hack or hack job. (Pelosi, Mayor of SF, Boxer, etc.)

I can’t imagine a sane parent reading this and not immediately calling this hack and letting him know that he is an idiot. UGH, why can’t they just leave our holidays alone!!!
#24

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

#19…

oh I will stockpile and I won’t obey such insipid laws afterwards.

I’ll just drive 35 miles over to the Nevada border (of sanity) and get them there.
#25

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:32 pm, apostle53 said:

My power company in the interest of proving they are green were giving these away free yesterday at the subway station. It’s like your first free drug hit, they expect you to pay full price plus later.
#26

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, gayle said:

I hope he doesn’t need a colonoscopy anytime soon.
#27

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:38 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

gak!

Don’t they know that LEDs are the way of the future anyway?
#28

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

I’m assuming your sleigh is carbon-neutral

This guy’s never been around a herd of 4-legged herbivores, has he? “Carbon-Neutral?” Yeah…maybe from upwind.
#29

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:45 pm, Raving Lunatic said:

I’ve always found it funny how no one fights against nature harder than environmentalists.

The environment isn’t static, you morons. Now leave it alone and stop pestering it.
#30

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:48 pm, tacodawn said:

Somebody should tell this p.o.s. to move to the North Pole.

He must be best friends with the idiots claiming Thanksgiving is a sad holiday.

UGH!
#31

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:48 pm, steveegg said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:39 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

This guy’s never been around a herd of 4-legged herbivores, has he? “Carbon-Neutral?” Yeah…maybe from upwind.

It may be carbon-neutral, but it definitely isn’t methane-neutral.
#32

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:54 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

This is silly, considering that there are tremendous financial savings to be had by using CFL bulbs. By my estimate it saves me almost $100 a year. Now that’s the sort of “green” I can get excited about.
#33

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:55 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

I want this dingbat to explain to me how a lightbulb is going to melt a polar ice cap.
#34

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, Wade said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:54 pm, Mark Jaquith said:
This is silly, considering that there are tremendous financial savings

So does walking save money and wearing no underwear. It is a choice.
#35

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:13 pm, englishqueen01 said:

But I thought Santa was also part of the vast, right-wing conspiracy to turn America into a Christian theocracy!

This is silly, considering that there are tremendous financial savings to be had by using CFL bulbs. By my estimate it saves me almost $100 a year. Now that’s the sort of “green” I can get excited about.

Do you know most CFL bulbs contain mercury? If the bulb breaks in your house, you’re looking at a cost of $1,000 (or more) to have professionals clean up the mess. And you NEED to have professionals clean it up; mercury poisoning’s not fun.

Not to mention the environmental threat from mercury seeping into the ground, the water, etc.

The environment isn’t static, you morons.

No, it isn’t. In fact, if the environment stopped its fluctuations, I’d be extremely worried. THEN the planet would be dying.
#36

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:14 pm, Andy said:

Out of curiousity, I decided to do a quick Google for “Seattle gas emissions”. On page 1 I found two interesting hits

1) 10 Jan 07, Seattle PI article, “Cities’ vows to cut gas emissions questioned”

Nearly 360 U.S. mayors representing more than 55.5 million Americans have pledged to dramatically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

The effort and its leader — Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels — have been lauded by the “King of Climate Change,” Al Gore, and celebrated in the pages of Vanity Fair.

But although the vows may have generated warm, fuzzy feelings about helping Mother Earth, an early analysis finds that the cities are not on track for making needed cuts in planet-warming pollutants.

The cities signing on to the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement want to meet or beat the goals of the international Kyoto Protocol, which means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. Every state but South Dakota has a city onboard.

Not only are the cities expected to miss the mark, a report released Monday states, “Many will miss their goals by a wide margin.”

Wow, that’s some miracle… from missing the goal in January to beating 1990 by 8% within 11 months.

