Buh-bye, Whoopi: Another failed liberal talk radio venture
Just weeks after claiming she would reshape her faltering radio program to focus on a New York City audience, Whoopi Goldberg has now been cancelled even there.
According to press and trade reports today, Wake Up With Whoopi was yanked from WKTU-FM today without warning, other than a brief note sent to staffers mere hours before the change. Poor ratings were cited by the station.
Recently, after similar results led to terminations in Chicago and Philly, your Radio Equalizer speculated that Whoopi’s radio days appeared numbered. Now, one can easily expect the syndicated program to be shut down, perhaps in the next few days.
Blame Bush!
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Air America, Al Franken, Barbara Walters, Barbra Streisand
Sister Toldjah
» The anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall – and how the far left still hasn’t given upAmSpecBlog
» Carly Fiorina's Twitter OpponentPundit & Pundette
» Intelligence agencies knew Hasan was a traitorLegal Insurrection
» Will The Truth Be Hasan's Last Victim?The Powers That Be
» US Intel Knew Hasan Was Trying to Contact Al QaedaNewsBusters.org
» NYT's Krugman Quotes Song Proving ObamaCare Opponents' Point
Blame Bush!
that’s a snorter!
I didn’t even know she had a radio program.
I guess you can’t miss what you never had…or wanted in the first place.
HA!
Happy trails to you…
liberal radio… what a concept? they keep losing, why oh why? According to them mainstreet america really is NOT conservative, oh really? if there was a market for liberal radio it would be just as successful as conservative radio.
I am afraid that because they do not have an audience, they believe they have to force an audience through the fairness doctrine.
I love waking up with whoopi.
Actually, isn’t this part of the vast right wing conspiracy that is controlled by conservative radio show hosts that the stations play so much of because (GASP) they actually get good ratings, have an audience and make money for the stations?
Nobody likes the sound of your voice as much as you do! HAHAHAHAHA!!
Don Imus was unavailable for comment.
Also, liberals have pretty much any media source biased in their favor – especially television and newspapers. The glut of liberal-leaning news sources means they don’t need talk radio as an outlet. So they don’t listen, and it fails.
I hear another push for the UnFairness Doctrine coming…
Now we know without a doubt that Bush is using the Patriot Act to control Americans thoughts so they won’t listen to Liberal Talk Radio.
Well, if he just raised the price of oil by $2 a barrel, this morning, then he darn sure can control our brains.
Those Liberals are still in a quandry about how Bush can be such a brilliant idiot
Men in bowties and women with no eyebrows.
I have trouble with the veracity of either….
How can these liberal ventures fail if the country is allegedly half Democrat? Is it possible even the Dems can’t stand to listen to Whoopi and her ilk?
This is more of an indictment of the audience, than it is for Whoopi. She’s on in the a.m. It’s not her fault that libs don’t get up until noon.
Never been a fan of the fake named “actress”.
Free markets flush another Moon Loon icon. Life in the blue water tank is the only place for unprincipled liberal Moon Loon Media.
Faux testimonial to the idea of a Whoopi jaw shop:
“Oh, WhOOOpi! You’d be so great!!!”
-anonymous liberal drooler over anything African American
Its interesting to me that the Lib’s can’t hold an audience but Dems now own the HOuse. Crazy world. They don’t listen but they do vote.
Bob 69 says,
Indeed they do; even after death
Bwahahahahaha!
I can’t tell you how glad this makes me.
Whoopi is the most dangerous kind of liberal: the “non-nutroots” kind. She spews the same venom, she believes and propagates the same lies.
But she’s not shrill. She tends to be soft-spoken, even when she’s cursing a blue streak or being inappropriate. To the liberal elite this is all it takes to be considered cultured and educated. It gives her credibility that her words and actions don’t merit.
It allows her lies to be considered “more truthful.”
Al Franken is effective when he is acting the same way. When he’s being glib and funny and not losing his cool, liberals credit him with being a genius.
Fortunately for us, he can’t repress his inner sociopathic behavior and he erupts more regularly (and more violently) than Old Faithful. The real Al is exposed time and again as a nut.
Whoopi rarely comes across that way, even when her words are hateful and/or stupid (like wanting a menage a trois with the Pelosi’s – how coarse and ignorant to mention that on TV).
Happily, Whoopi’s low-toned approach is also very good at putting people to sleep. As a radio personality I can’t see how she ever had a chance…
Hooray!
Oh my goodness! It would be like waking up next to a female Predator! Arrrrgggghhhh, I just got sick all over my keyboard when that visual popped up in my mind.
You folks above are correct. Hollywierdos generally have the IQ of a vegetable. Talk radio does not have a week for writers to give you your lines. You have to be quick and witty and educated. Three stikes against libs on the air.
