Did You Know...

   

NYT: All the racial-profiling data that’s fit to screw up

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  November 30, 2007 11:30 AM

First, read this NYT correction:

An article on Nov. 21 about a Rand Corporation study on street stops by the New York Police Department referred incorrectly at some points to an overall figure and misstated the number of individual officers who were found to be disproportionately more likely to stop whites. There were 508,540 street stops in 2006 — not 508,540 people stopped — and 13 officers, not 9, tended to stop whites more often. The article also misstated the finding of a racial disparity in the handing out of summonses. Whites are more likely — not less — to receive them

Now read Tom Maguire’s uncovering of The Orwellian Times’ botched cover-up.

Oh, have I mentioned NYT’s stock lately:

nytstock2.gif

Posted in: New York Times

Judge helps NY Times coin a MUCH better slogan

August 30, 2017 07:54 AM by Doug Powers

Fake but unintentional?

The Red York Times: First in Fake News

August 23, 2017 08:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

NY Times warns Guam of grave threat (no, not THAT one)

August 11, 2017 03:04 PM by Doug Powers

2 degree Celsius rise over the next century

Paul Krugman serves up more proof Nobel Prize needs ‘comedy’ category

August 1, 2017 05:40 PM by Doug Powers

Obama the Honest


Categories: Barack Obama, Health care, New York Times, Paul Krugman