About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Digging out more CNN/YouTube plants: Abortion questioner is declared Edwards supporter (and a slobbering Anderson Cooper fan); Log Cabin Republican questioner is declared Obama supporter; lead toy questioner is a prominent union activist for the Edwards-endorsing United Steelworkers

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 29, 2007 12:47 AM

Update: New - Muslim questioner was a former CAIR intern.

Update: CNN on the defensive. CNN’s Glenn Beck comments here.

Update: The foliage keeps blooming…a questioner working with Dick Durbin’s staff and a Richardson supporter masquerading as a Paulbot… and a former Jane Harman intern…and the “Blind Black Republican satirist” (a milder species, but still, all in the same family).

Update: Watch video of the disappearing plants. CNN cuts out Keith Kerr from the debate rebroadcast. Keep pulling those weeds…

***
Welcome to Horticulture Journalism 101. (Keep scrolling down for new updates to this handy CNN/YouTube illustrated plant guide.)

5plant.jpg
Concerned Young Undecided Person “Journey” = John Edwards supporter “Journey”

***

3cercone.jpg
Concerned Undecided Log Cabin Republican supporter David Cercone = Obama supporter David Cercone

***

4leeann.jpg
Concerned Undecided Mom LeeAnn Anderson = Activist for the John Edwards-endorsing United Steelworkers union LeeAnn Anderson

***

3lgb.jpg
Concerned Undecided Gay Military Retiree Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr = Hillary/Kerry supporter and anti-”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” activist Keith H. Kerr

***
The best thing about Republicans agreeing to do the CNN/YouTube debate is that it created yet another invaluable opportunity to expose CNN’s abject incompetence.

Retired Brig. Gen./gays in the military lobbyist/Hillary-Kerry supporter Keith H. Kerr wasn’t the only plant at the CNN/YouTube debate. The plant uncovering is in full-swing over at Free Republic.

Example: “Journey,” a.k.a. “Paperserenade,” the girl who asked an abortion question, is a declared John Edwards supporter.

You couldn’t tell from the video that CNN aired, where she’s wearing a plain shirt:

1journey.jpg

But if you click through on her YouTube profile, you see her latest video in response to the candidates’ answers. And she’s prominently wearing…her John Edwards ‘08 t-shirt:

In case CNN’s eyesight is impaired:

6journey.jpg

How, you ask, should CNN have known? Well, on her YouTube profile, this woman links to her personal blog, where her user profile makes her political leanings crystal clear:

1edwards.jpg

Turns out “Journey/” “paperserenade” is also a big slobbering Anderson Cooper fan. She posted this video a month ago exulting that “Anderson Cooper said my name!” during a CNN viewer comment segment. She wrote, “Horrible video, but at least I’ve got some type of recording of this event that has made my week!:”

On her blog, she posted an Anderson Cooper segment from VH1 with the following comment: “Anderson officially had the Best Week Ever for the week of 10/26/07, and looked more delicious than a pic-i-nic basket while doing so. And lookie, I found the video and uploaded it to Youtube for y’all. :D”

“Delicious!”

***

Update: And another one…Brian McMurphy at SixMeatBuffet (hat tip See-Dubya) notes that David Cercone, the Pompano Beach, Florida, man who asked the question about Log Cabin Republicans, is a declared Obama supporter.

1cercone.jpg

His video:

Hillary must have shared a bag of her fertilizer with CNN. And yeah, it stinks:

1manure.jpg

***

Update: And another one…via The Autopsy…The lead toy questioner, LeeAnn Anderson, who appears to be an ordinary mom concerned about her two children, whom she includes in her video, is a prominent Pittsburgh union activist–and aide to Leo Gerard, President of the American Steel Workers Union/John Edwards supporter.

Her video:

If you go to the United Steelworkers YouTube page, you’ll see that Ms. Anderson’s video question is the featured video…along with a John Edwards ‘08 icon (click for full-size):

1usw.jpg

1usw002.jpg

***

“Constructive incompetence” or “convenient ineptitude?”

You decide.