W-hoopi
K-ept
T-alking
U-nhinged
F-ailed
M-iserably
In spite of liberal academic claims to the contrary, cause and effect still operate in this universe.
No ratings = no listeners
No listeners = no viable content
The Left defines itself through a short list of mindless talking points and by being “against” various and sundry. These sources are quickly depleted, leaving an inherent intellectual vacuum. There is nothing of substance to sustain interest or dialog, and there are only so many ways to say, “Bush is evil.” Even die-hard true believers will wander away eventually, and the remainder of the public won’t ever bother because it’s all been said before.
Why work when you can collect checks from the government? After all, the world owes them a living.
Oh well, another goldfish down the “terlet”, as Mr. A. Bunker of Queens would say. Come to think of it, I guess Arch wasn’t listening.
English Queen,
You are definitely right about why liberal talk radio fails. They don’t need it. For example, if you are a lib in Washington, you have ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, the Washington Post, PBS to get liberal opinions from (under the guise of “news”), plus Hollywood, the public schools, and universities. There is no need for liberal radio. The liberal hosts can’t say anything that is not already being reported and advocated everywhere else.
It seems Michelle closed the comments for the CNN plants because of the Drudge link. Knowingly placing plants in a Republican primary debate is a huge ethical lapse, and this ranks up there with the Dan Rather fiasco. Republican debates are for REPUBLICAN voters, and Democratic debates for DEMOCRATIC voters. To have a liberal Democrat pose as a Republican and ask questions and for CNN to know this. . .well, that is why liberals don’t need talk radio.
Gabe
Add NPR to that list.
MAN is she ugly.
i can’t trust anyone that shaves their eyebrows….
Why are most liberals so unattractive?
I suggest WKTU-FM hire the founder of the Guardian Angels since he’s losing his radio slot to Don Imus December 8th.
IMHO
GSP
from eating tree bark
She still has weiV ehT , she can alway’s go off the deep end there. I just can’t seem to work up any tears for her.
Okay, now remember people cannot help how they look (I mean come on, do you think Hillary really strives to look THAT way- teh heh). But I think unattractive people may be drawn to the dark-side as they are bitter and hostile, because, well, they are unattractive- it is a vicious cycle, but explains why these people are so angry at the world and MUST lash out at anything and everything…and or course eating tree bark and tofu (yuck) certainly does not help
On November 29th, 2007 at 11:36 am, PBoilermaker said:
To be fair, not all are welfare recipients, for instance, the Hollyweirdo’s who were out partying ’til dawn after the weekly, “Aren’t we FABULOUS” award shows.
It’s the curse of our Scottish heritage, probably, though I cannot confirm that Whoopi is also Scottish.
And feebie, not all of us Mona Lisas shave them; my whole family is eyebrow- challenged!
from eating tree bark
Lol
i hear ya…i was just told she shaved them…don’t mind me…i was just being silly!!!
Me, too, sorry, feebs.
I think it is how ugly they are spiritually that comes out in their countenance. I mean, if you have had 20 abortions, you are for partial birth abortion, you are for destroying Western Civilization, want to get rid of God in every sphere of public life, you have no morals, you hate capitalism except for yourself, etc. . .the ugliness and bitterness of your soul is going to appear somehow. Look at Whoopi’s picture. Am also reminded of how socialist men, like Hugo Chavez, are so often extremely short and fat and have to grow beards like Fidel Castro and liberal “intellectuals” do to appear more enlightened than how stupid they actually are. Definitely a vicious cycle.
At the risk of being accused of heresy, some of these comments are as vicious as dailykos posts.
She’s full of crap and so her show went down the crapper.
How sweet.
Of course she’s not Scots! She’s Jewish…Goldberg, right?
/joke
Hey Chuck, a female predator as this queen is much preferred than waking to whoopi.
Her real name is Caryn Johnson. I actually like her as an actress, especially as Guinan in Star Trek. So, if she and other entertainers would follow Laura Ingraham’s advice and just “Shut Up and Sing”, they wouldn’t keep crashing and burning like this. The fact that she’s one of only a few to have won an Oscar, Emmy, Tony, and Grammy shows she’s found her niche, as an entertainer, so just shut up and entertain me.
I’m with tre. Good post.
Heretic!
Errah her maiden name is cushion. errah
I have to agree with vickisoup here. The lady cannot help her appearance, eyebrows apart. Lets not descend to that level, please.
As for the appearance of liberals versus conservatives, in all honesty I can’t see that either side has a natural advantage in pulchritude.
See, PB?! I knew it was risky.