2) City of Seattle - Office of Sustainability and Environment’s Inventory and Report: Seattle’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions, April 2002

Just a few caveats I found:

The City Wide inventory is different from the City Operations inventory in that it uses the geographic City limits to define the “boundary” of what is included (with one major exception, SeaTac Airport; see note 4b.) Most of the data in the City Wide inventory has been provided by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and includes all the major greenhouse gas emissions that actually occur within the City limits including the region’s major source of greenhouse gas emissions - traffic - as well as emissions associated with industry, heating all the homes and businesses in the City, etc. Because only emissions within the city limits are counted (with the noted exception) unlike the City Operations inventory it does not include indirect emissions (also called upstream emissions.) It does include a sub-set of the City and Utilities Operations inventory (those that occur within City limits.)

Of the list of bad gases, CO2 was ranked the lowest with a global warming potential (GWP) of 1 and the leading industrial gases are Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) (GWP=140 to 6,300), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) (GWP = 6,500 to 9,200 and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) (GWP = 23,900) are man-made gases used or generated by a variety of industrial activities.

Umm, didn’t Goracle claim that CO2 is the #1 threat? Well, read on:

HFCs, PFCs and SF6 are by far the most potent of the greenhouse gases in their ability to trap atmospheric heat. To account for these different potencies, the GHG emissions for these gases have been converted to be equivalent to the weight of CO2, termed ‘carbon dioxide equivalent’

Umm fuzzy math?

But what about the 8% reduction? Read on:

City and Utilities Operations
” The City has substantially reduced GHG emissions attributable to its operations and projections are that the trend will continue. Kyoto Protocol calls for US emissions to be cut by seven percent below 1990 levels by 2012. Comparing 2000 to 1990, the City has already cut its emissions by 48 percent, primarily because it divested its interest in the Centralia Coal Plant . Other reductions are due to flaring methane at a closed City landfill and recycling programs that have reduced the amount of solid waste handling.
” Projections are that by 2010, the City will cut its emissions by 84 percent compared to 1990. In addition to the landfill reductions the other major reduction is due to City Light’s commitment of no net GHG emissions by 2003.
” Without the City’s recycling and energy conservation programs, the City’s emissions in 2000 would have been more than twice as large as they were.

Citywide
” Citywide emissions in 2000 remained essentially constant compared to 1990 but by 2010 are projected to increase by nearly 20 percent over 1990 levels.
” In 2000, transportation accounted for 56 percent of Seattle’s GHG emissions compared to 31 percent for the nation as a whole. Transportation accounts for a higher percentage of our GHG emissions than the rest of the country because our region uses less coal or other GHG- emitting electric power sources.
” To fulfill the Kyoto Protocol goal of reducing emissions to seven percent below 1990 levels means that Seattle’s emissions target would be 6.5 million metric tonnes of CO2 equivalents (about 480,000 tonnes less than current levels.) To reach a forty percent reduction target would mean that Seattle’s emissions would be 4.2 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents in 2010.
” Additional emissions were avoided through such measures as the changes to the City’s energy code that require gas heated buildings to be more energy efficient and the regions’ various transportation programs - transit, heavy rail, bicycle commuting and van and car pools - that increase mobility and reduce the use of single occupancy vehicles. However, data by which to estimate emissions reductions due to these measures are not available.

We already know that short of a full load in HOV, all the others “mobility” measures are less effective, in terms of GHG & operational cost, than me jumping in my car and going whenever & wherever I want. But I digress.

So what do we have so far on Seattle’s effort to reduce GHG?
1) Narrowly define the city limits & only a proportion of SeaTac;
2) Carbon offsetting & sequestration,
3) Take only the municipal assets & emissions and brag about the marvelous reductions and play down the at-large (combined public/private) GHGs.

