<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, Barbara Boxer: Move on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-186053</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-186053</guid>
		<description>A Californian myself, even the liberals I talk to here have known for years that Boxer is an idiot.  She&#039;s a model of the stereotype elitist liberal, who has professed (unintentionally) her complete unfamiliarity with our nation&#039;s foreign affairs history on numerous occasions in print news in our state.

It baffles me how she keeps getting re-elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Californian myself, even the liberals I talk to here have known for years that Boxer is an idiot.  She&#8217;s a model of the stereotype elitist liberal, who has professed (unintentionally) her complete unfamiliarity with our nation&#8217;s foreign affairs history on numerous occasions in print news in our state.</p>
<p>It baffles me how she keeps getting re-elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphonse</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185686</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphonse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185686</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bill Clinton doesn’t hold a grudge against Rogan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And why should he?--he was guilty as sin, but his transgressions were not deemed serious enough for removal from office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bill Clinton doesn’t hold a grudge against Rogan.</p></blockquote>
<p>And why should he?&#8211;he was guilty as sin, but his transgressions were not deemed serious enough for removal from office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185441</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185441</guid>
		<description>Papa Louie, your Progressive-English translator is working fine.  Anything you put in said by the leftists comes out the same: &quot;We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.&quot; ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papa Louie, your Progressive-English translator is working fine.  Anything you put in said by the leftists comes out the same: &#8220;We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.&#8221; <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajmontana</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185349</link>
		<dc:creator>ajmontana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185349</guid>
		<description>Right on #46,
 You are 100% correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on #46,<br />
 You are 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklyn red</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185270</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklyn red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185270</guid>
		<description>Yo #43, Boxer is (one reason) WHY God is displeased with the Golden state... lol

I have said it before, 2008 starts the end of our 40 years in the wilderness. When Boxer and the  rest of her ilk have &lt;strike&gt;passed&lt;/strike&gt; moved on, then America can be the land of milk &amp; honey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo #43, Boxer is (one reason) WHY God is displeased with the Golden state&#8230; lol</p>
<p>I have said it before, 2008 starts the end of our 40 years in the wilderness. When Boxer and the  rest of her ilk have <strike>passed</strike> moved on, then America can be the land of milk &amp; honey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185263</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185263</guid>
		<description>LOL #36 JSR: I stand corrected. It turns out I was using an outdated translator. The official &lt;strike&gt;Liberal&lt;/strike&gt; Progressive-English translator does respond to every input with the output: &lt;blockquote&gt;We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.&lt;/blockquote&gt; On a related note, I just discovered what Democrats mean when they say they will only raise taxes on the rich.  From a global, one-world-government point of view, they are telling the truth.  Compared to the average individual from China, India, North Korean, or other 3rd world countries, all Americans are rich.  So in their minds, when they raise taxes on all Americans, they are only taxing the rich. Why else would they refuse to remove the Alternate Minimum Tax or correct it for inflation.  They WANT the AMT to eventually trap all tax payers. It is an automatic tax increase every year that they don&#039;t even have to vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL #36 JSR: I stand corrected. It turns out I was using an outdated translator. The official <strike>Liberal</strike> Progressive-English translator does respond to every input with the output:<br />
<blockquote>We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.</p></blockquote>
<p> On a related note, I just discovered what Democrats mean when they say they will only raise taxes on the rich.  From a global, one-world-government point of view, they are telling the truth.  Compared to the average individual from China, India, North Korean, or other 3rd world countries, all Americans are rich.  So in their minds, when they raise taxes on all Americans, they are only taxing the rich. Why else would they refuse to remove the Alternate Minimum Tax or correct it for inflation.  They WANT the AMT to eventually trap all tax payers. It is an automatic tax increase every year that they don&#8217;t even have to vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_on</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185250</link>
		<dc:creator>right_on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185250</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That it backfired on Republicans is of far less significance than the fact that the President lied under oath.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It didn&#039;t backfire on Republican&#039;s, in my opinion. Those &lt;em&gt;patriotic&lt;/em&gt; Democrats in the Senate not only showed their true nature, but also gave us a preview of things to come. Party loyalty and partisanism was able to overcome the rule of law. And now, political dissent has overcome patriotism.