***

More: “Total crap.” Can’t argue with that.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Michelle Malkin » Liveblogging the CNN/YouTube debate: “Edginess,” “elbows, “eh.” Update: Romney’s the Energizer candidate; Update: PLANT ALERT; The biggest stumble of the night award goes to…CNN
  2. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Debate questioner is affiliated with Hillary’s — and Kerry’s — campaigns
  3. JunkYardBlog
  4. A NEWT ONE
  5. Another Plant? « The Autopsy
  6. CNN Let’s Hillary Backer Ask Question at GOP Debate » The American Mind
  7. No defense at Hoystory
  8. Ed Driscoll.com
  9. GINA COBB
  10. Log Cabin Republicans at The Bitch Girls
  11. Ron Paul on Abortion at The Bitch Girls
  12. Rhymes With Right
  13. Post Debate Observations « Blogs 4 Conservatives
  14. Outside The Beltway | OTB
  15. PrestoPundit » Blog Archive » Plantmania! The CNN/YouTube Freak Show
  16. Plains Feeder
  17. Hillary’s garden « Crush Liberalism
  18. Planting Questions « The Van Der Galiën Gazette
  19. Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » Hillary Plant in Republican CNN YouTube Debate?
  20. snapped shot
  21. No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » Plant ‘em!
  22. Right Wing Nut House » CNN HOLDS GOP DEBATE - MOSTLY
  23. Blogmeister USA
  24. Right Angles » Blog Archive » More CNN/YouTube Democratic plants
  25. Steve Spinks
  26. Sock puppet at the “debate” | BitsBlog
  27. Neocon News
  28. BackyardConservative
  29. Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense
  30. Church and State
  31. Blue Crab Boulevard
  32. Liberty Pundit
  33. Bill's Notes
  34. Suitably Flip
  35. Brain Shavings
  36. Bottom Line Up Front
  37. Pirate's Cove
  38. Gay Patriot
  39. Daily Takes » Blog Archive » CNN YouTube Debate Full of Democrat Plants
  40. FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog » GOP You Tube Presidential Debate Watch: CNN Fails to Vet Clinton Gay Partisan and Others
  41. CNN Unfairly Bashes Fred » The American Mind
  42. » Follow-up: Even More CNN/YouTube Discoveries Election Geek Blog 2008 Presidential Election News Twenty-Four Hours a Day
  43. PoliticalDerby.com: Home of the Original 2008 White House Power Rankings
  44. Commentary » Blog Archive » CNN: The Last Name In News
  45. Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah's Military Guys..
  46. Arena of Ideas » Blog Archive » At least four Democrat activist selected in 11-28-2007 GOP “YouTube” Debate.
  47. BobKrumm.com » Fredblogging
  48. Dinocrat » Blog Archive » The spectre of Eason Jordan
  49. Laugh At Liberals Web Blog » THE CNN REPUBLICAN DEBATE AND YOU-TUBE BOTANICAL GARDEN
  50. Stop Her Now » Blog Archive » Hillary now planting GOP questions
  51. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: The disappearing Hillary plant; Update: Does it matter who the questions come from?
  52. Plants in The CNN/YouTube Debate « Truth and Grace
  53. AmericanElephant
  54. Conservative Blog Therapy
  55. More Plants Discovered At CNN Debate : Ian Schwartz
  56. PAXALLES
  57. Hyscience
  58. pamibe » Blog Archive » Republican debate feedback
  59. Moonbattery
  60. Don Surber » Blog Archive » Republicans should thank Democrats
  61. The 0011 Blog » CNN - You Tube Debate plants.
  62. Hillary Plants at the Republican Debate? Who Cares? » Odd Culture
  63. Hillary plants question in Republican debate - Benzworld.org - Mercedes Benz Discussion Forum
  64. Hang Right Politics » Perhaps the MSM loves conservatives, after all.
  65. More CNN Plants -Assorted Babble by Suzie
  66. Protestant Pontifications » More on the CNN Debate Plants
  67. Three Sources
  68. Shouldn’t CNN Be Getting Annoyed With Hillary? « Nice Deb
  69. Texas Rainmaker » CNN’s Gardening Tip Line: How To Plant Hillary Democrat Supporters into a Republican Debate
  70. The Reality Project
  71. CosmicConservative » Clinton Campaign plants questions in Republican Debate
  72. Hillary's Towering Gardening Skills | No Hillary Clinton
  73. Riehl World View
