Comments on: CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking” http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:13:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Families Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan | Right Voices http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-504593 Hawaii Ending Universal Child Health Care After 7 Months Because Families Were Dropping Private Coverage So Their Children Would Be Eligible For The Subsidized Plan | Right Voices Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:33:07 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-504593 [...] CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking” [...] [...] CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking” [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Gawker lies again http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-459246 Michelle Malkin » Gawker lies again Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:56:58 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-459246 [...] (But never mind. In their warped heads, there’s no difference at all between republishing public information made public by those individuals and publishing private photos of children obtained through the federal crime of illegal e-mail hacking. While we’re on the subject of nutroots talking points, it looks like they forgot to dredge up my “stalking” of the Graeme Frost family and CNN/YouTube debate plants.) [...] [...] (But never mind. In their warped heads, there’s no difference at all between republishing public information made public by those individuals and publishing private photos of children obtained through the federal crime of illegal e-mail hacking. While we’re on the subject of nutroots talking points, it looks like they forgot to dredge up my “stalking” of the Graeme Frost family and CNN/YouTube debate plants.) [...]

]]> By: SILENCING THE RIGHT « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-401024 SILENCING THE RIGHT « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:00:35 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-401024 [...] label it “stalking” to publish public e-mail contact information for anti-war shills, or to Google Democrat donors, or to vet Democrat health care sob stories by actually reporting on their financial [...] [...] label it “stalking” to publish public e-mail contact information for anti-war shills, or to Google Democrat donors, or to vet Democrat health care sob stories by actually reporting on their financial [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Document drop: The “Accountable America” warning letter targeting GOP donors http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-398978 Michelle Malkin » Document drop: The “Accountable America” warning letter targeting GOP donors Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:23:56 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-398978 [...] it “stalking” to publish public e-mail contact information for anti-war shills, or to Google Democrat donors, or to vet Democrat health care sob stories by actually reporting on their financial [...] [...] it “stalking” to publish public e-mail contact information for anti-war shills, or to Google Democrat donors, or to vet Democrat health care sob stories by actually reporting on their financial [...]

]]> By: ScottyDog http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-186293 ScottyDog Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:23:44 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-186293 <blockquote>davenp35 said: I have a serious question. Couldn’t a FEC complaint be filed for them to look into whether CNN (or some of it’s employees) <strong>is intentionally trying to boost Dem candidates</strong> and degrade Republican ones? It’s pretty obvious that some of their execs have a biased political agenda and in light of the recent alegations of illegality here… Just a thought.</blockquote> Dave I was hoping somebody would respond to your question. I too think what CNN and the rest of the MSM is doing is in fact Illegal or a violation of campaign finance laws. People keep saying we should just change the channel or call them out on their misrepresentations. For the first time in History, the MSM is actively trying to rig a election. They no longer are even trying to hide the fact that they are trying to elect Hillary Clinton and are rigging Presidential Debates to that end. If CNN and MSNBC are going to campaign for their candidate, they should have to register with the FEC and the campaigning should have a dollar value ascribed to their efforts. That way every thing can be out in the open instead of hiding behind the first amendment. This is no longer just a left right bias issue, it has become interference in the election of the President of the United States. IMHO-They have already exceeded any financial limits that would apply to rigging the debates. I am stunned that people do not see this as a violation of campaign laws and do not see this as criminal act. Attorneys, What say you?

davenp35 said:

I have a serious question. Couldn’t a FEC complaint be filed for them to look into whether CNN (or some of it’s employees) is intentionally trying to boost Dem candidates and degrade Republican ones? It’s pretty obvious that some of their execs have a biased political agenda and in light of the recent alegations of illegality here… Just a thought.

Dave I was hoping somebody would respond to your question. I too think what CNN and the rest of the MSM is doing is in fact Illegal or a violation of campaign finance laws.

People keep saying we should just change the channel or call them out on their misrepresentations.

For the first time in History, the MSM is actively trying to rig a election. They no longer are even trying to hide the fact that they are trying to elect Hillary Clinton and are rigging Presidential Debates to that end.

If CNN and MSNBC are going to campaign for their candidate, they should have to register with the FEC and the campaigning should have a dollar value ascribed to their efforts. That way every thing can be out in the open instead of hiding behind the first amendment.

This is no longer just a left right bias issue, it has become interference in the election of the President of the United States.

IMHO-They have already exceeded any financial limits that would apply to rigging the debates.

I am stunned that people do not see this as a violation of campaign laws and do not see this as criminal act.

Attorneys, What say you?

]]> By: David Rossie Pouts About Those Nasty Right-Wingers : RSSBinghamton.com http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185952 David Rossie Pouts About Those Nasty Right-Wingers : RSSBinghamton.com Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:21:15 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185952 [...] Homework: For a great read on this general topic from a national A-List blogger–Michelle Malkin–read her excellent recent post titled “CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking”. [...] [...] Homework: For a great read on this general topic from a national A-List blogger–Michelle Malkin–read her excellent recent post titled “CNN apologists accuse critics of “stalking”. [...]

]]> By: NOW RESEARCHING DEM PLANTS IS STALKING « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185860 NOW RESEARCHING DEM PLANTS IS STALKING « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:23:45 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185860 [...] Michelle Malkin has the details. [...] [...] Michelle Malkin has the details. [...]