That Clinton lied was never an issue with Democrats. Just look how they started spinning it...&lt;em&gt;lying to cover up a sexual indiscretion is not a matter of national security...oral sex is not sex...and, of course, &quot;It depends on what the meaning of &#039;is&#039; is!&quot;&lt;/em&gt; This was the accelerator used to fuel their current agendas of gotcha, and revenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That it backfired on Republicans is of far less significance than the fact that the President lied under oath.</p></blockquote>
<p>It didn&#8217;t backfire on Republican&#8217;s, in my opinion. Those <em>patriotic</em> Democrats in the Senate not only showed their true nature, but also gave us a preview of things to come. Party loyalty and partisanism was able to overcome the rule of law. And now, political dissent has overcome patriotism.</p>
<p>That Clinton lied was never an issue with Democrats. Just look how they started spinning it&#8230;<em>lying to cover up a sexual indiscretion is not a matter of national security&#8230;oral sex is not sex&#8230;and, of course, &#8220;It depends on what the meaning of &#8216;is&#8217; is!&#8221;</em> This was the accelerator used to fuel their current agendas of gotcha, and revenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granite</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185245</link>
		<dc:creator>granite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185245</guid>
		<description>Whoa!!

...Independent cognition...

Apologies....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa!!</p>
<p>&#8230;Independent cognition&#8230;</p>
<p>Apologies&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granite</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185242</link>
		<dc:creator>granite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185242</guid>
		<description>From #39:

&quot;But you can’t deny that the impeachment (like the Schiavo incident) was a cynical act that eventually backfired on the Republicans.&quot;

1) Bill Cinton lied - that is, he knowing spoke an untruth, under oath, in answer to a question.

Trying to hold him to account for perjury was cynical?

That it backfired on Republicans is of far less significance than the fact that the President lied under oath.

2)Whatever the cognitive function of her brain was, Terry Schiavo was starved and dehydrated to death.

Whether Terry had said something at some time about not wanting to live in a certain condition; and the fact that she would never - never - have regained even minimum undependent cognition and function are of far less significance than the fact that a human life was purposely ended by starvation and dehydration over two weeks.


The attempt by some to prevent such an act was cynical?

Such a comment as is in quotations above, that refers to these acts as cynical - not as imperfectly, or clumsily carried out, but as cynical - speaks volumes about the world view of the one who would call these acts cynical. 

The comment speaks for itself.
No further discussion or explanation are necessary.  In fact, such further effort would be futile.
Yet another example of, &quot;If I have to explain it to you, you&#039;ll never understand.&quot;

Such is the sad, unbridgeable chasm between worldviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From #39:</p>
<p>&#8220;But you can’t deny that the impeachment (like the Schiavo incident) was a cynical act that eventually backfired on the Republicans.&#8221;</p>
<p>1) Bill Cinton lied &#8211; that is, he knowing spoke an untruth, under oath, in answer to a question.</p>
<p>Trying to hold him to account for perjury was cynical?</p>
<p>That it backfired on Republicans is of far less significance than the fact that the President lied under oath.</p>
<p>2)Whatever the cognitive function of her brain was, Terry Schiavo was starved and dehydrated to death.</p>
<p>Whether Terry had said something at some time about not wanting to live in a certain condition; and the fact that she would never &#8211; never &#8211; have regained even minimum undependent cognition and function are of far less significance than the fact that a human life was purposely ended by starvation and dehydration over two weeks.</p>
<p>The attempt by some to prevent such an act was cynical?</p>
<p>Such a comment as is in quotations above, that refers to these acts as cynical &#8211; not as imperfectly, or clumsily carried out, but as cynical &#8211; speaks volumes about the world view of the one who would call these acts cynical. </p>
<p>The comment speaks for itself.<br />
No further discussion or explanation are necessary.  In fact, such further effort would be futile.<br />
Yet another example of, &#8220;If I have to explain it to you, you&#8217;ll never understand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Such is the sad, unbridgeable chasm between worldviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_on</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185241</link>
		<dc:creator>right_on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185241</guid>
		<description>ajmontana said :
&lt;blockquote&gt;As a Native Caliifornian…
Boxer must Go!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dude, we can&#039;t stop there! Feinstein, Pelosi, Fortney (Stark), Sanchez, Miller, and others need to go, too!