  74. race42008.com » Blog Archive » Race 4 2008 Early Morning Essential Reads
  75. WuzzaDem
  76. Daily Pundit » Reaping What You Sow
  77. CNN regains its old 90s title « Happycrow’s Eyeball Factory
  78. Digging out more CNN/YouTube plants: - Debate Politics Forums
  79. CNN Debates Reveal Strong, Long Clinton Ties « THE “G” BLOG @WordPress.com
  80. The Republican Presidential Debate « m a r k a n d e y a
  81. Solomonia
  82. The Planters Are In Full Bloom : A South Dakota Moderate
  83. You conservatives are in deep trouble - NY Sports Day Forums
  84. The DNCNN-YouTube-Idiocracy Debate
  85. Republican You-Tube Debate « THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS
  86. The Anchoress » Blog Archive » CNN-YouTube Debates: The good, the bad and the ugly
  87. Publius Pundit
  88. THE HOT JOINTS | Breaking News and Opinion
  89. Gay General member of Hillary’s campaign « Musings of a Thoughtful Conservative
  90. The Black Informant | If Fox News is “unfair and unbalanced”, what does that make CNN?
  91. That’s an Interesting Interpretation of “Even Playing Field” You Have There. : The Sundries Shack
  92. Random Nuclear Strikes » Last night’s Dog and Pony Show
  93. Whore-to-culture
  94. Snarky Bastards » Blog Archive » Fair and Balanced
  95. The Plant Life Of Anderson Cooper And CNN (Clinton News Network) | No Hillary Clinton
  96. Ace of Spades HQ
  97. Boycotting CNN « THE CONSERVATIVE ALTERNATIVE
  98. CNN = Pravda?: Media muscles flex to fix election « the lower casefiles
  99. Common Sense and Wonder » CNN debate and dishonesty.
  100. Plant-O-Rama « First State Politics
  101. EphBlog
  102. The Festering Swamp
  103. Sword At-The-Ready
  104. Ron Paul - the non-interventionist, white-flag-waving appeasement anti-war surrender monkey « Sword At-The-Ready
  105. CNN gets busted again. - Kawasaki Motorcycle Forums
  106. small dead animals
  107. GOP and College
  108. CNN’s World of Plants · New York Articles
  109. Big Dogs Weblog
  110. Big Dogs Weblog
  111. CNN’s Shameful Planting
  112. The Radio Patriot
  113. America Needs Me
  114. Articles of Interest, November 29th, 2007 « The American Muslim
  115. Republican CNN/YouTube Debate - Page 4 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum
  116. YouTube Gets Grounded at Blog P.I.
  117. Riehl World View
  118. Some Thoughts on CNN/YouTube Debate » The Bivings Report
  119. BIRD
  120. Hillary plants question in Republican debate - Page 6 - Political Hotwire
  121. CNN is a Bias Joke - Political Hotwire
  122. More Planted Questions « The View from Alexandria
  123. Washington Wire - WSJ.com : Planting Season?
  124. Leave Our Plants ALONE!! « Bilby’s
  125. And Then There Were Six (Or Seven (Or Eight)) Planted Questions at CNN debate! | No Hillary Clinton
  126. CNN Aces Horticulture Journalism 101 : Todd And = Marketing + Media
  127. The "Hey, where's our CNN/YouTube debacle post?" post [Karl]
  128. Blogs For Fred Thompson
  129. America In Danger - The Blog » Blog Archive » Digging out more CNN/YouTube plants
  130. Conservative Musings
  131. CNN: The Most (Dis)Trusted Name in News™ « Copia Verborum
  132. Digging out more CNN/YouTube plants: - Page 12 - Debate Politics Forums
  133. CNN, biased liberal Media exposed. - Debate Politics Forums
  134. plants « My Rants
  135. The Curt Jester
  136. JunkYardBlog
  137. Hot Air » Blog Archive » CNN producer last week: We want GOP debate to be … “a debate of their party”
  138. monoblogue
  139. The Question | PAWaterCooler.com
  140. Bear Creek Ledger » CNN’s Plants Thrive in YouTube Republican Debate
  141. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Dump debates
  142. CNN Plants Democrats To Ask Questions At Republican Debate : American Conservative Daily
  143. Wonkette
  144. Right Angle Blog » Fred Thompson’s Attack Ad
  145. Mark My Words
  146. On Ulterior Motives of YouTube Debate Questioners
  147. Leave Our Plants ALONE!! (Update: CNN runs with the lefty spin) « Bilby’s
  148. SameOldSchmidt » Blog Archive » Plants?