If Goracle decides to jump in the POTUS sweepstakes, any takers that he’ll want Mayor Nickels as the VP or appointed chief of the new Ministry of Sustainability (ubercabinet position)– to whom the EPA, DOT, Army Corps of Engineers et al will report.
#37

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:15 pm, DelosWorld said:

I use cfl floodlight bulbs in some pain in the @ss ceiling can fixtures that are hard to reach but after 10 years those things are dim, dim, dim. Hopefully more modern ones might last longer but when I throw the mercury laden old bulbs away do I need to find a recycle center to accept them? (I bet the electronics are also soldered together with lead solder so they are doubly nasty.) Unless I was going close to a recycle place anyway I’m pretty sure the gas I burn to get there in a separate trip would negate the CO2 savings. But I guess the overall numbers don’t matter. I need to feel good about myself and not over-analyze the situation!

And I think that whole 8% reduction in CO2 gases for Seattle is a bunch of hooey unless a nuclear power plant came on line since 1990 or 8% of their industry has relocated to China. Oh wait, can I use the phrase “nuclear power plant” or has that phrase also been banned by the PC police???
#38

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:18 pm, steveegg said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:54 pm, Mark Jaquith said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:13 pm, englishqueen01 said:

That’s the beauty of choice. One can choose to save some electricity and accept a crappier light and the possibility of a $1,000 cleanup bill (question; how did we get along with broken thermometers all these years without the professional cleanup crews?), or one can burn more electrons and have a better light.

Full-disclosure; I’m cheap.
#39

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:23 pm, Jim M. said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 4:07 pm, ajmontana said:
I know a place where they can put those light bulbs and wont use any energy at all.
Merry Christmas to all!

Beat me to it! My thoughts exactly!
#40

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:23 pm, DelosWorld said:

the City has already cut its emissions by 48 percent, primarily because it divested its interest in the Centralia Coal Plant .

Ah, I see. The coal plant isn’t closed but it’s been taken off the books. Brilliant! In that case why count the contributions of transportation except for the vehicles that the city owns? Take all the private vehicles off the books! Also contributions from private homes! And factories! And private lawn mowers!
#41

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:28 pm, fourstringfuror said:

Does anyone have an email address for the good mayor? I’d like to have a word or two with him.

This is just another carefully calculated step in advancing environmentalism. Brainwashing children from an early age is by far the most effective method of behavior modification. Nickels should be ashamed of himself for using a tree lighting ceremony to promote his views.

Pathetic.
#42

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:34 pm, Andy said:

DelosWorld,

Isn’t it amazing what creative accounting & fuzzy math can do?

Isn’t that what brought down Enron, Worldcom etc? Hmmm
#43

On November 28th, 2007 at 5:57 pm, puhiawa said:

Moron.The incredible thing is global warming has jumped the shark, but these ignorant loons can’t let go.
#44

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:03 pm, BobJones-77 said:

I tossed all the CFL’s when I found out about the mercury and I have stocked up GE Reveal incandescent bulbs. Man, are they nice to read by and just turn on & off. When it is cold, they turn on right now and give off a little heat too. The CFL’s don’t work worth sh%t in cold weather.
#45

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:09 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

I can’t believe I have not said this yet:

Taze him.

Must be ’cause feebz has not been around to remind me. I think I skert her off.
#46

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:14 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

Am I using my CFL’s wrong? They seem to burn out faster than my regulars.
BTW, they all go into the garbage when I’m done with them. Is that wrong?
#47

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:36 pm, taylork said:

Does this count as fear mongering, or can that phrase only be used when we talk about radical Islam regularly threatening to kill all of us?
#48

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:36 pm, John Ansell said:

Alright, they’re making me do it again. I’ll be back after driving around for 15 minutes just for the hell of it.
#49

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:52 pm, malkin_fan said:

“On November 28th, 2007 at 4:30 pm, Varilux said:
I too live between those two points that you mentioned and despite your prejudices against an entire region we’re not all nutty, we’re not even all liberal.

Try not to paint us with such a broad brush.”

Sorry, no offense but I guess “you people” (OMG) are collateral damage.
#50

On November 28th, 2007 at 7:19 pm, Wade said:

On November 28th, 2007 at 6:14 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:
BTW, they all go into the garbage when I’m done with them. Is that wrong?