(Thanks, Grey Fox…though I had to look up, “pulchritude”
)
Errah, another bark martini please!
“I love waking up with whoopi.”
dam you aj. I lost half a soda on that one. Right outta my nose and into the keyboard.
In all seriousness, although jabs at Whoopi’s appearance are lowbrow, MM’s contributors at their worst don’t hold a candle to the vitriol and hateful spew found at DKos.
Unfortunately, she’s still on The View. Lucky for me, I don’t watch it!
This doesn’t mean she is going to get one of those yoga swings, and hang upside down on the View now, does it? Next thing, she will be hanging out with Hugo Chavez’s bird SMILE
Oh, I don’t think she’s Scottish. I doubt she has any Celtic blood in her. But, I can understand the libs wanting the fairness doctrine. As with any bad loser, you want the rules changed so you win.
Call this one more reason they’re so enthusiastic about reviving the “fairness” doctrine. It’a a very efficient business model: when your ideas can’t compete in the marketplace, just force people to listen!
Too bad, so sad…..NOT. Hahahahahahaaha. Boobyeeeee!
vicki’s no lib….jeesh.
I love it when Teddy shows up!
Put that bark martini on my tab.
What is it about liberal Hollywood actors that makes them believe that, because they may have good looks (not all, but obviously some), can speak a scripted line (only stage actors have to be able to memorize lines), and emote fake emotions, they actually have any intelligent things to say about political, social, or economic topics? From Sheen to Penn, Clooney to Goldberg, Robbins to Franken (the list at times seems endless), attempts by liberal actors to morph into savvy political commentators fail with such certainty as to be in a class with death and taxes (they probably like being joined with the latter).
Well,
She could show up here, and whine about it…oh wait a minute wasn’t Whoopi one of the people insisting Imus be fired last April…hmmm Karma it always finds you.
Imus he has made a list! check out the New York Post article: Imus coming back with a Vengence. This one below has the USA Today Article.
http://imustruth.typepad.com/index/2007/11/peter-johnson-i.html
James Carville, stated to be one of the first guest…damage control for the Clintons?
I had no idea Whoopi’s show was political. She took over on the station that used to have RuPaul as their morning person so I just assumed it was the usual morning drive madness of stupid sound effects and nonsensical conversation.
What about Whoopi I seem to recall she was involved in the pile on last April.
Weasels where are they all now?
http://www.nypost.com/seven/11292007/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm
We already have a government-paid-for liberal radio station. It’s called NPR.
As loud and obnoxious as she is I never knew she had a radio show. Maybe her voice only carried to the Rocky Mountains. Time for the ‘Fairness Doctrine’. We need to help these victims like lib radio hosts.
Thanks for the props, feebie.
Gabe #34
I agree with you even if I’ve stooped to the same tactics as liberals. There is a saying which I’m probably paraphrasing badly; “In order to beat the Devil, you must use the Devil’s tools. If you use the Devil’s tools, you become like the Devil.” Paradoxes always make my head spin.
I think some are missing the point that the posts are in jest, tongue- in -cheek, and served with heaping portion of sarcasm
There is vast distinction from what is posted here v. the kos, simply because most of us have a sense of humor and recognize these posts as just that- humor…I have yet to see humor from the kos, or a sense of it from their ilk.
Who said she was a lib?
#51 – unless i mis-understood….cuz, that happens sometimes….
In the interest of full disclosure (in contrast to CNN, ha ha), I did purpose to listen to “Wake up with Whoopi” when it first debuted, so that I could hear for myself how the other half chatted it up. I listened for about a month. I know, PB…it’s risky for me to admit it!
Truth be told, I didn’t hear much political discourse during that month, but maybe she entered on tiptoe and then let it rip later.
I know I took a posting hiatus in the past month or so, but you’ve got me pegged all wrong
It is wise to study the reasoning of those we disagree with.
good one On-my-soap-box
quote
On November 29th, 2007 at 11:29 am,
On-
my-soap-box said:
W-hoopi
K-ept
T-alking
U-nhinged
F-ailed
M-iserably
unquote
Why do liberals think that comedians/comediennes who tell stupid jokes, and make their livelyhood belittling those with different political views, would capture a listening audience for more than a few minutes?
That’s why these ethically challenged idiots elect Democrats into office…you don’t have to hear them rant incessantly for hours…all you get is sound bites, and (thank God) only seconds of feigned outrage.
They are simular in as much as they both create emotional feelings of dis-satisfaction within their base, and with undecided (apothetic), impressionable voters.