  149. More “undecideds” exposed as Democrat operatives in GOP YouTube debate at Tupelo Geek
  150. CLINTON NEWS NETWORK IS AT IT AGAIN… « Democrat Equals Socialist
  151. Mark Levin Fan » Blog Archive » Michelle Malkin: GOP debate lib plants "entire greenhouse"
  152. The Bilerico Project
  153. Bluey Blog | RobertBluey.com » Debating the Debate: Tough Times for CNN
  154. CNN Screws it Up Again at The Bitch Girls
  155. The liberal news media : [H] Hegemonic Pundit
  156. Madison County Republicans » Blog Archive » On CNN/YouTube Debate, Republicans Answer the Questions that Matter Most….. To Democrats!
  157. Video: Olby and Edwards Attack Conservatives For Pointing Out Democratic Plants : Ian Schwartz
  158. YouTube-CNN Republican Debate Reflects Poorly on New Media
  159. Grizzly Groundswell » CNN, How Does Your Garden Grow?
  160. American Politics: Theater Of The Absurd « Out West
  161. Wizbang
  162. » Politcs and the Art of War: Considering the CNN YouTube Debate Debacle » Leaning Straight Up » Blog Archive »
  163. House of Eratosthenes
  164. BizzyBlog » Couldn’t Help But Notice (113007)
  165. The Clinton News Network- GooTube Republican Debate
  166. The Marshian Chronicles » Short Rounds #72
  167. Scott Allan’s World » Blog Archive » YouTube/CNN scandal grows
  168. Ben’s Blog » Blog Archive » Michelle Malkin - Digging out more CNN/YouTube plants: Abortion questioner is declared Edwards supporter (and a slobbering Anderson Cooper fan); Log Cabin Republican questioner is declared Obama supporter; lea
  169. Plants and Weeds | American Princess
  170. jillstanek.com
  171. Michelle Malkin » CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking”
  172. The CNN/YouTube debacle, Pt. 3 [Karl]
  173. QT Monster's DittoPod Index of The Rush Limbaugh Program
  174. Rethink.
  175. Bruised Orange » Fact Checking as “Stalking”
  176. Classical Values
  177. andreas04: close to attraction
  178. JasonColeman.com
  179. ChaosScenario
  180. YouTube-CNN Republican Debate Reflects Poorly on New Media | moraaz.org - feed all tech!
  181. GOP CNN/YOUTUBE DEBATE « The Domain for Truth
  182. geschichten.cc » YouTube-CNN Republican Debate Reflects Poorly on New Media
  183. Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Dems Said Fox Was Dishonest?
  184. Moonbattery
  185. The Republic of Dave » Blog Archive » Sandbagging the Candidates
  186. The Right Place
  187. Grizzly Groundswell » CNN Republican Debate: Not Just A Plant, But A Whole Nursery
  188. YouTube-CNN Republican Debate Reflects Poorly on New Media teasered @ Feed UP !!
  189. YouTube-CNN Republican Debate Reflects Poorly on New Media teasered @ Feed UP !!
  190. Villa Julie College Republican’s-Blog » Another Debate Another Plant
  191. Kah Zoohl List
  192. Baseball Crank
  193. TEN JACK TEN » Blog Archive » This Week In Stupid - 12/1/07
  194. POLITICS: Quick Links 12/3/07 | Sports 4 Dorks
  195. YouTuber: CNN, Cooper Knew Kerr
  196. Anderson Cooper KNEW Gen. Kerr…?! — 1389 Blog - Antijihadist Tech
  197. “Not an Honest Broker” « Something should go here, maybe later.
  198. CNN/You Tube Debate Scandal
  199. QT Monster's DittoPod Index of The Rush Limbaugh Program
  200. Uhhh, the dog ate my book « You’re Making Me Do This…
  201. Flashpoint » Blog Archive » Finally, some commentary on the BoobTube debate
  202. Brent Bozell Discusses CNN « The Christ Follower Blog
  203. a7756bb69be54292a285
  204. It’s About the U.S. Constitution, Citizens! « WorldViewPoints
  205. AMERICAN NONSENSE » CNN to Team with Google for Next GOP Debate
  206. Michelle Malkin » The Iowa GOP Debate
  207. Oh, There Was Another Debate Today « Bilby’s
  208. c2f1c0b5d40187a73020
  209. 600d6692331c7bc38ad9
  210. CNN’s Plants Thrive in YouTube Republican Debate
  211. http ru youtube com
  212. Michelle Malkin » Nutroots ballistic: We demand a stultifyingly dull debate! Or else!
  213. Smells like teen outrage | Cold Fury
  214. Now CNN Is Getting A Bit Hypocritical « Beltway Snark
  215. CNN/YouTube Debate: Ethics & Plants
  216. Commentary » Blog Archive » Flotsam and Jetsam