I&#039;m a Califonian also. It&#039;s like our representatives are &quot;main-lining&quot; a drug straight out of San Francisco! 

Look what SF politics has brought our country...The list just gets longer, and longer...it sickens me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ajmontana said :</p>
<blockquote><p>As a Native Caliifornian…<br />
Boxer must Go!</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, we can&#8217;t stop there! Feinstein, Pelosi, Fortney (Stark), Sanchez, Miller, and others need to go, too!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Califonian also. It&#8217;s like our representatives are &#8220;main-lining&#8221; a drug straight out of San Francisco! </p>
<p>Look what SF politics has brought our country&#8230;The list just gets longer, and longer&#8230;it sickens me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185216</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185216</guid>
		<description>must avoid temptation...must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must avoid temptation&#8230;must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185212</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185212</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this translator broken or am I doing something wrong?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Translation:
This is &lt;em&gt;efficiency &lt;/em&gt;to a liberal.
.
 (Redundant rhetoric to the rest of the world.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are going to raise your taxes and create more government programs.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Is this translator broken or am I doing something wrong?</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation:<br />
This is <em>efficiency </em>to a liberal.<br />
.<br />
 (Redundant rhetoric to the rest of the world.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenfairie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185199</link>
		<dc:creator>greenfairie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185199</guid>
		<description>Barbara Boxer is proof God is displeased with the Golden State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara Boxer is proof God is displeased with the Golden State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185168</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185168</guid>
		<description>Ahhh yes, Barbara Boxer, US House of Representative, famous checker bouncer...

&lt;blockquote&gt;...quoting Boxer as admitting she didn&#039;t pay enough attention to her House bank account. More specifically, that meant 143 overdraft checks totaling $41,417 over a three-year period that she had written on the House Bank.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She should excuse herself on judicial appointments.  After all, she&#039;s a thief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh yes, Barbara Boxer, US House of Representative, famous checker bouncer&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;quoting Boxer as admitting she didn&#8217;t pay enough attention to her House bank account. More specifically, that meant 143 overdraft checks totaling $41,417 over a three-year period that she had written on the House Bank.</p></blockquote>
<p>She should excuse herself on judicial appointments.  After all, she&#8217;s a thief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertLover</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/comment-page-1/#comment-185163</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/30/hey-barbara-boxer-move-on/#comment-185163</guid>
		<description>ajmontana 

OT ...

Morning ... are you having problems with the Friends site?

Back on topic ...

Boxer can forgive Abscam Murtha, Cold Cash Jefferson, Impeached former Judges, Prostitution Ring Runners, KKK Grand Wizards and others in her party ... but she can&#039;t own up to the fact that Billy Boy lied to a Grand Jury and tried to impede an investigation ... both of which are crimes ... if that had been any one of us doing that we would still be in jail ...

As for Libby ... what a crock ... it was a witch hunt ... they knew all along who the &quot;leak&quot; was ... and it wasn&#039;t Libby ... 

The first viable presidential candidate that tells me he promises to exonerate Libby and pardon the Border agents moves to the top of my vote list ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ajmontana </p>
<p>OT &#8230;</p>
<p>Morning &#8230; are you having problems with the Friends site?</p>
<p>Back on topic &#8230;</p>
<p>Boxer can forgive Abscam Murtha, Cold Cash Jefferson, Impeached former Judges, Prostitution Ring Runners, KKK Grand Wizards and others in her party &#8230; but she can&#8217;t own up to the fact that Billy Boy lied to a Grand Jury and tried to impede an investigation &#8230; both of which are crimes &#8230; if that had been any one of us doing that we would still be in jail &#8230;</p>
<p>As for Libby &#8230; what a crock &#8230; it was a witch hunt &#8230; they knew all along who the &#8220;leak&#8221; was &#8230; and it wasn&#8217;t Libby &#8230; </p>
<p>The first viable presidential candidate that tells me he promises to exonerate Libby and pardon the Border agents moves to the top of my vote list &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

