Did You Know...

   

NYT: All the racial-profiling data that’s fit to screw up

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  November 30, 2007 11:30 AM

First, read this NYT correction:

An article on Nov. 21 about a Rand Corporation study on street stops by the New York Police Department referred incorrectly at some points to an overall figure and misstated the number of individual officers who were found to be disproportionately more likely to stop whites. There were 508,540 street stops in 2006 — not 508,540 people stopped — and 13 officers, not 9, tended to stop whites more often. The article also misstated the finding of a racial disparity in the handing out of summonses. Whites are more likely — not less — to receive them

Now read Tom Maguire’s uncovering of The Orwellian Times’ botched cover-up.

Oh, have I mentioned NYT’s stock lately:

nytstock2.gif

Posted in: New York Times

It’s ALIVE! VRWC resuscitated to explain ‘why many doubted Broaddrick’s claims’

November 14, 2017 11:16 AM by Doug Powers

Time-honored excuse

NY Times: Economy’s getting better, and here’s how that might kill you

October 18, 2017 07:16 AM by Doug Powers

Even good news is bad news in the Trump era

2017: Dem senator on break from corruption trial calls Trump’s leadership ‘shameful’

October 1, 2017 03:07 PM by Doug Powers

Also vouches for character of San Juan mayor

NY Times runs another hot take featuring upside to brutal dictatorship

September 26, 2017 02:31 PM by Doug Powers

2017 just got more idiotic


Categories: Media Bias, New York Times, Politics