Honestly, I would love to have Whoopi’s job security. Burglar. Jumpin’ Jack Flash. Made in America. Fatal Beauty. Theodore Rex. Bogus. Monkeybone. “Whoopi.” (Mavis hosts her lesbian cousin’s wedding at the hotel the same night Courtney hosts a gathering of right-wing conservatives.) Comedy genius! “Whoopi’s Littleburg.” “Just for Kicks.” Wake Up With Whoopi.
She’ll have another radio show in five minutes.
It’s ok, PB, we’re good. I’m messin’ wif ya.
daddee02004
One word:
Coffee
‘Cause everybody knows:
Blondes have more fun
.oO(hope I don’t get banned for that one)
True dat, Soap!
I can’t take anyone seriously when she tells you that
she named herself after a bodily function because of
her diet when she first started the comedy circuit. Her
brand of zealotry is deceptive because she can deliver
it in such a reasonable fashion.
What they hear/read about conservative talk show hosts makes them think that that’s how they do. Maybe they should try listening for a few minutes to learn the difference.
“…she named herself after a bodily function…”
AJ, is this what you meant by “waking up with Whoopi”? I was imagining something more, you know, more special.
Wood, Vicki, wood.
Please Vicki, waking up with Whoopi was enough of a
picture…now PB has added to it.
Sorry
*blush*
Why, whatevah do you mean, Mistah PB?
Whoopi…. Schmoopie
Who cares?????
Yeah, trinitytim is right, I s’pose.
Well, kids, I gotta go dry my dumb blonde hair and get to work.
Peace out.
Why doesn’t Liberal Radio work? because no one, not even Liberals wants to listen to that much hate, lies, whining and gloom and doom based on nothing but fear and conjecture. this is the difference between Liberal Radio and Conservative Radio. Conservative Radio has an upbeat message of hope, of getting things done, of accepting responsibility for your actions, of anyone can succeed if they apply themselves. It makes people want to listen because it motivates them. Contrast that to any Liberal station and the results are painfully obvious.
So long Whoopie. Now we have one less place to hear about where you have your Bush.
What a shock….no Whoopi!…too bad…she’s so entertaining. I’ve never really understood her popularity in the past. She’s not a funny comedian, her acting is marginal, although I did enjoy that nun movie she made (the first one). It seems that liberal talk radio can’t really thrive in an atmosphere of audio only. You need to keep people’s interest and with now “moving pictures” liberals can’t stay focused for very long. Just recently, a liberal station in San Diego, 1360AM…moved from Air America to sports talk….now I can’t find Randi Rhodes anywhere on my dial…I guess I’ll learn to live with that…
This should be posted under the DLTDHYOTWO category, if there is one. If there isn’t…there should be.
Maybe all those liberals are reading the books that we
conservatives supposedly aren’t reading, instead of
listening to “their” radio station. And Al Gore had such
High Hopes for liberal talk radio. I think we have more
inclination to actually get involved without needing
highly visible public displays of moonbat mentality.
Must.stay.PG.
Yes and no.
I have yet to see on here the true vileness that can be found over at the kos it still doesn’t serve any of us well when it’s just a nasty comment like:
and while:
isn’t exactly phrased in a nasty way would you like someone to ask the same question of your children?
Be constructive or be funny, or both, but don’t just be negative unless it’s your blood-type.
When someone asks, why are most liberals so
unattractive, you can always say, but he/she is kind to
their (insert child/children/type of pet or next door
neighbor) and let it go at that.
I am always positive. O Positive that is yuck yuck! Sorry I had to it was a morale imperative.
It is their ideas that are so unattractive. As much I hate to admit it, I know and see plenty of very attractive liberals. Women anyways.
A+ here
As Grandma always said, “Pretty is as pretty does.”
Lefty radio has no chance because liberals have NPR, courtesy of taxpayers, including high production values, skilled reporters and talkers, big syndication, a measure of decorum that prevents constant, crude spinning, plus some non-political programming. Opera, anyone?
So, Franken and Whoopi were dead on Day 1. Their potential market space is long and well occupied by taxpayer-subsidized lefty radio.
Should taxpayers carry NPR? Of course not. People who don’t listen to NPR shouldn’t pay for somebody else’s radio. Why not raise Pelosi’s taxes and give the money to my favorite country/western station? No? Features on coffee-growing coops in the Third World, that’s a public need? But not Salem news, not Paul Harvey, not Laura?
As long as NPR is around as a taxpayer charity case, out-there leftwing investors who want “real” liberal radio can stop wasting their money. Nobody wins a competitive fight with Congress. Washington prints money. You have to earn it.
Making terrorist watch and listen to Whoopi and the others on the View 24/7 could be a lot more effective than waterboarding. Of course, it’s still torture.
I don’t understand. She had the perfect face for radio.