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

  1. #201
    On November 29th, 2007 at 7:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    eeks “and is not undecided”

  2. #202
    On November 29th, 2007 at 7:41 pm, a crapweasel said:

    Kudos to the Producer at CNN who came up with this brilliant ideal. Unfortunately, I feel they won’t be employed too much longer. In one fell swoop they have given CNN another black eye and the Hillary Campaign broken teeth to go with the broken nose from the Vegas debate, and black eyes from the Russert debate and Iowa plants.

    The best part in this is to see if any of the Republican candidates learned anything from this fiasco. They should have known better in the first place to have gone.

    Whoever it was that said on this board that Michelle isn’t a journalist is as about clueless as Anderson Cooper is.

    Outstanding job Michelle!

  3. #203
    On November 29th, 2007 at 7:49 pm, DesertLover said:

    CNN = Crapweasel News Network

  4. #204
    On November 29th, 2007 at 7:50 pm, beenthere said:

    Any Republican candidate who did not fully expect this to happen, did not have plans to deal with it when it did, and did not have a strategy to turn these questions back against the plants, was, it, and always will be a fool and should quit the campaign in disgrace as having confessed to the whole of humanity of being utterly unable to lead what is left of this country and the free world.

    This is CNN! A fully-owned subsidiary of the democrat party. What did they expect? This is Youtube, which might as well be. These guys are never going to play nice. Why should they?

    It’s not that Republicans don’t learn; it’s that they cannot learn, will never learn, hate the thought of learning.

    I am so sick of the Party of Stupid. That’s right: the PoS.

  5. #205
    On November 29th, 2007 at 7:52 pm, TeutonicNomad said:

    I have no problem with the Republicans getting all these inane questions from the lefties; they are parried so easily. It’s too bad that the DNC, CNN and the rest of the alphabet are to scared to let their folks answer real questions; they think protecting them is going to be a winning strategy, losers!

    The retired general portrayed himself as openly gay; there is no way that he had that conviction while he was in uniform. He was in the closet all the way through; and that’s where he should stay. I’m not a fan of don’t ask, don’t tell; it is the best that the gay community can expect or deserve.

    Lastly, CNN has proved over and over that it is the DNC’s lapdog. I think this u-tube experiment is a bust and never expected any different. The MSM is trying desperately to shape these elections that belong to it’s citizens. The best part is that they are constantly being exposed by MM and her com padres; keep it up.

  6. #206
    On November 29th, 2007 at 8:06 pm, DesertLover said:

    beenthere

    You Tube is owned by CNN … any more questions?

  7. #207
    On November 29th, 2007 at 8:13 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    I think some people are missing Michelle’s terrifically relevent perspective on this which defines everything about this story: for as long as such things have been going on, “undecided” voters are the ones who have been brought forward for their questions and responses; “undecided” voters are the ones who are often targeted with the greatest scrutiny by poll takers for obvious reasons. CNN has disavowed the traditional history by pretending that “undecided” or “identified as republican or democrat” is somehow irrelevent; that “the average” person is good enough.

    It isn’t good enough. It never has been and it never will be no matter what CNN says to excuse it’s collective, unconscionaby prejudiced self.

    I’m glad to see people raising their voices about the cowardly Democrat candidates not debating on Fox. Hopefully this will prove to be the straw that broke the camel’s back for millions of angry and disenchanted citizens - but only if people keep their voices loud on this insane set of circumstances that flies in the face of everything our forefather’s carefully constructed by way of a balanced two-party system.