]]> By: sherlock http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185440 sherlock Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:55:44 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185440 #48 When did you hear Mara Liasson say that? I listened to her report on NPR the morning after and there was no mention of the "plants" issue, or of any of the questions they asked, including the gay "General". When did she decide to come clean? #48 When did you hear Mara Liasson say that? I listened to her report on NPR the morning after and there was no mention of the “plants” issue, or of any of the questions they asked, including the gay “General”.

When did she decide to come clean?

]]> By: guspapa http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185383 guspapa Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:46:05 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185383 Not a problem for CNN, now they have a Lewinsky moment to savor and Presidential Hylary saving the world from whacko's with flares duct taped to their bellies. Didn't even have to call in an air strike on Baghdad to get everyone's focus off this issue Not a problem for CNN, now they have a Lewinsky moment to savor and Presidential Hylary saving the world from whacko’s with flares duct taped to their bellies.

Didn’t even have to call in an air strike on Baghdad to get everyone’s focus off this issue

]]> By: Prime Director http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185078 Prime Director Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:27:41 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185078 <blockquote>MSM journalists and their protectionists don’t like Internet researchers, bloggers, and talk radio hosts</blockquote> MM is no ordinary blogger. She's an accomplished journalist in her own right. That's why she's so damn good at what she does. Postmoderns say "the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house". The MSM only wishes this was true. MM's hobby is using <em>their</em> tools to bring <em>their</em> house down around <em>their</em> ears.

MSM journalists and their protectionists don’t like Internet researchers, bloggers, and talk radio hosts

MM is no ordinary blogger. She’s an accomplished journalist in her own right. That’s why she’s so damn good at what she does.

Postmoderns say “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house”. The MSM only wishes this was true.

MM’s hobby is using their tools to bring their house down around their ears.

]]> By: hadsil http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185024 hadsil Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:59:16 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185024 "Google it" - Rosie O'donnell “Google it” – Rosie O’donnell

]]> By: Mr_Conservative_Cat http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-185001 Mr_Conservative_Cat Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:55:42 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-185001 Michelle, you're a national treasure... of responsible values, among other things. Noo ne need tell you to wear their contempt like badge of honor. You were quoted by Hannity the other night who credited you with being the first to post the info. If you were this good but on the left, you'd be as revered to the mainstream press as Will Rogers or Murrow. You keep fighting the good fight and we'll enrage the left further by supporting you and getting your words out. Deal? Michelle, you’re a national treasure… of responsible values, among other things. Noo ne need tell you to wear their contempt like badge of honor.

You were quoted by Hannity the other night who credited you with being the first to post the info.

If you were this good but on the left, you’d be as revered to the mainstream press as Will Rogers or Murrow.

You keep fighting the good fight and we’ll enrage the left further by supporting you and getting your words out. Deal?

]]> By: Grey Fox http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-184972 Grey Fox Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:34:08 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-184972 Hey Michelle, A quibble on language - A stalking horse is something used for cover while stalking. The phrase originally comes from the practice of hiding behind a horse while it grazed in a field and slowly moved towards those partridges - partridges don't notice if a horse has six legs. A stalking horse provides a screen for the stalker, but doesn't itself stalk. Ergo, a stalking horse is something that looks innocent, but hides danger. For example, "The Children" is a stalking horse for increased government control. You, yourself, are the hunter, and seem to have struck home, judging by the reaction! Hey Michelle,
A quibble on language – A stalking horse is something used for cover while stalking. The phrase originally comes from the practice of hiding behind a horse while it grazed in a field and slowly moved towards those partridges – partridges don’t notice if a horse has six legs. A stalking horse provides a screen for the stalker, but doesn’t itself stalk.
Ergo, a stalking horse is something that looks innocent, but hides danger. For example, “The Children” is a stalking horse for increased government control.

You, yourself, are the hunter, and seem to have struck home, judging by the reaction!

]]> By: WarTip http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-184936 WarTip Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:10:11 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-184936 <blockquote> On November 30th, 2007 at 2:26 pm, bipartisancomplainer said: Hope you are able to take all this negative bashing for what it is - a positive indication of how far-reaching your influence is becoming!</blockquote> Woot Woot! Score one for the good "guys" <blockquote> On November 30th, 2007 at 2:42 pm, max said: They think they’re just being stalked, until they find out they’ve been ….MaglaGONGED! :)</blockquote> Sorry Michelle but this is TOO FUNNY! CNN Pwned! The truth will set you free CNN but first it will make you miserable!

On November 30th, 2007 at 2:26 pm, bipartisancomplainer said:

Hope you are able to take all this negative bashing for what it is – a positive indication of how far-reaching your influence is becoming!

Woot Woot! Score one for the good “guys”

On November 30th, 2007 at 2:42 pm, max said:

They think they’re just being stalked, until they find out they’ve been ….MaglaGONGED!
:)

Sorry Michelle but this is TOO FUNNY! CNN Pwned!

The truth will set you free CNN but first it will make you miserable!

]]> By: brooklyn red http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/comment-page-1/#comment-184901 brooklyn red Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:20:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/cnn-apologists-accuse-critics-of-stalking/#comment-184901 Karen444, the point is they (CNN) have the agenda... they didn't fail to screen, they perpetrated this fraud. Karen444, the point is they (CNN) have the agenda… they didn’t fail to screen, they perpetrated this fraud.

]]>