1. Earth911.org (or call 1-800-CLEAN-UP for an automated hotline): Online, enter your zip code, press “GO,”
click “Household Hazardous Waste”, then “fluorescent light bulb disposal.” The site will identify your nearest
residential mercury recycling facility or mail disposal method. If you find no specific information on CFL disposal,
go back and click on the link for “Mercury Containing Items.”
2. Call your local government if the Web site and Hotline number above does not have your local information.
Look on the Internet or in the phone book for your local or municipal government entity responsible for waste
collection or household hazardous waste.
#51

On November 28th, 2007 at 7:36 pm, Varilux said:

No offense taken, we live in blue states after all, we encounter quite a few limited minds.
#52

On November 28th, 2007 at 8:31 pm, almeehan said:

If all these eco mayors want to cut back on gas emissions, we could form the cork foundation and send them each two corks. The big one goes into their big flapping trap (Oh the humanity of using unacceptable non-PC words) and the other cork goes….
#53

On November 28th, 2007 at 9:01 pm, jimC said:

“Greenhouse gases below 1990 levels”… an accomplishment that he completely erased with the prolithic amount of hot air he just released with his environut rant.

Jim C
#54

On November 28th, 2007 at 9:25 pm, garyt said:

Steve L so you are a fellow Eastern Washingtonian, how you feel about forming a new state here? We get tired of one county running the whole state and wondered how you felt about that?
#55

On November 28th, 2007 at 10:46 pm, TXRose said:

Actually, I’m allergic to mercury. Had to have my
fillings replaced about fifteen years ago. I will not tell
you what the mercury did to me, but I’m not allowed
to eat anything that may have mercury in it. These
lightbulbs won’t be in my house. I make up for that by
(unlike Gore from all the weight he’s gained) by
walking as many places as I can.
#56

On November 28th, 2007 at 11:28 pm, vsatt said:

Let’s all hop in our SUV’s (the bigger the better) and have a nice little parade through downtown Seattle!
#57

On November 29th, 2007 at 12:20 am, rightisright said:

This guy Mayor Greg Nickels, obviously was educated in the government school system. Looks like he did real well at it too.
#58

On November 29th, 2007 at 2:06 am, ArmoredCAV said:

Don’t break off eastern WA, move to King County and drive the whackos out. It is too hot on the dusty side of the state.
#59

On November 29th, 2007 at 2:52 am, georgej said:

Point 1: Reindeer swim quite well, actually. So Mayor Nickels can shove his faux “concern” about drowning reindeer up his fat, leftwing …..

Point 2: Reindeer, like white-tails and elk, are fine eating. Fly lower Santa and come into range of my 10 gauge goose gun. Pretty please?

Point 3: We have lived in our custom designed, solar heated house for 27 years now. The architect designed the house with florescent lighting tubes in all rooms. In some places, we have supplemented the florescents with low-voltage halogen track lighting for specific illumination tasks. I can tell you that the tubes last a long time, years in fact. The four hanging incandescent light fixtures in my hallways now have GE and/or Phillips florescent bulbs (the enclosed globular ones, not the ones that look like pigs tails) and have lasted over a year.

I understand the reluctance to convert to florescents, and I understand the health issues of dealing with burned out bulbs (which is manageable, BTW).

TXRose, you don’t have a choice. You can’t switch. Neither does anybody else who has suffered mercury poisoning in the past. You can’t convert without placing your life at risk. You definitely need to stay away from these lights.

Living in a florescent lighted house is not onerous, I can attest. And the electricity savings are real.
#60

On November 29th, 2007 at 5:19 am, Eclectic said:

Uhangtight, #23 said:

I sure hope that the people vote this moron out of office, but alas, when you are too close to the west coast you are likely to stay in office no matter what kind of a hack or hack job.

Unfortunately, it wouldn’t matter if the people in Seattle did vote him out, he would still win. All of Seattle’s elections are now rigged!!

There is, however, one thing I can agree with the stupid mayor on:

“(Hint: Mariners win the World Series!)”