    TO THOSE WELL PLACED TO DO SUCH THINGS: FOX SHOULD BE PRESSED HARD TO INVITE THE DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES TO DEBATE ON FOX NEWS NOW - NOW, BEFORE THIS STORY GOES AWAY… AND HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE ON-AIR FOR THEIR RESPONSES. LET THE WORLD KNOW WHAT KIND OF ‘LEADERS’ THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES ARE IN THE FACE OF ‘ADVERSITY”.

  8. #208
    On November 29th, 2007 at 9:04 pm, purplepeep said:

    Mr_Conservative_Cat said:
    for as long as such things have been going on, “undecided” voters are the ones who have been brought forward for their questions and response

    Y’know, mrCC, the real problem here is clarity. What’s needed is for an enterprising guy/gal with a microphone to go up to these people and grill them:
    “What the h-ll are you undecided about??”

  9. #209
    On November 29th, 2007 at 9:30 pm, huggybear said:

    The GOP needs to start playing dirty or concede the electoral process!

    L . O . L ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! And then some !!!!!!!!

  10. #210
    On November 29th, 2007 at 10:03 pm, Sergeant Tim said:

    Michelle Malkin discussed last night’s garden party with Mark Levin tonight on his radio show. (Full disclosure: that’s my post)

  11. #211
    On November 29th, 2007 at 10:17 pm, gandolphxx said:

    “He retired as a California Army National Guard colonel,” said Campenni. “It is common at Guard retirement ceremonies to give an honorary promotion to colonels to the STATE rank of Brigadier General…[but] it has no meaning other than a fancy certificate for the wall and use of the title at local Guard functions.”

    Campenni said the rank of general is not federally recognized and the title can not be used or the rank worn outside the state.

    - There’s More to the Keith Kerr Story

    This gets better as it ages.

  12. #212
    On November 29th, 2007 at 10:31 pm, SilverCat said:

    All this outrage about ‘who’ asked the questions is just a smokescreen to cover up the fact that none of the Republican candidates (except maybe McCain) came across as Presidential. Just more anger and shallowness.

  13. #213
    On November 29th, 2007 at 11:16 pm, DannoJyd said:

    Clinton News Network GooTube Republican Debate
    That pretty much says it all, and while we who follow the political shenanigans of the leftists did expect this debate to be a sham again we were surprised by the depths that liberals will go to in their effort to fool the stupid American people. Yes, I said the stupid people due to democrats believing the average American to be stupid enough to be fooled by their pre-conspired machinations. Yes, I did use the CONSPIRACY word as it is impossible for so many liberal extremist activists to be passed by screeners. Yes, I said extremists as it is plain to see that these people just used extreme measures in their attempts to fool us all.
    In the meantime it is good to see SO many liberal apologists here. I’m glad they support the acts of their beloved liars and will be expecting to again see their support for having known republican activists at the next democrat debate. I just hope we have a few who can stay awake through one of those…
    I’m damn certain that laws were broken by the Clinton News Network. I’ll be eagerly awaiting the results of the necessary investigation into this farce perpetuated by the Clinton News Network in collusion with GooTube. Let the subpoenas begin!

  14. #214
    On November 29th, 2007 at 11:36 pm, puhiawa said:

    CNN is basically anti-American. These ‘journalists’ consider themselves citozens of the world. Since the GOP is marginally more patriotic (Bush-Pres, ex officio, Mexico), they want to do what they can to prove to their viewers that they are true moonbats. Their act is well received in Iran, Arabia, China (laughing), and Venezuela.

  15. #215
    On November 29th, 2007 at 11:41 pm, Poison said:

    On November 29th, 2007 at 4:27 am, Kentucky Unclaimed Money said:

    Haha, just caught your update on the other Edwards supporter.

    Can you guys imagine, CAN YOU IMAGINE, if during a Fox News Democrat debate (oh wait, the Dems backed out didn’t they?) picked as questioners right-wing evangelical mega-church pastors, NRA chapter presidents, or minute men, all of whom had professed their love for a particular GOP candidate on the internet? CAN YOU IMAGINE IT?