MARINERS, 2008!!!!!!!! :0)
#61

On November 29th, 2007 at 6:55 am, jamesgreenidge said:

I’ve a couple of these bulbs and brought them purely for their longevity, not for being “eco” anything. They’re plain screw-in florescent bulbs to me. The way all these companies are tripping over another doing the right P.R. thing painting all their products “Oh so sensitive and humane and friendly” green makes me green with sickness. Talk to kids about how Bambi (ala caribou) is holding the energy independence of this country hostage!

James Greenidge
Queens New York
#62

On November 29th, 2007 at 7:09 am, Eclectic said:

Did anyone watch the tree lighting on NBC last night? I almost gagged when the guy (Al Brokaw or something?) started singing, “I’m dreaming of a GREEN Christmas!” Aaargh! Luckily I was at my friend’s place so I didn’t do/say anything rash (my friend is ultra liberal).
#63

On November 29th, 2007 at 7:13 am, FlyingTigress said:

I’m recalling that this is the mayor of the same city of “Seattle” which built a new civic campus building (Council chambers, Council offices, etc.) that was supposedly designed to be more energy efficient than the previous structure, but, in its first energy audit was determined to use MORE energy to operate than the circa 1960s structure.
#64

On November 29th, 2007 at 9:43 am, misterbee241 said:

The mayor needs to read the instruction manual - Genesis 9:11 to be exact. The world wont be inundated by another flood.
#65

On November 29th, 2007 at 9:53 am, misterbee241 said:

I know a place where they can put those light bulbs and wont use any energy at all.

And since the bulbs are already spiral it should be a fairly easy insertion.
#66

On November 29th, 2007 at 9:56 am, Andy said:

misterbee, that’s a very good point!! The Bible tells us the world will instead be destroyed by fire.

So what does the Deciever tell us?
Ignore the nutjob behind the nuclear button and fear the Goracle.
#67

On November 29th, 2007 at 12:02 pm, jbirish said:

If there’s a flood,(no, wait, God said no more floods)if there’s a rising tide, one would hope that Seattle and San Fransicko would become islands, connected to the mainland(maybe, maybe not)by a “bridge to nowhere”!
Hopefully, I’ll be gone from Seattle by then.
“Useful idiots”, one and all!
#68

On November 29th, 2007 at 12:09 pm, Blind_Mule said:

I am going to go out on a limb here, I will donate 12 life jacket’s to Santa and his reindeer. That’s one for Santa
Nine for the reindeer (one extra in case their really is a rudolph), one for Dennis Kucinich and one for Santa’s favorite elf, Ok just make that two for the elves. What an idiot.
#69

On November 29th, 2007 at 1:28 pm, Barry F. said:

I know a place where they can put those light bulbs and wont use any energy at all.

I agree, AJ. I think I could offer Mayor Nickels a place or two to put his bulbs to reduce emmissions.
#70

On November 29th, 2007 at 1:29 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

This is stupid. Talk like that will get environmental causes nowhere. You don’t help the environment by scaring kids. What’s wrong people in Seattle these days?
#71

On November 29th, 2007 at 2:28 pm, xler8bmw said:

Can you say Indoctination!
#72

On November 29th, 2007 at 3:15 pm, GaijinBob said:

This is such a non-issue. Hasn’t anybody heard that Santa doesn’t live at the North Pole anymore? Now he resides in Lapland, Finland.
Mukava tavata sinut!
#73

On November 29th, 2007 at 3:53 pm, bipartisancomplainer said:

It’s too bad the liberals and free publicity celebs will end up making this an issue that no one can stand to talk about, let alone do something about. Overkill will always rear its ugly head.
#74

On November 29th, 2007 at 3:54 pm, bipartisancomplainer said:

BTW, does anyone have suggestions on a brand of these bulbs that actually gives off decent light? I tried some of the spiral ones but they were too dim for my tastes.
#75

On November 29th, 2007 at 4:23 pm, bear1909 said:

These flourescent bulbs are not proven to be more efficient just because they last longer.

They are so retrograde it is pathetic.
Get the whole analysis of this scam from : “Bottomless Well” by Huber.

Nails these turdburpers.