    I’ve been imagining it all day (didn’t see your post until now though). There would be hearings… investigations… lawsuits… calls to boycott all of FOX’s advertisers (oh wait, I think we already have that)… demands that each GOP candidate denounce FOX’s actions… Michael Moore documentaries… and if none of that worked, they would try to use it to have the election results overturned.

  16. #216
    On November 29th, 2007 at 11:52 pm, almeehan said:

    When will the people storm the CNN complex with pitch forks and torches? Really folks, we can babble, blog & bellyache til we are all blue in the face but the truth is they (MSM, Libs & Dems) are flipping the country the bird and don’t care if they are caught. That is how evil and contemptuous they are. No fear, no shame. There are frightening similarities in the power struggle going on in Venezuela and what is happening in the USA right now. The people are realizing there, perhaps too late, that their backs are against the wall and they are in the streets. Sadly we may wake up one day soon to the same scenario. Let’s beat on their door and make them look over their shoulder.

  17. #217
    On November 30th, 2007 at 12:20 am, josetheguerilla said:

    So let me get this strait, the Dems will not do a debate on Foxnews, because they can’t plant questions like they do at CNN. Right?

  18. #218
    On November 30th, 2007 at 2:30 am, PowWow said:

    And tonight on Olby’s car wreck, Silky spoke up about it. He said he didn’t see why candidates from the other side can’t answer questions from democrats. I don’t remember the exact words. But that was the gist of his segment.
    I had a hard time paying attention. Because I was wastching those two after all. But coming from a guy that won’t go on FNC. And who complains that everyone picks on him. Speaking to a guy that never has guests on that don’t agree with him, I found it very sickening.

  19. #219
    On November 30th, 2007 at 6:41 am, ProudGulfWarVet65 said:

    On November 29th, 2007 at 10:31 pm, SilverCat said:

    All this outrage about ‘who’ asked the questions is just a smokescreen to cover up the fact that none of the Republican candidates (except maybe McCain) came across as Presidential. Just more anger and shallowness.

    And which question that was asked gave any of them the opportunity to come across as presidential? That’s the bloody point of all this! And no doubt you like McCain for saying ‘we failed in Iraq’ and because he supported amnesty before he didn’t support amnesty. Cripes…

  20. #220
    On November 30th, 2007 at 7:10 am, jungatheart said:

    Michelle’s gonna be on Fox News around 8AM Eastern time today, Friday.

  21. #221
    On November 30th, 2007 at 12:38 pm, legalbgl said:

    Its like the New York Times…All the news thats fit to make up.

    Its sad when our news outlets have turned into entertainment vehicles. I want the news. I want a debate without plants. I want honest news reporting, not relying on terorists feeds.

    Someone please explain why the news media insists on treating us like uneducated morons who will eat up anything they put out there.

    Enough of this. Get back to good old honest journalism!!! Stop creating the news and simply report it!!!

  22. #222
    On November 30th, 2007 at 1:56 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    On November 30th, 2007 at 12:20 am, josetheguerilla said:
    So let me get this strait, the Dems will not do a debate on Foxnews, because they can’t plant questions like they do at CNN. Right?

    Among other things. Personally I think it’s just a terrible fear of their BS unravelling. It must be tough to live every day of your life balancing on the head of a pin.

    DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES; AGREE TO FOX NEWS’ OFFER TO DEBATE NOW

Comment pages: « 1 2 [3]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Attack of the killer GOP balloons!

September 5, 2008 01:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Andrea Mitchell in hostile territory.

Liberal Republicans lick their wounds

September 4, 2008 04:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

177 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“We were looking for someone who would be transformative and take control of the party away from the social conservatives.”

Liberal press: GOP needs more minorities we can rip apart

September 4, 2008 03:25 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Bean-counting.

Two covers, one conclusion

September 3, 2008 01:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

60 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

What liberal media?

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

130 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Curb your enthusiasm.

What the GOP platform says about immigration

September 2, 2008 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The rule of law.

Thinky Linky: the UnRealists

September 1, 2008 09:03 AM by see-dubya

27 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

“…the behavior of nations, like human nature, is unchanging…”


Categories: 2008 campaign, GOP, Media Bias, YouTube


TigerHawk

» Rank sexism

PoliPundit.com

» Yesterday’s Sample

David Frum

» Why Bother?

The Sundries Shack

» Gutless Gutman